What 'crypto winter'? Global stablecoin monthly trading volume hits an all-time record

FinboldPubblicato 2022-09-08Pubblicato ultima volta 2022-09-08

Introduzione

Stablecoins have been cast into the spotlight over their different uses and role in the ongoing crypto market crash.

What 'crypto winter'? Global stablecoin monthly trading volume hits an all-time record

Stablecoins have been cast into the spotlight over their different uses and role in the ongoing crypto market crash. The development of stablecoins within the cryptocurrency community is being emphasized by volume that is hitting new milestones.
In this case, as of August 2022, on-chain stablecoin volume almost hit the $1 trillion mark after recording consistent growth in the last two years, data by CoinMetrics indicates

On-chain stablecoin volume. Source: CoinMetrics

Growing stablecoin popularity 
The growth aligns with the popularity of stablecoins, characterized by increasing global use cases. 
The enthusiasm for stablecoins is highlighted by WeTrust platform maintainer Patrick Long, who stresses that they stand out due to their year-long use. 

Stablecoins is one of the biggest use cases of crypto blockchains.
Initially, the use of stablecoins within the crypto sector was tied to acting as a safe haven in cases of increased volatility. However, the use cases have since multiplied, especially with the growing popularity of decentralized finance (DeFi) applications. 
In this line, several cryptocurrency firms have increasingly focused on embracing stablecoins in a bid to control the highly competitive market. For instance, cryptocurrency exchange Binance has announced plans to remove access to three stablecoins that compete with its own, dubbed Binance USD (BUSD). 
From September 29, the exchange will automatically turn users’ USD coin (USDC), Pax dollar (USDP), and trueUSD (TUSD) holdings into BUSD. 
At the same time, different jurisdictions have raised concerns about the financial risks posed by stablecoins. The concerns were accelerated with the Terra (LUNA) ecosystem crash that was triggered after the platform’s stablecoin TerraClassicUSD lost its dollar peg. 
Concerns about stablecoin popularity 
Most of the concerns have been due to the private nature of stablecoins considering that the Terra ecosystem crash has been linked to mismanagement by officials at the company. Notably, investigations are ongoing regarding the allegations of fraud in the collapse. 
It is worth mentioning that some of the early stablecoin regulation initiatives have seen U.S. states like New York release specific regulations targeting the sector. 
At the same time, other jurisdictions are exploring using stablecoin to power transactions. As reported by Finbold, the Russian Ministry of Finance (Minfin) announced it was ready to support the legality of transactions in the country through stablecoins. 
According to Russian government officials, using stablecoins minimizes risk and works better than traditional settling transactions. 

Letture associate

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit1 h fa

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit1 h fa

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit1 h fa

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片