Trump urges CLARITY Act passage in honor of ‘big supporter’ Lindsey Graham

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-07-14Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-14

Introduzione

President Donald Trump is urging the Senate to quickly pass the CLARITY Act, a crypto market structure bill, framing it as a race against China to lead in crypto and AI. He linked the push to honoring the late Senator Lindsey Graham, a key supporter. The bill faces a tight deadline before the Senate's August recess. While gaining support from some law enforcement groups, it faces opposition from banks and Democrats. Banks seek clearer stablecoin rules, and Senator Elizabeth Warren is demanding ethics provisions, citing Trump's past crypto gains. With key Republican absences, Trump needs 9-10 Democratic votes, and Warren's ethics demand could decide the outcome. Market prediction odds for passage have fallen to 38%.

President Donald Trump has pressed the Senate to advance the crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act. For him, the passage should be ‘in honor’ of the late South Carolina Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, whom he said was a big supporter of the bill.

The president warned that the Senate should act fast to avoid letting China win on crypto and AI.

Source: Bluesky

A similar urgency was echoed by White House crypto advisor Patrick Witt, adding that,

Critical week for Clarity, which also happens to be the one-year anniversary of GENIUS. We cannot afford to delay any longer.

The U.S. Senate officially reconvened on Monday, 13th of July, after the Independence Day break. It will go for another recess on the 8th of August. Hence, the only window for the bill’s passage is before the August recess, meaning less than three weeks.

Yet, a Senate floor vote has not been scheduled. Besides, if it passes the Senate floor vote, it must also be approved by the House before it reaches President Trump’s desk for signing into law.

On a positive note, the bill has won the support of another major enforcement group, the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Associations (FLEOA). With recent backing by sheriffs, the bill has cleared a key hurdle initially posed by these groups.

But banks and Democrats’ opposition remained.

Sen. Warren calls for CLARITY Act ethics provisions

In a letter on Monday, the American Bankers Association urged the Senate to strengthen stablecoin yield provisions. The bank lobby group decried ‘ambiguities’ in the bill that could deepen capital flight.

We remain concerned that ambiguities within the bill could encourage stablecoin arrangements to effectively function as substitutes for deposits, despite Congress’s longstanding and clearly stated intent that payment stablecoins should serve as transaction tools rather than store-of-value products.

Worth pointing out that a deal had been reached on the stablecoin yield. In fact, Witt reinforced the same and slammed the group.

Asked and answered. Give it a rest

For her part, Sen. Elizabeth Warren slammed the bill as a ‘sanctions evasion’ ticket last week. This week, she renewed calls for an ethics provision in the bill, citing Trump’s $1.4B crypto windfall in 2025.

To get the 60-vote threshold to pass the bill, Republicans previously needed only seven extra votes. Now, with Sen. Graham gone and Mitch McConnell (R-KY) hospitalized, Trump will need 9-10 Democrats to pass the bill. And the ethics provision could make or break the outcome.

In fact, the market is so pessimistic about the bill’s passage that odds have dropped to an annual low of 38%.

Source: Polymarket

Final Summary

  • Trump has turned the CLARITY Act into a race with China, urging the Senate to pass it.
  • A renewed ethics provision call could stall the bill if the Democratic Party withdraws support.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the CLARITY Act and why is President Trump urging its passage?

AThe CLARITY Act is a crypto market structure bill. President Trump is urging the Senate to pass it to avoid letting China win on crypto and AI, and to honor the late Senator Lindsey Graham, a big supporter of the bill.

QWhat is the current timeline and challenge for the CLARITY Act to become law?

AThe Senate has less than three weeks before its August recess to vote on the bill. If it passes the Senate, it must also be approved by the House before reaching the President's desk. A floor vote has not been scheduled yet.

QWhat are the main points of opposition to the CLARITY Act mentioned in the article?

ABanks, represented by the American Bankers Association, oppose ambiguities they believe could encourage stablecoins to function like deposits. Senator Elizabeth Warren opposes it, calling it a 'sanctions evasion' ticket and calling for an ethics provision, citing Trump's crypto windfall.

QHow has the political landscape for passing the bill changed, according to the article?

AWith the death of Senator Lindsey Graham and the hospitalization of Senator Mitch McConnell, Republicans now need 9-10 Democratic votes to reach the 60-vote threshold, instead of just seven. The ethics provision demanded by Democrats could be a decisive factor.

