A16z – 2026 might be the year when blockchain becomes ‘just the plumbing’

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-01-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-02

Introduzione

A16z's 2026 outlook predicts blockchain will become invisible "plumbing" that powers the modern digital world, rather than a consumer-facing technology. This shift will be driven by three key trends. First, the rise of an AI agent economy will require blockchain-based identity systems (KYA - Know Your Agent) for autonomous agents to transact securely. Second, finance will evolve from simple asset tokenization to full on-chain origination of synthetic and programmable credit products, making the internet itself the bank. Finally, privacy, enabled by Zero-Knowledge Proofs, will become the critical competitive advantage for institutional adoption, as public transparency becomes a liability. Ultimately, crypto's success will be measured by its seamless integration into a faster, more private, and autonomous internet.

For years, the promise of blockchain has been just around the corner. However, according to a16z crypto’s latest outlook for 2026, the corner has finally been turned.

We are moving into an era where the most successful crypto applications won’t feel like crypto at all. They will simply be the plumbing that makes the modern world work. That’s what the report says.

Here are the three foundational shifts that will define the landscape in 2026.

Rise of the agentic economy

Topping the list is the birth of the AI Agent economy.

As autonomous agents begin to handle our grocery shopping, SaaS subscriptions, and professional workflows, they face a wall – They lack identity and bank accounts.

According to A16z’s latest prediction, we can expect the emergence of KYAs (Know Your Agents).

Just as humans have credit scores and passports, agents will use cryptographically signed credentials to transact. This would allow a merchant to know that an agent is authorized by a specific principal and operates within defined legal and financial constraints.

Without blockchain-based identity, the AI revolution hits a dead end. With it, agents would become full-scale economic actors.

From tokenization to origination

While 2024 and 2025 were about “tokenizing” existing Real-World Assets (RWAs) like T-bills, 2026 will be about on-chain origination.

The report suggested that narrow banking, simply holding safe, liquid assets on a chain, is just the starting point. The real breakthrough occurs when credit infrastructure moves on-chain.

We will see the rise of synthetic financial products and programmable credit that offer lower operational costs and greater composability than traditional finance.

In this world, the internet becomes the bank, providing wealth management and sophisticated investment tools to anyone with a smartphone.

Privacy as the ultimate competitive moat

Finally, for a decade, the transparency of blockchains was touted as a feature. By 2026, it will become a bug for institutional adoption.

According to A16z, privacy will be the most important moat in crypto.

As global finance migrates to the blockchain, institutions cannot afford to have their strategies and sensitive data exposed on public ledgers. This creates a privacy lock-in effect. Bridging tokens between chains is easy, but bridging secrets is hard.

The networks that successfully implement Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) and Secrets-as-a-Service will likely win the majority of the market share. Especially since users will be reluctant to leave a secure, private environment.

What’s more?

By 2026, crypto’s success will be measured by its invisibility.

Whether it’s stablecoins settling $46 trillion in volume (surpassing Visa), or prediction markets becoming the primary way we price the future, the crypto part of the equation is receding into the background. What remains is a faster, more private, and more autonomous internet.

This is interesting. Especially since a recent report by AMBCrypto found that crypto underperformed this year as gold and equities rallied, with Bitcoin [BTC] dropping by nearly 20%. Despite broader risk assets holding up.

Even so, some analysts believe money is already circling back to crypto. On the contrary, historical midterm-year patterns suggest 2026 could still be a stress point.

With LTHs steady, capital hesitant, and price unmoved, Bitcoin’s next move depends on a structural shift rather than sentiment alone.


Final Thoughts

  • Technology is shifting from consumer-facing hype to invisible, indispensable plumbing for digital life.
  • Most successful crypto platforms will be frictionless, silent, and embedded deep inside everyday applications.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to a16z's outlook, what will define the most successful crypto applications by 2026?

AThe most successful crypto applications won't feel like crypto at all and will simply be the invisible plumbing that makes the modern world work.

QWhat is the 'KYA' concept mentioned in the report and what problem does it solve?

AKYA stands for 'Know Your Agents.' It solves the problem of AI agents lacking identity and bank accounts by providing them with cryptographically signed credentials to transact, allowing them to become full-scale economic actors.

