Bitwise files for prediction market ETF: Election bets to go mainstream?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-18Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-18

Introduzione

Bitwise has filed for a prediction market ETF called "PredictionShares," focusing on event contracts tied to U.S. election outcomes in 2026 and 2028. This move follows a similar filing by Roundhill Investments, signaling growing interest from TradFi in crypto-based prediction markets. Analysts expect more players to enter the space, citing the "ETF-ization of everything." The segment saw record growth, reaching $12.4 billion in monthly volume in January. However, regulatory uncertainty persists: the CFTC supports these markets as hedging tools, while many states view them as gambling and seek stricter oversight.

After stablecoins went mainstream with TradFi support last year, prediction markets seem poised to become the next success in crypto. Top players are positioning themselves for the potential growth despite regulatory uncertainty.

Prediction market ETF race heats up

Digital asset manager Bitwise filed for a prediction market-backed ETF under the brand ‘PredictionShares,’ noted Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart.

The filing was event contracts eyeing election outcomes in 2026 and 2028 across the House, Senate, and presidential candidates.

Interestingly, the move echoed its 2026 outlook. Bitwise projected that prediction site Polymarket would hit a record high in open interest ahead of the 2026 midterms.

“With U.S. midterms approaching and politics coming back into the frame, the platform will be firing on all cylinders in 2026.”

The update also comes a few days after Roundhill Investments made the first move on the prediction market ETF race. And Seyffart expected more players would join the race.

“This is not the first filing of this kind, and I think it’s extremely unlikely that these will be the last. The financialization and ETF-ization of everything continues.”

Now Bitwise has made its move, and another firm, GraniteShares, has also shown interest in the prediction markets within the political segment.

Besides, top trading firms such as Susquehanna (SIG) are also positioning for the market boom.

CFTC clashes with states

Prediction markets or event contracts are derivatives that allow users to speculate on future outcomes.

For supporters, they involve users putting money on the line, which makes prediction markets’ data (odds and probability figures) more robust in risk management and hedging than that from traditional surveys.

As such, major players, especially from the crypto industry, are rallying behind Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) chair Mike Selig to defend the federal regulator’s oversight in the segment.

According to supporters, these are useful hedging tools that should be allowed to flourish, blaming states for overreach.

However, most local states view prediction markets as gambling, no different from sports betting, and call for strict regulation and oversight. It remains to be seen whether CFTC will have the sole jurisdiction in the space.

That said, the segment has recorded significant growth since the 2024 U.S. elections. In January 2026, the segment reached a new all-time monthly volume of $12.4 billion, surpassing $10 billion for the first time.


Final Summary

  • TradFi players are positioning for the prediction markets boom, with ETF issuers eyeing the 2026 midterms.
  • The segment crossed $10 billion of monthly volume for the first time in January.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main focus of Bitwise's newly filed ETF under the 'PredictionShares' brand?

ABitwise filed for a prediction market-backed ETF focused on event contracts tied to election outcomes in 2026 and 2028, covering the House, Senate, and presidential candidates.

QWhich other investment firm was mentioned as making the first move in the prediction market ETF race before Bitwise?

ARoundhill Investments was the first to make a move in the prediction market ETF race before Bitwise filed its application.

QWhat is the key regulatory challenge facing prediction markets according to the article?

APrediction markets face regulatory uncertainty as most U.S. states view them as gambling and call for strict regulation, while supporters argue they are useful hedging tools and advocate for CFTC oversight instead of state-level restrictions.

QWhat significant milestone did the prediction market segment achieve in January 2026?

AIn January 2026, the prediction market segment reached a record monthly volume of $12.4 billion, surpassing $10 billion for the first time.

QWhich major trading firm is mentioned as positioning itself for the prediction market boom?

ASusquehanna (SIG), a top trading firm, is positioning itself for the expected growth in prediction markets.

