After Three Days on Hotel Wi-Fi, My Crypto Wallet Was Drained

marsbitPubblicato 2026-01-09Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-09

Introduzione

While on vacation, the author connected to an unsecured hotel Wi-Fi network without a password, only a captive portal login. After discussing cryptocurrency topics on a phone call in a shared space, an attacker nearby identified him as a crypto user with a Phantom wallet. The attacker executed a man-in-the-middle attack, injecting malicious code into a webpage the author visited. While using JupiterExchange for a swap, a fraudulent transaction approval request was triggered, disguised as a legitimate platform action. The author approved what appeared to be an authorization or session confirmation—not a direct fund transfer—granting the attacker permission to access his wallet. Days after leaving the hotel, the attacker drained his SOL, tokens, and NFTs. The author lost around $5,000 from a secondary hot wallet, emphasizing mistakes: using public Wi-Fi, discussing crypto in public, and approving transactions without thorough verification. He advises using mobile hotspots, avoiding public crypto discussions, and scrutinizing every wallet request.

Original Author:The Smart Ape

Original Compilation: Deep Tide TechFlow

A few days ago, I went with my family to a very nice hotel for the year-end holiday. One day after leaving the hotel, my wallet was completely drained. I couldn't figure out why, as I hadn't clicked on any phishing links or signed any malicious transactions.

After hours of investigation and seeking help from experts, I finally uncovered the truth. It all turned out to be due to the hotel's Wi-Fi network, a brief phone call, and a series of foolish mistakes.

Like most cryptocurrency enthusiasts, I brought my laptop with me, thinking I could squeeze in some work while on vacation with my family. My wife repeatedly insisted that I shouldn't work during these three days—I really should have listened to her.

Like other guests, I connected to the hotel's Wi-Fi network. This network didn't require a password; it only needed to be logged into via a captive portal.

I worked as usual in the hotel without doing anything risky: I didn't create new wallets, click on strange links, or visit suspicious decentralized applications (dApps). I just checked X (Twitter), my balances, Discord, Telegram, etc.

At one point, I received a call from a crypto friend, and we chatted about market trends, Bitcoin, and other cryptocurrency-related topics. But what I didn't know was that someone nearby was eavesdropping on our conversation and realized I was involved in cryptocurrency. This was my first mistake. The other party learned from our conversation that I was using a Phantom wallet and that I was a user with significant holdings.

This made me his target.

In public Wi-Fi networks, all devices share the same network, and the visibility between devices is actually much higher than you might think. There is almost no real protection between users, which creates an opportunity for "Man-in-the-Middle Attacks." The attacker acts like a middleman, quietly inserting themselves between you and the internet, much like someone secretly reading and tampering with your mail before it reaches you.

While I was browsing the web on the hotel Wi-Fi, one website appeared to load normally, but in reality, malicious code was injected behind the page. I didn't notice anything unusual at the time. If I had installed some security tools, I might have detected these issues, but unfortunately, I hadn't.

Normally, websites might request your wallet to sign certain operations. The Phantom wallet would pop up a window, and you could choose to approve or reject. Generally, you would sign without suspicion because you trust the website and the browser. However, I shouldn't have done so that day.

Just as I was performing a token swap on the @JupiterExchange platform, the malicious code triggered a wallet request that replaced my normal swap operation. I could have detected it as a malicious request by carefully checking the transaction details, but since I was already performing a swap on Jupiter, I didn't suspect anything.

That day, I didn't sign any transaction to transfer funds; instead, I signed an authorization. This was the reason my assets were stolen days later.

The malicious code didn't directly ask me to send SOL (Solana), as that would have been too obvious. Instead, it requested me to "authorize access," "approve account," or "confirm session." In simple terms, I was actually giving another address permission to operate on my behalf.

I approved it because I mistakenly thought it was related to my operation on Jupiter. The message that popped up in the Phantom wallet at the time looked very technical, showing no amounts and no prompt for an immediate transfer.

And that was all the attacker needed. He waited patiently until I left the hotel before taking action. He transferred my SOL, withdrew my tokens, and moved my NFTs to another address.

I never thought something like this would happen to me. Fortunately, this wasn't my main wallet but a hot wallet used for specific operations, not for long-term asset holding. But even so, I made many mistakes, and I believe I am primarily responsible for this.

