Feishu Has Become Doubao

marsbitPubblicato 2026-07-30Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-30

Introduzione

This may be the most important day in the ten-year history of Feishu. On July 30, ByteDance announced a major restructuring via internal email. Feishu, an independent operation for a decade, will no longer function separately and will lose its independent sales and marketing teams. Its product team is being integrated into Doubao AI, and its Go-to-Market strategy merges into the Volcano Engine's To B system. This move signals a strategic pivot, not a failure of Feishu. The era where Feishu sought to be an all-encompassing super-app for productivity is ending. AI has become the dominant logic. Industry trends show a shift from building platform "entrances" to embedding AI directly into workflows, as seen with Microsoft Copilot and Google's Gemini. Data reveals the driver: over 90% of Feishu's new clients in Q2 2026 purchased its AI products. Enterprises are now buying integrated AI solutions, not standalone software. By integrating Feishu's deep enterprise workflow scenarios, Doubao evolves from a consumer-facing chatbot into a powerful enterprise productivity engine. This gives Doubao a critical asset: real-world business application. Concurrently, ByteDance established the "Creative Services Platform," unifying its previously fragmented sales fronts (Feishu, Doubao, Volcano Engine) into a single customer-facing entity. This represents ByteDance's first genuine shift to thinking like a true To B company, organizing around client needs rather than internal product silos. T...

By | Beyond the Layout, Author|Huahua

This may be the most important day since Feishu's inception ten years ago.

On the morning of July 30th, ByteDance sent an internal email announcing a major reshuffle of its organizational structure:

This means that from today, Feishu will no longer operate independently and will no longer have its own independent sales and marketing teams.

An independent business that ran for ten years, ended with a single email.

I. Did Feishu Lose?

The first reaction for many might be to think so. After all, Feishu is one of ByteDance's most heavily invested innovative businesses. Liang Rubo stated in 2023 that the R&D investment in Feishu and Volcano Engine is no less than that in Douyin and TikTok.

A business with investment no less than Douyin is today completely dismantled and restructured. Isn't that losing?

But looking at the timeline reveals a different story.

Over the past few years, Feishu has been fighting a war of independence. It wanted to prove itself as China's Office, China's Slack, China's Notion, China's Microsoft 365...

In one sentence, it wanted too badly to be a super gateway.

And the result?

Google embedded Gemini into Workspace. Microsoft used Copilot to take over the entire Office experience. Tencent directly infused AI into WeCom and Tencent Docs. Alibaba let Tongyi Qianwen cover office scenarios.

Today, almost all global leading companies simultaneously made one move: abandoning the gateway logic and embedding AI directly into workflows.

This also made Feishu suddenly realize that its long-held platform logic was becoming increasingly difficult to sustain in the fight.

So what happened today is not Feishu being swallowed up; it's Feishu shrinking for the first time from an independent product to an infrastructural capability.

It's not that Feishu lost; it's that AI won. AI won against everyone, including the very thing Feishu aspired to be.

Recalling Feishu's organizational streamlining in 2024, shifting from broad coverage to focusing on key accounts. Many interpreted it as a contraction back then. Actually, it wasn't.

Perhaps at that juncture, Feishu had already realized that simply selling tools couldn't win this battle; it needed to be embedded within a larger, more fundamental organizational framework.

Today, that framework has arrived. Except it wasn't Feishu that found it; ByteDance chose it for Feishu.

II. Why Today?

The answer lies in a set of data.

As of June 2026, Doubao Large Model's daily token consumption exceeded 180 trillion. Volcano Engine is already a leading player in China's public cloud MaaS market. Calculated based on average consumption in July, ByteDance's large model business annualized revenue reached 40 billion USD, exceeding the combined annualized revenue of other domestic model companies.

And Feishu's side?

In Q2 2026, over ninety percent of Feishu's new customers simultaneously purchased Feishu AI products.

This number is the key. It indicates that enterprise customers have already voted with their feet; they are not coming to buy Feishu, they are coming to buy AI.

Feishu is merely a channel through which AI reaches enterprises.

ByteDance had to act at this juncture. The reason is simple: AI has become the sole entry point for enterprise procurement.

Enterprises don't buy office software and cloud platforms separately, nor do they only purchase large model APIs; enterprises buy a suite of AI solutions.

Whoever can bundle AI capabilities, office tools, and cloud infrastructure to serve customers well gets the enterprise orders.

Doubao, Feishu, and Volcano Engine can only compete when twisted together.

In this email, ByteDance admitted one thing for the first time: AI is not a business line, but a layer of infrastructure.

You cannot operate infrastructure as a regular department; the entire organization must be rearranged around it.

This aligns perfectly with ByteDance's top-level strategy.