Letture associate

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

**Summary: Rising Interest Rates Are Not the Killer of Tech; EPS Is: The "Keep the Strong, Ditch the Weak" Strategy After the AI Theme Plunge** The author argues that the sharp sell-off in tech and AI-related stocks, triggered by a strong US jobs report that heightened Fed rate hike fears, represents a "pullback to pick up passengers" rather than a "car crash." The true end of a tech bull market is not determined by an extra 25 basis point hike, but by industry overcapacity and the disproval of earnings per share (EPS) expectations. Historical analysis shows that during past rate hike cycles, the Nasdaq-100 often outperformed, provided EPS growth remained strong. The current phase is seen as a shift from a "broad narrative-driven rally" to a "focused verification stage" for AI. The investment strategy should be to "keep the strong, ditch the weak." * **Retain exposure** to high-conviction AI infrastructure leaders with clear order visibility, stable margins, strong cash flow, and upward EPS revisions (e.g., AI servers, advanced packaging, optical modules, key cloud suppliers). * **Reduce exposure** to high-beta, narrative-driven stocks with unclear profit paths (e.g., some quantum computing, space, or speculative chip stocks), especially on rebounds. Valuation concerns should focus on whether earnings can catch up to high multiples, not on high P/E alone. Crowded positioning signals a concentration into quality assets, not necessarily a market top. The upcoming Q2 earnings season will be a key validation point. The core principle is to hold stocks with proven EPS, while using macro events (CPI data, central bank meetings) to manage timing and risk.

marsbit34 min fa

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

marsbit34 min fa

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

SpaceX's potential IPO is priced at $135 per share, aiming to raise $75 billion and valuing the company at approximately $1.77 trillion, which would make it the largest IPO in history. This valuation has sparked intense debate among investors. Bullish analysts, including major underwriters Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, argue the valuation is justified by SpaceX's long-term potential. They see it not just as a rocket company but as a future leader in space infrastructure, with key growth drivers being Starlink satellite internet, low-cost rocket launches, and future AI-related ventures. They project revenues reaching hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars by 2030-2040. ARK Invest's model suggests a 2030 enterprise value could reach $2.5 trillion. Bearish analysts from independent research firms like Morningstar, PitchBook, and New Constructs contend the IPO price is excessively high, already pricing in unrealistic future growth. Using DCF and sum-of-the-parts models, they estimate fair value between $780 billion and $1.7 trillion, significantly below the IPO target. They highlight risks such as the speculative nature of AI projections, over-dependence on Elon Musk, high growth expectations, and corporate governance concerns. Trefis set a target price of just $79 per share. While both sides acknowledge SpaceX's unique position in commercial space, the core disagreement centers on whether the $135 share price offers a reasonable margin of safety or is overly optimistic. Despite the valuation controversy, reported strong demand for the IPO indicates significant market interest.

marsbit2 h fa

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

marsbit2 h fa

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

The article discusses the evolution of on-chain credit, distinguishing three markets: overcollateralized crypto lending, unsecured lending (largely unsuccessful), and asset-backed credit (ABC). ABC, backed by identifiable real-world collateral with legal recourse, is identified as the fastest-growing category and the only one credibly addressing adverse selection—the core problem in credit where the riskiest borrowers self-select. Current growth in on-chain Real World Assets (RWAs), particularly tokenized private credit funds (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge), is substantial but often merely "wraps" existing fund structures, inheriting their risks rather than solving adverse selection at the protocol level. The regulatory landscape is a key driver, with the US GENIUS Act (prohibiting stablecoin issuers from paying yield) and the proposed CLARITY Act (closing loopholes on indirect yield) set to redefine permissible yield-bearing products. This makes vaults (like ERC-4626) the critical architecture—they become the primary compliant vehicle for delivering yield, functioning as issuance, disclosure, distribution, and recovery mechanisms. The author's thesis is that the correct post-GENIUS/CLARITY architecture involves building ABC solutions where credit assessment, structure, and recovery are encoded directly into the smart contract vault layer, moving beyond mere tokenized fund wrappers to solve adverse selection fundamentally and ensure regulatory compliance.

Foresight News3 h fa

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

Foresight News3 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片