Another GIGGLE bounce coming? History says yes, but only IF…

ambcryptoPubblicato 2025-12-12Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-12

Introduzione

GIGGLE token has extended its decline, with a 71% drawdown since November, and is now trading near the bottom of a falling wedge pattern. Oversold conditions and compressed momentum suggest a potential turning point, though market sentiment remains fragile as liquidity shifts to larger-cap assets. Key support lies near $70, with a break below potentially leading to a test of the $47.30 zone. Despite heavy selling, the token is at a historical bounce area, with RSI indicating extremely oversold conditions that often precede recovery attempts. However, any rebound is likely corrective unless resistance between $160-$172 is broken. Macro headwinds, including a defensive risk sentiment and rising Bitcoin dominance, continue to pressure memecoins, limiting upside potential even if technical structures appear bullish.

Giggle Fund [GIGGLE] extended its decline this month, deepening a drawdown that reached 71% since November. The token now traded near the wedge bottom, where oversold conditions and compressed momentum set up a possible turning point.

Market sentiment stayed fragile across memecoins as liquidity rotated into larger caps. Rising volume accelerated GIGGLE’s downside momentum as traders cut exposure to higher-risk tokens.

Pressure builds near key supports

At press time, volume rose while price fell, showing strong bearish control. GIGGLE continued testing the upper boundary of its falling wedge but failed to reclaim any momentum.

The key downside area sat near $70.

Losing this level exposed support around $47.30, a zone aligned with earlier liquidity absorption and the wedge’s historical reaction line. A sustained break below that level could pull GIGGLE into deeper declines.

The lack of strong support between these price levels and the $47 zone increased the risk of volatility spikes before stabilization.

Despite heavy selling, GIGGLE tapped the lower boundary of the falling wedge again, the same region that triggered sharp bounces in past cycles.

RSI dropped to extremely oversold levels, showing washed-out momentum. This combination often preceded recovery attempts if buyers stepped in.

Resistance between $160 and $172 remained the zone GIGGLE must break to reclaim higher ranges.

Until then, any rebound looked corrective rather than a full trend reversal. GIGGLE also needed to hold its daily ascending support, as a breakdown would mirror wedge failure patterns and extend the downside.

Macro headwinds weigh on memecoins

Bitcoin [BTC] and Ethereum [ETH] slipped ahead of the recent Fed decision, pulling the broader market lower. Risk sentiment turned defensive, with the Fear & Greed Index at 29/100.

Memecoins like GIGGLE typically weaken during such rotations as traders shift toward Bitcoin dominance and stable assets.

BTC dominance rising to 58.6% reinforced that preference for lower-risk exposure.

Sector-wide weakness also showed a steady rotation out of meme tokens as Funding Rates compressed and liquidity thinned.

GIGGLE’s volume spikes during down-moves indicated forced unwinds rather than accumulation.

Until sentiment improves across the meme sector, upside momentum may stay limited even with bullish technical structures forming.


Final Thoughts

  • GIGGLE’s decline pushed the token into an oversold wedge retest, a setup that often precedes relief moves.
  • With support tightening, traders might watch how GIGGLE behaves near this zone over the coming sessions.

Letture associate

Public Chain Moat Only 3/10? Alliance DAO Founder's Remarks Ignite Crypto Community Debate

Alliance DAO founder qw (@QwQiao) sparked intense debate in the crypto community by claiming that Layer 1 blockchains have "limited moats," rating them only 3/10 in terms of sustainable competitive advantage. This triggered strong reactions from key industry figures. Dragonfly Capital partner Haseeb strongly disagreed, arguing that Ethereum’s decade-long dominance despite well-funded challengers proves its strong moat. Others, like Multicoin’s Kyle Samani and researchers from Ethereum and Circle, questioned whether liquidity alone constitutes a real moat, with some calling it fleeting and unreliable. In response, qw elaborated on his moat rating framework, giving traditional giants like Microsoft, Apple, and Visa perfect scores (10/10) based on revenue models and infrastructure, while rating top crypto projects around 5/10. He notably rated Bitcoin at 9/10, citing its unique founding story and Lindy effect, but deducted a point due to uncertainties around security and quantum threats. The debate expanded into what truly constitutes a moat in crypto. Critics argued qw’s framework overemphasizes current revenue and undervalues network effects, trust, and technological ethos. Defenders of blockchain moats pointed to elements like developer ecosystems, brand strength, switching costs, and application diversity as core defensive attributes. The article concludes that the crypto industry is still young and small compared to traditional finance and tech giants. Rather than fixating on abstract moat concepts, the priority should be solving real user needs at scale, driving adoption, and expanding overall market reach.

marsbit1 h fa

Public Chain Moat Only 3/10? Alliance DAO Founder's Remarks Ignite Crypto Community Debate

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片