In June of this year at the Volcano Engine Momentum Conference, ByteDance CEO Liang Rubo stated that scaling the AI peak is ByteDance's most important task at present; by July, Liang Rubo issued his first all-staff letter in four years, reshaping ByteDance's organizational structure and leadership principles, emphasizing the elimination of business barriers and increasing organizational flexibility around the core strategy. (Extended reading: Liang Rubo Personally Dismantles the Old ByteDance)

Looking back today, the reshaping of organizational and leadership principles in the all-staff letter was the signal flare for this major adjustment.

In less than a month, the organization rearranged itself according to the strategy.

III. Doubao Begins to Become ByteDance's Organizational Focus

Saying this sounds simple, but consider its weight carefully.

For the past ten years, ByteDance had only one organizational focus: Douyin. Resources, talent, and commercialization all revolved around Douyin.

Today, a new product is beginning to possess the same level of strength: Doubao.

Note, this is not referring to Doubao's user or revenue growth; that's a product-level matter. The core is that the company's organizational structure is beginning to be comprehensively rearranged around Doubao.

Feishu's product team merges into Doubao; Feishu's head reports to Doubao's head; Feishu's GTM merges into Volcano Engine's To B system.

An independently operated business segment for nearly a decade was split, restructured, and absorbed by Doubao in a single day.

This is a very significant signal. A product transcends being just a product and becomes company strategy only when it becomes the organizational center.

Comparing with Douyin makes this clearer.

Before 2018, Douyin was just a short-video app under Toutiao. In 2018, Douyin exploded in the market, becoming ByteDance's strategic focus.

After years of business integration, ByteDance gradually restructured its domestic business around Douyin, incorporating e-commerce and local life into the Douyin ecosystem; the overseas market independently developed TikTok in a dual-track approach. Douyin ultimately grew from an independent product into the underlying foundation of ByteDance's domestic business.

Today, the same thing is happening to Doubao.

Especially this year when Doubao officially launched its Pro version, marking its transition from a free, entertainment-oriented conversational tool for C-end users to a productivity engine with advanced reasoning and complex task-handling capabilities.

With the foundational capabilities of the Pro version, Doubao Enterprise entering Feishu scenarios becomes logical; it's no longer just a simple chatbot, but an AI assistant deeply embedded in enterprise workflows. Natively integrated into Feishu Docs, Sheets, Meetings, Group Chats, coupled with enterprise-level data isolation, permission controls, and security auditing.

ByteDance is transforming Doubao from a C-end chatting tool into a B-end productivity foundation.

Feishu becomes the connector in this transformation.

Is this role important? Extremely important.

If Doubao were just an API, enterprises could only call the interface to get text back. But if Doubao can directly read enterprise Feishu documents, analyze meeting minutes, answer business questions in group chats, and turn knowledge bases into live assistants, that's on a completely different scale.

Feishu gives Doubao a core asset: real office scenarios.

The hardest part of enterprise AI isn't model capability; it's finding scenarios, letting AI know when and how to intervene in workflows. The office scenario data and product experience Feishu accumulated over a decade cannot be built from scratch; it can only be inherited.

This might be a better outcome than an independent IPO.

Feishu finally doesn't have to prove itself anymore; its value is completely embedded within a larger story.

IV. ByteDance Finally Thinks Like a To B Company

Many focus on Feishu merging into Doubao, but may overlook another matter: the establishment of the Creativity Services Platform.

The strategic significance of this might be greater than the product integration.

What was ByteDance's To B state in the past?

One sales team for Feishu, one sales team for Volcano Engine. The same enterprise client might face three ByteDance representatives simultaneously: one selling Feishu, one selling cloud, one selling models.

Three sales systems, three pricing logics, three types of client relationships. This isn't To B; this is the opposite of To B.

Enterprise clients never procure according to your organizational structure. They only recognize solutions; they don't care how you are divided internally, only whether one person can get things done.

Today, ByteDance merged all windows facing enterprise clients into a single outlet.

Feishu's Head of Sales Lin Chan, Feishu's Head of Strategy and Marketing Shi Zhijuan, all report to Volcano Engine's head Tan Dai.

One client, one window, one solution.

This is what doing To B looks like.

In the To B battlefield, product integration solves what to do; unified GTM solves how to sell.

In To B, how to sell is often harder than what to do. Products can iterate quickly, but rebuilding sales systems, client relationships, and delivery processes often takes years.

ByteDance chose to do it in one step.

This shows ByteDance's goal is not just optimizing To B; it's a fundamental reconstruction of the underlying logic, no longer organizing sales around products, but organizing sales around client needs.

What do clients need? AI. Feishu, Volcano Engine, Doubao are all components to fulfill this need. Components can be developed separately, but for the client, they must be sold integrated together.

This is the first time ByteDance truly thinks like a To B company.

