Crypto Clarity At Standstill In Congress, Says Fed Governor On Market Structure Bill

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-02-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-10

Introduzione

Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller stated that progress on the crypto market structure bill, known as the CLARITY Act, has stalled in Congress due to disagreements over key issues. The main points of contention include stablecoin yield provisions and the Fed's proposed "skinny" master accounts. Crypto advocates argue that yield-bearing stablecoins promote adoption and competition, while banking groups oppose them, warning of potential deposit outflows from traditional banks. Additionally, the White House has scheduled a meeting to address tensions between crypto firms and banks. The Fed aims to propose regulations for skinny master accounts by the fourth quarter of this year.

Federal Reserve (Fed) Governor Christopher Waller said on Monday that progress on the long‐anticipated crypto market structure legislation, commonly referred to as the CLARITY Act, appears to have stalled in Congress.

His remarks come as lawmakers remain divided over key issues, most notably stablecoin yield provisions and the Federal Reserve’s proposal for so‐called “skinny” master accounts, a topic earlier highlighted by Crypto In America.

Stablecoin Yield Fight Fuels CLARITY Act Stalemate

Waller’s comments quickly drew reaction from market observers. Crypto analyst MartyParty noted on X that the governor’s assessment reflects the ongoing deadlock surrounding the CLARITY Act.

According to MartyParty, the delay is not accidental. He argued that resistance from the banking sector has intensified, particularly around the treatment of stablecoin yields and rewards.

At the center of the dispute is whether crypto platforms such as exchanges and digital wallets should be allowed to offer interest‐like returns or incentives on stablecoins held by users.

Crypto industry advocates contend that yield‐bearing stablecoins encourage adoption, improve efficiency, and increase competition in the payments market. Banking groups, however, strongly oppose this view.

They argue that stablecoin yields pose a direct challenge to traditional bank deposits, warning that higher returns—often in the range of 3% to 5% or more, compared with near‐zero yields on many bank accounts—could trigger massive deposit outflows.

In MartyParty’s assessment, banks are concerned that passage of the CLARITY Act could move trillions of dollars onto crypto‐based payment rails, breaking what he described as the banking sector’s “closed‐loop system” and putting pressure on long‐established profit models.

Crypto And Banks Head Back To White House

Amid rising tensions, MartyParty also reported that the White House has scheduled a second meeting for Tuesday, February 10, aimed at easing friction between cryptocurrency firms and banks over stablecoin yield payments.

The meeting is expected to include senior policy officials rather than company chief executives, along with representatives from banking and crypto trade associations.

Another major point of contention is the Federal Reserve’s proposed “skinny” master account model. Under this framework, eligible fintech and crypto firms would be granted limited access to the Fed’s payment systems without receiving full banking privileges.

The debate around skinny accounts became especially clear through 44 comment letters submitted to the Federal Reserve. Crypto firms and industry groups generally expressed support, while banking organizations responded with caution or outright opposition.

Banking groups raised concerns about oversight and risk. The American Bankers Association (ABA) warned that many entities likely to qualify for payment accounts lack a long‐term supervisory track record and are not subject to consistent federal safety standards.

Governor Waller indicated that he hopes the Federal Reserve will be able to publish proposed regulations for skinny master accounts in the fourth quarter of this year.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap at $2.35 trillion as of Monday. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main reason for the stalled progress of the CLARITY Act in Congress, according to the article?

AThe main reason is the ongoing deadlock over key issues, particularly the dispute around stablecoin yield provisions and the Federal Reserve's proposal for 'skinny' master accounts.

QWhy do banking groups oppose the idea of stablecoin yields?

ABanking groups argue that stablecoin yields pose a direct challenge to traditional bank deposits, as higher returns (often 3% to 5% or more) compared to near-zero yields on many bank accounts could trigger massive deposit outflows and threaten their established profit models.

QWhat is the purpose of the White House meeting scheduled for February 10th?

AThe White House meeting aims to ease friction between cryptocurrency firms and banks over the contentious issue of stablecoin yield payments.

QWhat is the Federal Reserve's proposed 'skinny' master account model?

AThe 'skinny' master account model is a framework where eligible fintech and crypto firms would be granted limited access to the Fed’s payment systems without receiving full banking privileges.

QWhat was a key concern raised by the American Bankers Association (ABA) regarding the 'skinny' master accounts?

AThe ABA warned that many entities likely to qualify for these payment accounts lack a long-term supervisory track record and are not subject to consistent federal safety standards, raising concerns about oversight and risk.

Letture associate

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit12 min fa

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit12 min fa

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit25 min fa

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit25 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片