Australia Gugat Telegram Atas Dugaan Kegagalan Menghapus Konten Teror

cointelegraphPubblicato 2026-07-30Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-30

Introduzione

Australia mengajukan gugatan hukum terhadap platform pesan Telegram, menuduh perusahaan gagal menghapus konten terorisme yang dilaporkan pengguna. Regulator keselamatan online Australia, eSafety Commissioner, menyatakan bahwa Telegram melanggar Undang-Undang Keselamatan Online dengan tidak menindaklanjuti keluhan dan membiarkan materi tertentu, termasuk rekaman penembakan masjid Christchurch 2019, tetap ada hingga tiga minggu. Otoritas menuntut denda potensial hingga 54,6 juta dolar Australia. Tindakan hukum ini terjadi bersamaan dengan tekanan global terhadap praktik moderasi Telegram. Sehari sebelumnya, Rusia menuduh CEO Telegram Pavel Durov memfasilitasi aktivitas teroris karena gagal menghapus saluran yang digunakan oleh kelompok Ukraina. Durov juga sedang diselidiki di Prancis terkait distribusi konten ilegal. Telegram belum memberikan pernyataan resmi mengenai gugatan Australia, tetapi membalas dengan postingan tentang kebebasan berekspresi. Durov sendiri mengkritik ancaman terhadap privasi online dan kontrol pemerintah yang meningkat.

Telegram, platform perpesanan yang digunakan oleh lebih dari 1 miliar orang di seluruh dunia, menghadapi tantangan hukum besar di Australia atas klaim bahwa mereka gagal menghentikan penyebaran materi yang dikaitkan dengan terorisme.

Regulator keamanan online Australia, Komisioner eSafety, meluncurkan proses hukum perdata terhadap Telegram di Pengadilan Federal pada hari Kamis, menurut pernyataan resmi.

Otoritas tersebut menduga Telegram melanggar kewajibannya berdasarkan Undang-Undang Keamanan Online negara itu dalam menangani konten "pro-teror" dengan gagal menindaklanjuti keluhan dari beberapa pengguna.

Kasus ini menambah sorotan global yang semakin besar terhadap praktik moderasi Telegram, menyusul tekanan hukum terhadap CEO Pavel Durov di Rusia dan Prancis karena pemerintah semakin memeriksa bagaimana platform online besar menangani konten berbahaya.

Australia Menduga Telegram Mengabaikan Peringatan Berulang

ESafety menyatakan bahwa investigasi selama satu tahun mereka menemukan bahwa Telegram gagal menghapus materi ilegal tertentu setelah mengetahuinya, dengan beberapa konten yang dilaporkan tetap terlihat hingga tiga minggu.

Regulator itu juga menduga bahwa Telegram tidak mengambil langkah yang cukup untuk mencegah pelanggaran berulang, termasuk menghapus akun, saluran, dan grup yang digunakan untuk mendistribusikan materi pro-teror.

Menurut eSafety, Telegram juga gagal mendeteksi konten ekstremis yang dikenal, termasuk rekaman dari penembakan masjid Christchurch 2019 dan penembakan massal Buffalo 2022, sebelum materi tersebut kemudian dihapus.

Terkait: Pavel Durov Mengatakan Telegram Akan Luncurkan Dompet Kripto Gram Native

Regulator tersebut menuntut sanksi finansial, dengan pelanggaran aturan keamanan online Australia membawa potensi denda hingga 54,6 juta dolar Australia ($35,8 juta).

Telegram belum mengeluarkan pernyataan resmi tentang proses hukum di Australia, tetapi akun X resminya memposting video dengan keterangan "kebebasan berekspresi."

Telegram tidak segera menanggapi permintaan komentar Cointelegraph untuk cerita ini.

Rusia Intensifkan Tekanan Hukum pada Durov

Tindakan hukum Australia datang sehari setelah Layanan Keamanan Federal (FSB) Rusia menuduh Durov memfasilitasi aktivitas teroris dan mengatakan telah memulai prosedur untuk menempatkannya dalam daftar pencarian internasional.

