Ripple, Circle, Paxos Secure Path To National Banking Charters In The US

bitcoinistPubblicato 2025-12-12Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-12

Introduzione

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has granted conditional approval for national trust bank charters to several major crypto firms, including Ripple, Circle, BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets, and Paxos. Once fully approved, these charters will allow the companies to manage and hold digital assets on behalf of customers, enabling faster payment settlements. Currently, Anchorage Digital is the only other crypto firm with such a charter. Ripple’s CEO Brad Garlinghouse hailed the move as a significant step for the company’s stablecoin, RLUSD, and criticized banking lobbyists for "anti-competitive tactics." The OCC emphasized that each application underwent rigorous review and that these approvals modernize the financial system and expand access to innovative products.

On Friday, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) approved national trust charter applications from several key firms in the industry including Circle’s First National Digital Currency Bank, Ripple National Trust Bank, BitGo Bank & Trust, Fidelity Digital Assets, and Paxos Trust Company.

OCC’s Approval Of Digital Asset Trust Banks

Once finalized and full approval is reached, these national trust bank charters would empower the crypto companies to manage and hold assets on behalf of their customers, enabling faster payment settlements.

Currently, Anchorage Digital is the only digital asset company that holds a national trust bank charter from the OCC, which oversees a total of 60 such institutions.

Comptroller Jonathan Gould emphasized that each application underwent a thorough and rigorous review process, underscoring the necessity for each entity to meet additional conditions before gaining full operational status.

He explained that welcoming new entrants into the banking landscape aids in modernizing the system, diversifying offerings, and enhancing access to innovative financial products.

Ripple CEO Challenges Banking Lobbyists

Brad Garlinghouse, CEO of Ripple, commented on the approval via social media, highlighting it as a significant advancement for Ripple’s stablecoin, RLUSD. He stated that it sets a high standard for compliance under both federal and state regulation.

Garlinghouse also took a moment to address banking lobbyists who may have opposed this move, asserting that their “anti-competitive tactics” are evident.

The executive pointed out that while these lobbyists have argued that the crypto industry does not abide by the same regulations, the recent approvals demonstrate that the crypto sector is operating transparently under the supervision of the OCC.

Stuart Alderoty, Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, noted that the firm is among the first entities to receive conditional approval following the enactment of the GENIUS legislation, ensuring the sustainability of Ripple’s stablecoin business for the long term.

The daily chart shows XRP’s price trading just below the key $2 resistance wall. Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com

Letture associate

BIT Research: If It Followed Nasdaq, Bitcoin Should Be Close to $140,000

BIT Research: Bitcoin Price Analysis Under Inflation Re-pricing The market is currently undergoing a macro adjustment phase dominated by inflation re-pricing. Analysis suggests that if Bitcoin had continued to follow Nasdaq's trajectory, its theoretical price would be near $140,000. However, a significant divergence between the two assets has emerged since October 2025. The core reason is the resurgence of US inflation, which has led to a reversal in market expectations for the Federal Reserve's rate-cut path. Recent data shows US CPI rising to 3.8% and PPI to 6.0%, prompting markets to scale back expectations for 2026 rate cuts. For Bitcoin, the previous supportive narrative of anticipated loose liquidity is weakening. Concurrently, escalating tensions involving Iran have driven oil prices up approximately 40% since late February 2026, heightening inflation concerns through rising energy costs. While the market currently views this inflation surge as a temporary pressure point, the interplay between energy, interest rates, and risk appetite is prompting a reassessment of the potential for a prolonged high-rate environment. In this context, Bitcoin has begun to underperform tech stocks, which can benefit from nominal inflation. The divergence stems from a key distinction: Bitcoin's past rallies were driven by loose liquidity and rate-cut expectations, not inflation itself. As a long-duration asset, Bitcoin is highly sensitive to interest rate paths. When expectations for rate cuts are withdrawn, its valuation faces pressure. Unlike equities, which can benefit from increased nominal revenues and reduced real debt burdens during inflation, Bitcoin possesses neither debt that inflates away nor cash flows that expand with inflation, offering no direct structural benefit from rising prices. Looking ahead, the critical question is whether high inflation will force the Fed to maintain elevated rates for longer. The BIT model anticipates US CPI could potentially rise further to 6.0%. Additionally, factors like AI infrastructure expansion—driving data center construction and power demand—may sustain energy price pressures and extend the period of above-target inflation. In such an environment, tech stocks gain from order growth and improved earnings expectations, while Bitcoin remains susceptible to high-rate pressure. In summary, the current shift does not invalidate Bitcoin's long-term thesis but reflects a market re-evaluation of interest rate and liquidity paths amid resurgent inflation. In the short term, a high-inflation environment may continue to suppress Bitcoin's performance relative to Nasdaq. This represents a slowdown in its upward momentum rather than a bearish turn. Bitcoin could regain support once markets begin to reprice expectations for future liquidity easing.

