Computing Power Crisis: Google Quietly Imposes Usage Caps on Meta for Gemini

marsbitPubblicato 2026-06-29Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-29

Introduzione

Google has quietly imposed usage caps on Meta's access to its Gemini AI models since around March due to surging demand overwhelming its computational infrastructure, according to a Financial Times report. The limits, which remain in place, have disrupted and delayed several of Meta's internal AI projects, forcing the social media giant to ration AI usage and improve efficiency. This reflects a broader industry-wide shortage of AI inference capacity, as companies deploy more chatbots and AI agents. Google CEO Sundar Pichai acknowledged compute constraints are limiting cloud revenue growth. In response, Google recently signed a $920 million monthly compute leasing deal with SpaceX to expand capacity. The restrictions have accelerated Meta's shift toward its own AI models, such as Muse Spark, to reduce dependence on external providers like Google. While other Google clients also face limits, Meta's vast scale made it particularly affected. The situation highlights how the AI infrastructure bottleneck has shifted from model training to inference, requiring massive new capital investments to resolve.

Written by: Xu Chao

The supply-demand contradiction in artificial intelligence infrastructure is intensifying among the world's leading technology companies. According to informed sources, Google informed Meta around March this year that it could not meet its full Gemini computing power demands and imposed usage caps on the social media giant—even the world's largest AI service provider is struggling to cope with the surging demand for computing power.

According to a report by the Financial Times, the restrictions remain in effect and have already caused disruptions and delays to several internal AI projects at Meta. As a result, Meta has instructed employees to improve the efficiency of their AI computing power usage, promoting a more meticulous accounting of AI tokens internally. Both Google and Meta declined to comment on the matter.

This situation has forced Google to accelerate its expansion efforts. Earlier this month, Google signed a computing power leasing agreement with Elon Musk's SpaceX worth $920 million per month. Google CEO Sundar Pichai admitted during the Q1 earnings call: "We are indeed facing constraints in computing power recently; if we could meet the demand, cloud business revenue would be higher."

Meta is not alone. Multiple sources pointed out that other Google enterprise customers are also subject to varying degrees of restrictions, with Meta being the most affected due to its exceptionally large demand. This incident highlights the explosive growth of AI inference workloads, which has become one of the industry's biggest challenges.

Computing Power Bottleneck Under Persistent Pressure, Major Clients Bear the Brunt

Despite hundreds of billions of dollars invested by major tech companies in chips, data centers, and power supply, AI computing power supply still struggles to keep pace with demand growth.

Google's Q1 cloud business revenue surpassed $20 billion for the first time, and its backlog of signed but undelivered cloud contracts nearly doubled sequentially, exceeding $460 billion. Pichai clearly stated that computing power constraints will persist in the near term.

Against this backdrop, the impact on Meta is particularly pronounced. Sources indicate that it is the high-intensity demand from major enterprise clients like Meta that directly pushed Google to accelerate its search for external computing power sources. As enterprises deploy chatbots, coding assistants, and AI agents on a large scale, inference workloads—the computing power consumed when models perform tasks in real-world applications after training—are becoming a core bottleneck for the industry.

Meta's Internal Projects Hindered, Accelerates Shift to In-House Models

Meta uses Gemini extensively internally, covering platform security review (including identifying fraudulent content and removing harmful information), customer service and advertising-assisted chatbots, as well as some internal workflows and code development, while also using other models like Anthropic's Claude.

According to sources, Meta initially chose Gemini because its performance surpassed that of the company's own open-source Llama model. However, as computing power restrictions tightened, Meta is accelerating its migration to in-house models. Multiple sources stated that Meta has recently begun prioritizing the promotion of its newly launched Muse Spark model, which is believed to be competitive with Gemini in performance, helping to reduce reliance on external models.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has previously continued to increase investment in AI talent and infrastructure, aiming to build what he calls "personal super intelligence." Unlike Google, Meta does not have a cloud business and is accelerating the construction of its own data center system, pledging a cumulative investment of $600 billion in the United States by 2028.

Google Expands Capacity via SpaceX, Industry Seeks Solutions

Faced with computing power pressure, Google signed a $920 million per month computing power leasing agreement with SpaceX this month to bridge the infrastructure gap. AI lab Anthropic also reached a similar agreement with SpaceX last month.

Google's move to impose restrictions on Meta provides a rare window for the outside world to glimpse the real pressure faced by the world's top AI service providers in allocating computing power. Currently, the infrastructure bottleneck across the entire AI industry is spreading from the training side to the inference side. Resolving the supply-demand contradiction still depends on the realization of a new round of large-scale capital investment.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the article, what limitation did Google impose on Meta regarding Gemini usage?

AGoogle reportedly informed Meta around March that it could not meet all of Meta's Gemini computing power demands and imposed usage limits on the AI model for the social media giant.

QWhat consequence did the reported Gemini usage limit have on Meta's internal operations?

AThe limitation has interfered with and delayed several of Meta's internal AI projects, leading the company to instruct employees to be more efficient with AI computing power and to carefully manage their use of AI tokens.

