Uniswap’s $591mln burn sparks a deflation loop – UNI at $7.2 ONLY IF…

ambcryptoPubblicato 2025-12-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-28

Introduzione

Uniswap's community overwhelmingly approved a proposal to burn 100 million UNI tokens, worth approximately $591 million, from its treasury. This deflationary measure will use future protocol fees to conduct ongoing token burns, creating a deflationary loop aimed at reducing supply and potentially increasing the token's value. Following the burn, UNI's price surged 5.2% to $6.3, with trading volume rising 52% to $297 million. Key indicators, including moving averages and momentum, turned bullish. If buying pressure continues, UNI could target $7.2; however, a loss of momentum might lead to a retracement to $5.7.

Deflationary measures have become increasingly popular across major crypto projects, especially token buybacks and token burns.

These mechanisms have played a significant role in market stability, helping avoid major price crashes and absorb selling pressure. Amid this growing trend, Uniswap joined the wave, with the community approving token burns.

Uniswap treasury burns $591 million of UNI

The Uniswap community approved the UNIfication proposal with 99.9% support, marking a significant shift in the protocol’s economics.

More than 125 million UNI tokens were cast in favor of the proposal compared to 742 tokens against it. After Uniswap’s [UNI] fee-burning proposal was approved, the Uniswap treasury burned 100 million UNI, worth approximately $591 million.

Under the approved deflationary measure, the future protocol fees collected by Uniswap will be used to burn the tokens.

At the same time, it set fees to zero on its web app, wallet, and extension. The move activated revenue from V2 and select V3 pools, as well as Unichain sequencer proceeds.

All the revenue from these sources will be directed to ongoing UNI burns.

Following the token burns, the amount of UNI held by Uniswap Treasury dropped from $2.1 billion to $1.6 billion.

This step effectively creates a deflationary loop as the coin supply decreases while the protocol usage increases. In turn, prices make sustained upward gains if demand from the open market follows suit.

How did the market react?

After token burns, UNI recorded a positive response, with demand following across the market. In fact, Uniswap jumped to a local high of $6.4 before retracing.

At press time, UNI traded at $6.3, up 5.2% on daily charts. Over the same window, its volume hiked 52% to $297 million, while the market cap touched a monthly high of $4.6 billion.

The altcoins’ volume and market cap surged in tandem, reflecting increased on-chain activity and steady capital inflows.

Additionally, the market recovered from a recent distribution phase, as evidenced by Accumulation and Distribution Volume.

The accumulation side volume surged to 744.6k, and flipped the smoothed average of 500k, signaling increased buy-side activity.

Although the accumulation volume remains below 1.2 million peaks, buyers stepped into the market and displaced sellers. As such, the Buyers v Sellers index showed this shift in market dynamics, as UNI recorded a positive Netflow of 0.116.

Can the momentum hold?

As UNI faced reduced scarcity, the altcoin’s upward momentum strengthened, backed by organic demand. The altcoin flipped the 50 and 20 Moving Averages, indicating strong short-term upward momentum.

At the same time, its Stochastic Momentum Index made a bullish crossover and surged to 37, breaking out of oversold territory. These market conditions position UNI on a positive trajectory, setting it up for further gains.

Therefore, if buyers continue to accumulate, supporting the Uniswap token burn initiative, UNI could clear $6.4 resistance, reclaim $6.6, and target $7.2.

However, if the market impact is short-term and demand declines, UNI could retrace to $5.7.


Final Thoughts

  • Uniswap treasury burned 100 million UNI, worth approximately $591 million.
  • UNI surged 5% to a local high of $6.4, as the market recovered from the distribution phase.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the value of the UNI tokens burned by the Uniswap treasury and how many tokens were burned?

AThe Uniswap treasury burned 100 million UNI tokens, worth approximately $591 million.

QWhat was the community's level of support for the UNI token burn proposal?

AThe proposal received 99.9% support, with over 125 million UNI tokens cast in favor and only 742 tokens against it.

QWhat is the new mechanism for the protocol fees collected by Uniswap after the proposal was approved?

AFuture protocol fees collected by Uniswap will be used to burn UNI tokens, creating a deflationary loop.

QWhat was the immediate market reaction to the token burn in terms of UNI's price and trading volume?

AFollowing the burn, UNI's price increased by 5.2% to $6.3, and its trading volume surged 52% to $297 million.

QWhat are the potential price targets for UNI if the positive market momentum continues?

AIf buyers continue to accumulate, UNI could clear the $6.4 resistance, reclaim $6.6, and target $7.2.

Letture associate

Vitalik May Not Realize That Ethereum's Transition to PoS Actually Buried a Financial 'Hidden Bomb'

After transitioning from Proof-of-Work (PoW) to Proof-of-Stake (PoS), Ethereum introduced staking rewards for ETH, creating a "maturity mismatch" arbitrage opportunity with Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) and Liquid Restaking Tokens (LRTs). This led to leveraged lending, recursive borrowing, and yield arbitrage on platforms like Aave, becoming a major DeFi use case—similar to traditional finance’s reliance on arbitrage. However, this arbitrage does not generate additional liquidity or value for the Ethereum ecosystem. Instead, it creates persistent selling pressure, as institutions cash out their staking rewards. This dynamic forms a delicate balance between sell pressure, ETH buy demand, and deflationary mechanisms. Unlike traditional banking, where maturity mismatch helps transform savings into productive capital (e.g., long-term loans funding economic growth), DeFi’s version is purely speculative. Institutions engage in recursive staking—staking ETH via Lido to get stETH, using it as collateral on Aave to borrow more ETH, and repeating the process—amplifying staking yields without contributing to real economic activity or dApp development. This套利套利behavior essentially exploits Ethereum’s security budget. With over 34 million ETH staked—far exceeding the estimated 15 million needed to resist state-level attacks—the network experiences "excess security." Post-Dencun upgrade, with reduced gas fees and renewed ETH inflation, the selling pressure from staking rewards structurally suppresses ETH’s price. ETH’s staking yield, currently around 2.5%, trails behind U.S. Treasury yields, making ETH a less attractive asset institutionally. The rise of Real-World Assets (RWA) on-chain could create external demand, potentially boosting ETH’s value, but for now, the PoS shift has turned ETH into a perpetual bond with negative yield spread versus Treasuries, posing a financial risk rather than fostering organic growth.

marsbit1 h fa

Vitalik May Not Realize That Ethereum's Transition to PoS Actually Buried a Financial 'Hidden Bomb'

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di S S sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片