QWhat is the market's prediction for the passage of the CLARITY Act?

AThe market is pessimistic, with betting odds on the bill's passage dropping to an annual low of 38%.

Letture associate

Buyback and Burn: Just Empty Promises? The Unbridgeable Rights Gap Between Tokens and Equity

"Token Repurchase and Burn: An Empty Promise? The Unbridgeable Rights Gap Between Tokens and Equity" Holding company stock grants shareholders residual claim rights - a legally enforceable entitlement to remaining assets after all other obligations are paid. This comes with rights like voting, dividends, and a share in sale proceeds. Crypto protocols have long promised token holders similar benefits: governance participation and a share of future growth. However, this narrative is fundamentally flawed and built on voluntary promises, not enforceable legal rights. The core difference is that token holders lack any legally enforceable claim to a protocol's underlying value or revenues. Common mechanisms like using protocol revenue to buy back and burn tokens are purely discretionary; the team can alter or stop the policy at any time. Token holders have no legal recourse. This rights gap becomes critically apparent when protocols introduce traditional equity alongside tokens, as seen with Venice AI's $65M funding round. Equity investors hold legal contracts with rights to company assets and profits, while token holders' benefits depend entirely on the continued goodwill of the protocol's management. The acquisition of Houdini Swap, where equity holders were paid while token holders received nothing, starkly illustrates this disparity. Upcoming legislation like the CLARITY Act threatens to eliminate the regulatory gray area that has allowed this ambiguous "pseudo-equity" narrative. The Act would classify tokens as either digital commodities (regulated by CFTC) or investment contract assets/securities (regulated by SEC). Protocols aiming for the "digital commodity" classification would be explicitly prohibited from granting token holders any legal claim to corporate revenue, profits, or assets. Promising that tokens will appreciate from protocol profits would likely classify them as securities. Projects like Aave are attempting technical solutions, such as its automated, on-chain "Aavenomics 3.0" buyback mechanism. However, this remains code that the governance body could still vote to change, not an immutable legal contract. The industry faces a clear fork: either acknowledge tokens as digital commodities and stop promising economic rights tied to corporate profits, or formally register tokens as securities and bear the associated compliance burden. The decade-long narrative equating tokens with ownership is built on unenforceable promises. The entry of traditional equity investors with real legal rights exposes this foundational weakness, which may unravel with the next major funding deal.

Foresight News26 min fa

Buyback and Burn: Just Empty Promises? The Unbridgeable Rights Gap Between Tokens and Equity

Foresight News26 min fa

Navigating the World of Event Trading: Top 5 Prediction Markets for Every Type of User

The prediction market industry has grown significantly, with trading volumes exceeding $20 billion monthly by mid-2026, driven by sports, politics, and macroeconomics. Success now depends heavily on platform choice and execution logistics. This guide compares five leading networks: **Polymarket**: A high-volume, decentralized platform on Polygon, using USDC for international and crypto-native users. It offers diverse markets but lacks built-in risk tools. **Kalshi**: A CFTC-regulated U.S. exchange for institutional traders, using direct fiat. It leads in regulated volume, especially for major sports and economic events, but has limited contract listings. **Outpoll**: A CeDeFi platform for advanced traders, focusing on professional tools. It uniquely features built-in stop-loss/take-profit orders, 0.1% fees, and full API support, with settlement in USDC. **OG Predictive**: A CFTC-regulated, sports-focused platform from Crypto.com. It offers granular player props and a flat fee structure, appealing to long-term position traders. **Manifold Markets**: A play-money, no-KYC platform for casual users and developers. It allows user-generated markets on any topic with zero fees, serving as a sandbox for strategy testing. Key differentiators include regulatory models (regulated vs. decentralized), funding (fiat vs. crypto), order types, risk management features, API access, and mobile support. The conclusion emphasizes that in today's event trading, profitability hinges not just on accurate predictions but on optimizing execution through platform infrastructure, liquidity, fees, and risk tools.

TheNewsCrypto1 h fa

Navigating the World of Event Trading: Top 5 Prediction Markets for Every Type of User

TheNewsCrypto1 h fa

Why Are Large-Scale Crypto Conferences No Longer Glamorous?

