Tensions Escalate in the Strait of Hormuz, Bitcoin Sells Off as Safe-Haven Asset, Plunging to $61.7K

marsbitPubblicato 2026-07-14Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-14

Introduzione

Bitcoin's price fell sharply on Monday, July 13, dropping approximately 4% to around $61,700, as heightened geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz triggered a broader shift toward safe-haven assets across global financial markets. Analysts attributed the decline to a confluence of factors: escalating U.S.-Iran tensions fueled risk-off sentiment, reignited inflation concerns, and dampened expectations for near-term Federal Reserve rate cuts. This macro-driven sell-off coincided with a slowdown in institutional ETF inflows and a wave of liquidations for leveraged long positions following Bitcoin's failure to break key resistance levels. Despite the pullback, several market observers characterized the move as a typical, healthy correction within a longer-term bullish cycle, noting that the underlying structural trajectory for Bitcoin remains intact. Attention now turns to upcoming U.S. Consumer Price Index data, which will provide further direction on inflation and monetary policy, key factors influencing risk assets like Bitcoin.

Written by: Forbes

Compiled by: AididiaoJP, Foresight News

On Monday, July 13, Bitcoin prices experienced a notable pullback as global financial markets collectively shifted into risk-off mode due to the latest geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz. This event, intertwined with other macro factors, exerted significant downward pressure on the price of this digital asset, swiftly cooling market sentiment.

According to real-time data from Coinbase on the TradingView platform, the price of the world's most valuable cryptocurrency once fell to around $61,700. Earlier in the session, Bitcoin had briefly approached a high near $64,400 but ultimately pared gains and turned negative, ending the day down approximately 4%.

This volatility also echoed the broader stock market performance: major U.S. equity benchmarks such as the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average similarly declined on the day, indicating a weakening of overall investor risk appetite.

Multiple market analysts pointed out in interviews that this Bitcoin price adjustment was not an isolated event but a direct reflection of changes in the global macro environment. In emailed comments, Roy Kashi, Co-founder and CEO of Falconedge, analyzed: "The recent weakness in Bitcoin primarily stems from the broad risk-off sentiment prevalent in global markets."

He further explained that escalating tensions between the U.S. and Iran have not only pushed up international oil prices but also reignited market concerns about inflation while diminishing expectations for near-term interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve. In this context, investors tend to reduce exposure to risk assets, including Bitcoin, seeking safer havens instead.

Tal Fromchenko, Founder and CEO of Leveraged, expressed similar views and added more specific triggers. He stated: "The price drop to around $62K is mainly influenced by escalating tensions between the US and Iran in the Strait of Hormuz, triggering a broader sell-off in risk assets.

Simultaneously, institutional inflows via ETFs have slowed, and after Bitcoin failed to break through key resistance levels on Friday, it triggered a large number of forced liquidations of leveraged long positions." Nevertheless, Fromchenko maintained an optimistic outlook, emphasizing: "This is just a typical macro-driven shakeout within a healthy multi-year market cycle. Bitcoin's overall structural growth trajectory remains intact, and the long-term upward trend is unchanged."

Himanshu Sahay, Co-founder and CTO of the Arch crypto lending platform, offered an interpretation from the perspectives of market psychology and liquidity. He noted in an email: "I believe this decline is not triggered by a single event, but more likely the result of the market's combined reaction to macro sentiment, position sizing, and liquidity conditions—factors that can change rapidly in a short period."

Sahay advised investors not to overinterpret short-term volatility, pointing out that Bitcoin has historically experienced sharp price movements during periods of high volatility. Future direction will still depend on the evolution of macroeconomic conditions and the gradual rebuilding of investor confidence.

Saeed Al-Marri, CEO of Ethra Invest, focused his attention on technical aspects and upcoming key data. He analyzed: "From a technical perspective, what we are seeing now looks more like a wave of liquidations rather than a loss of confidence in Bitcoin. When a large number of traders are leveraged long—meaning they borrow money to bet on price increases—any price drop can reach loss thresholds, forcing exchanges to automatically liquidate these positions."

He specifically mentioned that long positions are currently being liquidated at six times the rate of short positions (6 to 1), which clearly indicates that it is primarily bullish bets being cleared out, not a large-scale investor exit from Bitcoin.

Al-Marri further emphasized the macro-level influence: "The bigger driver lies in the upcoming U.S. Consumer Price Index data, i.e., inflation figures, to be released this Wednesday. If the data comes in higher than expected, it would further delay hopes for Fed rate cuts. A higher interest rate environment makes relatively safe assets like bonds and cash appear more attractive, thereby putting pressure on volatile assets like Bitcoin."

He concluded: "The real core story right now is not a structural breakdown in Bitcoin itself, but that the entire market is holding its breath, waiting for the guidance that will come from the key CPI number."

