Coinbase CEO Backs CLARITY Act Push After Treasury Secretary Called For Senate Action

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-04-13Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-04-13

Introduzione

The push for crypto legislation in the U.S. has gained momentum with rare alignment between policymakers and industry leaders. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong publicly endorsed the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025, marking a shift from his previous opposition. His statement came in response to a Wall Street Journal op-ed by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who urged Congress to pass the bill, warning that the U.S. risks falling behind jurisdictions like Abu Dhabi and Singapore without clear regulations. Bessent emphasized the need for "durable law" to attract blockchain developers and entrepreneurs back to the U.S. Armstrong expressed gratitude for bipartisan efforts, despite having withdrawn support for an earlier draft in January 2026. SEC Chair Paul Atkins also backed the call for comprehensive market structure legislation.

The push to pass crypto legislation in the United States has picked up pace again, this time with rare alignment between policymakers and one of the crypto industry’s most influential voices.

A new statement from Brian Armstrong has added new weight to calls for Congress to move the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, just as pressure is coming from Washington to bring the bill back into focus.

Treasury Steps In As Urgency Builds In Washington

One of the most consequential voices in American crypto just changed sides. Brian Armstrong, CEO of crypto exchange Coinbase, declared on social media that it is time to pass the Clarity Act, publicly endorsing the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 in a post on X, the same legislation he had twice rejected previously.

The comment by Armstrong is in response to a forceful Wall Street Journal opinion piece by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and is one of the first few signs that the legislative standoff over US crypto market structure may finally be reaching its end.

Discussions around the CLARITY Act increased after Scott Bessent publicly called on lawmakers to act, noting that the United States risks falling behind in shaping the future of digital finance without clear regulations. In the opinion piece, Bessent mentioned how Congress has already spent years attempting to define how digital assets should be treated and that the time for debate is running out.

Bitcoin is now trading at $71,500. Chart: TradingView

The Treasury Secretary also noted the difference in other jurisdictions with clearer regulatory rules, such as Abu Dhabi and Singapore. Therefore, passing the CLARITY Act is important to bringing back blockchain developers and crypto entrepreneurs to the United States after much of the industry relocated to these countries.

“There is one way to give developers and entrepreneurs the comfort to reshore: durable law,” he said.

The piece also connected the CLARITY Act to its predecessor, the GENIUS Act, the stablecoin framework that President Trump signed into law in July 2025. The Genius Act proved that progress is possible, but the progress cannot be fully realized without support from the CLARITY Act.

Armstrong Expresses Support

Armstrong responded to Bessent opinion, noting how it is time to pass the Clarity Act.

“Grateful for all the bipartisan work among Senators and staff over the past several months to make this a strong bill,” the Coinbase CEO said.

Armstrong’s response to Bessent’s remarks is a notable turn for Coinbase, which has played a complicated role in the bill’s journey to being passed. In January 2026, he publicly withdrew Coinbase’s support for the Senate Banking Committee’s draft, stating that the version was materially worse than the current regulatory status quo and that Coinbase would rather have no bill than a bad one.

SEC Chair Paul Atkins also backed the Treasury Secretary’s comments, stating in a post on X how it’s high time for Congress to future-proof against rogue regulators and advance comprehensive market structure legislation to US President Donald Trump’s desk.

Featured image from Pexels, chart from TradingView

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main reason Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is pushing for the CLARITY Act according to the article?

ATreasury Secretary Scott Bessent is pushing for the CLARITY Act because he believes the United States risks falling behind in shaping the future of digital finance without clear regulations, and that durable law is needed to bring blockchain developers and crypto entrepreneurs back to the U.S. after many relocated to jurisdictions with clearer rules like Abu Dhabi and Singapore.

QHow did Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong's position on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act change?

ABrian Armstrong's position changed from twice previously rejecting the legislation to publicly endorsing it in a post on X, expressing gratitude for the bipartisan work to make it a strong bill.

QWhat previous legislation does the article connect to the CLARITY Act, and why is it mentioned?

AThe article connects the CLARITY Act to its predecessor, the GENIUS Act, a stablecoin framework signed into law by President Trump in July 2025. It is mentioned to show that legislative progress is possible, but that it cannot be fully realized without the support of the CLARITY Act.

QWhat was Brian Armstrong's stated reason for withdrawing Coinbase's support for an earlier draft of the bill in January 2026?

AIn January 2026, Armstrong withdrew support because he stated the Senate Banking Committee's draft version was materially worse than the current regulatory status quo, and Coinbase would rather have no bill than a bad one.

QBesides Brian Armstrong, which other prominent figure publicly supported Treasury Secretary Bessent's call for the CLARITY Act?

ASEC Chair Paul Atkins also backed the Treasury Secretary's comments, stating it is high time for Congress to future-proof against rogue regulators and advance comprehensive market structure legislation.

