Banks win on stablecoin yield, CLARITY Act delayed – ‘Still hopeful we get a bill’

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-01-13Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-13

Introduzione

Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman John Boozman has delayed the markup of the CFTC portion of the crypto market structure bill (CLARITY Act) to the end of January to secure broader bipartisan support. Meanwhile, the Senate Banking Committee is proceeding with its January 15 markup deadline. Its draft legislation prohibits stablecoin rewards on deposits, allowing only "activity-based" rewards—a move opposed by many in crypto. Industry leaders like Jake Chervinsky warned this issue could threaten the bill, while Mike Novogratz remains cautiously optimistic. The bill would assign regulatory roles: CFTC oversees commodities and derivatives, while the SEC handles token classification, stablecoins, and DeFi. Officials like Paul Atkins express confidence in its passage, predicting it will help the U.S. become the "crypto capital of the world." Prediction markets indicate an 80% chance of the bill passing in 2026, with Bitwise CIO noting its outcome could significantly influence Bitcoin's price trajectory.

Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman John Boozman (R-Arkansas) has delayed the markup of the CFTC side of crypto market structure legislation (CLARITY Act).

In a statement, Boozman said the committee markup has been pushed from the 15th of January to the last week of this month, citing the need for more engagement to garner “broad bipartisan support.”

“To finalize the remaining details and ensure the broad support this legislation requires, additional time is needed before moving to markup.”

Senate Banking draft prohibits stablecoin yield

However, the Senate Banking Committee, which will handle the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) side of the legislation, will proceed with the 15th January deadline for the markup.

At press time, the Banking Committee had released a tentative draft for markup.

Although the draft offered safe harbor for developers, the crypto industry appeared to have lost the stablecoin yield issue to banks. The draft bans stablecoin rewards on deposits via service providers.

The only stablecoin rewards permitted by the legislation will be “activity-based” rather than deposits, a proposal some crypto leaders had strongly opposed.

In fact, Jake Chervinsky, chief legal officer at crypto VC Variant Fund, said the yield issue was “one of the few things” that could blow up the market structure bill.

For his part, Galaxy CEO Mike Novogratz said there were,

“Lots of woods to chop, but still hopeful we get a bill.”

That said, the bill will enable the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) to oversee commodities, derivatives, and the spot market.

On the other hand, the SEC will handle token classification, stablecoins, DeFi, and investor protection aspects of the bill.

After each side has finalized its respective markups, the bill should be merged before the Senate debate and floor vote. The House must also approve it before it can be advanced to the president.

Paul Atkins bullish on crypto bill outcome

Despite considerable panic from some crypto leaders over the outcome, the President Donald Trump administration officials appeared positive.

Patrick Witt, Executive Director, President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, reiterated that the bill would pass.

“Don’t be a panican. Stay engaged, and trust the process. CLARITY is near.”

SEC Chair Paul Atkins also reinforced a bullish outlook and added,

“Passing bipartisan market structure legislation will help us future-proof against rogue regulators, ensuring that we achieve President Trump’s goal to make the U.S. the crypto capital of the world.”

Meanwhile, prediction site Polymarket projected an 80% chance of the bill’s passage in 2026. Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan said that BTC could reach a new record high if the bill passes.

However, he warned the “crypto winter” could be prolonged if the bill fails to advance.


Final Thoughts

  • Senate Banking draft released for January 15 markup prohibits stablecoin rewards.
  • Bitwise CIO predicted that the bill’s outcome could determine Bitcoin’s direction in 2026.

Domande pertinenti

QWhy was the markup of the CFTC side of the CLARITY Act delayed?

ASenate Agriculture Committee Chairman John Boozman delayed the markup to allow for more engagement to garner broad bipartisan support, pushing it from January 15th to the last week of the month.

QWhat is the key restriction on stablecoin rewards in the Senate Banking Committee's draft legislation?

AThe draft legislation bans stablecoin rewards on deposits via service providers, permitting only 'activity-based' rewards instead.

QAccording to the article, which regulatory body will oversee the spot market for crypto commodities under the proposed bill?

AThe Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) will oversee commodities, derivatives, and the spot market.

QWhat did Galaxy CEO Mike Novogratz say about the prospects of the crypto market structure bill?

AMike Novogratz said, 'Lots of woods to chop, but still hopeful we get a bill.'

QWhat potential market impact did Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan predict based on the bill's outcome?

AMatt Hougan predicted that Bitcoin could reach a new record high if the bill passes, but warned that the 'crypto winter' could be prolonged if it fails.

