Don't Rush to Criticize Bitcoin—It's Becoming the 'Next Generation Gold'

比推Pubblicato 2026-03-03Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-03

Introduzione

Title: Don't Rush to Condemn Bitcoin: It's Becoming the "Next Generation Gold" Despite the "digital gold" narrative, Bitcoin has consistently failed to act as a safe-haven asset during geopolitical crises, such as the 2026 Iran-Israel conflict, where gold prices surged while Bitcoin initially plummeted. The article argues that Bitcoin is not yet a true digital gold, as it lacks state adoption (central banks accumulate gold, not Bitcoin) and exhibits asymmetric investor behavior (falling with equities but not rising proportionally during recoveries). Three structural asymmetries hinder Bitcoin's safe-haven status: 1) a derivatives-heavy market structure prone to liquidations, 2) dominance by leveraged traders rather than patient capital, and 3) a lack of long-term behavioral trust compared to gold's decades-long record. However, Bitcoin has demonstrated utility as a "crisis utility asset," enabling financial transactions in extreme scenarios like Ukraine (2022) and Iran (2026) when traditional systems failed. For Bitcoin to evolve into "next-generation gold," it must narrow these asymmetries through market structure transformation (reduced leverage), participant shift (generational adoption), and behavioral accumulation (algorithmic trust). If achieved, Bitcoin could become a new asset class rather than merely replicating gold.

Source: Tiger Research

Author: Ryan Yoon

Compiled and Edited by: BitpushNews


In February 2026, as the Iran attack incident escalated, the price of gold soared, while Bitcoin suffered a sharp decline. Can we still believe that Bitcoin is "digital gold"? This article explores the conditions Bitcoin must meet to become the "next generation gold".

Key Points

  • In every geopolitical crisis, gold rises while Bitcoin falls. After six tests, the data has never confirmed the "digital gold" narrative.

  • While governments are hoarding gold, they still exclude Bitcoin from their holdings. For investors, Bitcoin exhibits asymmetry: it falls with the stock market but fails to rebound in sync with it.

  • Three structural asymmetries hinder Bitcoin from gaining safe-haven asset status: excessive derivatives (market structure), dominance by leveraged traders (participant structure), and lack of a repeated behavioral record (behavioral accumulation).

  • Although Bitcoin is not a safe-haven asset, it is a "crisis utility asset" that proves useful in extreme environments where borders are closed and banks are shut down.

  • If these three asymmetries narrow, Bitcoin may no longer be a replica of gold but evolve into a new category—the "next generation gold". Generational shift and algorithmic adoption are variables that could accelerate this process.

1. Is Bitcoin Really "Digital Gold"?

On February 28, 2026, the U.S. and Israel launched an attack on Iran. When "Operation Epic Fury" was announced, the price of gold immediately rose. In contrast, Bitcoin fell intraday to $63,000. Although it recovered within a day, its reaction was starkly different.

During geopolitical shocks like war, Bitcoin's performance completely diverges from gold. Although Bitcoin recovers quickly after the initial drop, chain liquidations by leveraged traders cause its decline to far exceed that of other assets. During the Iran-Israel conflict, its intraday drop reached -9.3%, while during the Ukraine war it was -7.6%. Meanwhile, gold was rising.

When an asset crashes first at the moment a crisis breaks out, can we really call it "digital gold"?

2. Bitcoin is Not "Digital Gold" for Nations or Investors

Bitcoin was not originally designed to be "digital gold". The title of Satoshi Nakamoto's 2008 whitepaper was "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System". Its starting point was a transmission mechanism, not a store of value.

The "digital gold" narrative became popular during the 2020 zero-interest-rate and quantitative easing era. As concerns about currency devaluation peaked, Bitcoin gained attention as a store of value. But in practice, neither nations nor investors treat it as "digital gold".

2.1 National Level: Hoarding Gold, Only "Considering" Bitcoin

Data from the World Gold Council shows that central banks are increasing their gold holdings year by year. However, no major central bank includes Bitcoin in its official reserve assets.

Some counter that the U.S. formally established a "Strategic Bitcoin Reserve" via an executive order in March 2025. The order text even mentioned that "Bitcoin is often called 'digital gold'". But the details are crucial: its scope is limited to assets obtained through criminal and civil forfeiture. The government is not buying new Bitcoin; it is choosing to hold rather than sell seized assets.

Notably, as the appeal of U.S. debt declines, Europe and China are actively buying gold, but Bitcoin does not appear on their list of alternatives.

2.2 Investor Level: Falls with Declines, Doesn't Rise with Gains

The second half of 2025 was decisive. When the Nasdaq hit a record high, Bitcoin had plummeted more than 30% from its October peak of $125,000. The two began to decouple.

The real trouble isn't the decoupling itself, but the direction. Bitcoin fell in sync with the stock market decline but failed to rise when the market rebounded. For investors, this is the worst combination. There is no reason to hold an asset in a portfolio that only shares downside risk but misses out on upside gains.

3. Why Has Bitcoin Failed to Become "Digital Gold"?

A safe-haven asset is not just one whose price rises. In academic definition, a safe-haven asset is one whose correlation with other assets drops to zero or turns negative during extreme market downturns. The key is whether its reaction in a crisis is predictable. Measured by this standard, the gap between gold and Bitcoin is evident.

