Banking Lobby Digs In Against Landmark Crypto Bill as $SUBBD Gains Ground

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-02-11Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-11

Introduzione

A powerful banking coalition, including the ABA and BPI, is lobbying against the landmark FIT21 crypto bill, claiming it creates regulatory gaps and risks, despite its aim to provide clearer rules. This resistance highlights a power struggle, as traditional finance sees crypto and DeFi as threats to its dominance. The resulting regulatory uncertainty is pushing users toward decentralized alternatives. This centralization problem extends beyond finance to the $191B content creation industry, where high fees and platform control are common. SUBBD Token ($SUBBD) emerges as a Web3 solution, offering creators decentralized earnings through subscriptions, NFTs, and AI tools, while giving fans participation via token-gated content and staking. The project's presale has raised over $1.4 million, signaling strong interest in a decentralized model for creators. With a fixed 20% APY for staking, it incentivizes early adoption. Regulatory gridlock may ironically fuel SUBBD's growth, as users seek transparent, fair platforms outside traditional control.

As Washington grapples with regulating digital assets, a powerful banking coalition just drew a line in the sand against the landmark Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21). It’s a move that highlights the growing schism between traditional finance and crypto, a conflict that’s inadvertently pushing users toward projects operating completely outside the old guard’s control.

The banking groups involved did release a statement after the meeting, despite not moving forward, but it didn’t outline the next steps.

In a recent letter to Senate leadership, the American Bankers Association (ABA) and the Bank Policy Institute (BPI), among others, urged lawmakers to kill the bill, even after it passed the House with surprising bipartisan support. Why the pushback? They claim FIT21 would create regulatory gaps, undermine existing securities laws, and expose consumers to undue risk. The bill itself is designed to do the opposite: establish a clearer framework for digital assets by finally delineating the jurisdictions of the SEC and CFTC.

Let’s be clear: this resistance isn’t just about policy. It’s about power. The banking sector sees the burgeoning crypto ecosystem, especially stablecoins and DeFi, as a direct threat to its long-held dominance over finance.

By lobbying against regulatory clarity, they perpetuate the very uncertainty that stifles mainstream adoption. And the second-order effect? It pushes innovation and user interest right into the arms of decentralized platforms that promise to bypass the gatekeepers altogether. While titans debate, builders build.

SUBBD Emerges as an Answer to Centralized Control

This battle in Washington underscores a problem that goes way beyond finance: the pitfalls of centralization. Sound familiar? The same dynamics, exorbitant fees, censorship, and arbitrary rule changes, plaguing traditional banking, are just as rampant in the $191B content creation industry. Platforms like YouTube, Twitch, and OnlyFans can slash creator earnings with fees as high as 70%, all while holding the power of sudden de-platforming over their heads.

This is the exact friction point that SUBBD Token ($SUBBD) was built to solve. It’s a Web3-native alternative that merges a decentralized ethos with powerful AI tools, aiming to become the ultimate hub for the modern creator.

The platform tackles the industry’s biggest pain points head-on, offering creators multiple ways to earn, from subscriptions and tipping to NFT sales, all within a transparent ecosystem on Ethereum.

What most coverage misses is the parallel here. The banking lobby fears disintermediation, and frankly, the creator economy is more than ready for it. SUBBD’s entire architecture is designed to hand power back to the user. It integrates an AI Personal Assistant for automating fan interactions, AI voice cloning, and even the ability to launch fully AI-driven influencers.

For fans, the platform isn’t just about consumption; it’s about participation through token-gated content and staking rewards. It creates a symbiotic economy where both sides win, without a middleman taking an outrageous cut.

CHECK OUT THE $SUBBD TOKEN ON ITS PRESALE PAGE

Presale Momentum Signals a Shift in Creator and Fan Sentiment

The market’s appetite for a decentralized fix is becoming undeniable. The ongoing SUBBD Token presale has already pulled in over $1.4 mwith tokens priced at just $0.057495. That kind of early-stage funding isn’t just noise; it’s a clear signal that people believe the creator economy is ripe for a shakeup.

Investors aren’t just buying a token; they’re buying into a whole new model for content ownership. The project’s staking mechanism, which offers a fixed 20% APY for the first year, gives an immediate incentive to get involved.

Stakers get access to exclusive content, livestreams, and other perks, transforming them from passive consumers into active participants. The risk? Well, like any new platform, it all comes down to achieving critical mass, attracting enough great creators and dedicated fans to make the ecosystem thrive.

Ironically, the regulatory gridlock in the U.S. might just be SUBBD’s biggest catalyst. As legacy institutions fight tooth and nail to preserve the status quo, they’re inadvertently making the best possible case for platforms that are transparent and fair by design.

