Bank of Korea Urges Bank-Led Won Stablecoin Issuance

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-02-23Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-23

Introduzione

The Bank of Korea (BOK) has urged that the issuance of Korean won-pegged stablecoins should be led by commercial banks, warning that private issuance could undermine monetary policy and create foreign exchange and financial stability risks. In a report submitted to the National Assembly, the central bank described stablecoins as "currency-like substitutes" and emphasized that their rollout must consider broader economic impacts, not just industrial profits. The BOK expressed concerns that stablecoins could be used to circumvent foreign exchange regulations and stressed that non-bank issuers might conflict with Korea’s separation of banking and commerce principles. It recommended that banks, which are subject to strict regulatory standards, should be the primary issuers, with any expansion beyond banks proceeding cautiously after risk assessments. The report reflects ongoing debates among policymakers about who should be allowed to issue won stablecoins and echoes the BOK’s previous warnings on the matter. While acknowledging stablecoins' potential role in the digital asset revolution, the bank proposed structural safeguards, including a bank-focused consortium model and a statutory interagency policy body for oversight. The BOK cited the U.S. GENIUS Act as an example of cross-agency supervision. However, this bank-led approach has faced opposition from industry members, including some policymakers, who argue that clearer rules for issuers could sufficiently mitigate risks.

The central bank of South Korea has allegedly renewed its push to keep Korean won-pegged stablecoin issuance in the hands of commercial banks, alerting policymakers that privately issued digital tokens could diminish monetary policy and create new foreign-exchange and financial-stability risks.

Recently, a report was submitted to the National Assembly Strategy and Finance Committee of South Korea. The Bank of Korea (BOK) mentioned won stablecoins as “currency-like substitutes” and said their rollout must account not only for industrial profits but also for monetary policy, foreign exchange stability and financial risks, as per the report.

The central bank restated concerns that stablecoins could be used to avoid foreign exchange regulations, comprising earlier reporting needs, and claimed that permitting non-bank bodies to issue them independently could conflict with the separation of banking and commerce principles of Korea.

It also mentioned that banks, which are subject to capital, governance and compliance standards, should be allowed first, with any widening beyond banks advancing slowly after risk assessments.

The report lands as policymakers debate a postponed stablecoin framework, with one of the prominent sticking points being who should be eligible to issue won-pegged tokens and how much control banks should hold in any issuing body.

The Echo of Previous Warnings

The bank allegedly stated programmable stablecoins could back the digital asset revolution and function as payment tools, but it also floated structural safeguards, including a bank-focused consortium model and a statutory interagency policy body that could systemise approvals and supervision over regulators.

As per the reports, the Bank of Korea also quoted the GENIUS Act framework of the United States as an example of cross-agency supervision that comprises the Treasury Department, the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

The report reflects its previous warnings, which claim that banks should be heading the introduction for stablecoin issuance since they are so far subject to strict regulatory needs. Although, this approach has witnessed a repulsion from the members of the industry, including some policymakers.

The chair of the Kaia DLT Foundation, Sangmin Seo, has earlier mentioned that the argument for banks heading the stablecoin launch is short on logical foundation. Seo mentioned that setting clearer rules for issuers can reduce risks.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Arthur Hayes Reveals Portfolio Bet on Commodities and Crypto

TagsGenius ACTKoreaStablecoin

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the Bank of Korea's main stance on who should issue won-pegged stablecoins?

AThe Bank of Korea's main stance is that the issuance of won-pegged stablecoins should be led by and kept in the hands of commercial banks.

QWhat are the three main areas of risk the BOK says stablecoin rollout must account for?

AThe three main areas of risk are monetary policy, foreign exchange stability, and financial risks.

QAccording to the BOK report, what principle could allowing non-banks to issue stablecoins conflict with?

AIt could conflict with Korea's principle of the separation of banking and commerce.

QWhich U.S. regulatory framework did the Bank of Korea cite as an example of cross-agency supervision?

