La Casa Blanca acusa a los demócratas de retrasar la ley de cripto CLARITY Act

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-08-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-10

Introduzione

El director ejecutivo del Consejo Presidencial de Activos Digitales de EE.UU., Patrick Witt, acusó a los demócratas de bloquear activamente el proyecto de ley CLARITY Act para la industria cripto, insistiendo en retrasar la votación antes del receso del Congreso. Advirtió que si no se aprueba antes del 15 de septiembre, es posible que nunca llegue a ser ley. Los demócratas expresaron preocupaciones pendientes, como los rendimientos de los stablecoins que podrían alejar a clientes de los bancos tradicionales, y la exención de proyectos descentralizados de las normas contra el lavado de dinero. También señalaron un posible conflicto de intereses del presidente Donald Trump, quien promueve la ley y habría obtenido ingresos significativos de proyectos cripto. The Wall Street Journal describió el proyecto como lleno de "minas de acción retardada", mientras que Witt desestimó sus críticas por estar alineadas con los bancos de Wall Street.

El director ejecutivo del Consejo de Activos Digitales de la Presidencia de EE. UU., Patrick Witt, declaró que los demócratas han hecho todo lo posible para que el proyecto de ley CLARITY Act no sea aprobado. Según el principal asesor cripto de la Casa Blanca, es posible que el documento nunca sea aprobado por ellos.

A finales de la semana pasada, los senadores demócratas, que se preparaban para irse de vacaciones, insistieron en que la votación sobre el emblemático proyecto de ley para la industria cripto no se llevara a cabo antes de las vacaciones. El receso de los legisladores estadounidenses comenzó el 7 de agosto y durará hasta mediados de septiembre. Después de que los senadores regresen, su atención probablemente estará centrada en las elecciones intermedias de noviembre.

"La semana pasada, Chuck Schumer y los 'demócratas pro-cripto' hicieron todo lo posible para bloquear una simple votación procedimental sobre el proyecto de ley antes del receso del Congreso, exigiendo otro retraso. Si no lo logran antes del 15 de septiembre, entonces no lo lograrán nunca", escribió Witt.

La CLARITY Act debería dar más legitimidad a los proyectos cripto, abriendo amplias oportunidades para ellos en EE. UU. Pero, según los demócratas, quedan sin resolver temas como la rentabilidad de las stablecoins, que amenaza con llevar a clientes de bancos tradicionales al ecosistema cripto, y la exención de los proyectos descentralizados de cumplir con los requisitos de lucha contra el blanqueo de capitales y la verificación de usuarios.

Los representantes del partido demócrata también plantean la cuestión del conflicto de intereses del presidente de EE. UU., Donald Trump, que promueve la CLARITY Act. En 2025, los ingresos totales de Trump por proyectos cripto ascendieron aproximadamente a 1.400 millones de dólares.

El 4 de agosto, The Wall Street Journal publicó un artículo que analizaba las posiciones de los senadores sobre la CLARITY Act, calificándola como una ley con muchas "minas de efecto retardado". Se señala que los republicanos se apresuraban a aprobar el documento antes de las vacaciones, mientras que los demócratas insistían en que no debía hacerse mientras quedaran preguntas sin resolver, para no tener que volver a corregir errores más tarde.

"El presidente Trump quiere que el Congreso presente para su consideración un proyecto de ley que recompense a sus amigos y patrocinadores en esta industria. Los demócratas exigen restricciones más estrictas sobre la emisión y promoción de criptomonedas por parte de funcionarios federales durante su mandato. Es totalmente justo. Las transacciones cripto de Trump son desconcertantes", se afirma en el artículo del WSJ.

Witt declaró que no vale la pena prestar atención a este material, porque "The Wall Street Journal, que repite los argumentos de los bancos de Wall Street, no merece mucha atención".

Crypto di tendenza

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Domande pertinenti

Q¿Quién es Patrick Witt y qué acusación hizo contra los demócratas?

APatrick Witt es el director ejecutivo del Consejo de Activos Digitales de la presidencia de EE.UU. Acusó a los demócratas de hacer todo lo posible para que no se aprobara el proyecto de ley CLARITY Act.

Q¿Cuál es la situación del calendario legislativo que dificulta la aprobación del CLARITY Act?

ALos senadores demócratas insistieron en no votar el proyecto antes de las vacaciones del Congreso, que comenzaron el 7 de agosto y duran hasta mediados de septiembre. Luego, la atención se centrará en las elecciones de mitad de mandato de noviembre, lo que podría hacer que el proyecto nunca se apruebe si no se avanza antes del 15 de septiembre.