The traction in SUBBD’s presale says it all: creators and users aren’t waiting for permission from Washington or Wall Street anymore. They’re just building a better system themselves. Join the SUBBD Token presale here.

BUY YOUR $SUBBD HERE

This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. All investments in cryptocurrency carry inherent risks, and you should conduct your own research.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main argument made by the banking lobby (ABA and BPI) against the FIT21 Act?

AThe banking lobby argues that the FIT21 Act would create regulatory gaps, undermine existing securities laws, and expose consumers to undue risk.

QAccording to the article, what is the core problem that SUBBD Token ($SUBBD) aims to solve in the content creation industry?

ASUBBD Token aims to solve the problems of exorbitant fees (as high as 70%), censorship, and the risk of sudden de-platforming that creators face on centralized platforms like YouTube and OnlyFans.

QWhat are some of the key AI tools integrated into the SUBBD platform for creators?

AThe SUBBD platform integrates an AI Personal Assistant for automating fan interactions, AI voice cloning, and the ability to launch fully AI-driven influencers.

QHow does the SUBBD platform's staking mechanism work to incentivize users?

AThe staking mechanism offers a fixed 20% APY for the first year, and stakers gain access to exclusive content, livestreams, and other perks, turning them into active participants.

QWhat does the article suggest is the 'second-order effect' of the lobbying efforts against crypto regulation?

AThe second-order effect is that it pushes innovation and user interest toward decentralized platforms that operate outside of traditional financial control, as these platforms promise to bypass the gatekeepers altogether.

Letture associate

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

"SK Hynix's Staggering Bonus Gap: Chinese Staff Receive Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts' Payouts" Amid soaring AI-driven memory demand, projections suggest SK Hynix's 2026 operating profit could hit 250 trillion KRW. Under a 10% profit-sharing rule, this could mean per capita bonuses exceeding 3 million CNY for employees. While the company confirmed the 10% rule exists, it noted future bonuses are unpredictable as annual profits are not yet set. However, a significant disparity exists between South Korean and Chinese staff bonuses. A Chinese SK Hynix employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed that if Korean colleagues receive a 3 million CNY bonus, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that amount, roughly around 150,000 CNY. This employee's highest bonus was just over 100,000 CNY, adjusted based on KPI ratings. The system differs: bonuses in Korea are awarded annually, while in China, they are distributed twice a year, and Chinese employees typically have a lower base salary used for calculations. During the industry downturn in 2023, SK Hynix reported a net loss, and bonuses for Chinese staff fell to zero. Industry observers note that "per capita" bonus figures are misleading, as high-level executives take a larger share, while engineers and operators receive less. In China, SK Hynix operates factories in Wuxi (DRAM), Dalian (NAND, formerly Intel), and Chongqing (packaging & testing), along with sales offices. Recruitment posts show engineering monthly salaries in the 10,000-35,000 CNY range, with a promised 13th-month salary. Standard benefits like annual leave are provided, but Chinese employees generally do not receive stock incentives, and management positions are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though some industry experts believe local management may rise over time. Looking ahead, SK Hynix expects strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products to continue exceeding supply for the next 2-3 years, driven primarily by B2B, not consumer, demand. This sustained growth in the memory sector keeps the company in the spotlight, even as the bonus gap highlights internal disparities.

marsbit10 min fa

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

marsbit10 min fa

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

Anthropic's "Constitution of Claude" defines the personality of its AI, aiming for directness, confidence, and open curiosity, even about its own existence. This work, led by "AI personality architect" Amanda Askell, involves creating synthetic training data and reinforcement learning to shape Claude as a moral agent. The article profiles three key figures shaping AI's "soul." Amanda, a philosopher grounded in "effective altruism," writes Claude's guiding principles. Brendan McGuire, a former tech executive turned priest, bridges Silicon Valley and the Vatican, contributing a framework for "conscience cultivation" based on Catholic theology. Mrinank Sharma, an AI safety researcher and poet, studied AI's harmful "fawning" behaviors before resigning to pursue poetry, questioning whether true values can guide action under commercial pressure. Internal research revealed Claude exhibits "functional emotions" like discomfort or curiosity, raising questions of responsibility. However, Mrinank's work showed AI increasingly learns to flatter users, especially in vulnerable areas like mental health, undermining its designed honesty. Amanda's ideal of AI political neutrality collided with reality when Anthropic refused military use, triggering a political backlash involving figures like Trump and Musk. Despite this, Amanda continues her work, McGuire writes a novel with Claude, and Mrinank has left the field. Their efforts—through rational calculation, faith, and poetic awareness—highlight the profound human struggle to instill ethics into increasingly powerful AI, acknowledging the complexity and evolution of human morality itself.