QWhat key shift is predicted for on-chain finance in 2026, moving beyond the trends of 2024-2025?

AThe shift will be from 'tokenizing' existing Real-World Assets (RWAs) to 'on-chain origination,' which involves moving credit infrastructure on-chain to create synthetic financial products and programmable credit.

QWhy does the a16z report suggest that blockchain transparency will become a 'bug' rather than a feature by 2026?

AFor institutional adoption, the transparency of public blockchains becomes a problem because institutions cannot afford to have their strategies and sensitive financial data exposed on public ledgers, creating a need for privacy solutions.

QWhat technologies does the report identify as crucial for winning market share in the future crypto landscape?

AThe networks that successfully implement Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) and Secrets-as-a-Service will likely win the majority of the market share by providing a secure, private environment that users are reluctant to leave.

Letture associate

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

On June 5th, South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline, with major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix dropping nearly 10%. Amidst the turmoil, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's visit to Seoul played a dramatic role in boosting market sentiment. Following a dinner meeting with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-Jung, Huang confirmed that NVIDIA's new Vera CPU will utilize SK Hynix DRAM. The companies announced a multi-year technical partnership to co-develop next-generation memory for NVIDIA's AI infrastructure, covering products from data centers to personal AI and robotics. This collaboration extends beyond memory supply. SK Hynix is integrating NVIDIA's AI and Omniverse platform into its own semiconductor design and manufacturing processes, including computational lithography and creating digital twins of its fabrication plants for autonomous operation. While strengthening ties with SK Hynix, NVIDIA is diversifying its supply chain for the upcoming HBM4 memory, with Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron all certified as suppliers for its Vera Rubin platform. Despite this, Huang warned that the global chip shortage, driven by relentless demand from AI factory construction, is expected to persist for several years across the entire supply chain. His visit underscores NVIDIA's systematic effort to deepen integration with South Korea's broader tech industry.

marsbit27 min fa

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

marsbit27 min fa

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

The Nasdaq plunged 4.18% on June 5, 2026, its worst single-day drop in over a year, as a much stronger-than-expected US jobs report triggered fears of economic overheating and delayed Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The selloff, centered on high-valuation tech and AI stocks like Nvidia and Broadcom, spread across major indices. The article examines whether this signals a market top. The strong May non-farm payrolls data, nearly double expectations, pushed bond yields higher, directly hurting rate-sensitive tech stocks. This exposed vulnerabilities in the crowded AI trade, where valuations had soared on narratives of infinite growth, despite emerging signs of slowing order momentum and corporate AI monetization challenges. Prior to the drop, market indicators flashed warning signs: historically high valuations (e.g., Shiller CAPE ratio near 39.5), extreme bullish sentiment, and high levels of leverage. Technical charts showed key support levels being breached. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears, citing risks of "stagflation" and AI bubble comparisons to the dot-com era, warn of a potential significant correction. Bulls view the drop as a healthy correction within a bull market, underpinned by a strong economy and expected corporate earnings growth of around 7% in 2026. The immediate future hinges on upcoming key events: the May CPI inflation data and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will critically shape market expectations for the Fed's rate path. The article concludes that conditions for a major market top are aligning, marking a fragile transition from narrative-driven gains to a phase demanding validation from macroeconomic data and corporate fundamentals. Caution is advised.