Overall, this Bitcoin price retracement reflects the immediate impact of geopolitical uncertainty on global risk appetite. However, analysts from multiple institutions agree that this falls within the scope of normal market adjustment and does not alter the fundamental nature of Bitcoin as a long-term growth asset. While paying attention to short-term fluctuations, investors also need to closely track this week's U.S. inflation data and further developments in the geopolitical situation to better grasp subsequent market directions.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main reason for Bitcoin's recent price drop according to most analysts in the article?

AThe main reason for Bitcoin's recent price drop is a broad global shift towards safe-haven assets driven by escalating geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz between the US and Iran, which has sparked a widespread risk-off sentiment.

QHow did the US stock market perform on the day Bitcoin price fell significantly?

AOn the day Bitcoin price fell significantly, major US stock market benchmarks like the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average also moved lower, reflecting a general decrease in investor risk appetite.

QAccording to Tal Fromchenko, what specific factor triggered a large wave of forced liquidations for leveraged long positions in Bitcoin?

AAccording to Tal Fromchenko, the forced liquidations were triggered after Bitcoin failed to break through a key resistance level on Friday, following the price decline caused by the heightened tensions in the Strait of Hormuz.

QWhat key economic data point does Saeed Al-Marri highlight as a major driver for Bitcoin's price movement in the coming days?

ASaeed Al-Marri highlights the upcoming US Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation data release as a major driver. If the data comes in higher than expected, it could further delay hopes for Federal Reserve rate cuts, putting pressure on volatile assets like Bitcoin.

QWhat is the overall consensus among the cited analysts regarding the long-term trend for Bitcoin despite the recent sell-off?

AThe overall consensus among the cited analysts is that the recent sell-off is a typical macro-driven shakeout within a healthy multi-year market cycle. They believe the fundamental long-term upward growth trajectory for Bitcoin remains intact and unchanged.

Letture associate

Buyback and Burn: Just Empty Promises? The Unbridgeable Rights Gap Between Tokens and Equity

"Token Repurchase and Burn: An Empty Promise? The Unbridgeable Rights Gap Between Tokens and Equity" Holding company stock grants shareholders residual claim rights - a legally enforceable entitlement to remaining assets after all other obligations are paid. This comes with rights like voting, dividends, and a share in sale proceeds. Crypto protocols have long promised token holders similar benefits: governance participation and a share of future growth. However, this narrative is fundamentally flawed and built on voluntary promises, not enforceable legal rights. The core difference is that token holders lack any legally enforceable claim to a protocol's underlying value or revenues. Common mechanisms like using protocol revenue to buy back and burn tokens are purely discretionary; the team can alter or stop the policy at any time. Token holders have no legal recourse. This rights gap becomes critically apparent when protocols introduce traditional equity alongside tokens, as seen with Venice AI's $65M funding round. Equity investors hold legal contracts with rights to company assets and profits, while token holders' benefits depend entirely on the continued goodwill of the protocol's management. The acquisition of Houdini Swap, where equity holders were paid while token holders received nothing, starkly illustrates this disparity. Upcoming legislation like the CLARITY Act threatens to eliminate the regulatory gray area that has allowed this ambiguous "pseudo-equity" narrative. The Act would classify tokens as either digital commodities (regulated by CFTC) or investment contract assets/securities (regulated by SEC). Protocols aiming for the "digital commodity" classification would be explicitly prohibited from granting token holders any legal claim to corporate revenue, profits, or assets. Promising that tokens will appreciate from protocol profits would likely classify them as securities. Projects like Aave are attempting technical solutions, such as its automated, on-chain "Aavenomics 3.0" buyback mechanism. However, this remains code that the governance body could still vote to change, not an immutable legal contract. The industry faces a clear fork: either acknowledge tokens as digital commodities and stop promising economic rights tied to corporate profits, or formally register tokens as securities and bear the associated compliance burden. The decade-long narrative equating tokens with ownership is built on unenforceable promises. The entry of traditional equity investors with real legal rights exposes this foundational weakness, which may unravel with the next major funding deal.

Foresight News27 min fa

Buyback and Burn: Just Empty Promises? The Unbridgeable Rights Gap Between Tokens and Equity

Foresight News27 min fa

Navigating the World of Event Trading: Top 5 Prediction Markets for Every Type of User

The prediction market industry has grown significantly, with trading volumes exceeding $20 billion monthly by mid-2026, driven by sports, politics, and macroeconomics. Success now depends heavily on platform choice and execution logistics. This guide compares five leading networks: **Polymarket**: A high-volume, decentralized platform on Polygon, using USDC for international and crypto-native users. It offers diverse markets but lacks built-in risk tools. **Kalshi**: A CFTC-regulated U.S. exchange for institutional traders, using direct fiat. It leads in regulated volume, especially for major sports and economic events, but has limited contract listings. **Outpoll**: A CeDeFi platform for advanced traders, focusing on professional tools. It uniquely features built-in stop-loss/take-profit orders, 0.1% fees, and full API support, with settlement in USDC. **OG Predictive**: A CFTC-regulated, sports-focused platform from Crypto.com. It offers granular player props and a flat fee structure, appealing to long-term position traders. **Manifold Markets**: A play-money, no-KYC platform for casual users and developers. It allows user-generated markets on any topic with zero fees, serving as a sandbox for strategy testing. Key differentiators include regulatory models (regulated vs. decentralized), funding (fiat vs. crypto), order types, risk management features, API access, and mobile support. The conclusion emphasizes that in today's event trading, profitability hinges not just on accurate predictions but on optimizing execution through platform infrastructure, liquidity, fees, and risk tools.