First, I should never have connected to the hotel's public Wi-Fi. I should have used my phone's hotspot for internet access.

My second mistake was talking about cryptocurrency in the hotel's public area, where many people might have overheard our conversation. My father once warned me never to let others know you're involved in cryptocurrency. This time, I was lucky; some people have even faced kidnapping or worse because of their crypto assets.

Another mistake was approving the wallet request without paying full attention. Because I was sure the request came from Jupiter, I didn't analyze it carefully. In fact, every wallet request should be carefully reviewed, even on applications you trust. Requests can be intercepted and may not actually come from the app you think.

In the end, I lost about $5,000 from a secondary wallet. While it wasn't the worst-case scenario, it was still very frustrating.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the primary security vulnerability that led to the author's wallet being drained?

AThe author connected to the hotel's unsecured public Wi-Fi network, which allowed an attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attack, intercept and inject malicious code into web pages, and trick the author into signing a malicious transaction approval.

QHow did the attacker identify the author as a potential target for the cryptocurrency theft?

AThe attacker overheard the author's phone conversation about cryptocurrency, market trends, and Bitcoin in a public area, which revealed that the author used a Phantom wallet and was a sizable holder.

QWhat specific action did the author unknowingly approve that led to the theft days later?

AThe author approved a malicious transaction that granted authorization or permission for another address to operate on their behalf, rather than directly transferring funds. This approval was disguised as part of a normal token swap on Jupiter Exchange.

QWhat security measures does the author mention could have prevented this incident?

AThe author states they should have used a mobile hotspot instead of public Wi-Fi, avoided discussing cryptocurrency in public, and carefully inspected every wallet transaction request, even from trusted applications.

QWhat was the financial impact of the attack on the author?

AThe author lost approximately $5,000 from a secondary hot wallet used for specific operations, not their main wallet, which mitigated the severity of the loss.

Letture associate

How Will the Price Move Before SpaceX's Next Share Unlock?

TL;DR Investors buying SPCX after SpaceX's IPO are not simply investing in a typical tech stock. It’s a high-valuation asset driven by Musk's narrative, Starlink, and space transport potential, but with a key twist: a very small initial float of ~4% has led to significant post-listing price appreciation. The current price action reflects a timing gap. Before the first lock-up expiration (estimated around August, subject to official confirmation), scarcity and high demand could continue to push prices up. Short-term bulls focus on low float, FOMO, and potential index inclusion. However, bears point to the supply dynamics that will change post-lockup. Existing shareholders still hold over 95% of shares, which will be released in stages starting from the first unlock window. This introduces future selling pressure from low-cost holders. The upcoming Q2 earnings report is a critical catalyst before the unlock. It will test whether the company's fundamentals can justify the current ~$2.1T valuation. Strong results could support the pre-unlock momentum, while weak figures could amplify concerns about future supply. The trading thesis is shifting from immediate scarcity ("can't buy enough") to evaluating future absorption capacity ("who will buy when more supply hits"). The path ahead hinges on the specifics of the unlock schedule, Q2 earnings performance, and whether anticipated passive index buying materializes.

marsbit1 min fa

How Will the Price Move Before SpaceX's Next Share Unlock?

marsbit1 min fa

Bitcoin Short-Term Bullish Structure Validated, HYPE Low-Entry Window Opens | Guest Analysis

