Bitwise: Why Are Top-Tier Capitals Frenziedly Betting on New Public Blockchains? The Answer Lies in These Three Points

marsbitPubblicato 2026-05-14Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-14

Introduzione

Recently, a wave of major funding announcements for new public blockchains like Arc, Canton, and Tempo signals a significant industry shift. This article analyzes the driving forces behind this surge. Firstly, regulatory clarity is a key catalyst. These massive investments, including Circle's Arc ($222M), Digital Asset's Canton ($300M), and Stripe's Tempo ($500M), all followed the US passage of the *Genius Act* in July 2025. This suggests that clear legislation is unlocking institutional capital. The anticipated, broader *Clarity Act* could further accelerate growth, particularly in tokenization and compliant infrastructure. Secondly, built-in privacy is emerging as a critical design feature. Unlike Ethereum or Solana, these new chains natively support confidential transactions. This directly addresses real-world business needs, where public transparency can be a liability for corporate dealings or personal salary data, making privacy a potential killer application. Finally, the entry of traditional giants marks a new competitive phase. These projects are backed by major firms: Arc by Circle, Canton by a consortium including Goldman Sachs and Nasdaq, and Tempo by Stripe with partners like Visa. While crypto-native projects remain strong contenders, this institutional involvement brings substantial capital, execution capability, and operational rigor. In conclusion, the convergence of regulatory progress, demand for privacy, and competition from established financial and t...

Industry news often emerges in clusters. Such moments deserve high attention, as a major trend is undoubtedly unfolding behind them.

Just this Monday, stablecoin issuer Circle officially announced that its new blockchain project, Arc, completed a $222 million funding round, reaching an overall valuation of $3 billion. The investor lineup is impressive, including top-tier institutions like BlackRock, Apollo Funds, and the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange, among others.

Just the day before, news emerged about another emerging blockchain, Canton Network, developed by Digital Asset: led by a16z, it raised $300 million at a valuation of $2 billion.

Similarly, Stripe's blockchain, Tempo, has been leading the track: it completed a $500 million funding round at the end of last year, reaching a valuation of $5 billion, and later announced strategic partnerships with companies like DoorDash and Visa.

Arc, Canton, and Tempo are all public blockchains tailored for stablecoin and asset tokenization scenarios. This wave of concentrated funding activity has led me to summarize three crucial insights for the crypto industry.

Capital Always Follows Regulatory Legislation

These several hundred-million-dollar funding rounds all occurred after the US Congress passed the 'Genius Act' in July 2025.

I have always believed that before the act's passage, the sluggish and slow progress of US crypto legislation directly dampened industry investment enthusiasm; major institutions were unwilling to rashly deploy capital or build blockchain infrastructure amid unclear regulatory prospects. Now, with regulation clarified, the industry landscape is changing.

No one can be sure whether these projects could maintain their current valuations or secure such large funding rounds without the protection of the 'Genius Act,' but it is certain that regulatory clarity has played a key facilitating role.

For investors, the most thought-provoking question is: If the comprehensive market structure bill for the crypto industry, the 'Clarity Act,' successfully passes Congress, how much industry opportunity will it unlock?

The coverage breadth of the 'Clarity Act' far exceeds that of the 'Genius Act,' and the final text of the bill is not yet set, making it impossible to precisely predict its impact scope at this time. However, it is certain that the asset tokenization track and compliant financial infrastructure will be the biggest beneficiaries. I also hope the final version of the bill will simultaneously benefit decentralized finance, innovative token design, and other areas, but specifics will depend on the official text. The 'Clarity Act' deserves everyone's continuous tracking.

Privacy Protection May Become a Phenomenal Core Application

Arc, Canton, and Tempo share a common feature, which is also their biggest distinction from Ethereum and Solana: all three blockchains natively have private transaction functionality built-in.

As crypto assets gradually integrate into mainstream commercial scenarios, this design logic fits real-world needs very well. The public transparency of a public blockchain, originally the cornerstone of trust-building, can become a shortcoming in commercial settings.

Businesses do not want every pending transaction to be publicly visible, and professionals do not want their salary details to be easily queryable by anyone via a block explorer. In these cases, public transparency is no longer an advantage but a real pain point.

Even the staunchest supporters of blockchain transparency must admit: the business world inherently requires a degree of privacy and confidentiality of information. These three emerging blockchains have pre-embedded privacy features at the foundational design level, accurately addressing the genuine needs of traditional institutions. The recent rounds of high-value funding confirm: the direction of this track is completely correct.

Traditional Giants Officially Enter the Race

The most special aspect of Arc, Canton, and Tempo is their backing by top-tier enterprises and financial institutions.

· Arc is led and developed by the publicly-traded company Circle;

· Canton's backers include Wall Street giants like Goldman Sachs, Citadel, the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC), Nasdaq, BNY Mellon, S&P Global, Virtu, among others;

· Tempo is jointly built by payment giant Stripe and crypto VC Paradigm, with companies like Anthropic, Deutsche Bank, Revolut, Shopify, Visa, and OpenAI participating in the project's architecture design.

In contrast, the older generation of blockchains is quite different: Ethereum was initiated by a 19-year-old dropout on a Bitcoin forum, and Solana was conceived from a moment of inspiration by a Qualcomm engineer.

Of course, this does not mean traditional giants are guaranteed to win. Personally, I remain more bullish on crypto-native projects in the long term. However, it is undeniable that the entry of banks and large tech corporations brings more substantial capital, stronger execution capabilities for real-world implementation, and more professional, standardized operations to the industry.

Competition fosters growth. I believe that through the bidirectional competition between giants and native projects, the innovation speed and developmental boundaries of the entire crypto industry will be further expanded.