TheNewsCrypto1 h fa

Navigating the World of Event Trading: Top 5 Prediction Markets for Every Type of User

TheNewsCrypto1 h fa

Why Are Large-Scale Crypto Conferences No Longer Glamorous?

Why Are Major Crypto Conferences Losing Their Allure? A growing sense of fatigue surrounds large in-person crypto conferences, with many founders and investors now avoiding events they would never have missed just two years ago. While complaints cite declining ROI and information quality, the root causes are more structural. Crypto, global from inception, once relied on these mega-conferences as neutral hubs for essential face-to-face connections. However, their core value has been fragmented. High-quality participants—developers, investors—have largely migrated to smaller, private side-events, leaving main stages for repetitive content already shared online. The main conference often just becomes the excuse for being in the same city, with attendees scrambling between exclusive dinners and micro-events. While these intimate gatherings offer signal-rich conversations, they lose the "serendipitous encounters" of large conferences and can create insular echo chambers, especially as talent concentrates in hubs like New York. Meanwhile, invite-only, high-caliber summits are rising, offering quality and scale but at the cost of accessibility and crypto's early egalitarian ethos. This shift isn't unique to crypto; AI events in San Francisco show a similar trend. The perception of higher-value interactions drives core groups towards smaller, private settings, potentially creating a vicious cycle that drains larger events of their vitality. Yet, a more optimistic view exists. The apparent decline of crypto-centric events may signal industry maturation. Leading projects are now focused outward—on stablecoins for traditional finance, consumer-facing digital banks, or real-world assets. Crypto topics are increasingly integrated into mainstream finance and tech conferences. Just as dedicated "internet conferences" faded, dedicated crypto summits may become redundant as the technology embeds into every sector. The future likely holds far fewer large, inward-looking crypto conferences. The industry has moved past needing frequent self-congratulatory gatherings. True growth lies in engaging with the broader economy. This evolution towards private networking and mainstream integration, for better or worse, is a mark of the industry coming of age.

marsbit1 h fa

Why Are Large-Scale Crypto Conferences No Longer Glamorous?

marsbit1 h fa

Coin & Stock Compass: Global Listed Companies Net Sold $85.45 Million in BTC Last Week, Strategy's Dollar Reserves Scale Up to $3 Billion (July 14)

Global Public Companies Net Sell $85.45 Million in BTC; Strategy's Dollar Reserves Hit $3 Billion (July 14) Last week saw a significant net sell-off of Bitcoin by global public companies, excluding miners, totaling $85.45 million—a 908.42% decrease from the prior week. Major buyers like Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) and Japan's Metaplanet were notably absent from the market. However, two companies, Brazil's OrangeBTC and asset manager Strive, made purchases, adding 8 and 18 BTC, respectively. The aggregate BTC holdings of tracked public companies now stand at 1,139,635 BTC, valued at approximately $71.38 billion and representing 5.7% of Bitcoin's circulating market cap. In corporate updates, Strategy announced its dollar reserves have grown by $450 million to reach $3 billion, while its BTC holdings remain at 843,775 coins. Hyperscale Data increased its BTC reserves past 1,000 coins. Strategy will report its Q2 2026 financial results on July 30. Mining firm Cleanspark added 454 BTC, bringing its total to 13,924 BTC. Conversely, BitFuFu sold 184 BTC, Bitdeer maintained zero net BTC holdings after selling its weekly production, and Empery Digital sold 1,400 BTC to fund an AI data center project and repay debt. Overall, public companies purchased 110,000 BTC in Q2 2026, 1.8 times the volume of the previous two quarters combined. In other cryptocurrency-related corporate news, Ethereum treasury company Bitmine increased its ETH holdings by 27,801 coins, with total staked ETH exceeding 4.9 million. Solana-focused company DFDV transferred daily operations of its meme coin DONT to an independent team. BNB treasury company BNB Plus was delisted from Nasdaq for failing to meet the $1 minimum bid price and moved to trade on the OTCQB market under the symbol BNBX. The broader equity markets showed mixed signals. Bank of America warned that bullish investor positioning indicated a potential pullback risk for stocks. In contrast, Morgan Stanley predicted the ongoing earnings season could broaden market gains beyond tech giants. Specific regional highlights included continued foreign investor outflows from South Korean stocks, pressure on US equities, and the upcoming IPO of Chinese memory chip maker ChangXin Memory. Most crypto-linked stocks remained in a downtrend.

marsbit1 h fa

Coin & Stock Compass: Global Listed Companies Net Sold $85.45 Million in BTC Last Week, Strategy's Dollar Reserves Scale Up to $3 Billion (July 14)

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片