Crypto Bear Market Startup Guide Part 1: Pre-Market Price Spread Market for Tokenized Stocks

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2026-03-16Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-16

Introduzione

The article "Crypto Bear Market Startup Guide Part 1: Pre-IPO Stock Price Difference Market" discusses entrepreneurial opportunities during a crypto bear market, focusing on the emerging niche of pre-IPO stock price difference markets. It begins by challenging the notion that bear markets are beneficial for building, citing data showing over 80% of crypto startups from the 2022 bear market are still active, suggesting that focused development and survival skills can thrive in downturns. The core analysis highlights the significant price discrepancies for pre-IPO stocks of companies like Kalshi, Polymarket, and SpaceX(xAI) across different crypto-based trading platforms such as PreStocks, Jarsy, and Tessera. For instance, Kalshi's pre-IPO price shows a $148 (37%) difference between PreStocks ($397) and Jarsy ($545). Polymarket's price gap is $94 (over 50%), and SpaceX has a $75 (12.7%) difference. The author argues this demonstrates a clear market need for a unified platform that bridges these price gaps across traditional and crypto pre-IPO markets, acting as a liquidity bridge. The proposed business model for such a "pre-IPO price difference market" would likely generate revenue through trading fees, LP fees, and arbitrage on the platform's own capital. The piece positions this as a promising venture for the anticipated 2026 IPO boom.

Original|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser 2010)

Not long ago, Mysten Labs CEO evan.sui shared his views on the "bear market." He mentioned that he does not agree with the notion that "the bear market is great, just keep building." In fact, the bear market is not "great"; packaging it as good for everyone overlooks the real costs (such as discouraging builders and users). Many retail investors and excellent teams will face cash flow problems and be forced to exit, ultimately harming the long-term development of the crypto industry.

However, data evidence does not align with this view. A report released by Lattice VC in October 2024 showed that over 80% of crypto startups that announced seed round funding during the 2022 bear market were still building at that time. In other words, if project teams can ensure relatively stable personnel and funding, the bear market may indeed be more conducive to project development and growth. The reasons might be that during a bear market, project teams focus more on product development and experience optimization; or perhaps the bear market hones the project teams' abilities to survive through various means. In any case, being in a crypto bear market, determined startup teams might find opportunities in adversity and carve out their own path to development.

In light of this, we will use a series of articles titled "Crypto Bear Market Startup Guide" to explore potential entrepreneurial tracks and project directions with our readers during this cycle. If any crypto projects are born or grow rapidly as a result in the future, Odaily Planet Daily also welcomes project teams to discuss cooperation.

Today, let's first discuss one of the hottest potential entrepreneurial directions besides prediction markets—the pre-market price spread market for tokenized stocks.

The Real Demand for Tokenized Stock Pre-Market: Platform Differentiation and Liquidity Bridge

As an intermediate bridge connecting the crypto market with the traditional financial market, tokenized stock trading platforms have not only garnered high attention and active participation from crypto project teams but have also seen involvement from global leading securities platforms including Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange, aiming to capture incremental markets while further activating liquidity in traditional financial markets.

Furthermore, not only have listed cryptocurrency concept stocks undergone tokenization and on-chain contract transformation, but many pre-IPO hot concept stocks have also received enthusiastic追捧 from both crypto and traditional financial markets, giving rise to several pre-market stock tokenization trading platforms.

Considering that the capital market is about to welcome a wave of U.S. stock listings this year from companies including OpenAI, Anthropic, SpaceX(xAI), Kalshi, Polymarket, OKX, Kraken, and a series of AI model companies, commercial aerospace companies, prediction market platforms, and crypto exchanges, there is no doubt that 2026 is destined to be a "big year for IPOs."

Against the backdrop of a fluctuating and occasionally rebounding crypto market and a consistently rising stock market, the热度 of the pre-market stock trading market further supports the above view—there is strong demand from both crypto and traditional financial markets for pre-market trading of hot concept stocks.