**Market Analysis Summary (Week of June 2026)** **Overall Market Context:** The market environment is exceptionally complex, with the unexpected US-Iran agreement and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz triggering a global asset repricing and significant volatility. This heightened noise underscores the importance of a structured analytical framework. **Bitcoin (BTC) Analysis & Strategy:** * **Current Status:** The price has climbed above $65,000, currently in a rebound phase (segment 38-39) following a complex 12-segment correction from the May high of $82,850. * **Key Levels:** * **Primary Resistance:** $69,500–$70,500. A successful breakout above $65,000 targets this zone. * **Primary Support:** $65,000 (immediate), followed by $59,000–$60,000 and $55,000. * **Weekly Outlook & Strategy:** The focus is on the confirmation of the $65,000 level. * **Bullish Scenario (Hold $65K):** A move toward the $69.5K–$70.5K resistance zone is anticipated, which is a potential area for initiating medium-term short positions. * **Bearish Scenario (Break below $65K):** A retest of the $60,000–$62,000 support range is likely. * **Medium-Term Strategy:** Currently neutral. Plan to establish short positions (up to 60% allocation) either in the $69.5K–$70.5K resistance zone upon signs of rejection, or on a confirmed breakdown below $65,000 and further below $59K–$60K. * **Short-Term Strategy:** Utilize 30% capital for scalping opportunities based on support/resistance levels, using 30/60-minute charts. **HYPE Analysis & Strategy:** * **Current Status:** The price has stabilized around $52 after a four-segment decline from the June high of $75.87 and is now in a rebound (segment 50-51). * **Key Levels:** * **Primary Resistance:** $62.50–$64.57. Watch for potential rejection here to form a lower high. * **Primary Support:** $52–$55.50, followed by $47–$49. * **Weekly Outlook & Strategy:** Adopt a "buy on dips, avoid chasing rallies" approach. * **Core View:** Monitor the price action and potential formation of a lower high ("endpoint 51") in the $62.50–$64.57 resistance zone. * **Short-Term Strategy:** Consider light long positions (max 30% allocation) if the price finds support and shows reversal signals in the $52–$54.50 or deeper $47–$49 support zones, confirmed by proprietary quantitative bottom signals. **Trade Review:** Last week's HYPE short-term long trade, executed based on proprietary "Price Difference" and "Momentum" model signals, yielded a profit of approximately 11.88%. The entry was near $54.39 and exit near $60.85. **Risk Management Reminder:** Always set an initial stop-loss upon entry. Move stop-loss to breakeven at +1% profit, then trail it upwards to lock in gains as the trade progresses. *Disclaimer: All analysis, models, and strategies are based on personal technical analysis for educational purposes only, not investment advice. The market carries inherent risk.*

Odaily星球日报6 min fa

Bitcoin Short-Term Bullish Structure Validated, HYPE Low-Entry Window Opens | Guest Analysis

Odaily星球日报6 min fa

Bitcoin Short-Term Bullish Structure Validated, HYPE Accumulation Window Opens | Guest Analysis

**Bitcoin and HYPE Market Analysis: Short-Term Outlook and Trading Strategies** This market analysis examines Bitcoin (BTC) and HYPE amid volatile conditions, providing short-term outlooks and specific trading strategies. **Key Outlooks:** * **Bitcoin (BTC):** Focus is on whether BTC's recent move above $65,000 holds. A successful breakout could lead to a test of the $69,500-$70,500 resistance zone, where medium-term short positions are considered. A failure, breaking below $65,000, may trigger a decline towards the $59,000-$60,000 support area. * **HYPE:** The token completed a four-wave correction and is now rebounding. The key resistance zone is $62.5-$64.57. The trading strategy is "buy on dips," looking for entry opportunities near the $52-$54.5 or deeper $47-$49 support zones, pending confirmation from proprietary models. **BTC Trading Strategy:** * **Medium-term:** Primarily looking to establish short positions (up to 60% allocated capital) if price rallies to the $69,500-$70,500 resistance area and shows signs of reversal. Alternative plans involve initiating shorts on a breakdown below $65,000. * **Short-term:** Allocate up to 30% capital for intraday "spread" trades based on support/resistance levels on 30/60-minute charts. **HYPE Trading Strategy:** * **Short-term:** Adopt a dip-buying approach. Consider light long positions (under 30% capital) when price tests key support levels ($52-$54.5 or $47-$49) and shows stabilization, confirmed by proprietary "Price Spread" and "Momentum Quant" models. **Trade Recap:** The analysis reviews a successful HYPE long trade from the previous week, executed at ~$54.39 and closed at ~$60.85 for an ~11.88% gain, based on signals from the aforementioned models. **Risk Management Emphasis:** The article stresses strict capital allocation (under 30-60%), immediate initial stop-loss placement, and a trailing stop-loss protocol to lock in profits as trades move favorably. ***Disclaimer:** All analysis, models, and strategies are for educational purposes based on technical analysis, not investment advice. Markets are volatile; trade with caution.*

marsbit8 min fa

Bitcoin Short-Term Bullish Structure Validated, HYPE Accumulation Window Opens | Guest Analysis

marsbit8 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片