The principle is simple, but in the past few years, almost no Chinese internet company doing To B truly figured it out. Everyone cut sales teams according to product lines, making clients adapt to the organizational structure.

ByteDance today reversed this: making the organizational structure adapt to the client.

In the AI era, what should a company organize itself around?

ByteDance's answer is: around the model, not around products.

Words from [Beyond the Layout]:

The biggest change for Feishu today is not merging into Doubao, but it proving one thing: AI has begun to reorganize a company's organizational structure.

In the past, the company decided products. Today, models begin to decide the company.

Who reports to whom, where resources are allocated, which business becomes the center, is no longer decided by experience, but begins to be decided by AI.

ByteDance is just the first, not the last.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat does the organizational restructuring described in the article signify for Feishu?

AIt signifies that Feishu is no longer an independent business with its own sales and market team. Instead, it has been absorbed into Doubao as a foundational capability, shifting from an 'entrance' or platform logic to becoming an infrastructure for AI workflow integration.

QAccording to the article, what is the primary reason behind ByteDance's decision to integrate Feishu with Doubao now?

AThe primary reason is that AI has become the single entry point for enterprise procurement. Over 90% of Feishu's new customers in Q2 2026 simultaneously purchased its AI products, showing clients are buying AI solutions. To compete, ByteDance must integrate Doubao's AI, Feishu's tools, and Volcano Engine's cloud infrastructure as a unified package.

QWhat does the establishment of the 'Creativity Service Platform' represent for ByteDance's To B strategy?

AIt represents ByteDance truly thinking and acting like a To B company. It consolidates previously separate sales teams for Feishu, Volcano Engine, and Doubao into a single front-end for enterprise customers. This shift organizes sales around client needs (e.g., AI solutions) rather than around individual product lines, solving the critical 'how to sell' challenge in To B business.

QWhy is Feishu considered a 'core asset' for Doubao in this restructuring?

AFeishu provides Doubao with a crucial asset: real-world office work scenarios and data accumulated over ten years. This allows Doubao's AI to be deeply embedded into enterprise workflows—reading documents, analyzing meetings, answering questions in chats—transforming it from a simple API/text generator into a powerful productivity engine integrated into daily operations.

QWhat fundamental shift in organizational logic does the article argue this restructuring illustrates?

AIt illustrates a shift from companies being organized around products to being organized around the AI model. Strategic priorities, resource allocation, and reporting lines are now being determined by the central role of AI (Doubao) rather than by traditional business units or products, marking a new phase where 'the model begins to determine the company.'

Letture associate

Coinbase Vice President: The Wars Over Cryptocurrency Regulation Are Over

Coinbase's new Vice President, Ryan VanGrak, declared that regulatory wars in the cryptocurrency sector are over. Since taking office on July 9, 2026, he has shifted the company's approach from litigation and sanctions to focusing on growth and innovation. The industry can now concentrate on development rather than fighting for its right to exist. He highlighted that the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act), which aims to establish a clear federal regulatory framework dividing oversight between the SEC and CFTC, has gained significant momentum. This framework is intended to provide proper supervision, investor protection, and maintain U.S. leadership in digital assets. VanGrak's appointment marks a strategic shift from a "wartime" to a "peacetime" advisor, replacing former Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal, who oversaw major litigation, including a dismissed 2023 SEC lawsuit. With his background at Citadel Securities and the SEC, VanGrak brings deep regulatory and institutional finance expertise as Coinbase expands beyond a simple exchange into a broader financial services provider, offering stocks, futures, prediction markets, and AI tools. For investors, bipartisan support for crypto legislation like the CLARITY Act represents a major shift from the enforcement-focused environment of 2023-2024. Lawmakers are now focused on *how* to regulate crypto, not *if* it should exist. However, risks remain, as the bill's passage is not yet guaranteed.

cryptonews.ru19 min fa

Coinbase Vice President: The Wars Over Cryptocurrency Regulation Are Over

cryptonews.ru19 min fa

Deep Dive into FWA: An Intriguing Experiment Turning NFTs into "On-Chain Gachapon"