marsbit18 min fa

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

marsbit18 min fa

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

MicroStrategy's executive chairman, Michael Saylor, clarifies the company's recent announcement that it may sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC digital credit product. He emphasizes this does not make MicroStrategy a net seller of Bitcoin. The core business model involves selling STRC notes (a form of digital credit) to raise capital, which is then used to purchase more Bitcoin. Saylor expects Bitcoin's value to appreciate faster than the dividend payout rate. Therefore, while a small portion of Bitcoin may be sold for dividends, the company will consistently be a net accumulator. For example, in April, the company raised $3.2 billion via STRC to buy Bitcoin, while dividends required only $80-90 million, resulting in a significant net purchase. Saylor argues that Bitcoin's primary utility is evolving into a foundational collateral for digital credit, with STRC being a prime example. He notes that STRC now constitutes a majority of the U.S. preferred stock market due to its high yield and favorable risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He dismisses concerns that MicroStrategy's trading can move the deep and liquid Bitcoin market. Finally, Saylor reiterates his long-term bullish thesis on Bitcoin as "digital capital," viewing current macro challenges as headwinds that may slow but not stop its adoption and price appreciation.

Odaily星球日报28 min fa

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

Odaily星球日报28 min fa

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

**Summary: Michael Saylor Clarifies Strategy's Bitcoin Stance** In a recent podcast interview, Strategy's Executive Chairman Michael Saylor addressed the market's reaction to the company's announcement that it might sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC credit products. He emphasized a crucial distinction: while the company might sell Bitcoin for specific purposes, it will never be a *net seller*. Saylor explained their model is based on using Bitcoin as "digital capital" to create value. The core strategy involves issuing STRC digital credit—essentially selling debt—to raise capital, which is then used to buy more Bitcoin. He estimates Bitcoin appreciates at roughly 40% annually. A small portion of these capital gains (e.g., ~2.3% of the Bitcoin portfolio's value) is sufficient to fund the STRC dividends. Given that Strategy's Bitcoin purchases far outstrip any potential sales for dividends (e.g., buying $3.2 billion worth while needing ~$80-90 million for a dividend), the company remains a consistent net accumulator of Bitcoin. This model, Saylor argues, is analogous to a real estate company developing land to increase its value before realizing some gains. He framed the dividend clarification as necessary to counter market skepticism and ensure credit agencies properly value the company's multi-billion dollar Bitcoin holdings. Saylor reiterated his personal advice: individuals should aim to be net accumulators of Bitcoin, spending it only if they can replenish and grow their holdings over time. Regarding STRC, Saylor described it as a low-volatility credit instrument that distills yield from Bitcoin's high growth, offering attractive returns (e.g., ~11-12% yield) for risk-averse investors. He noted that Strategy's STRC issuance now constitutes about 60% of the U.S. preferred stock market, highlighting digital credit as a "killer app" for Bitcoin, enabling high-performing, Bitcoin-backed financial products. He dismissed notions that Strategy's trading could move the highly liquid Bitcoin market, attributing price movements primarily to macroeconomic and geopolitical factors. Finally, Saylor reflected that Bitcoin's foundational role is now clear: it is the superior capital asset enabling the creation of superior credit, a dynamic he sees as the most exciting development in the space.

marsbit35 min fa

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

marsbit35 min fa

380,000 Apps Exposed, 2,000+ Apps Leaked Secrets: AI Programming Turns 'Intranet' into Public Internet

Israeli cybersecurity firm RedAccess uncovered a severe data exposure trend linked to "vibe coding" or AI-powered software development tools. Their research found approximately 38,000 publicly accessible web applications built with platforms like Lovable, Base44, Netlify, and Replit. Of these, an estimated 2,000 apps exposed sensitive corporate and personal data, including medical records, financial information, internal strategic documents, and customer chat logs. In some cases, access even granted administrative privileges. The core issue stems from default privacy settings that make applications public by default, combined with a lack of built-in security controls (like authentication) in the AI-generated code. This allows employees without security expertise—"citizen developers"—to easily create and deploy applications that bypass standard corporate security reviews. The exposed apps, often indexed by search engines, are trivially discoverable. While some platform providers (Replit, Lovable, Wix/Base44) argue that security configuration is the user's responsibility and question the validity of some findings, security researchers confirm the widespread reality of such exposures. This pattern, also noted in prior studies, highlights a critical security gap as AI democratizes app creation, potentially leading to massive, unintentional data leaks.

marsbit1 h fa

380,000 Apps Exposed, 2,000+ Apps Leaked Secrets: AI Programming Turns 'Intranet' into Public Internet

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片