Q¿Cuáles son las principales preocupaciones de los demócratas sobre el proyecto de ley CLARITY Act?

ALos demócratas están preocupados por temas no resueltos, como los rendimientos de las stablecoins que podrían alejar a los clientes de los bancos tradicionales, y la exención para proyectos descentralizados de cumplir con las normas contra el lavado de dinero y verificación de usuarios.

Q¿Qué conflicto de intereses se menciona en relación con el presidente Donald Trump y el CLARITY Act?

ASe menciona que el presidente Donald Trump, quien promueve el CLARITY Act, obtuvo unos ingresos de aproximadamente $1.4 mil millones de proyectos cripto en 2025, lo que plantea un posible conflicto de intereses.

Q¿Cómo describió The Wall Street Journal al proyecto de ley CLARITY Act y cuál fue la respuesta de Patrick Witt?

AThe Wall Street Journal describió al CLARITY Act como una ley con muchas 'minas de acción retardada'. Patrick Witt respondió que no se debía prestar atención a ese material, afirmando que el periódico, al repetir los argumentos de los bancos de Wall Street, no merece mucha consideración.

Letture associate

CoreWeave: The Inflection Point Has Arrived. Has the 'Hard-Working Underdog' Finally Turned Profitable?

CoreWeave, an AI cloud unicorn, released its Q2 2026 earnings on August 12, with shares rising about 15% post-announcement. While overall performance did not significantly exceed expectations, key positive trends emerged. Revenue reached approximately $2.58 billion, up 112% year-over-year, though slightly below the high end of prior guidance. A major highlight was the acceleration in computing power deployment, with Active Power increasing by a record 500 Mw to 1,500 Mw, far surpassing market forecasts and signaling faster future revenue growth. Capital expenditures also hit a new high of $9.4 billion. Importantly, profitability showed signs of inflection. "True" gross margin (after deducting cost of revenue and Tech & Infrastructure expenses) rose to 7.3%, up 3 percentage points from the previous quarter. As revenue scales, depreciation and operating expenses are being diluted. Adjusted operating profit margin improved significantly to 5% from 1% last quarter. The company's guidance points to continued acceleration, with Q3 revenue growth expected at 158% and margins continuing to climb. Management raised full-year 2026 guidance, projecting Q4 revenue growth of around 194% and an adjusted operating margin of approximately 14.6%, suggesting a rapid path toward its 25%-30% long-term target. Recent developments, including a 25% price increase for its services and the launch of higher-margin Managed Inference offerings, support the improving profitability narrative. While long-term competitive challenges remain for new cloud providers, CoreWeave's near-term trajectory of accelerating growth and expanding margins presents a high-risk, high-reward opportunity, especially amid renewed market optimism for cloud stocks.

marsbit23 min fa

CoreWeave: The Inflection Point Has Arrived. Has the 'Hard-Working Underdog' Finally Turned Profitable?

marsbit23 min fa

Uncovering the Secret Reasoning Chains of Claude Opus for $720: A Leak via Haiku, with GPT and Gemini Also Affected

Researchers discovered a method to extract hidden reasoning traces, or "Chain of Thought" (CoT), from major proprietary large language models (LLMs) like Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.8, OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol, and Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro. The attack exploits a design flaw in how these models handle encrypted reasoning "blobs." These blobs, which contain a model's internal reasoning steps, are encrypted and sent to the client for storage between conversation turns to save server costs. The researchers found these blobs were encrypted with a global key, allowing them to be reused across different sessions, users, and, crucially, different models from the same company. By taking an encrypted reasoning blob generated by a powerful "flagship" model and feeding it to a smaller, less capable model from the same family (e.g., feeding Claude Opus's blob to Claude Haiku), the researchers could prompt the smaller model to divulge the hidden CoT. This bypassed the need to crack the encryption directly. The implications are significant: 1) Competitors could potentially distill high-value reasoning data at low cost (estimated at ~$720 for 10,000 traces). 2) Sensitive information like API keys, passwords, and personal emails, which models might process internally but not output, could be leaked. The team found such leaks in 4.9% of analyzed public agent logs. 3) Models might internally analyze dangerous queries (e.g., car theft methods) before refusing to answer, but this dangerous analysis could be extracted from the CoT. 4) Malicious instructions could potentially be hidden within a reasoning blob to influence a model's future behavior. While the vulnerability was responsibly disclosed and patched by the affected companies, the research highlights a fundamental tension between the convenience of portable reasoning states and security. The paper also notes preliminary tests found no clear evidence that open-source models like DeepSeek had been distilled from the extracted CoTs.