Why Are Major Crypto Conferences Losing Their Allure? A growing sense of fatigue surrounds large in-person crypto conferences, with many founders and investors now avoiding events they would never have missed just two years ago. While complaints cite declining ROI and information quality, the root causes are more structural. Crypto, global from inception, once relied on these mega-conferences as neutral hubs for essential face-to-face connections. However, their core value has been fragmented. High-quality participants—developers, investors—have largely migrated to smaller, private side-events, leaving main stages for repetitive content already shared online. The main conference often just becomes the excuse for being in the same city, with attendees scrambling between exclusive dinners and micro-events. While these intimate gatherings offer signal-rich conversations, they lose the "serendipitous encounters" of large conferences and can create insular echo chambers, especially as talent concentrates in hubs like New York. Meanwhile, invite-only, high-caliber summits are rising, offering quality and scale but at the cost of accessibility and crypto's early egalitarian ethos. This shift isn't unique to crypto; AI events in San Francisco show a similar trend. The perception of higher-value interactions drives core groups towards smaller, private settings, potentially creating a vicious cycle that drains larger events of their vitality. Yet, a more optimistic view exists. The apparent decline of crypto-centric events may signal industry maturation. Leading projects are now focused outward—on stablecoins for traditional finance, consumer-facing digital banks, or real-world assets. Crypto topics are increasingly integrated into mainstream finance and tech conferences. Just as dedicated "internet conferences" faded, dedicated crypto summits may become redundant as the technology embeds into every sector. The future likely holds far fewer large, inward-looking crypto conferences. The industry has moved past needing frequent self-congratulatory gatherings. True growth lies in engaging with the broader economy. This evolution towards private networking and mainstream integration, for better or worse, is a mark of the industry coming of age.

marsbit1 h fa

Why Are Large-Scale Crypto Conferences No Longer Glamorous?

marsbit1 h fa

Coin & Stock Compass: Global Listed Companies Net Sold $85.45 Million in BTC Last Week, Strategy's Dollar Reserves Scale Up to $3 Billion (July 14)

Global Public Companies Net Sell $85.45 Million in BTC; Strategy's Dollar Reserves Hit $3 Billion (July 14) Last week saw a significant net sell-off of Bitcoin by global public companies, excluding miners, totaling $85.45 million—a 908.42% decrease from the prior week. Major buyers like Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) and Japan's Metaplanet were notably absent from the market. However, two companies, Brazil's OrangeBTC and asset manager Strive, made purchases, adding 8 and 18 BTC, respectively. The aggregate BTC holdings of tracked public companies now stand at 1,139,635 BTC, valued at approximately $71.38 billion and representing 5.7% of Bitcoin's circulating market cap. In corporate updates, Strategy announced its dollar reserves have grown by $450 million to reach $3 billion, while its BTC holdings remain at 843,775 coins. Hyperscale Data increased its BTC reserves past 1,000 coins. Strategy will report its Q2 2026 financial results on July 30. Mining firm Cleanspark added 454 BTC, bringing its total to 13,924 BTC. Conversely, BitFuFu sold 184 BTC, Bitdeer maintained zero net BTC holdings after selling its weekly production, and Empery Digital sold 1,400 BTC to fund an AI data center project and repay debt. Overall, public companies purchased 110,000 BTC in Q2 2026, 1.8 times the volume of the previous two quarters combined. In other cryptocurrency-related corporate news, Ethereum treasury company Bitmine increased its ETH holdings by 27,801 coins, with total staked ETH exceeding 4.9 million. Solana-focused company DFDV transferred daily operations of its meme coin DONT to an independent team. BNB treasury company BNB Plus was delisted from Nasdaq for failing to meet the $1 minimum bid price and moved to trade on the OTCQB market under the symbol BNBX. The broader equity markets showed mixed signals. Bank of America warned that bullish investor positioning indicated a potential pullback risk for stocks. In contrast, Morgan Stanley predicted the ongoing earnings season could broaden market gains beyond tech giants. Specific regional highlights included continued foreign investor outflows from South Korean stocks, pressure on US equities, and the upcoming IPO of Chinese memory chip maker ChangXin Memory. Most crypto-linked stocks remained in a downtrend.

marsbit1 h fa

Coin & Stock Compass: Global Listed Companies Net Sold $85.45 Million in BTC Last Week, Strategy's Dollar Reserves Scale Up to $3 Billion (July 14)

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片