CRYPTO Act Proposal: Unlicensed Operations In New York Could Lead To 15 Years In Prison

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-01-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-17

Introduzione

A new bill called the "CRYPTO Act" has been proposed in New York, aiming to impose stricter regulations on digital asset firms. Introduced by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and State Senator Zellnor Myrie, the legislation would criminalize unlicensed cryptocurrency operations, including exchanging, trading, or transporting digital assets. Currently, such activities only face civil penalties. Under the proposed law, unlicensed operations could be classified as a felony, with penalties ranging from a misdemeanor to up to 15 years in prison for transactions exceeding $1 million annually. The bill aims to align state regulations with federal standards and combat money laundering and illicit activities facilitated by what Bragg described as a "shadow financial system." The push for stronger oversight coincides with concerns from federal lawmakers regarding the SEC's enforcement approach toward digital asset securities.

On Thursday, a new legislation was proposed in New York that aims to impose additional regulations on digital asset firms. The proposed law, known as the “CRYPTO” Act—short for “Cryptocurrency Regulation Yields Protections, Trust, and Oversight”—would make it illegal for digital asset firms to operate without the necessary licenses.

The announcement came from Manhattan District Attorney (DA) Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., and New York State Senator Zellnor Myrie, who emphasized the urgency of regulating the cryptocurrency marketplace in the State.

NY’s Proposed Crypto Bill

According to the duo’s press statement, organizations that exchange, trade, or transport cryptocurrencies in New York are required to register for a virtual currency license. Failure to do so has resulted in merely civil sanctions.

In contrast, the proposed CRYPTO Act would introduce criminal penalties for operating without a license, bringing New York’s regulatory framework closer to that of the federal system, where unauthorized conduct can result in up to five years in prison.

The new Act aims to ensure that digital asset businesses adhere to the same levels of diligence and transparency as traditional money transmitters.

Under the new legislation, unlicensed operations would fall under the category of Unlicensed Virtual Currency Business Activity, leading to a series of graduated penalties based on the value of the transactions involved.

Offenders could face charges ranging from a Class A misdemeanor to a Class C felony for activities involving $1 million or more within a year, potentially resulting in sentences of 5 to 15 years in state prison.

A “Shadow Financial System”

District Attorney Bragg expressed concern about the growth of cryptocurrency, describing it as a “shadow financial system” that facilitates money laundering and other criminal activities. “Crypto is the go-to means for bad actors to move and hide the proceeds of crime,” he stated.

Bragg further urged that the time has come for unlicensed cryptocurrency businesses to face criminal repercussions for not adhering to due diligence requirements.

Senator Myrie echoed Bragg’s sentiments, noting, “As the use of crypto has grown, so has illicit activity.” He emphasized that New York, as a major financial hub, must take seriously its regulatory responsibilities.

Myrie’s bill aims to align the state with the 18 other jurisdictions that have made unlicensed virtual currency transactions criminal offenses, to enhance consumer protection against potential fraud and scams.

This legislative push coincides with a letter from House Democrats to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Paul Atkins, in which several lawmakers urged the reinstatement of enforcement actions against digital asset firms.

The letter sent on Thursday and signed by Representatives Maxine Waters, Sean Casten, and Brad Sherman, expressed deep concerns regarding the SEC’s recent retreat from prosecuting violations related to “digital asset securities.”

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap valuation dropping below $3.2 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the full name of the CRYPTO Act and what does it stand for?

AThe full name is the 'Cryptocurrency Regulation Yields Protections, Trust, and Oversight' Act.

QWhat is the maximum prison sentence proposed for unlicensed crypto operations involving over $1 million in transactions?

AThe maximum proposed prison sentence is 15 years in state prison.

QWhich two officials announced the proposed CRYPTO Act legislation?

AManhattan District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg, Jr. and New York State Senator Zellnor Myrie announced the proposed legislation.

QHow did District Attorney Bragg describe the cryptocurrency marketplace?

ADistrict Attorney Bragg described it as a 'shadow financial system' that facilitates money laundering and other criminal activities.

QWhat was the main concern expressed by House Democrats in their letter to the SEC Chair?

AThey expressed deep concerns regarding the SEC's recent retreat from prosecuting violations related to 'digital asset securities'.

Letture associate

Summary of Kevin Warsh's Past Remarks: How Will This Prospective 'New Head' Upend the Fed?