marsbit4 min fa

BIT Research: If It Followed Nasdaq, Bitcoin Should Be Close to $140,000

marsbit4 min fa

Law Firm Behind FTX Legal Work Now Facing $525M Suit

A federal lawsuit seeks $525 million from Silicon Valley law firm Fenwick & West for its alleged central role in facilitating FTX's fraud. A bankruptcy examiner found the firm "deeply intertwined" in FTX's wrongdoing, creating shell companies like North Dimension to funnel over $3 billion, drafting backdated agreements, and implementing FTX's auto-delete messaging policy on Signal. The suit, filed by 20 international victims, claims Fenwick's involvement lent FTX false legitimacy, preventing investors from withdrawing savings. It cites former FTX engineer Nishad Singh, who testified he directly told Fenwick attorneys about misuse of customer funds, after which the firm allegedly advised on concealment. The complaint includes claims of malpractice and fraud, targeting both the firm and two individual partners. This follows the recent rejection of Sam Bankman-Fried's bid for a new trial.

bitcoinist9 min fa

Law Firm Behind FTX Legal Work Now Facing $525M Suit

bitcoinist9 min fa

Bankless Interview: Private Equity Insiders Reveal the Inside Story of Anthropic's Primary Market Trading

**Bankless Interview: A Private Equity Veteran Exposes the Dark Side of Anthropic's Pre-IPO Trading** In a Bankless podcast, Patagon founder Dio Casares reveals the opaque inner workings of the massive secondary market for shares in pre-IPO giants like Anthropic. The market, driven by private SPVs (special purpose vehicles), brokers, and even informal networks, sees hundreds of billions in notional value changing hands, with single-deal fees as high as 10%. However, an estimated 10-20% of transactions involve fraud or fabricated share certificates. Intermediaries often profit more from these deals than from their core investment businesses. Two types of "secondary" exist: company-sanctioned trades (like employee tender offers) that bring new money to the company, and disruptive "gray market" trades on platforms like Hive or Forge, which companies like Anthropic actively fight. The latter creates pricing chaos and complicates primary fundraising. A major risk involves multi-layered, nested SPV structures. When a company like Anthropic finally IPOs, delays in distributing shares down these chains, combined with discretionary powers of fund managers (GPs) to hold or sell, could trigger a wave of lawsuits and settlement nightmares lasting years. For small investors in "tokenized" versions of these assets, transparency is minimal, and due diligence is often impossible. Casares advises extreme caution, suggesting investors trust their gut and exit if something feels wrong. He warns that the post-IPO period will be a major "reckoning" for this wild and largely unregulated market.

marsbit26 min fa

Bankless Interview: Private Equity Insiders Reveal the Inside Story of Anthropic's Primary Market Trading

marsbit26 min fa

Is Elon Musk Actually the Victim?