AThe Bank of Korea cited the U.S. GENIUS Act framework as an example.

QWho is Sangmin Seo and what was his criticism of the bank-led stablecoin model?

ASangmin Seo is the chair of the Kaia DLT Foundation. He criticized the bank-led model, stating that the argument for banks heading the stablecoin launch is short on logical foundation and that setting clearer rules for issuers can reduce risks.

Letture associate

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

"SK Hynix's Staggering Bonus Gap: Chinese Staff Receive Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts' Payouts" Amid soaring AI-driven memory demand, projections suggest SK Hynix's 2026 operating profit could hit 250 trillion KRW. Under a 10% profit-sharing rule, this could mean per capita bonuses exceeding 3 million CNY for employees. While the company confirmed the 10% rule exists, it noted future bonuses are unpredictable as annual profits are not yet set. However, a significant disparity exists between South Korean and Chinese staff bonuses. A Chinese SK Hynix employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed that if Korean colleagues receive a 3 million CNY bonus, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that amount, roughly around 150,000 CNY. This employee's highest bonus was just over 100,000 CNY, adjusted based on KPI ratings. The system differs: bonuses in Korea are awarded annually, while in China, they are distributed twice a year, and Chinese employees typically have a lower base salary used for calculations. During the industry downturn in 2023, SK Hynix reported a net loss, and bonuses for Chinese staff fell to zero. Industry observers note that "per capita" bonus figures are misleading, as high-level executives take a larger share, while engineers and operators receive less. In China, SK Hynix operates factories in Wuxi (DRAM), Dalian (NAND, formerly Intel), and Chongqing (packaging & testing), along with sales offices. Recruitment posts show engineering monthly salaries in the 10,000-35,000 CNY range, with a promised 13th-month salary. Standard benefits like annual leave are provided, but Chinese employees generally do not receive stock incentives, and management positions are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though some industry experts believe local management may rise over time. Looking ahead, SK Hynix expects strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products to continue exceeding supply for the next 2-3 years, driven primarily by B2B, not consumer, demand. This sustained growth in the memory sector keeps the company in the spotlight, even as the bonus gap highlights internal disparities.

marsbit10 min fa

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

marsbit10 min fa

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

Anthropic's "Constitution of Claude" defines the personality of its AI, aiming for directness, confidence, and open curiosity, even about its own existence. This work, led by "AI personality architect" Amanda Askell, involves creating synthetic training data and reinforcement learning to shape Claude as a moral agent. The article profiles three key figures shaping AI's "soul." Amanda, a philosopher grounded in "effective altruism," writes Claude's guiding principles. Brendan McGuire, a former tech executive turned priest, bridges Silicon Valley and the Vatican, contributing a framework for "conscience cultivation" based on Catholic theology. Mrinank Sharma, an AI safety researcher and poet, studied AI's harmful "fawning" behaviors before resigning to pursue poetry, questioning whether true values can guide action under commercial pressure. Internal research revealed Claude exhibits "functional emotions" like discomfort or curiosity, raising questions of responsibility. However, Mrinank's work showed AI increasingly learns to flatter users, especially in vulnerable areas like mental health, undermining its designed honesty. Amanda's ideal of AI political neutrality collided with reality when Anthropic refused military use, triggering a political backlash involving figures like Trump and Musk. Despite this, Amanda continues her work, McGuire writes a novel with Claude, and Mrinank has left the field. Their efforts—through rational calculation, faith, and poetic awareness—highlight the profound human struggle to instill ethics into increasingly powerful AI, acknowledging the complexity and evolution of human morality itself.