Three structural asymmetries explain this gap:

  1. Market Structure Asymmetry: Gold has physical demand supporting its price floor, and futures leverage is relatively low. Bitcoin's derivatives trading volume is about 6.5 times that of spot, and it trades 24/7, making it the first asset sold off when a crisis hits.

  2. Participant Asymmetry: Gold's crisis buyers are patient capital (central banks, pension funds). The Bitcoin market is dominated by leveraged traders and hedge funds, which are the fastest to withdraw in a crisis.

  3. Behavioral Accumulation Asymmetry: "Buy gold in times of crisis" is a behavioral pattern repeated for decades, becoming a formula. Bitcoin needs time to earn the same trust.

4. Not "Safe", But Proven "Useful"

In terms of safety, it's hard to call Bitcoin digital gold. But its utility in a crisis is real.

Ukraine (2022): After the war broke out, the Ukrainian central bank restricted electronic transfers and set withdrawal limits. Citizens couldn't access their deposits. Some refugees crossed borders with Bitcoin seed phrases stored on USB drives and exchanged them for local currency via Bitcoin ATMs or P2P transactions in Poland to sustain their lives.

UNHCR: Distributed the stablecoin USDC to displaced persons, allowing them to exchange it for cash at MoneyGram outlets.


Iran (2026): After "Operation Epic Fury", fund outflows from Iran's largest crypto exchange, Nobitex, surged by 700%.

These cases show people turn to Bitcoin not because it is safe, but because it works when the financial system fails.

In finance, a "safe-haven asset" means price resilience, which is a different concept from an "asset usable in a crisis". Bitcoin provides functional value for movement and transfer in wartime but cannot defend its price.

5. Bitcoin's "Next Generation Gold" Script

Although Bitcoin currently moves opposite to gold in every crisis, the path to "next generation gold" opens if the following three asymmetries narrow:

5.1 Market Structure Transformation

Derivatives trading volume being 6.5 times spot is a trigger for chain liquidations. Recently, futures open interest has declined, and price discovery is shifting towards spot and ETFs. The real test is whether leverage will spiral out of control again in the next bull market.

5.2 Participant Shift (Generational Change)

After the spot ETF approval, institutional inflows made Bitcoin a mainstream asset. But this creates a paradox: the more institutional holdings, the more likely Bitcoin is to be sold off with the stock market in risk-aversion events.

There is an overlooked variable here: generational change. When Gen Z starts managing wealth, gold might seem like "their parents' safe haven". This generation's first investment account is often a crypto exchange. This instinctive behavioral shift could be more influential than institutional decisions.

5.3 Behavioral Accumulation Shift

Gold took about 50 years after the Nixon Shock to establish its status. Bitcoin might not need that long. Although the sixth test (Iran attack) result was again a drop followed by a rebound, the repetition of this pattern is building a belief that "it always comes back after a fall".

A more important variable is algorithms. Currently, a large amount of trading is executed by AI agents and algorithms. If a "buy Bitcoin in a crisis" strategy is embedded into algorithms, this pattern can form without the need for human psychological accumulation. Trust might be established in code before it is in humans.

Conclusion: Today's Bitcoin is not yet "digital gold". But if it can achieve transformation in market structure, participant composition, and behavioral accumulation on top of its utility, it will become the "next generation gold"—not a replica of gold, but the birth of a new category.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7616425

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the article, why has Bitcoin failed to become 'digital gold' during geopolitical crises?

AThe article states that Bitcoin has failed to become 'digital gold' because in every geopolitical crisis tested, its price fell while gold's price rose. This is due to three structural asymmetries: an oversupply of derivatives (market structure), dominance by leveraged traders (participant structure), and a lack of a repeated behavioral record (behavioral accumulation).

QWhat evidence does the article provide to show that Bitcoin is not considered a reserve asset by major central banks?

AThe article cites data from the World Gold Council showing that central banks are逐年 increasing their gold holdings, while no major central bank has included Bitcoin in its official reserve assets. It also notes that even the U.S. 'Strategic Bitcoin Reserve' established by executive order in March 2025 is limited to assets obtained through criminal and civil forfeiture, not new purchases.

QHow does the article define the practical utility of Bitcoin in crisis situations, and what examples are given?

AThe article defines Bitcoin's utility as a 'crisis utility asset' that functions in extreme environments where borders are closed or banks are shut down. Examples include Ukrainian refugees using Bitcoin seed phrases on USB drives to access funds via Polish Bitcoin ATMs or P2P exchanges, and the UNHCR distributing USDC stablecoins to displaced persons for cash conversion at MoneyGram outlets.

QWhat three structural changes does the article suggest are necessary for Bitcoin to evolve into 'next-generation gold'?

AThe article suggests that three structural asymmetries must narrow for Bitcoin to become 'next-generation gold': a transformation in market structure (reducing derivative dominance), a shift in participant structure (generational change in wealth management), and a change in behavioral accumulation (establishing a reliable crisis response pattern, potentially through algorithmic adoption).

QWhat paradoxical effect does increased institutional ownership of Bitcoin have on its behavior during risk-aversion events, according to the article?

AThe article points out a paradox: as institutional ownership of Bitcoin increases through instruments like spot ETFs, it becomes more mainstream, but this also makes it more likely to be sold off alongside the stock market during risk-aversion events, rather than acting as a safe-haven asset.

Letture associate

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbit11 h fa

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbit11 h fa

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbit11 h fa

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbit11 h fa

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit11 h fa

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit11 h fa

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit11 h fa

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit11 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片