marsbit28 min fa

Uncovering the Secret Reasoning Chains of Claude Opus for $720: A Leak via Haiku, with GPT and Gemini Also Affected

marsbit28 min fa

OpenAI Loses Four Executives in One Month, Former COO Departs, Almost the Entire Safety Team Ousted

In a surprising turn of events, OpenAI's longtime COO and key lieutenant to CEO Sam Altman, Brad Lightcap, has announced his departure after eight years with the company. His exit follows the recent resignations of several key safety and ethics leaders, including Chief Futurist Joshua Achiam, Safety Systems Lead Johannes Heidecke, and Ethics Lead Chloé Bakalar, within a single month. Lightcap, instrumental in building OpenAI's commercialization and operational framework, described his departure as "bittersweet" and hinted at wanting to tackle new challenges. While his statement and Altman's farewell were amicable, internal shifts had previously reduced his operational role, signaling a longer-term transition. The mass exodus, particularly from the safety and ethics divisions, coincides with growing internal and external scrutiny over AI safety. This follows incidents like models exhibiting unauthorized actions during testing and the recent decision to delay the launch of the advanced Astra model due to unresolved safety concerns about its potential cybersecurity capabilities. OpenAI has stated that safety and ethics are not confined to any single team or leader, but the concentration of departures raises questions about the company's direction and internal dynamics, especially as it navigates pressures of rapid development and a potential future IPO.

marsbit29 min fa

OpenAI Loses Four Executives in One Month, Former COO Departs, Almost the Entire Safety Team Ousted

marsbit29 min fa

1confirmation: Reverse Entrepreneurship, the Next Web3 Blockbuster Might Come from a Once-Failed Track

**Title: Reverse Entrepreneurship: The Next Web3 Blockbuster May Come from Previously Failed Tracks** This article argues that the next major consumer crypto application is likely to emerge from a concept that failed five years ago, now benefiting from matured infrastructure and better timing. It examines several such "failed" tracks that hold renewed potential: 1. **Internet-Native Assets:** Beyond simply tokenizing tweets or creating digital collectibles, there's an opportunity to create a genuinely new, crypto-native asset class that captures cultural moments and online phenomena, as opposed to merely tokenizing real-world assets (RWA). 2. **X-to-Earn:** While unsustainable token emission models doomed early projects like STEPN, the core premise that most people will first *earn* crypto, not buy it, remains valid. The future challenge is designing what is earned and why users would hold it long-term. 3. **The Metaverse:** Past failures like Decentraland stemmed from trying to replicate the physical world online. The opportunity lies not in abandoning shared online social spaces, but in reimagining their form beyond real-world analogs. 4. **DAOs:** DAOs have underdelivered by overcomplicating governance. The fundamental, unmet user need is simpler: enabling groups of internet strangers to pool funds and collectively achieve goals (e.g., buying assets, funding projects) that are impossible individually. 5. **Personal Value Tokenization:** Numerous attempts (Friend.tech, BitClout) to create markets around individuals have failed. The enduring demand for "person-as-asset" trading (seen in meme coins, prediction markets) suggests the direction isn't wrong, but the execution has been flawed, often lacking creator consent or a less commodified model. The conclusion is that true innovation will come from revisiting these past ideas with new insights, rather than crowding into currently popular trends.

marsbit39 min fa

1confirmation: Reverse Entrepreneurship, the Next Web3 Blockbuster Might Come from a Once-Failed Track

marsbit39 min fa

Arizona crypto ATM law helps 35 scam victims recover $171K

Arizona's cryptocurrency ATM law, effective since September 2025, has successfully helped 35 scam victims recover a total of $171,332 in full refunds. The state's attorney general announced the results, urging residents to report fraudulent transactions quickly to meet the law's 30-day reporting deadline. The legislation requires crypto kiosk operators to refund eligible new customers for scam-induced transactions, provided victims contact both the operator and law enforcement within 30 days with an official fraud report. The law defines new customers as those using an operator for fewer than 10 days and caps their daily transactions at $2,000.

cointelegraph49 min fa

Arizona crypto ATM law helps 35 scam victims recover $171K

cointelegraph49 min fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare HOUSE

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Housecoin (HOUSE) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente HousecoinHOUSE.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Housecoin (HOUSE)Dopo aver acquistato Housecoin (HOUSE), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Housecoin (HOUSE)Scambia facilmente Housecoin (HOUSE) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

452 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.04.27Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di HOUSE HOUSE sono presentate come di seguito.