Otoritas Rusia menduga bahwa Telegram gagal menghapus saluran, obrolan, dan bot yang digunakan oleh dinas intelijen Ukraina, kelompok teroris, dan organisasi ekstremis untuk mengoordinasikan serangan, merekrut operatif, dan melakukan penipuan siber.

Telegram juga belum mengeluarkan pernyataan resmi tentang perkembangan hukum terbaru di Rusia, tetapi memposting gambar Durov membuat gerakan tangan yang tidak senonoh.

Sumber: Telegram Messenger

Durov juga masih dalam penyelidikan di Prancis menyusul penangkapannya pada Agustus 2024 di Bandara Le Bourget. Jaksa Prancis menuduhnya dengan pelanggaran termasuk keterlibatan dalam distribusi konten ilegal, termasuk materi terkait kejahatan terorganisir, melalui Telegram.

Durov sebelumnya telah mengkritik apa yang dia gambarkan sebagai ancaman yang tumbuh terhadap privasi online, memperingatkan bahwa pemerintah sedang mengurangi perlindungan untuk internet bebas.

"Apa yang dulunya adalah janji pertukaran informasi bebas sedang diubah menjadi alat kontrol tertinggi," tulisnya dalam postingan di X pada Oktober 2025.

Majalah: Alasan sebenarnya proyek DeFi yang selamat dari crash 2022 tutup sekarang

Crypto di tendenza

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Domande pertinenti

QApa alasan Australia menggugat platform perpesanan Telegram?

AAustralia menggugat Telegram karena dugaan pelanggaran terhadap Undang-Undang Keamanan Online, yaitu gagal menangani konten pro-teror dan menghapus materi terorisme yang dilaporkan oleh pengguna.

QSiapa yang mengajukan proses hukum terhadap Telegram di Australia?

AProses hukum diajukan oleh regulator keamanan online Australia, yaitu eSafety Commissioner, di Pengadilan Federal.

QBerapa denda maksimal yang dapat dijatuhkan pada Telegram karena kasus di Australia?

APelanggaran terhadap aturan keamanan online Australia dapat dikenakan denda hingga 54,6 juta dolar Australia (sekitar 35,8 juta dolar AS).

QTuduhan hukum apa yang dihadapi CEO Telegram, Pavel Durov, di Rusia?

ADi Rusia, Durov didakwa oleh FSB (Badan Keamanan Federal) atas tuduhan memfasilitasi kegiatan teroris karena Telegram diduga gagal menghapus saluran dan konten yang digunakan oleh kelompok Ukraina dan organisasi ekstremis untuk mengoordinasikan serangan.

QBagaimana tanggapan Telegram terhadap gugatan hukum dari Australia dan Rusia?

ATelegram belum mengeluarkan pernyataan resmi mengenai gugatan di Australia dan Rusia. Namun, akun resmi mereka di X memposting video dengan keterangan 'kebebasan berekspresi' dan gambar Durov membuat gerakan tangan yang mengekspresikan ketidaksetujuan.

Letture associate

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

Google Earth's newly launched "Create image" feature, powered by the Nano Banana 2 AI image generation model, was abruptly withdrawn shortly after its release due to being "played" by users. The feature allowed users to generate and overlay AI-created visuals directly onto real-world satellite and 3D maps in Google Earth. The tool enabled creative applications like historical recreations (e.g., visualizing ancient Pompeii), generating informational graphics for landmarks, and envisioning architectural projects or futuristic cityscapes on real terrain. It operated under "geospatial grounding," meaning the AI respected the underlying geography, topography, and perspective of the chosen map view. The model also integrated with Gemini to retrieve relevant factual information. However, upon release, users quickly tested its limits. A prominent example involved reimagining Philadelphia's historic Independence Hall as a post-apocalyptic ruin overrun by "happy" zombies, evil clowns, and giant alien mechs. This highlighted both the feature's playful potential and its risks regarding the generation of inappropriate or misleading content on realistic maps, leading to its swift temporary removal. Google stated it would re-release the feature after implementing "enhanced guardrails." Analysts note this move strategically leverages Google's vast proprietary geospatial data, positioning its AI not just for artistic generation but for spatially accurate world visualization—a unique advantage in the competitive AI image generation landscape.