QWhich company did Google recently sign a major compute rental agreement with to address its capacity constraints?

AGoogle recently signed a compute rental agreement with Elon Musk's SpaceX, worth $920 million per month, to help expand its infrastructure capacity.

QHow is Meta responding to the challenges posed by the reliance on external AI models like Gemini?

AMeta is accelerating its shift towards its own self-developed models. It is prioritizing the promotion of its new Muse Spark model, which is considered competitive with Gemini, to reduce dependency on external providers.

QWhat does the article highlight as a major industry-wide bottleneck that is shifting from one area to another?

AThe article states that the infrastructure bottleneck in the AI industry is shifting from the training side to the inference side, as explosive growth in AI inference workloads becomes a core challenge for the sector.

Letture associate

Blood Loss of $55 Million Selling 3,588 BTC, Strategy Becomes a Literal Scumbag

On July 6th, Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) disclosed in an SEC filing that it sold 3,588 Bitcoin (BTC) between June 29th and July 5th for approximately $216 million, at an average price of ~$60,200. This marked the company's largest net sale since initiating its Bitcoin strategy in 2020 and its first institutionalized reduction of its core holding. The sale resulted in a realized loss of about $54.8 million, as the selling price was below its average cost basis of ~$75,476 per BTC. The proceeds were used to pay preferred stock dividends and replenish USD reserves. This move follows a new "Digital Credit Capital Framework" approved on June 29th, authorizing the sale of up to $1.25 billion in Bitcoin. The sale consumes roughly 17% of this authorized amount in its first week. Strategy's foundational narrative, built by founder Michael Saylor, was a commitment to "never sell" Bitcoin. The recent institutionalized selling framework and these substantial sales represent a significant shift from that original promise. While the amount sold is only 0.4% of Strategy's total holdings of 843,775 BTC, the action challenges the premium at which its stock (MSTR) trades relative to its Bitcoin holdings. Investors had priced in the "never sell" narrative. The company now faces a contradiction: it sells Bitcoin at a loss to pay dividends on the preferred stock it issued to fund Bitcoin purchases. Saylor has framed selling as a tool for future strategic purchases, but each sale erodes the credibility of the original commitment, potentially threatening the premium valuation of MSTR shares.

Foresight News55 min fa

Blood Loss of $55 Million Selling 3,588 BTC, Strategy Becomes a Literal Scumbag

Foresight News55 min fa

Dialogue with Yihui Capital, SoundAI Technology, Ling Universe, and Zhongbo Jili: Opportunities and Challenges in the AI Smart Hardware Track

On June 28, 2026, an event titled "New Opportunities in AI Hardware: The Battle for Interactive Entry Points Begins" was held in Beijing. It featured a report from ITJuzi and discussions with experts from SoundAI, Ling Universe, One Reed Capital, and Zhongbo Juli on the opportunities and challenges in China's AI hardware sector. Key report findings highlight the sector's intense activity: 327 out of 431 startups founded post-2023 have secured funding, with 179 investments in H1 2026 alone. The landscape is dominated by embodied intelligent robots, while wearable tech like smart rings and AI glasses shows rapid growth. Geographically, Shenzhen leads, leveraging its superior hardware supply chain, followed by Beijing and Shanghai. The overarching trend is for companies to focus on micro-innovations within specific scenarios rather than reinventing foundational technology. Industry leaders shared several critical insights: 1. **Balancing Innovation & Market Readiness**: Entrepreneurs face the "hammer looking for a nail" dilemma. Success requires balancing technical capability with user acceptance, cost control, and incremental design improvements rather than chasing disruptive innovation. 2. **Competitive Landscape**: The future interactive entry point may not be a single super-device but a mix of universal terminals and specialized, scenario-specific hardware. While large companies have ecosystem advantages, startups can win by deeply targeting vertical markets and specific user groups. 3. **Core Challenges & Business Models**: Key hurdles include deep understanding of AI models and navigating non-transparent hardware supply chains. Viable business models may involve selling hardware at cost and generating revenue through software subscriptions, but this requires tight control over both hardware BOM and model inference costs. 4. **The Road to Commercialization**: The ultimate test is market validation—achieving sales growth and sustainable cash flow. Companies must find the right application scenario, use edge computing effectively, and close the loop from technology to commercial success. 5. **The Future of Interaction**: Proactive, context-aware interaction is the next frontier, though it's currently limited by issues like model hallucinations and environmental perception. The near-term focus should be on identifying target users and creating a coherent experience in specific domains, such as health wearables. In summary, to succeed in the competitive AI hardware arena, companies must strategically choose their niche, build a team with the right geographical advantages (e.g., leveraging Shenzhen's supply chain), and most importantly, execute a flawless commercialization strategy that translates technology into market-accepted products and sustainable business growth.

marsbit1 h fa

Dialogue with Yihui Capital, SoundAI Technology, Ling Universe, and Zhongbo Jili: Opportunities and Challenges in the AI Smart Hardware Track

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片