Letture associate

Manus Buyback Plan Emerges: Chinese Investors Plan to Repurchase Equity with $2 Billion, Path to Hong Kong IPO Becomes Clearer

According to a report by The Information, early Chinese investors of Manus, including Tencent, Sequoia Capital China, and ZhenFund, are planning to repurchase the company from Meta for $2 billion—the same price Meta paid in its acquisition last December. This move is a direct response to the Chinese government's prohibition of the foreign acquisition in April. As part of the repurchase plan, Manus is considering establishing a Sino-foreign joint venture within China. This structure is seen as a way to ensure regulatory compliance for its Chinese investors and to pave the way for a future IPO in Hong Kong. Notably, U.S. investor Benchmark will not participate in the buyback, which will concentrate ownership even more among Chinese capital. Since its acquisition by Meta, Manus's business has grown rapidly, with its annualized revenue run rate reportedly increasing four-to-fivefold to $400-$500 million in roughly six months. This strong growth underpins the investors' willingness to repurchase at the original price. Financially, the forced unwinding of the deal may benefit the early investors, allowing them to regain equity at a cost far below the company's current implied valuation, with the added prospect of an independent future listing. However, specific terms of the repurchase, including funding proportions and the joint venture's equity structure, are still under negotiation. This "repurchase-joint venture-Hong Kong IPO" approach could serve as a reference model for other Chinese AI startups navigating cross-border M&A regulations.

marsbit11 min fa

Manus Buyback Plan Emerges: Chinese Investors Plan to Repurchase Equity with $2 Billion, Path to Hong Kong IPO Becomes Clearer

marsbit11 min fa

STRC Loses Peg by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Running?

The article discusses the significant and concerning depegging of MicroStrategy's (MSTR) preferred stock, STRC. Designed to trade near its $100 target par value, STRC has recently fallen sharply, reaching a low of $83.26 and closing at $88.59, representing an over 11% discount. STRC is a core component of MicroStrategy's financial strategy. As a perpetual preferred stock, it allows the company to raise capital through an "at-the-market" (ATM) issuance program without diluting common shareholders (MSTR). This capital is primarily used to purchase Bitcoin, creating a "capital flywheel": issuing STRC → raising cash → buying BTC → increasing net assets → supporting STRC's value. The flywheel's operation depends on STRC maintaining its $100 price. To enforce this, MicroStrategy employs a dynamic dividend mechanism, recently raising the rate to 11.5% and increasing payout frequency. However, this has failed to halt the depegging, indicating market concerns extend beyond yield. Analysts cite two main reasons. First, technical factors like forced liquidations from leveraged arbitrage trades may have exacerbated the sell-off. Second, and more fundamentally, is waning confidence in MicroStrategy's financial resilience. A JPMorgan report highlighted the company's limited cash relative to its ~$1.7 billion annual dividend obligation, raising liquidity concerns. While MicroStrategy counters that its massive Bitcoin holdings provide decades of coverage, this argument relies on the potential need to sell BTC—a departure from its long-standing "never sell" narrative. The company's recent sale of a small amount of Bitcoin for "testing," despite being framed as minor, has intensified these fears. The persistent depegging threatens to cripple MicroStrategy's primary funding channel. If STRC remains discounted, the company's ability to fund further Bitcoin purchases weakens. Should cash reserves dwindle while financing is constrained, the market may increasingly price in the risk of MicroStrategy becoming a forced seller of Bitcoin to meet obligations. This shift from a major marginal buyer to a potential seller could pose significant downside risk to the broader Bitcoin market.

链捕手20 min fa

STRC Loses Peg by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Running?

链捕手20 min fa

Behind the AI Scorecards Lies a Chinese 'Question Setter'

Behind the AI scorecards that dominate industry discussions—benchmarks like MMLU-Pro, MMMU, and MMMU-Pro—stands a Chinese-Canadian researcher: Wenhu Chen. As an assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of the TIGER Lab, Chen has become a key "exam-setter" for evaluating large language and multimodal models. Chen first gained broader recognition with MMLU-Pro, a more challenging and stable update to the popular MMLU benchmark. As top models like OpenAI’s o3 began achieving near-perfect scores on the original MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. MMLU-Pro introduced more complex reasoning questions, expanded answer choices, and filtered out ambiguous or simple items, effectively reintroducing differentiation among state-of-the-art models. His work on MMMU addressed the evaluation of multimodal models, requiring them to integrate visual information (like charts, diagrams, or tables) with textual knowledge across diverse academic subjects. Even the strongest models initially scored only around 56-59%, highlighting significant room for improvement in genuine multimodal reasoning. MMMU-Pro further refined this by preventing models from bypassing visual cues. Chen’s research focus has long been on complex information understanding and reasoning. His background—including a PhD at UC Santa Barbara, research at Google/DeepMind on Gemini, and now a role in Meta’s superintelligence lab—provides deep insight into model development and their potential weaknesses. His TIGER Lab also builds models (e.g., for video understanding and generation), ensuring his evaluation benchmarks are grounded in practical challenges. While AI headlines often spotlight company leaders and product launches, Chen’s work exemplifies the critical, behind-the-scenes contributions of researchers crafting the rigorous standards that define and drive progress in AI capabilities.

marsbit1 h fa

Behind the AI Scorecards Lies a Chinese 'Question Setter'

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare PUSH

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Push Protocol (PUSH) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente Push ProtocolPUSH.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Push Protocol (PUSH)Dopo aver acquistato Push Protocol (PUSH), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Push Protocol (PUSH)Scambia facilmente Push Protocol (PUSH) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

537 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.13Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare PUSH

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di PUSH PUSH sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片