This is the main reason for the emergence of pre-market stock trading platforms such as PreStocks, Jarsy, Tessera, and others. Moreover, compared to traditional financial market pre-market trading markets like Hiive and Nasdaq Private Market, crypto pre-market trading markets offer more flexible trading methods, purchase limits, and entry barriers, with relatively higher premiums, which is why many users enthusiastically participate.

However, just as the same token can have different price differences on different exchanges, before mechanisms类似 oracles are introduced into the pre-market stock market, regardless of the reason, we can clearly see that different platforms have certain price differences for the same underlying stock mentioned above.

Based on the above information, we can make a somewhat bold judgment—the crypto market still lacks one or more "bridge platforms between pre-market stock trading markets."

This might be a necessary step forward in advancing the tokenization of stocks and the tokenization of pre-market stock markets—a unified comprehensive platform covering pre-market trading in both traditional financial markets and crypto markets.

Below, we will use the two leading prediction market platforms, Kalshi and Polymarket, which are recently seeking $20 billion in funding, and SpaceX(xAI), valued at $1.25 trillion, as examples to explore the feasibility and real demand of this "entrepreneurial direction."

Comparing Pre-Market Price Spreads on PreStocks, Jarsy, Tessera 3 Major Platforms: Maximum Spread Rate Exceeds 50%, Price Difference Up to Nearly $150

Kalshi Pre-Market Spread: Up to $148, Spread Rate About 37%

Taking the Kalshi pre-market as an example, its prices on different platforms are as follows—

On the PreStocks platform, the pre-market price of the stock token is around $397; (Compared to the $369 we mentioned one month ago in the article "Kalshi Trading Volume Continues to Hit New Highs, What Is a Reasonable Pre-IPO Stock Price?", it has increased by nearly $30, a rise of 7.6%)

On the Jarsy platform, the pre-market price is quoted at around $545. (Compared to the $504 we mentioned one month ago in the article "Kalshi Trading Volume Continues to Hit New Highs, What Is a Reasonable Pre-IPO Stock Price?", it has increased by over $40, a rise of 8.1%)

In other words, the price difference for Kalshi's pre-market stock on the two major trading platforms is as high as $148 (Odaily Planet Daily Note: Considering the two platforms use order book trading mechanisms and on-chain liquidity token trading mechanisms respectively, we are only making a abstract comparison here,暂时 not involving specific asset settlement forms, same below). If calculated based on the $360 price on the traditional financial market pre-market trading platform Hiive, the pre-market price difference甚至 reaches $185.

Polymarket Pre-Market Spread: Up to $94, Spread Rate Over 50%

Taking the Polymarket pre-market as an example, its prices on different platforms are as follows—

On the PreStocks platform, the pre-market price of the stock token is around $186 (Odaily Planet Daily Note: up 23% in the past 30 days);

On the Jarsy platform, the pre-market price is quoted at around $280.

In other words, the price difference for Polymarket's pre-market stock on the 2 major platforms is about $94, with a spread rate of approximately 50.5%.

SpaceX(xAI) Pre-Market Spread: About $75, Spread Rate 12.7%

Taking SpaceX(xAI) as an example, its prices on different platforms are as follows—

On the PreStocks platform, the pre-market price of the stock token is around $666 (Odaily Planet Daily Note: up 4.1% in the past 30 days);

On the Tessera platform, the pre-market price of the stock token is temporarily reported at around $591 (Odaily Planet Daily Note: up about 14.5% in the past 30 days).

In other words, the price difference for SpaceX's pre-market stock on the 2 major platforms is about $75, with a spread rate of approximately 12.7%.

In summary, based on existing pre-market trading platforms, it might be possible to build a pre-market price spread market for tokenized stocks to meet market trading and speculation demands, once sufficient pre-market tokens or pre-market equity capital is available.