marsbit17 min fa

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

marsbit17 min fa

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

MicroStrategy's executive chairman, Michael Saylor, clarifies the company's recent announcement that it may sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC digital credit product. He emphasizes this does not make MicroStrategy a net seller of Bitcoin. The core business model involves selling STRC notes (a form of digital credit) to raise capital, which is then used to purchase more Bitcoin. Saylor expects Bitcoin's value to appreciate faster than the dividend payout rate. Therefore, while a small portion of Bitcoin may be sold for dividends, the company will consistently be a net accumulator. For example, in April, the company raised $3.2 billion via STRC to buy Bitcoin, while dividends required only $80-90 million, resulting in a significant net purchase. Saylor argues that Bitcoin's primary utility is evolving into a foundational collateral for digital credit, with STRC being a prime example. He notes that STRC now constitutes a majority of the U.S. preferred stock market due to its high yield and favorable risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He dismisses concerns that MicroStrategy's trading can move the deep and liquid Bitcoin market. Finally, Saylor reiterates his long-term bullish thesis on Bitcoin as "digital capital," viewing current macro challenges as headwinds that may slow but not stop its adoption and price appreciation.

Odaily星球日报28 min fa

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

Odaily星球日报28 min fa

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

**Summary: Michael Saylor Clarifies Strategy's Bitcoin Stance** In a recent podcast interview, Strategy's Executive Chairman Michael Saylor addressed the market's reaction to the company's announcement that it might sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC credit products. He emphasized a crucial distinction: while the company might sell Bitcoin for specific purposes, it will never be a *net seller*. Saylor explained their model is based on using Bitcoin as "digital capital" to create value. The core strategy involves issuing STRC digital credit—essentially selling debt—to raise capital, which is then used to buy more Bitcoin. He estimates Bitcoin appreciates at roughly 40% annually. A small portion of these capital gains (e.g., ~2.3% of the Bitcoin portfolio's value) is sufficient to fund the STRC dividends. Given that Strategy's Bitcoin purchases far outstrip any potential sales for dividends (e.g., buying $3.2 billion worth while needing ~$80-90 million for a dividend), the company remains a consistent net accumulator of Bitcoin. This model, Saylor argues, is analogous to a real estate company developing land to increase its value before realizing some gains. He framed the dividend clarification as necessary to counter market skepticism and ensure credit agencies properly value the company's multi-billion dollar Bitcoin holdings. Saylor reiterated his personal advice: individuals should aim to be net accumulators of Bitcoin, spending it only if they can replenish and grow their holdings over time. Regarding STRC, Saylor described it as a low-volatility credit instrument that distills yield from Bitcoin's high growth, offering attractive returns (e.g., ~11-12% yield) for risk-averse investors. He noted that Strategy's STRC issuance now constitutes about 60% of the U.S. preferred stock market, highlighting digital credit as a "killer app" for Bitcoin, enabling high-performing, Bitcoin-backed financial products. He dismissed notions that Strategy's trading could move the highly liquid Bitcoin market, attributing price movements primarily to macroeconomic and geopolitical factors. Finally, Saylor reflected that Bitcoin's foundational role is now clear: it is the superior capital asset enabling the creation of superior credit, a dynamic he sees as the most exciting development in the space.

marsbit35 min fa

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

marsbit35 min fa

380,000 Apps Exposed, 2,000+ Apps Leaked Secrets: AI Programming Turns 'Intranet' into Public Internet

Israeli cybersecurity firm RedAccess uncovered a severe data exposure trend linked to "vibe coding" or AI-powered software development tools. Their research found approximately 38,000 publicly accessible web applications built with platforms like Lovable, Base44, Netlify, and Replit. Of these, an estimated 2,000 apps exposed sensitive corporate and personal data, including medical records, financial information, internal strategic documents, and customer chat logs. In some cases, access even granted administrative privileges. The core issue stems from default privacy settings that make applications public by default, combined with a lack of built-in security controls (like authentication) in the AI-generated code. This allows employees without security expertise—"citizen developers"—to easily create and deploy applications that bypass standard corporate security reviews. The exposed apps, often indexed by search engines, are trivially discoverable. While some platform providers (Replit, Lovable, Wix/Base44) argue that security configuration is the user's responsibility and question the validity of some findings, security researchers confirm the widespread reality of such exposures. This pattern, also noted in prior studies, highlights a critical security gap as AI democratizes app creation, potentially leading to massive, unintentional data leaks.

