Centrifuge and Pharos Partner to Expand Onchain Access for Institutional Assets

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-02-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-17

Introduzione

Centrifuge and Pharos have partnered to enhance the distribution and usability of institutional-grade onchain assets, such as tokenized U.S. Treasuries (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA). The collaboration addresses key challenges in institutional onchain finance, including fragmented distribution, regulatory barriers, and limited post-issuance activity outside the U.S. and Western Europe. By integrating Centrifuge’s tokenization infrastructure with Pharos’ high-performance Layer 1 blockchain, the partnership aims to create a unified ecosystem for asset accessibility, liquidity, and execution. Both CEOs emphasize that tokenization alone is insufficient—the focus is on building robust infrastructure to enable active, composable financial systems for institutional assets.

Today, Centrifuge and Pharos announced a collaboration aimed at facilitating the large-scale distribution and operation of institutional-grade assets onchain via a common infrastructure architecture, such as tokenized U.S. Treasuries (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA).

The partnership focuses on addressing distribution, one of the main issues facing institutional onchain finance. Even though tokenization has advanced significantly, many institutional assets are still inaccessible, dispersed across platforms, or passive after they are issued. The goal of this collaboration is to make institutional assets useable in live onchain financial systems when they are issued.

Regulatory, onboarding, custody, and operational barriers still affect access to U.S. dollar-denominated credit and treasury products in many areas outside of the U.S. and Western Europe. Even with tokenization, these goods’ distribution is often dispersed and indirect, which restricts their capacity to actively spread once onchain or reach new users.

The collaboration tackles these issues at the system level by fusing Pharos’ inclusive, execution-first Layer 1 with Centrifuge’s institutional-grade tokenization infrastructure and asset standards. With its high-performance infrastructure and ecosystem connectivity, Pharos acts as a strategic liquidity and distribution layer for assets issued via Centrifuge, enabling deeper onchain liquidity pathways and wider capital entrance. Assets may be accessible, pooled, allocated, and reused instead of being static after issue thanks to this integrated ecosystem, which includes wallet access, platform and enterprise channels, and execution capability.

“Tokenization alone does not solve the access and usability problem,” said Bhaji Illuminati, CEO of Centrifuge Labs. “This partnership focuses on building the distribution and infrastructure layer that allows institutional assets to function within real onchain financial environments.”

Pharos is an inclusive financial Layer 1 that uses a modular architecture and native deep-parallel execution to facilitate high-throughput, real-world financial operations. The network is designed to support ongoing onchain operations and accommodate significant institutional asset activity.

“The challenge isn’t demand, it’s infrastructure,” said Wish Wu, CEO of Pharos. “This collaboration focuses on creating an environment where institutional assets can move onchain and remain active within open, composable financial systems.”

This collaboration is a first step toward practical onchain finance, in which institutional assets are backed by infrastructure intended for long-term participation, distribution, and execution in addition to being represented onchain.

As the future financial-grade infrastructure of global finance for everyone, Pharos is the inclusive financial Layer 1 for RealFi, where institutional-grade assets and real value move onchain and may be combined with decentralized assets. To enable asset-native ecosystems, Pharos blends deep-parallel execution, modular design, and built-in compliance. Supported by Hack VC, Faction VC, and other international TradFi investors, the project was developed by Ant Group’s engineers and leadership.

TagsAltcoinBlockchain

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main goal of the partnership between Centrifuge and Pharos?

AThe main goal is to facilitate the large-scale distribution and operation of institutional-grade assets onchain, making them usable in live onchain financial systems upon issuance.

QWhat specific types of institutional assets are mentioned in the collaboration?

AThe collaboration focuses on tokenized U.S. Treasuries (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA).

QAccording to Centrifuge Labs' CEO, what problem does tokenization alone not solve?

ATokenization alone does not solve the access and usability problem for institutional assets onchain.

QWhat role does Pharos play in this partnership according to the article?

APharos acts as a strategic liquidity and distribution layer with its high-performance infrastructure and ecosystem connectivity, enabling deeper onchain liquidity pathways and wider capital entrance.

QWhat are some key technical features of the Pharos network mentioned in the article?

APharos uses a modular architecture and native deep-parallel execution to facilitate high-throughput, real-world financial operations and support ongoing onchain institutional asset activity.

Letture associate

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit28 min fa

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit28 min fa

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit58 min fa

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit58 min fa

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX Learn1 h fa

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX Learn1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片