[Key interpretation] Giant whale sold 5000 BTC, and the ETH selling pressure increased by 375 million dollars

HuobiPubblicato 2022-09-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2022-09-06

Introduzione

Whale address was founded in December 2013 and fled after making a profit of $100 million, raising the falling signal.

1. BTC horizontal plate operation

With the progress of the adjustment, it seems that BTC's adjustment at the daily K-line level has not ended. Before the price is really close to the middle rail of brin line, there are signs of continued weakness. At present, BTC has been running sideways for the tenth consecutive trading day, and the current price is more likely to leave the platform. During the same period, BTC trading volume continued to shrink. Once the price broke away from the large-scale operation area in the past two months, the decline would soon expand.

In terms of transfer, Jujing address 18xghnru26w6hscel8dd5o1whfidaygp6i transferred a large number of BTCs, with the number of 5000 BTCs. Considering that the creation time of this address can be traced back to December 2013, it is judged that the target of transfer may be transaction BTC. Facts have also proved that 5000 BTCs have indeed entered the kraken exchange. Therefore, we can pay close attention to the judgment of the growth of selling pressure.

2. BTC unconfirmed transaction pullback

The number of unconfirmed transactions of BTC rose and fell, falling from the peak of more than 80 million bytes on September 2 to around 60 million bytes, which means that the number of unconfirmed transactions has clearly peaked recently. As the number of unconfirmed transactions fell, BTC also welcomed a very typical reversal signal.

Since most of the unconfirmed transactions are those of small and medium investors, the BTC price will also meet the demand for price change in the process of creating all the transactions.

3. Eth short-term sideways

The running time of eth sideways increased, and after the price closed near the middle rail of brin line, there were more opportunities for further changes. At present, the shrinking trend of the trading volume at the K-line level on the ETH day continues, and the trading volume has reached the lowest level since April 24. Therefore, the bulls have not continued to pull orders, which makes the ETH price continue its recent trend. At present, the price is lower than the corresponding $1602 of the middle rail of brin line, and the operation direction is still downward. The corresponding support point for the off track of brin line is US $1403, so we can pay appropriate attention to low-income opportunities.

4. Inflow growth of eth exchange

The exchange inflow of eth has continued to show obvious signs of growth recently, with the number increasing from 2226700 to 2257500, with an increase of 239874 Eth and a value of 375 million US dollars. Combined with the growth performance of eth value in the previous period, the value of eth in the exchange shows signs of bottom confirmation. In other words, the current number of eth has continued to flow into the exchange, or there may be signs to pay attention to the growth of short-term selling pressure.

Letture associate

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit1 h fa

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit1 h fa

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit1 h fa

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片