Kevin Warsh, nominated by President Trump to replace Fed Chair Powell, is poised to introduce sweeping reforms at the Federal Reserve. His agenda includes structural changes, advocating for lower policy rates, a fundamentally new approach to inflation, a significantly smaller balance sheet, safeguarding Fed independence, narrowing the Fed’s mandate, improving coordination with the Treasury, and reducing communication “noise” from policymakers. Warsh has criticized current monetary policy as “broken” and called for “fundamental regime change,” arguing that continuity is meaningless when the Fed has lost credibility. He believes interest rates should be lower and that a smaller balance sheet would help achieve that, describing the current one as “multiple trillions of dollars larger than necessary.” On inflation, he attributes its rise to cognitive errors at the Fed—including overreliance on flawed models, neglect of money supply, and blaming external factors rather than excessive government spending. He also suggests AI could lead to a structural decline in prices. He strongly defends Fed independence as its “most important asset” and warns against mission creep, which he says risks its core objectives and increases political vulnerability. He proposes closer coordination with the Treasury to align balance sheet and debt issuance plans, clarifying expectations for markets. Regarding communication, Warsh supports transparency but criticizes the current “cacophony of voices” and “forward guidance” that creates ambiguity. He has urged Fed officials to speak less frequently to avoid market confusion.

marsbit3 min fa

Summary of Kevin Warsh's Past Remarks: How Will This Prospective 'New Head' Upend the Fed?

marsbit3 min fa

Under Political Pressure, Is the Federal Reserve Still Independent?

Amidst political pressure from former President Trump and congressional scrutiny, Kevin Warsh, nominated as Federal Reserve chair, argued that public comments from elected officials on interest rates do not fundamentally threaten the Fed’s operational independence. Instead, he emphasized that the real risk to the Fed’s autonomy lies in its failure to control inflation, which could erode public trust. Warsh also cautioned against the Fed overstepping into fiscal or social policy domains beyond its mandate. His remarks come as the Fed faces external pressures, including a Justice Department investigation into a renovation project and persistent inflation above the 2% target, exacerbated by rising energy prices. Warsh stressed that the Fed’s focus on its core mission—price stability—is essential to maintaining its credibility and independence.

marsbit3 min fa

Under Political Pressure, Is the Federal Reserve Still Independent?

marsbit3 min fa

Bitmine Loads Up On 101,627 Ether In Record Post-December Buy

Bitmine Immersion Technologies significantly expanded its Ethereum holdings by acquiring 101,627 ETH in mid-April, marking its largest single-week purchase since December 2025. The company now holds nearly 5 million ETH, valued at approximately $11.5 billion, representing about 4.12% of all circulating Ether. Its goal is to reach 5% ownership. Of its total ETH, 3.33 million is actively staked, generating over $200 million in annualized revenue. Chairman Tom Lee stated that the company has increased its buying pace, believing Ethereum is nearing the end of a "mini-crypto winter." Bitmine also recently uplisted to the NYSE, improving its visibility among institutional investors.

bitcoinist9 min fa

Bitmine Loads Up On 101,627 Ether In Record Post-December Buy

bitcoinist9 min fa

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

Title: Arbitrum Poses as Hacker to Recover Stolen Funds from KelpDAO Last week, KelpDAO suffered a hack resulting in nearly $300 million in losses, marking the largest DeFi security incident this year. Approximately 30,765 ETH (worth over $70 million) remained on an Arbitrum address controlled by the attacker. In an unprecedented move, Arbitrum’s Security Council utilized its emergency authority to upgrade the Inbox bridge contract, adding a function that allowed them to impersonate the hacker’s address and initiate a transfer without access to its private key. The council’s action, approved by 9 of its 12 members, moved the stolen ETH to a frozen address in a single transaction before reverting the contract to its original state. The operation was coordinated with law enforcement, which attributed the attack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Community reactions are divided: some praise the recovery of funds, while others question the centralization of power, as the council can upgrade core contracts without governance votes. However, such emergency mechanisms are common among major L2s. Despite the partial recovery, over $292 million was stolen in total, with more than $100 million in bad debt on Aave and remaining funds scattered across other chains. The incident highlights escalating security challenges in DeFi, with state-sponsored hackers employing advanced tactics and L2s responding with elevated countermeasures.

marsbit12 min fa

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

marsbit12 min fa

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures