Bridgewater Founder Ray Dalio: The Concept and Mechanism of the All Weather Portfolio

marsbitPubblicato 2026-03-24Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-24

Introduzione

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, shares the core principles behind the All Weather Portfolio—a strategy designed to perform well across all economic environments with minimal need for market timing. The goal is to achieve returns significantly higher than cash or low-risk assets, with lower risk than traditional portfolios like the 60/40 stock-bond mix. Dalio emphasizes that cash, while safe from default, often yields the worst long-term real returns, especially during high inflation. The All Weather Portfolio is built on the concept of risk parity, balancing asset classes based on their risk contributions rather than capital allocation. By understanding how different assets (such as bonds, gold, inflation-linked securities, and commodities) react to changes in growth and inflation, the portfolio is structured to maintain stability. It aims to be passively held, avoiding market timing, which Dalio argues most investors—even professionals—cannot execute successfully. Originally developed for his family, the strategy has been refined over 30 years. Dalio encourages investors to understand and apply these principles to build confidence and resilience, particularly in volatile markets. He plans to release a detailed “recipe” for constructing such a portfolio in the future.

Author :@RayDalio

Compiled by: He Tongxue

Bridgewater Founder I am at a stage in my life where my primary goal is to pass on the principles I have learned over the past 60 years—principles that have helped me and that I believe can also help others. I believe one of the most important investment principles I can convey is about what the "All Weather Portfolio" is and how to construct such a portfolio. I believe these principles are particularly valuable in risky times like the present.

For me, the most important thing for most investors is to have a portfolio that: a) is well-diversified/designed to achieve the highest possible return with minimal risk; b) does not require market timing. The reasons are: a) Although most people believe the safest investment is cash (such as short-term Treasury bills, or interest-bearing deposits like high-quality money market funds with near-zero default risk), because it does not default, these cash investments inevitably yield the lowest after-tax returns over the long term and perform particularly poorly during periods of high inflation—meaning they lose significant purchasing power. It is also true that b) almost all investors (including most seasoned professional investors) cannot effectively time the market, even if they think they can. Therefore, I believe that for most investors managing their own portfolios, investment should involve as little or even no market timing as possible.

The All Weather Portfolio is a passively held portfolio with expected returns significantly higher than low-risk assets like cash, but with risk much lower than high-risk assets like stocks and bonds, and this holds true in any environment. This differs from most portfolios—such as the classic 60/40 stock-bond portfolio, or those that perform well in good times and poorly in bad times. So to be clear, the All Weather Portfolio is a type of portfolio designed to achieve the above goals, not a specific investment product. It is more like a financial engineering challenge aimed at achieving this balance, from which investment products can be derived. My All Weather Portfolio is constructed in my own way, which I will briefly describe here and elaborate on later. Naturally, my approach has evolved and improved over time, and I have some ideas to make it even better. But anyone can implement it in their own way—perhaps I should hold a competition to see who can build the best method.

I will start by explaining how I developed my method and how it works.

About 30 years ago, I tried to create an investment strategy for my family so they could invest without my guidance after I passed away. I believed I needed a portfolio that could:

a) Provide returns significantly higher than cash (i.e., equal to or exceeding the classic 60/40 stock-bond portfolio);

b) Have lower risk than the 60/40 portfolio;

c) Not perform poorly in any specific type of economic environment;

d) Not require market timing.

In my view, the only way to achieve such an All Weather Portfolio was to hold a variety of diversified, higher-return but higher-risk investments, so that when combined, due to the mutual diversification effects among these asset classes, the overall portfolio would achieve the same high returns as individual assets but with lower risk. To achieve better diversification, I developed the concept of "Risk Parity"—that is, adjusting investments with different risk levels (i.e., different volatilities) by increasing the risk/volatility of low-risk/low-volatility investments and reducing the risk/volatility of high-risk/high-volatility investments, so that their risk levels become more balanced. Then I balanced my exposure to each asset class based on the most fundamental factors driving their returns. In other words, by understanding how each asset class responds to changing economic conditions (such as inflation and growth—for example, bonds perform poorly when inflation and growth rise, while inflation-hedging assets like gold, inflation-linked bonds, and commodities perform well), and by allocating equal risk in environments where inflation and growth rise and fall, I could create a passive strategic allocation portfolio that remains well-balanced across all economic scenarios. Thirty years later, I still firmly believe that having this core strategic portfolio is crucial. My All Weather Portfolio is my ideal, continuously held strategic asset allocation—i.e., the "beta" (asset class) portfolio. Although I also make many tactical bets based on my judgments about market trends to create "alpha," these are achieved by creating a well-diversified alpha portfolio, which I call the"Pure Alpha" strategy. (I won’t explain this method in detail now, as it would digress too far.)

I developed this All Weather method together with my excellent Bridgewater team, especially Bob Prince and Greg Jensen, who have been at Bridgewater for 40 and 30 years respectively and remain co-chief investment officers there. After building it, I found the method simple and straightforward enough that almost anyone could implement it, and I couldn’t imagine we would be paid for managing money for others using it. So I showed almost everyone I knew how to do it (and I still want to do this today), but to my surprise, many clients asked us to manage their money using this strategy. We launched it as a product, and naturally, it has evolved and improved since then. Bridgewater is now operating and optimizing it in their own way, and I am operating and optimizing it in my own way. The difference between us is: they manage All Weather accounts for others, while I only do it for my family and family foundation, while showing others how to do it.