"Victim or Vindicator? Inside the OpenAI Trial That Shattered the Myth." In May 2026, the federal court in Oakland became the stage for deconstructing the carefully curated narrative of OpenAI. The trial revealed a complex reality far removed from its founding ideals. The core dispute centered on whether OpenAI, founded in 2015 as a non-profit dedicated to benefiting "all of humanity," had betrayed its mission by shifting towards a lucrative commercial structure, particularly after its 2019 capped-profit affiliate (OpenAI LP) was established and Microsoft invested $13 billion. Elon Musk, a co-founder and early funder, sued, claiming the organization was "stolen" and turned into a de facto Microsoft subsidiary for private gain. OpenAI countered that Musk's funds were unconditional donations and his lawsuit was driven by a desire for control and regret after leaving to found his own AI venture, xAI. The trial exposed early fractures. Evidence from 2017, years before ChatGPT's success, showed the founders were already grappling with the immense financial demands of pursuing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Musk himself had proposed having Tesla fund OpenAI. The court scrutinized whether the founders knowingly crossed a moral line. Greg Brockman's personal diary, entered as evidence, contained entries about wealth goals and anxieties over the company's revenue path, alongside self-reminders about the moral bankruptcy of "stealing" the non-profit. Brockman later testified his OpenAI stake was worth nearly $30 billion. The character of CEO Sam Altman was a key battleground. Musk's legal team cited five individuals, including co-founder Ilya Sutskever and former board members, who had described Altman as dishonest. This highlighted a recurring "trust debt" within OpenAI's leadership, exemplified by the chaotic 2023 boardroom coup and subsequent reinstatement. Altman defended his position, arguing Musk sought to absorb OpenAI into Tesla and that commercial success amplified OpenAI's charitable impact. Testimony from Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella underscored how commercial realities now dominated. While framing Microsoft's massive investment as a way to enlarge the non-profit's funding "pie," texts revealed Nadella pressuring Altman to launch ChatGPT's paid version quickly. Nadella also revealed that during the 2023 crisis, Microsoft was prepared to hire Altman and his team, showcasing the board's diminished power against the gravity of capital, talent, and infrastructure. Ultimately, the trial depicted OpenAI not as a singular act of betrayal but as a gradual, systemic transformation. Its grand AGI mission required a "heavier machine" to sustain it—a machine of computing power (largely from Microsoft), capital, and commercial obligations that inevitably reshaped its priorities. The non-profit board, tasked with guarding the mission, found itself unable to control the commercial juggernaut it had enabled. For the public, the proceedings served as a sobering window into the making of a foundational technology. The AI tools increasingly integrated into daily life—from writing and coding to customer service—are not born from a transparent, purely altruistic process. They emerge from a tangled web of personal ambitions, private negotiations, control struggles, and cloud computing bills. The trial's legacy is the stark realization that as AI becomes societal infrastructure, its steering wheel remains in very few, and very human, hands.

marsbit1 h fa

marsbit1 h fa

Cardano Millionaire Wallets Reach Record 25B ADA Holdings

Cardano's millionaire-tier wallets, holding at least 1 million ADA (approx. $262,400), have accumulated to a new all-time high of 25.09 billion ADA, according to on-chain data from Santiment. This represents about 67.47% of the total supply. Notably, this accumulation has persisted through the recent bearish market, during which ADA's market cap has fallen 71% over nine months, suggesting large investors are buying at discounted prices. In related news, Bitcoin sharks and whales have also added over 50,000 BTC in the past month. While large holders accumulate, smaller retail entities have shown net selling. At the time of reporting, ADA is trading around $0.264, down 1.9% in 24 hours.

bitcoinist1 h fa

Cardano Millionaire Wallets Reach Record 25B ADA Holdings

bitcoinist1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare US

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Talus Network (US) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente Talus NetworkUS.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Talus Network (US)Dopo aver acquistato Talus Network (US), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Talus Network (US)Scambia facilmente Talus Network (US) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

381 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.12.11Aggiornato il 2025.12.11

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di US US sono presentate come di seguito.