Analyst’s Bitcoin Price Crash Prediction From May 2025 Resurfaces And It Says The Bottom Is Not In

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-02-09Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-09

Introduzione

A previously published Bitcoin price crash projection from analyst KillaXBT, dating back to May 13, 2025, has regained attention for accurately predicting the current market downturn. The model uses rotational market mathematics to identify cycle stages—accumulation, distribution, and breakdown—and signaled that Bitcoin had not yet reached a macro bottom. The analysis highlighted key levels, including accumulation phases that fueled the rally and distribution zones near $115,000–$120,000 where exhaustion signals emerged. The chart correctly anticipated rejections at highs, fading momentum, and eventual breakdowns, with Bitcoin transitioning into mid-range consolidation around $100,000 before falling further. Currently, Bitcoin is trading in a lower distribution band near $70,000, with the model suggesting extended bearish consolidation. Relief rallies lack strength, and volatility remains high on declines. The projection indicates a potential capitulation toward $50,000 to complete the distribution phase, concluding that the true market bottom has not yet been established.

A previously published Bitcoin price crash projection from May 13, 2025, has re-entered market discourse after several prominent crypto traders on X recirculated the chart and commended the foresight behind the analysis from KillaXBT. The model mapped Bitcoin’s full cycle structure — from accumulation to distribution and breakdown — long before the current correction unfolded. Now, the same framework is signaling that Bitcoin has yet to establish a macro bottom.

Chart Signals That Nailed The Bitcoin Price Crash

KillaXBT’s framework is built on rotational market mathematics, measuring how many times price cycles are within a range before exhaustion. The analyst segmented Bitcoin’s structure into consolidation blocks and assigned swing counts to identify when liquidity had been fully absorbed.

In the early phase, accumulation rotations labeled “(2×2)+1 = 5” and “(5×2)+1 = 11” defined the base that ultimately fueled Bitcoin’s impulsive rally. These counts indicated that internal liquidity cycling was complete, clearing the path for expansion. Once that move matured, the price transitioned into a high-range consolidation beneath the cycle peak.

Inside the 115,000–120,000 distribution zone, the chart identified overlapping exhaustion clusters marked “(2×5)+1 = 9” and “(3×2)+1 = 7.” For traders, stacked counts at highs typically signal supply absorption. Although Bitcoin printed marginal higher highs, momentum was fading — a textbook late-stage distribution signal.

Source: Chart from KillaXBT on X

Market behavior followed that roadmap. Bitcoin formed repeated rejection wicks near the highs, upside momentum slowed, and breakout attempts failed to secure acceptance above resistance. Volume compression reinforced the distribution thesis. Instead of continuation, the price rolled over.

The model then mapped a transition into mid-range consolidation around the 100,000 psychological level, with BTCUSDT referenced near 102,603. Annotated “(2×2)+1 = 5, then subtract 2 = 3,” the structure signaled weakening bounce capacity. Price action mirrored the setup: multiple support tests, lower highs, and eventual breakdown — completing the crash phase outlined in the May 2025 forecast.

Bitcoin Price Could Drop Further Before Hitting Bottom

The resurfaced chart’s larger significance lies in its forward projection. After the six-figure range failed, the model guided Bitcoin into a lower distribution band around 70,000. This zone carried heavier rotational counts — “4×2 = 8” and “(5×5)+1 = 26” — implying extended consolidation within a bearish continuation framework.

Current market behavior continues to align with that structure. Bitcoin has already rotated into lower support territory following the 100K breakdown, while volatility has expanded on selloffs rather than recoveries. Relief rallies remain corrective, lacking the impulsive follow-through required to confirm bottom formation.

The chart’s final stage shows a potential capitulation toward the $50,000 area, marked by a sharp move below the lower range. Structurally, this is an unfinished downside that completes the current distribution phase.

The sequence is straightforward: accumulation pushed prices higher, the rise led to distribution, and now distribution is causing further breakdowns. Because no consolidation has shown the expansion profile typical of a macro base, the model maintains that the true bottom is not yet in.

BTC trading at $69,162 on the 1D chart | Source: BTCUSDT on Tradingview.com

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main prediction of the resurfaced Bitcoin price analysis from May 2025?

AThe analysis predicts that the Bitcoin price crash is not over yet and that the true macro bottom has not been established, with a potential further drop toward the $50,000 area.

QWho created the Bitcoin price projection model that is being discussed?

AThe model was created by an analyst known as KillaXBT.

QWhat key mathematical concept does KillaXBT's framework use to analyze Bitcoin's price action?

AThe framework is built on rotational market mathematics, measuring how many times price cycles are within a range before exhaustion, using formulas like (2x2)+1=5 to identify liquidity absorption and exhaustion clusters.

QAccording to the model, what was the significance of the distribution zone between $115,000 and $120,000?

AThis zone was identified as a high-range distribution area with overlapping exhaustion clusters, signaling supply absorption and marking a late-stage distribution phase before the price rolled over.

QWhat is the model's final projected stage for the current Bitcoin price cycle?

AThe model's final projected stage is a potential capitulation event, involving a sharp move below the lower consolidation range toward the $50,000 area to complete the current distribution phase.