Whether investors build their own All Weather Portfolio or have someone else do it, what I most hope is to help people understand how it works and give them the opportunity to apply it, so they can have confidence in achieving good returns without suffering unacceptable losses in market/economic environments that most people consider bad. I have written a lot about how to build my All Weather Portfolio and distributed it widely. (For example, if you want to systematically learn my investment principles, you can access them through the online course I collaborated on with the Singapore Wealth Management Institute:). In any case, I will soon write out my "recipe" to more clearly explain how you can build your own All Weather Portfolio, and I will share it once it is ready.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the primary goal of Ray Dalio's All Weather Portfolio?

AThe primary goal is to create a portfolio that is well-diversified and engineered to provide returns significantly higher than cash with much lower risk than stocks and bonds, without the need for market timing, and to perform reasonably well in all economic environments.

QAccording to Dalio, why is cash not the safest long-term investment?

ABecause while it carries minimal default risk, cash investments (like short-term Treasuries) provide the lowest after-tax returns over the long term and perform particularly poorly during periods of high inflation, leading to a significant loss of purchasing power.

QWhat is the core concept of 'Risk Parity' as described in the article?

ARisk Parity is the concept of adjusting investments with different risk/volatility levels so that their risk levels are equalized. This is done by increasing the risk/volatility of low-risk investments and decreasing the risk/volatility of high-risk investments, allowing them to better balance each other.

QHow does the All Weather Portfolio achieve balance across different economic conditions?

AIt achieves balance by understanding how different asset classes perform under varying economic conditions (like rising/falling inflation and growth) and then allocating an equal amount of risk to environments where inflation and growth are rising versus environments where they are falling.

QWhat is the key difference between the 'All Weather' (Beta) portfolio and the 'Pure Alpha' strategy mentioned by Dalio?

AThe All Weather portfolio is the core strategic, passive asset allocation (Beta) designed to perform in all environments. The Pure Alpha strategy consists of additional tactical bets based on market views to generate excess returns, and it is implemented through a separate, well-diversified alpha portfolio.

Letture associate

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

Tech giants like Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft are undergoing a radical financial transformation due to AI. Their traditional "light-asset, high-free-cash-flow" model is being dismantled by staggering capital expenditures on AI infrastructure—data centers, GPUs, and power. Combined 2026 guidance exceeds $700 billion, a 4.5x increase from 2022, causing free cash flow to plummet (e.g., Amazon's fell 95%). To fund this, they are borrowing unprecedented sums through long-dated, multi-currency bonds (e.g., Alphabet's 100-year bond). The world's most conservative capital—pensions, insurers—is now funding Silicon Valley's most speculative bet. This shift makes these companies resemble heavy-asset industrials (railroads, utilities) rather than software firms, threatening their premium valuations. Historically, such infrastructure booms (railroads, fiber optics) followed a pattern: genuine technology, overbuilding fueled by competitive frenzy, aggressive debt financing, and a crash triggered by financial conditions—not technology failure. The infrastructure remained, but many original builders and financiers did not survive. The core gamble is a "time arbitrage": using cheap debt today to build scale and lock in customers before AI capabilities commoditize. They are betting that AI revenue will materialize before debt comes due. Their positions vary: Amazon is under immediate cash pressure; Meta's path to monetization is unclear; Alphabet has a robust core business buffer; Microsoft has the shortest path from infrastructure to revenue. The contract is set: the most risk-averse global capital has lent its time to Silicon Valley, awaiting a future that is promised but uncertain.

marsbit29 min fa

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

marsbit29 min fa

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

"The article explores the 'VVV' concept as the new AI-focused narrative within the Base ecosystem, centered around the token $VVV of the privacy-focused, uncensored generative AI platform Venice, led by crypto veteran Erik Voorhees. Venice has seen significant growth in 2026, with its API users surging, partly attributed to exposure from OpenClaw. The platform now boasts over 2 million total users and 55,000 paid subscribers. Correspondingly, the $VVV token price has risen over 9x this year. Key to its performance are tokenomics designed for value accrual: reduced annual emissions, subscription revenue used for buyback-and-burn, and a unique staking mechanism. Staking $VVV yields $sVVV, which can be used to mint $DIEM tokens. Each staked $DIEM provides a daily $1 credit for using Venice's API services, creating tangible utility. The article also highlights other tokens associated with the 'VVV' narrative. $POD, the token of distributed AI network Dolphin (which co-developed Venice's default AI model), saw a massive price surge. $cyb3rwr3n, a project for a Venice credit auction market, gained attention due to perceived connections to Venice's team despite official denials. Finally, $SR of robotics platform STRIKEROBOT.AI rose after announcing a partnership with Venice for robot vision-language model development. Overall, the 'VVV' ecosystem combines AI platform growth, deflationary tokenomics, and innovative utility mechanisms, driving significant investor interest and price action in related tokens."

marsbit38 min fa

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

marsbit38 min fa

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbit1 h fa

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbit1 h fa

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报1 h fa

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare RAY

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Raydium (RAY) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente RaydiumRAY.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Raydium (RAY)Dopo aver acquistato Raydium (RAY), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Raydium (RAY)Scambia facilmente Raydium (RAY) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

206 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.10Aggiornato il 2025.03.21

Come comprare RAY

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di RAY RAY sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片