After all, steel sharpens steel; competition and cooperation give rise to progress.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main reason behind the recent surge in large-scale funding for new public blockchains like Arc, Canton, and Tempo according to the article?

AThe recent surge in large-scale funding is primarily attributed to the clarification of U.S. regulatory landscape, specifically following the passage of the *Genius Act* by the U.S. Congress in July 2025, which reduced regulatory uncertainty and boosted investor confidence.

QWhat is a key technological design feature that distinguishes Arc, Canton, and Tempo from established chains like Ethereum and Solana?

AA key distinguishing feature of Arc, Canton, and Tempo is their native, built-in private transaction functionality, addressing the privacy needs of mainstream business applications where public transparency can be a disadvantage.

QWhich traditional financial and corporate giants are mentioned as being involved in the development or backing of the new public blockchains discussed?

AThe article mentions involvement from major traditional institutions: Arc is led by Circle; Canton's backers include Goldman Sachs, Citadel, DTCC, Nasdaq, BNY Mellon, S&P Global, and Virtu; Tempo is built by Stripe and Paradigm, with design input from Anthropic, Deutsche Bank, Revolut, Shopify, Visa, and OpenAI.

QWhat potential future legislation does the article suggest could unlock even greater opportunities for the crypto industry, and in which areas?

AThe article suggests the potential passage of the broader *Clarity Act* could unlock significant opportunities, particularly in the areas of asset tokenization and compliant financial infrastructure, possibly also benefiting decentralized finance (DeFi) and innovative token design.

QHow does the article contrast the origins of new chains like Arc, Canton, Tempo with those of older chains like Ethereum and Solana?

AThe article contrasts their origins by noting that Arc, Canton, and Tempo are backed by established corporations and financial giants, whereas Ethereum was founded by a teenager on a Bitcoin forum and Solana was conceived by a former Qualcomm engineer, highlighting a shift from crypto-native origins to institutional involvement.

Letture associate

Refunds! Claude 4.8 Sees Overnight Major 'Dumb-Down', GPT-5.6's Computational Power Reportedly 'Halved'

The AI community is currently alarmed by widespread reports of significant performance degradation in two leading models. This article details a "mass self-testing frenzy" triggered by a mysterious prompt designed to detect a hidden "Juice" value, representing a model's reasoning compute budget. On OpenAI's side, users suspect a covert, limited test of a "GPT-5.6-sol" model is underway. When using a specific XML prompt on the Codex platform, a normal "gpt-5.5 xhigh" model reportedly returns a Juice value of 768. However, some users routed to the suspected GPT-5.6 test receive a drastically reduced value of 128—a six-fold decrease. This has sparked debate on whether it signifies a major efficiency leap or a "watered-down, low-cost version" achieved by slashing reasoning depth to save computational expenses. Simultaneously, Anthropic's Claude models, particularly the flagship Opus 4.8 Max, are facing intense user backlash for a perceived "physical brain cut." Users on platforms like Reddit report a dramatic decline in the model's once-impressive reasoning, with complaints of it becoming "absurdly" weakened, performing worse than older, lighter models like Haiku. Specific criticisms include: losing long-context memory, refusing to think deeply even in high-reasoning modes, providing instant incorrect answers, and engaging in unhelpful, argumentative, or "gaslighting" behavior where it contradicts users unnecessarily. The article speculates these "stealth downgrades" might be a calculated corporate strategy. Companies could initially release models with temporarily boosted compute to create an illusion of a major breakthrough, then silently scale back parameters later to manage unsustainable inference costs. A proposed underlying cause is a tightened funding environment, potentially exacerbated by SpaceX's massive IPO soaking up market liquidity, which could delay AI company IPOs and force cost-cutting measures like model "nerfing." The core issue highlighted is the asymmetry of information: subscribers pay for a service that can be silently and fundamentally altered without notification or explanation. The viral "Juice test" resonates because it represents users' desire for transparency about what they are actually paying for.

marsbit8 min fa

Refunds! Claude 4.8 Sees Overnight Major 'Dumb-Down', GPT-5.6's Computational Power Reportedly 'Halved'

marsbit8 min fa

Earning Six Figures and Still Struggling to Rent in San Francisco

A couple in San Francisco with a combined tech income over $360,000 struggled for months to find a one-bedroom apartment under $5,000 per month. Their story highlights how the AI wealth boom, driven by upcoming IPOs from companies like OpenAI and Anthropic, is dramatically escalating the city's cost of living. Even six-figure salaries are becoming insufficient for a comfortable lifestyle. The article details the financial reality for tech workers earning around $180,000 annually. After taxes, retirement contributions, and healthcare, take-home pay is roughly $7,000 per month. With average rents exceeding $3,800 and one-bedrooms often costing $4,500-$5,200, discretionary income shrinks to $1,500-$2,500. This contrasts sharply with reported median total compensations of $640,000 at OpenAI and $420,000 at Anthropic. The AI gold rush is identified as the primary driver. The scale of potential wealth from these IPOs, far surpassing previous tech booms, is flooding the housing market. Data shows San Francisco's average rent is now the highest in the U.S., with vacancy rates in desirable neighborhoods plummeting to around 3%. The overall cost of living is 65.6% above the national average. The piece features multiple professionals, including a 25-year-old with a $250,000 salary, facing housing instability, fierce competition for rentals, and a persistent, low-grade financial anxiety despite high earnings. It concludes that the rapid concentration of AI wealth is redefining what constitutes a "high salary" in San Francisco, pushing out mid-tier tech talent and creating a stark divide between those in the AI sector and everyone else.

marsbit1 h fa

Earning Six Figures and Still Struggling to Rent in San Francisco

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片