Coinbase CEO calls tokenized stocks ‘inevitable’ amid CLARITY Act uncertainty

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-01-18Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-18

Introduzione

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong remains highly optimistic about tokenized stocks, calling them "inevitable" due to their potential to be faster, cheaper, and more global, despite recent regulatory uncertainty surrounding the CLARITY Act. The tokenized stock market has grown rapidly to $867 million, nearing $1 billion, with projections suggesting it could reach trillions by 2030 under clear regulation. A Bitwise survey indicated strong institutional interest, with stablecoins and tokenization being the top focus among financial advisors. However, the industry is divided on proposed crypto legislation, with Coinbase withdrawing support over concerns that the Senate bill bans tokenized stocks, while others like Robinhood downplayed these issues. BNB Chain has recently overtaken Solana as the leading settlement layer for tokenized equities.

In less than a year, the tokenized stock market has risen from zero to nearly $1 billion and could explode if regulatory clarity is established for the sector.

Despite the recent legislative hiccups with the CLARITY Act, the Coinbase CEO has remained bullish on on-chain stocks. On X (formerly Twitter), he said tokenized stocks will be huge and added,

“It’s inevitable – faster, cheaper, more global”

Sizing tokenized markets

Tokenized equities and ETFs are the on-chain version of traditional shares. Most projections for the sector range from a few trillion dollars to tens of trillions by 2030.

For McKinsey, the market could reach $3.8 trillion in an accelerated adoption scenario with clear and permitted regulation.

In other words, the massive potential is undeniable. In fact, a recent survey by asset manager Bitwise found that stablecoins and tokenization had the highest interest among the financial advisors interviewed.

“Stablecoins and tokenization attracted the most interest (30%), followed by “digital gold”/fiat debasement (22%) and crypto-linked AI investments (19%).”

This was a telltale sign of the immense potential and institutional interest in tokenization. Commenting on the survey, Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan said,

“Crypto’s future has always depended on what financial advisors think of it.”

Tokenization rules split industry

However, the future growth hinges on clear rules for issuers. But the industry appears divided over the provisions of the Senate’s crypto market structure bill regarding tokenized securities.

For Coinbase, the Senate draft banned tokenized stocks and stablecoin rewards, forcing the exchange to withdraw its support earlier in the week.

But other leaders, such as Robinhood’s chief legal officer and former SEC commissioner Dan Gallagher, downplayed the concerns as “overblown.”

“Concerns about tokenization in the Senate bill are overblown, but we’ll work with Congress to address any lingering uncertainty.”

It remains to be seen whether a deal will be reached to reignite the bill’s momentum and usher in the tokenization boom.

Meanwhile, the tokenized stock market has reached $867 million and is inching closer to $1 billion. Notably, the sector saw an 11% surge in Monthly Transfer Volume to $2.3 billion while holders increased by 22% to 159,000.

This was indicative of accelerated early adoption and appetite for tokenized stocks.

At the chain settlement level, Solana has been leading traction since last July, but BNB Chain flipped it and has maintained the lead over the past two months.


Final Thoughts

  • Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong was bullish on tokenized stocks despite regulatory uncertainty.
  • BNB Chain flipped Solana as the top settlement layer for tokenized stocks and ETFs.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the Coinbase CEO's view on tokenized stocks despite the uncertainty surrounding the CLARITY Act?

ACoinbase CEO Brian Armstrong remains bullish on tokenized stocks, calling them 'inevitable' and describing them as 'faster, cheaper, more global'.

QWhat is the projected market size for tokenized equities and ETFs by 2030 according to McKinsey?

AMcKinsey projects that the tokenized market could reach $3.8 trillion in an accelerated adoption scenario with clear and permitted regulation.

QAccording to a Bitwise survey, which crypto-related topic attracted the most interest from financial advisors?

AStablecoins and tokenization attracted the most interest at 30%, followed by 'digital gold'/fiat debasement (22%) and crypto-linked AI investments (19%).

QWhy did Coinbase withdraw its support from the Senate's crypto market structure bill?

ACoinbase withdrew its support because the Senate draft was interpreted as banning tokenized stocks and stablecoin rewards.

QWhich blockchain has recently become the top settlement layer for tokenized stocks and ETFs?

ABNB Chain flipped Solana and has maintained the lead as the top settlement layer for tokenized stocks and ETFs over the past two months.

Letture associate

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit32 min fa

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit32 min fa

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit2 h fa

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit2 h fa

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit2 h fa

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片