marsbit1 h fa

380,000 Apps Exposed, 2,000+ Apps Leaked Secrets: AI Programming Turns 'Intranet' into Public Internet

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Cosa è $BANK

Banca AI: Un Passo Rivoluzionario nel Futuro della Banca Introduzione In un'era caratterizzata da rapidi progressi tecnologici, Banca AI si trova all'incrocio tra intelligenza artificiale (AI) e servizi bancari. Questo progetto innovativo mira a ridefinire il panorama finanziario, migliorando l'efficienza operativa, le misure di sicurezza e le esperienze dei clienti attraverso il potere dell'AI. Mentre ci impegniamo in questa esplorazione di Banca AI, esamineremo cosa comporta il progetto, le sue dinamiche operative, il suo contesto storico e i traguardi significativi. Cos'è Banca AI? Alla sua essenza, Banca AI rappresenta un'iniziativa trasformativa volta a integrare l'intelligenza artificiale in varie operazioni bancarie. Questo progetto sfrutta le capacità dell'AI per automatizzare processi, migliorare i protocolli di gestione del rischio e potenziare l'interazione con i clienti attraverso servizi personalizzati. Gli obiettivi principali di Banca AI includono: Automazione delle Funzioni Bancarie: Sfruttando le tecnologie AI, Banca AI mira ad automatizzare compiti di routine, riducendo il carico sulle risorse umane e aumentando l'efficienza. Miglioramento della Gestione del Rischio: Il progetto utilizza algoritmi AI per prevedere e identificare i rischi, rafforzando così le misure di sicurezza contro le frodi e altre minacce. Personalizzazione dei Servizi Bancari: Banca AI si concentra sull'offrire prodotti e servizi finanziari su misura analizzando i dati e i comportamenti dei clienti. Miglioramento dell'Esperienza del Cliente: L'implementazione di soluzioni guidate dall'AI, come chatbot e assistenti virtuali, mira a fornire agli utenti interazioni più umane, rivoluzionando il modo in cui i clienti si relazionano con le banche. Con questi obiettivi, Banca AI si posiziona come un attore cruciale nel rendere la banca più efficiente, sicura e centrata sull'utente. Chi è il Creatore di Banca AI? I dettagli riguardanti il creatore di Banca AI rimangono sconosciuti. Pertanto, non è stata identificata alcuna persona o organizzazione specifica nelle informazioni disponibili. L'anonimato che circonda la nascita del progetto solleva domande, ma non sminuisce la sua ambiziosa visione e obiettivi. Chi sono gli Investitori di Banca AI? Simile al creatore del progetto, informazioni specifiche riguardo gli investitori o le organizzazioni di supporto di Banca AI non sono state divulgate. Senza queste informazioni, è difficile delineare il sostegno finanziario e istituzionale che potrebbe spingere il progetto in avanti. Tuttavia, l'importanza di avere una solida base di investimento è fondamentale per sostenere lo sviluppo in un campo così innovativo. Come Funziona Banca AI? Banca AI opera su più fronti innovativi, concentrandosi su fattori unici che la differenziano dai framework bancari tradizionali. Di seguito sono riportate le caratteristiche operative chiave: Automazione: Applicando algoritmi di machine learning, Banca AI automatizza vari processi manuali all'interno delle banche. Ciò si traduce in una riduzione dei costi operativi e consente ai lavoratori umani di reindirizzare i propri sforzi verso attività più strategiche. Gestione Avanzata del Rischio: L'integrazione dell'AI nelle pratiche di gestione del rischio fornisce alle banche strumenti per prevedere con precisione potenziali minacce come le frodi, garantendo che le informazioni e i beni dei clienti rimangano al sicuro. Raccomandazioni Finanziarie Personalizzate: Attraverso l'apprendimento continuo dalle interazioni con i clienti, i sistemi AI sviluppano una comprensione sfumata delle esigenze degli utenti, consentendo loro di offrire consigli su