Letture associate

Macroeconomic Origins of the African Payments Market Structure

Africa’s payment landscape exhibits the world’s highest mobile money penetration and fastest cryptocurrency adoption. This is not a market anomaly but a macroeconomic inevitability driven by deep structural factors: a vast, young population, heavy reliance on commodity exports and remittances generating massive cross‑border payment needs, and a chronically underdeveloped formal banking system plagued by de‑risking, high inflation, and currency instability. This vacuum has allowed mobile money (e.g., M‑Pesa) to become the primary payment channel domestically, while cryptocurrencies—particularly stablecoins—serve as a store of value against local‑currency depreciation and a lower‑cost cross‑border medium. The key divide is the Sahara: North Africa integrates with the MENA oil‑centric financial system, while Sub‑Saharan Africa, facing acute dollar shortages and fragmented currencies, is the epicenter of this fintech surge. Structural reliance on dollars, driven by trade deficits and weak local currency credibility, creates persistent dollar scarcity, which crypto and mobile payments effectively address. Efforts like the Pan‑African Payment and Settlement System (PAPSS) aim at de‑dollarization, but these alternatives will remain essential as long as underlying economic constraints—commodity dependence, limited industrialization, and financial exclusion—persist.

marsbit3 min fa

Macroeconomic Origins of the African Payments Market Structure

marsbit3 min fa

AAOI Defies Trend with Over 10% Surge, 'New Stock God' Serenity Predicts Potential to Double Again

On June 4th, despite a significant sell-off in the broader AI and semiconductor sector triggered by Broadcom's disappointing guidance, Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI) surged over 11%, showcasing a sharp divergence in market sentiment. Broadcom's warning about potential supply chain diversification by key customer Google and a weaker-than-expected outlook punctured the high-flying AI valuation narrative. This led to heavy selling in names like Broadcom (-12.6%) and Micron (-7%), with funds rotating into traditional industrial stocks. AAOI defied this trend. The stock has experienced high volatility recently, driven by bullish analyst coverage, notably from Rosenblatt which raised its price target to $220. Key catalysts include initial 800G optical module revenue from Amazon, potential certification from Oracle, and strong demand across its product portfolio. The company has reported cumulative orders for 800G/1.6T modules exceeding $324 million and is aggressively expanding manufacturing capacity in Texas, targeting an annualized run-rate of $1.4 billion for its module business by Q3 2027. However, AAOI's fundamentals present a mixed picture. Its Q1 2026 results missed expectations, showing a GAAP net loss, and Q2 guidance points to merely breakeven adjusted EPS. Risks include a delayed 800G production ramp to the second half of the year and high dependence on a few key cloud customers. Recent stock sales by company executives near price highs also noted. The article suggests AAOI's rally reflects a market beginning to differentiate within the AI ecosystem. While Broadcom's issues prompted a reassessment of custom ASIC and customer concentration risks, funds flowing into AAOI indicate a belief that the "physical bottleneck" narrative for optical connectivity—where supply remains tight—remains intact and is somewhat decoupled from the current sector weakness. The sustainability of AAOI's premium valuation now hinges on the successful execution of its production plans and upcoming quarterly results.

marsbit10 min fa

AAOI Defies Trend with Over 10% Surge, 'New Stock God' Serenity Predicts Potential to Double Again

marsbit10 min fa

Worried about AI's Self-Evolution, Anthropic Intends to Stop Training?

In early 2026, Anthropic signaled a significant shift in its public narrative regarding AI development timelines and safety. In June, its Anthropic Institute published a detailed article, "When AI builds itself," presenting internal data suggesting accelerating AI self-improvement. Key figures included over 80% of merged code being written by Claude and a 52x speedup in certain optimization tasks. The article outlined three future scenarios, with the most speculative being full recursive self-improvement (RSI), where AI autonomously builds better successors. Anthropic stated RSI is "possible" and may arrive faster than most institutions are prepared for. This narrative pivot followed a series of strategic moves. In January, CEO Dario Amodei wrote about a powerful self-improvement feedback loop. In February, Anthropic revised its Responsible Scaling Policy, removing a core commitment to pause training if capabilities outstripped safety controls, citing the risk of falling behind competitors. This change coincided with reported pressure from the US Department of Defense. By May, Anthropic's valuation had soared to $965 billion. Anthropic's stance was mirrored by other industry leaders. DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis adjusted his AGI timeline to "by 2029" and admitted to using provocative language like "foothills of the singularity" to create urgency. OpenAI also released a model claiming a key role in its own creation process. The article's carefully calibrated tone—presenting dramatic data alongside qualifying footnotes—exemplifies a balancing act between signaling technological acceleration and managing commercial, regulatory, and safety imperatives. External experts offered contrasting interpretations of the same data, from warnings of catastrophic risk akin to Chernobyl to skepticism that current automation merely handles "grunt work," not genius. The coordinated narrative shift among top labs highlights the complex interplay between perceived technical inflection points and strategic communication aimed at investors, regulators, and the public.

marsbit12 min fa

Worried about AI's Self-Evolution, Anthropic Intends to Stop Training?

marsbit12 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片