China Tightens Crypto Ban; Hong Kong To Still Proceed With Its Plan

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-02-11Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-11

Introduzione

China has intensified its ban on cryptocurrency activities, with eight authorities led by the central bank issuing a joint notice reaffirming that crypto-related businesses are illegal. The policy expands scrutiny to offshore offerings and overseas activities by domestic entities, explicitly prohibiting the issuance of renminbi-pegged stablecoins abroad. While tokenization of real-world assets is acknowledged under regulated conditions, all digital finance activities must operate within state-approved systems. In contrast, Hong Kong plans to proceed with issuing stablecoin licenses by March, reviewing 36 applications, a move analysts view as a strategic hedge rather than a reversal of Beijing’s stance.

The recent policy adjustment of China seems more like a crackdown instead of a structural reordering. As reported by Bloomberg, it has tightened the cryptocurrency activity once again.

On Friday, 8 Chinese authorities headed by the central bank issued a joint notice on risks associated with the digital assets. It restates that the crypto-associated businesses stay illegal financial activities.

It also expands the investigation to offshore offerers and to overseas conduct by domestic actors. The structure of the document has equal weightage as of its tone, and it reiterates the ban. Specifically, the notice bans anybody from issuing renminbi-pegged stablecoins abroad.

However, it serves tokenisation of real-world assets as a clear tool of governance, and domestic activity is still constrained. Still, a special case is noted in the rulebook: cases approved by competent authorities and run via designated financial market infrastructure.

To impose these laws, the central government has planned to roll out a collaborative effort amalgamating local and national oversight. The collaborative effort has targeted removing regulatory arbitrage so far used by Chinese tech and finance companies.

These firms mostly used neighbouring jurisdictions to test with blockchain-based assets outside Beijing’s direct oversight. By tightening the tether on stablecoins as well as RWAs, Beijing has indicated that the upcoming generation of digital finance must stay completely within state-sanctioned, permissioned systems.

The Robust Move Being Unaffected

However, Hong Kong’s central bank is moving forward with plans to issue an initial batch of stablecoin licences in March, regardless of China’s prolonged opposition to crypto activity. Although, analysts state that the stablecoin plans of Hong Kong are more of a hedge than a reversal of position of Beijing.

The Chief Executive Officer of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, Eddie Yue, stated at a Legislative Council meeting on February 2 that we anticipate that by March we will be capable of making a decision.

He further added that the authority was reviewing an initial portion of 36 stablecoin issuer applications, as per the official interpreter.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bankman-Fried Petitions Federal Court for Retrial in FTX Collapse Case

TagschinaHong KongStablecoin

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main action taken by Chinese authorities regarding cryptocurrency activities according to the recent notice?

AChinese authorities, led by the central bank, issued a joint notice reiterating that cryptocurrency-related businesses are illegal financial activities and banning anyone from issuing renminbi-pegged stablecoins abroad.

QHow does the new policy affect offshore activities and domestic actors?

AThe policy expands investigations to offshore offerers and overseas conduct by domestic actors, aiming to eliminate regulatory arbitrage used by tech and finance companies in neighboring jurisdictions.

QWhat exception is noted in the rulebook for cryptocurrency activities?

AThe rulebook allows exceptions for cases approved by competent authorities and run via designated financial market infrastructure.

QHow is Hong Kong responding to China's cryptocurrency ban?

AHong Kong is proceeding with plans to issue an initial batch of stablecoin licenses in March, reviewing 36 applications, despite China's opposition.

QWhat does Beijing's tightening of regulations on stablecoins and RWAs indicate about the future of digital finance?

AIt indicates that the next generation of digital finance must operate entirely within state-sanctioned, permissioned systems.

Letture associate

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit22 min fa

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit22 min fa

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit1 h fa

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit1 h fa

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit2 h fa

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare BAN

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Comedian (BAN) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente ComedianBAN.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Comedian (BAN)Dopo aver acquistato Comedian (BAN), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Comedian (BAN)Scambia facilmente Comedian (BAN) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

509 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.11Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare BAN

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di BAN BAN sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片