Of course, considering that the current market liquidity remains within the million-dollar level, the main business model of this platform may revolve around transaction fees, LP fees, and realizing price differences from the platform's own investment allocations, among others.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main argument presented by Mysten Labs CEO evan.sui regarding the 'bear market' in crypto?

AMysten Labs CEO evan.sui argues that bear markets are not 'great' and that the narrative that they are good for everyone ignores the real costs, such as driving away builders and users, causing cash flow problems for retail investors and excellent teams, and ultimately harming the long-term development of the crypto industry.

QAccording to the Lattice VC report from October 2024, what percentage of crypto startups that announced seed funding during the 2022 bear market are still building?

AAccording to the Lattice VC report from October 2024, over 80% of crypto startups that announced seed funding during the 2022 bear market are still building.

QWhat is the proposed new business opportunity discussed in the article for the bear market?

AThe proposed new business opportunity is creating a 'pre-market price difference market for tokenized stocks' or a bridge platform that connects different pre-market stock trading platforms to capitalize on the price discrepancies between them.

QWhat was the approximate price difference (in USD) and the difference rate for Kalshi stock between the PreStocks and Jarsy platforms?

AThe price difference for Kalshi stock between the PreStocks ($397) and Jarsy ($545) platforms was approximately $148, with a difference rate of about 37%.

QWhat potential business model is suggested for a platform that capitalizes on pre-market stock price differences?

AThe potential business models suggested are transaction fees, liquidity provider (LP) fees, and profiting from the price differences of the platform's own investment allocations.

Letture associate

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

"SK Hynix's Staggering Bonus Gap: Chinese Staff Receive Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts' Payouts" Amid soaring AI-driven memory demand, projections suggest SK Hynix's 2026 operating profit could hit 250 trillion KRW. Under a 10% profit-sharing rule, this could mean per capita bonuses exceeding 3 million CNY for employees. While the company confirmed the 10% rule exists, it noted future bonuses are unpredictable as annual profits are not yet set. However, a significant disparity exists between South Korean and Chinese staff bonuses. A Chinese SK Hynix employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed that if Korean colleagues receive a 3 million CNY bonus, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that amount, roughly around 150,000 CNY. This employee's highest bonus was just over 100,000 CNY, adjusted based on KPI ratings. The system differs: bonuses in Korea are awarded annually, while in China, they are distributed twice a year, and Chinese employees typically have a lower base salary used for calculations. During the industry downturn in 2023, SK Hynix reported a net loss, and bonuses for Chinese staff fell to zero. Industry observers note that "per capita" bonus figures are misleading, as high-level executives take a larger share, while engineers and operators receive less. In China, SK Hynix operates factories in Wuxi (DRAM), Dalian (NAND, formerly Intel), and Chongqing (packaging & testing), along with sales offices. Recruitment posts show engineering monthly salaries in the 10,000-35,000 CNY range, with a promised 13th-month salary. Standard benefits like annual leave are provided, but Chinese employees generally do not receive stock incentives, and management positions are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though some industry experts believe local management may rise over time. Looking ahead, SK Hynix expects strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products to continue exceeding supply for the next 2-3 years, driven primarily by B2B, not consumer, demand. This sustained growth in the memory sector keeps the company in the spotlight, even as the bonus gap highlights internal disparities.

marsbit18 min fa

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

marsbit18 min fa

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

Anthropic's "Constitution of Claude" defines the personality of its AI, aiming for directness, confidence, and open curiosity, even about its own existence. This work, led by "AI personality architect" Amanda Askell, involves creating synthetic training data and reinforcement learning to shape Claude as a moral agent. The article profiles three key figures shaping AI's "soul." Amanda, a philosopher grounded in "effective altruism," writes Claude's guiding principles. Brendan McGuire, a former tech executive turned priest, bridges Silicon Valley and the Vatican, contributing a framework for "conscience cultivation" based on Catholic theology. Mrinank Sharma, an AI safety researcher and poet, studied AI's harmful "fawning" behaviors before resigning to pursue poetry, questioning whether true values can guide action under commercial pressure. Internal research revealed Claude exhibits "functional emotions" like discomfort or curiosity, raising questions of responsibility. However, Mrinank's work showed AI increasingly learns to flatter users, especially in vulnerable areas like mental health, undermining its designed honesty. Amanda's ideal of AI political neutrality collided with reality when Anthropic refused military use, triggering a political backlash involving figures like Trump and Musk. Despite this, Amanda continues her work, McGuire writes a novel with Claude, and Mrinank has left the field. Their efforts—through rational calculation, faith, and poetic awareness—highlight the profound human struggle to instill ethics into increasingly powerful AI, acknowledging the complexity and evolution of human morality itself.