A Deep Dive into FWA: The “On-Chain Gacha” Experiment for NFTs Fake World Assets (FWA), created by TokenWorks, introduces an innovative “NFT gacha machine” fully operating on-chain. Users can deposit eligible NFTs paired with ETH (called Backing) to create a Position, acting as a prize pool. Others can then pay a uniform Acquisition Price for a chance to win a random NFT from the pool. The core mechanism features a reverse probability system: Positions with lower Backing have a higher chance of being selected, serving as common prizes, while high-Backing Positions are rare “jackpots.” The acquisition price is calculated based on the harmonic mean of all Backings, keeping entry costs low. When a Position is won, the purchaser must choose: keep the NFT or accept the Standing Bid (85% of the Backing, claimable in ETH or $FWA tokens), returning the NFT to the original depositor. The protocol involves two main roles. Depositors provide liquidity (NFT + ETH), earning a share of fees from each draw, distributed equally per active Position, plus potential $FWA rewards. Purchasers pay to spin the gacha, receiving $FWA rewards for participation. A special “Crown” reward goes to the Position with the highest Backing. The $FWA token has a fixed supply and is initially obtainable only through protocol participation (depositing or purchasing), with external buying disabled early on to reduce sell pressure. Its value is supported by a built-in buy pressure: when purchasers opt for the $FWA settlement on a Standing Bid, the protocol uses the backing ETH to buy $FWA from the market. Revenue for the protocol comes from a 1% fee on each draw, a 1% settlement fee when an NFT is kept, and the 15% discount from Standing Bid settlements (currently allocated to the protocol). The design cleverly blends Uniswap-style liquidity provision, gacha mechanics, and tokenomics to create a novel, self-regulating marketplace for NFT liquidity and engagement.

marsbit34 min fa

Deep Dive into FWA: An Intriguing Experiment Turning NFTs into "On-Chain Gachapon"

marsbit34 min fa

10,000 Scientists Get 1 Year of Free Access: OpenAI Brings the Scientific Research Pipeline into ChatGPT

OpenAI has launched the "ChatGPT for Academic Researchers" program, offering free one-year access to its flagship models for 100,000 university researchers globally, with 10,000 spots available this summer. Selected institutions include prestigious centers like ENS Paris and the IAS at Princeton. The initiative provides an integrated research workspace within ChatGPT, bundling tools like ChatGPT, ChatGPT Work, and Codex, along with expanded Deep Research capabilities, higher usage limits, and specialized tools for life sciences. The suite connects to platforms like Zotero and GitHub, aiming to streamline the entire research workflow from literature review and coding to data analysis and manuscript drafting. OpenAI notes that about 1.3 million people already use ChatGPT weekly for advanced science and math. The program targets building long-term user dependency by embedding these tools into daily research habits. However, access comes with limitations: it does not include API credits or model weights, and eligibility is restricted to verified academic researchers from supported countries. This approach contrasts with Anthropic's "AI for Science" program, which offers API credits but not an integrated workspace. Both companies emphasize preventing misuse by withholding model weights, a point of contention for AI researchers seeking transparency. The core strategy remains clear: provide a powerful, integrated environment to foster user reliance ahead of the post-free period.

marsbit39 min fa

10,000 Scientists Get 1 Year of Free Access: OpenAI Brings the Scientific Research Pipeline into ChatGPT

marsbit39 min fa

What's Going On with Gigadevice? Major Shareholder Cashes Out 44 Billion, Then Announces 20 Billion Buyback

Gigadevice Innovation, a leading Chinese memory chip company, has executed a controversial financial maneuver. The company's controlling shareholder and chairman, Zhu Yiming, sold approximately 44 billion RMB worth of his shares between early May and mid-June 2026, capitalizing on a soaring stock price that peaked at 846.66 RMB on June 29th. Following a subsequent stock crash—plummeting to around 350 RMB in 22 trading days and erasing over 330 billion RMB in market value—Zhu announced a combined "market rescue" plan on July 29th. This plan includes his personal commitment to buy back at least 1 billion RMB in shares and a company proposal to repurchase 1 to 2 billion RMB worth of stock. This sequence of high-selling followed by a low-buying plan has confused and unsettled many of the company's 240,000 retail investors. The stock's dramatic decline was attributed to several factors: the successful IPO of its sister company, Changxin Technologies, which ended Gigadevice's status as a primary investment proxy for the domestic memory sector; a Morgan Stanley report warning of a potential peak in the memory chip cycle; and a severe loss of market confidence triggered by the chairman's massive sell-off. While the sell-off was procedurally compliant, its timing has been criticized. The company's fundamentals appear strong, with preliminary H1 2026 results showing revenue up 177% year-on-year to 11.5 billion RMB and net profit skyrocketing 1099% to 6.9 billion RMB, driven by a boom in memory chips and MCU demand. However, a significant portion (2.05 billion RMB) of this profit came from non-recurring gains like securities investment, and the memory industry is notoriously cyclical. Analysts highlight the company's role in the domestic substitution of niche DRAM and NOR Flash memory, with some maintaining bullish price targets. Yet, the recent events underscore key risks: its fabless model creates dependency on foundries like Changxin, and the chairman's actions have raised serious questions about management's alignment with minority shareholders. The promised buybacks cannot commence until December 13th due to a mandatory six-month cooling-off period following an insider sale, leaving the stock vulnerable in the interim.

marsbit39 min fa

What's Going On with Gigadevice? Major Shareholder Cashes Out 44 Billion, Then Announces 20 Billion Buyback

marsbit39 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片