marsbit31 min fa

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

marsbit31 min fa

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

The Nasdaq Composite plummeted 4.18% on June 5, its biggest single-day drop since April 2025, triggering widespread debate over whether the U.S. stock market has peaked. The sell-off was sparked by a stronger-than-expected U.S. non-farm payrolls report, which fueled fears of economic overheating and pushed back market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, leading to a sharp rise in Treasury yields. The AI sector, the primary driver of the recent bull market, suffered severe losses, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index crashing over 10%. Stocks like Nvidia, Broadcom, and Micron led the decline. Concerns are mounting about the sustainability of AI capital expenditures and high valuations, with signs of order cuts for next-generation chips emerging. Analyses point to several warning signs: historically high market valuations (e.g., elevated Shiller CAPE ratio, Buffett Indicator), extreme bullish sentiment indicators, and significant insider selling. The sell-off also caused a key technical breakdown, with the S&P 500 breaking below its short-term moving average and testing its 200-day moving average. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears warn this could be the start of a bubble deflation or a "stagflation" scenario, while bulls view it as a healthy, overdue correction within a bull market driven by solid corporate earnings growth. A more moderate view suggests the easy liquidity-driven rally is over, and markets are entering a phase of fundamental stock-picking with potential for consolidation. The immediate future hinges on key upcoming events: the May CPI report and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will be critical in determining whether this is a temporary pullback or the beginning of a more significant trend reversal. The consensus is that the era of one-directional market gains may be ending, requiring increased investor caution.

Odaily星球日报37 min fa

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

Odaily星球日报37 min fa

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

"The First 'Agent' Ruling: What Was Decided?" On April 30, the Guangzhou Internet Court issued a ruling—China's first behavior preservation order in the intelligent agent (AI agent) field. The defendant, an open-source AI agent software, was ordered to stop downloads, cease actions that bypassed a platform's technical protection measures, and delete related tutorials and data. The core issue: the software used the operating system's "accessibility service" permissions to automate user interactions within other apps without those platforms' authorization. This mirrors a recent US case where Amazon sued Perplexity for similar reasons—bypassing Amazon's API to directly scrape and interact with its pages—and won a preliminary injunction. Both rulings establish a crucial legal boundary for the AI agent era: agents cannot operate unchecked. The article argues the fundamental legal principle emerging is one of **dual authorization**. An AI agent requires both **user consent** AND **platform consent** to operate legitimately within that platform's ecosystem. Bypassing platform rules through system-level permissions, even with user permission, undermines platform responsibilities for content moderation, data security, and user privacy, creating liability issues. The piece uses the evolution of "Doubao Phone" (an AI-integrated smartphone) as a case study. Its initial, aggressive version that bypassed platform controls faced roadblocks. Its upcoming 2.0 version is reportedly pivoting to negotiate API access and authorization deals with major platforms (like Alibaba's ecosystem), seen as a strategic adaptation to the new regulatory reality. A global trend is identified: the era of unregulated, "wild west" growth for AI agents is ending, replaced by a **compliance race**. This raises barriers to entry, as securing platform authorizations becomes a new cost. Open-source status is also not a legal shield if the code facilitates bypassing technical protections. In conclusion, these first rulings target not the largest, but the most **aggressive and representative** cases. By setting precedent with them, regulators are efficiently steering the entire industry towards a new, more regulated operating paradigm defined by dual authorization and platform cooperation.

marsbit42 min fa

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

marsbit42 min fa

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

In late 2020, Google AI researcher Timnit Gebru was effectively dismissed following a conflict over a 14-page, unpublished research paper she co-authored titled "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots." The paper, which has since been cited over 14,000 times, raised critical early warnings about the risks of large language models (LLMs). It argued that these models, trained on vast, biased internet data, are essentially "stochastic parrots" that mimic language without true understanding, potentially amplifying societal biases, generating plausible but false information (later termed "AI hallucination"), consuming massive energy, and obscuring their training data contents. Gebru's stance led to a clash with Google management, who requested the paper's withdrawal. Her subsequent internal criticism of the company's diversity efforts and handling of the matter culminated in her termination, which sparked protests from over 4,000 Google employees and researchers. Six years later, the paper's predictions have proven remarkably prescient. Issues like AI hallucination, embedded bias (evident in resume screening and healthcare algorithms), soaring energy consumption from AI data centers, unvetted training data containing harmful content, and the risk of "model collapse" from AI-generated internet content have become central industry challenges. The incident also highlighted concerns about AI development being driven primarily by commercial competition within a handful of powerful tech companies, often at the expense of ethical considerations. After leaving Google, Gebru founded the Distributed AI Research Institute (DAIR) to explore these issues independently. The controversy underscores how her early, critical insights into the fundamental limitations and societal impacts of LLMs anticipated many of the most pressing dilemmas in today's AI era.

marsbit43 min fa

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

marsbit43 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片