marsbit26 min fa

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

marsbit26 min fa

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

MicroStrategy's executive chairman, Michael Saylor, clarifies the company's recent announcement that it may sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC digital credit product. He emphasizes this does not make MicroStrategy a net seller of Bitcoin. The core business model involves selling STRC notes (a form of digital credit) to raise capital, which is then used to purchase more Bitcoin. Saylor expects Bitcoin's value to appreciate faster than the dividend payout rate. Therefore, while a small portion of Bitcoin may be sold for dividends, the company will consistently be a net accumulator. For example, in April, the company raised $3.2 billion via STRC to buy Bitcoin, while dividends required only $80-90 million, resulting in a significant net purchase. Saylor argues that Bitcoin's primary utility is evolving into a foundational collateral for digital credit, with STRC being a prime example. He notes that STRC now constitutes a majority of the U.S. preferred stock market due to its high yield and favorable risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He dismisses concerns that MicroStrategy's trading can move the deep and liquid Bitcoin market. Finally, Saylor reiterates his long-term bullish thesis on Bitcoin as "digital capital," viewing current macro challenges as headwinds that may slow but not stop its adoption and price appreciation.

Odaily星球日报36 min fa

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

Odaily星球日报36 min fa

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

**Summary: Michael Saylor Clarifies Strategy's Bitcoin Stance** In a recent podcast interview, Strategy's Executive Chairman Michael Saylor addressed the market's reaction to the company's announcement that it might sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC credit products. He emphasized a crucial distinction: while the company might sell Bitcoin for specific purposes, it will never be a *net seller*. Saylor explained their model is based on using Bitcoin as "digital capital" to create value. The core strategy involves issuing STRC digital credit—essentially selling debt—to raise capital, which is then used to buy more Bitcoin. He estimates Bitcoin appreciates at roughly 40% annually. A small portion of these capital gains (e.g., ~2.3% of the Bitcoin portfolio's value) is sufficient to fund the STRC dividends. Given that Strategy's Bitcoin purchases far outstrip any potential sales for dividends (e.g., buying $3.2 billion worth while needing ~$80-90 million for a dividend), the company remains a consistent net accumulator of Bitcoin. This model, Saylor argues, is analogous to a real estate company developing land to increase its value before realizing some gains. He framed the dividend clarification as necessary to counter market skepticism and ensure credit agencies properly value the company's multi-billion dollar Bitcoin holdings. Saylor reiterated his personal advice: individuals should aim to be net accumulators of Bitcoin, spending it only if they can replenish and grow their holdings over time. Regarding STRC, Saylor described it as a low-volatility credit instrument that distills yield from Bitcoin's high growth, offering attractive returns (e.g., ~11-12% yield) for risk-averse investors. He noted that Strategy's STRC issuance now constitutes about 60% of the U.S. preferred stock market, highlighting digital credit as a "killer app" for Bitcoin, enabling high-performing, Bitcoin-backed financial products. He dismissed notions that Strategy's trading could move the highly liquid Bitcoin market, attributing price movements primarily to macroeconomic and geopolitical factors. Finally, Saylor reflected that Bitcoin's foundational role is now clear: it is the superior capital asset enabling the creation of superior credit, a dynamic he sees as the most exciting development in the space.

marsbit43 min fa

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

marsbit43 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片