Letture associate

The AI Agent Era Accelerates Its Arrival: Questflow Defines a New Paradigm of Financial Intelligence with On-Chain AI Brokerage

The AI Agent era is accelerating, with the CB Insights AI 100 list highlighting global investment confidence. The focus has shifted from whether AI works to its speed of deployment and ability to manage complex workflows, with autonomous AI Agents driving this transformation. At the forefront is Questflow, a Singapore-based startup redefining financial intelligence through its on-chain AI brokerage. Unlike tools that merely provide data dashboards, Questflow deploys AI Agents that proactively scan markets, form judgments, and execute trades via a conversational interface—operating 24/7 without requiring manual confirmation for each decision. This embodies the new AI paradigm of agents capable of executing multi-step workflows autonomously. Questflow's mission is to democratize institutional-grade trading intelligence. Historically reserved for the ultra-wealthy, this capability is now accessible starting from just $1 through Questflow's "AI Clone + Copy Trade" model. The platform charges only a 1% execution fee, aligning its incentives directly with users and eliminating traditional management or performance fees. The timing is opportune, aligning with key trends identified by CB Insights: the scalable deployment of AI Agents, accelerated AI adoption in financial services, and the maturation of on-chain infrastructure. With robust liquidity on platforms like Hyperliquid and Polymarket, alongside advancements in AI reasoning and non-custodial wallet security, Questflow is positioned to merge the roles of broker, fund, and exchange into a single, accessible platform for millions.

链捕手4 min fa

The AI Agent Era Accelerates Its Arrival: Questflow Defines a New Paradigm of Financial Intelligence with On-Chain AI Brokerage

链捕手4 min fa

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

Titled "Why Putting a Price on Social Interaction Is Doomed to Fail," this article critiques attempts to monetize social networks directly through SocialFi models, arguing their inevitable failure stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of media dynamics. Using Marshall McLuhan's theory of "hot" and "cold" media, the author posits that social networks are inherently "cold" media. Their value isn't contained in individual posts but is co-created through user participation, interpretation, and fragmented, ongoing interaction (e.g., replies, shares). This ambiguity and need for user involvement are core to their function. The article asserts that SocialFi projects like Friend.tech failed because introducing real-time, tradable financial pricing (a definitive "hot" signal) into this "cold" environment doesn't add a layer—it replaces the medium's essence. The unambiguous price signal overshadows and nullifies the nuanced, participatory social signal. Users become traders, not participants, and when speculative profits vanish, the underlying social ecosystem—never genuinely cultivated—collapses entirely. This principle extends beyond crypto. The author argues platforms like Twitter have gradually "heated up" through metrics (likes, retweets counts, algorithmically defined value), shifting users from participants to performers and eroding organic engagement. The solution isn't to abandon capital but to manage its entry point. Successful models like Substack, Patreon, or Bandcamp allow capital to "condense" at specific, isolated nodes (e.g., subscriptions, one-time payments) without permeating and "heating" every social interaction. They preserve the core "cold," participatory medium while enabling monetization at designated boundaries. The NFT boom and bust serves as a stark parallel: the ancient "cold" medium of collecting (valued for story, community, gradual accumulation) was rapidly destroyed by platforms that introduced real-time floor prices, rarity scores, and trading dashboards, transforming collectors into speculators and vaporizing cultural value when prices fell. The core lesson: "Liquidity equals heat." Injecting high liquidity and definitive pricing into a "cold" participatory medium doesn't optimize it; it fundamentally alters and destroys its value-creating mechanism. The future lies not in pricing every social gesture but in finding precise, non-invasive points for capital to condense without overheating the entire ecosystem.

marsbit12 min fa

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

marsbit12 min fa

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA and a first-generation immigrant, delivered the commencement address to Carnegie Mellon University's class of 2026. He shared his personal journey from a humble background to founding NVIDIA, emphasizing resilience, learning from failure, and the responsibility that comes with leadership. Huang framed the present moment as the dawn of the AI revolution, a shift he believes is more profound than previous computing waves. He described AI as fundamentally resetting computing—moving from human-written software to machines that understand, reason, and use tools. This will create a new industry for generating intelligence and transform every sector. While acknowledging AI's potential to automate tasks and displace some jobs, Huang distinguished between the *tasks* of a job and its core *purpose*. He argued AI will augment human capability, not replace humans. The real risk, he stated, is not AI itself, but people being left behind by those who effectively use AI. He presented AI as a generational opportunity for massive infrastructure investment—in chip factories, data centers, energy grids, and advanced manufacturing—that could re-industrialize nations like the U.S. and bridge the digital divide by making computing and intelligent tools accessible to all. Huang called for a balanced approach: advancing AI safely and responsibly, establishing prudent policies, ensuring broad access, and encouraging universal participation. He urged the graduates not to fear the future but to engage with optimism and ambition, reminding them of CMU's motto, "My heart is in the work." His core message was clear: this is their moment to actively build and shape the AI-powered future, not merely observe it.

marsbit1 h fa

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片