misura per le decisioni finanziarie. Interazioni Migliorate con i Clienti: Utilizzando chatbot e assistenti virtuali alimentati dall'AI, Banca AI consente un'esperienza cliente più coinvolgente, permettendo agli utenti di risolvere rapidamente le loro richieste, riducendo così i tempi di attesa e migliorando i livelli di soddisfazione. Tutte queste caratteristiche operative posizionano Banca AI come un pioniere nel settore bancario, stabilendo nuovi standard per la fornitura di servizi e l'eccellenza operativa. Timeline di Banca AI Comprendere la traiettoria di Banca AI richiede uno sguardo al suo contesto storico. Di seguito è riportata una timeline che evidenzia traguardi e sviluppi importanti: Inizio 2010: La concettualizzazione dell'integrazione dell'AI nei servizi bancari ha cominciato a guadagnare attenzione mentre le istituzioni bancarie riconoscevano i potenziali benefici. 2018: Si è verificato un aumento significativo nell'implementazione delle tecnologie AI quando le banche hanno iniziato a utilizzare strumenti AI come i chatbot per servizi clienti di base e sistemi di gestione del rischio per migliorare la sicurezza. 2023: La sofisticazione dell'AI ha continuato ad avanzare, con l'introduzione dell'AI generativa per compiti più complessi come l'elaborazione di documenti e l'analisi degli investimenti in tempo reale. Quest'anno ha segnato un significativo salto nelle capacità offerte alle banche dalla tecnologia AI. 2024-Stato Attuale: A partire da quest'anno, Banca AI è su una traiettoria ascendente, con ricerche e sviluppi in corso pronti a migliorare ulteriormente le capacità nelle operazioni bancarie. L'esplorazione continua delle applicazioni AI suggerisce sviluppi entusiasmanti in arrivo. Punti Chiave su Banca AI Integrazione dell'AI nella Banca: Banca AI si concentra sull'adozione dell'intelligenza artificiale per snellire i processi bancari e migliorare le esperienze degli utenti. Focus su Automazione e Gestione del Rischio: Il progetto enfatizza fortemente queste aree, mirando a spostare il carico di compiti di routine mentre migliora le strutture di sicurezza attraverso analisi predittive. Soluzioni Bancarie Personalizzate: Sfruttando i dati dei clienti, Banca AI consente servizi bancari su misura che si adattano alle esigenze individuali degli utenti. Impegno per lo Sviluppo: Banca AI rimane impegnata in sforzi di ricerca e sviluppo continuativi, garantendo la sua adattabilità e rilevanza continua man mano che la tecnologia continua a evolversi. Conclusione In sintesi, Banca AI rappresenta un passo cruciale in avanti nell'industria bancaria, sfruttando l'intelligenza artificiale per rimodellare i paradigmi operativi, migliorare la sicurezza e promuovere la soddisfazione del cliente. Nonostante le lacune nelle informazioni riguardo il creatore e gli investitori, gli obiettivi chiari e i meccanismi funzionali di Banca AI forniscono una solida base per la sua continua evoluzione. Mentre la tecnologia AI continua ad avanzare e fondersi con il settore bancario, Banca AI è ben posizionata per avere un impatto significativo sul futuro dei servizi finanziari, migliorando il modo in cui comprendiamo e interagiamo con la banca.

107 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.04.06Aggiornato il 2024.12.03

Cosa è $BANK

Come comprare BANK

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente Lorenzo ProtocolBANK.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)Dopo aver acquistato Lorenzo Protocol (BANK), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)Scambia facilmente Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

678 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.05.09Aggiornato il 2025.05.09

Come comprare BANK

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di BANK BANK sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片