marsbit57 min fa

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

marsbit57 min fa

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

Sam Altman has revised his earlier predictions about AI rapidly replacing jobs, admitting he overestimated the speed at which AI would eliminate entry-level white-collar roles. Speaking on the "Invest Like the Best" podcast, he stated that people do not truly want an AI CEO, as accountability and human connection remain critical. He found that individuals prefer interacting with people who can be held responsible for decisions. Similarly, NVIDIA's Jensen Huang argued that the narrative of AI destroying jobs is misguided. He distinguishes between tasks and jobs, noting that while AI can automate specific tasks, entire jobs—encompassing communication, judgment, coordination, and accountability—are not eliminated. He cited examples like radiologists and software engineers, where demand for these roles has increased as AI handles repetitive tasks, allowing for business expansion and the creation of more positions. Data from a University of Maryland and LinkUp study supports this, showing that U.S. job postings for new graduates have actually risen, countering the fear of vanishing entry-level roles. However, a significant shift is occurring: the traditional entry-level tasks that help newcomers gain experience are being automated, making initial career access more challenging. The key insight is that as AI takes over standardized tasks, the enduring value of human work shifts toward areas of responsibility, trust-building, and final decision-making—aspects that AI cannot replicate. The real "moat" for professionals lies in these irreplaceable human elements.

marsbit1 h fa

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

marsbit1 h fa

A Major Change at the Fed? Report: Wash Considers Reducing Frequency of Policy Meetings, Breaking 40-Year Precedent

The Federal Reserve Chairman is considering reducing the number of regular Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings held each year, a potential major shift from the current practice of eight meetings annually that has been in place since 1981. According to a report, the proposal was discussed internally, with possible details finalized ahead of the September meeting. This change would mean fewer formal opportunities to vote on interest rates and could diminish the Fed's ability to respond to economic data while reducing market access to policy signals, marking a reversal of the central bank's long-term trend towards greater transparency. While the 1935 Banking Act sets a legal minimum of four meetings per year, historical meeting frequency has varied. The move aligns with the Chairman's broader agenda of institutional reform since taking office, which includes revising communication practices and data usage. An internal memo from 1988 had previously concluded that the eight-meeting schedule remained appropriate. If implemented, this reduction in meetings would significantly reshape the Fed's operational rhythm and its interaction with financial markets.

marsbit1 h fa

A Major Change at the Fed? Report: Wash Considers Reducing Frequency of Policy Meetings, Breaking 40-Year Precedent

marsbit1 h fa

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731) provides a curated selection of deep analysis, filtering out market noise. Key themes from this week include: **Macro & Policy:** The Federal Reserve's upcoming meeting is marked by high uncertainty, balancing cooling inflation data against persistent price pressures. Meanwhile, the U.S. crypto regulatory Clarity Act faces critical political hurdles, with its 2026 passage probability seen as low. **Investing & Crypto:** Analysis suggests long-term crypto success depends on conviction through volatile cycles, focusing on assets like Bitcoin and core smart contract platforms. A trend noted is the increasing similarity between global equity markets (especially tech) and crypto, driven by narrative and leverage. Several major crypto protocols show strong revenue growth, but this isn't always translating to token price appreciation due to sell pressure and structural factors. **AI & Semiconductors:** Nvidia's rising credit default swap rates signal market concern over AI infrastructure financing risks. The storage sector experienced volatility as markets began pricing in potential 2027 oversupply. Despite a record profitable quarter, SK Hynix's results were deemed "below expectations," reflecting heightened investor demands for future growth visibility. **Markets & DeFi:** TradeXYZ demonstrated remarkable accuracy in pre-market pricing for a major A股 listing. The token ONDO saw gains, linked to its growing role in the on-chain tokenized stock ecosystem. **Ethereum:** Post-Pectra upgrade, a major structural shift is underway as Lido begins migrating millions of ETH to new validator architectures designed for capital efficiency. **Also Highlighted:** Butian's bullish stock market move; OpenAI's Altman promising major advances; Samsung and SK Hynix securing large AI chip deals; Apple reaching a $5T market cap; and ongoing discussions around exchange security following Poolin's bankruptcy case.

marsbit1 h fa

Low Investment Isn't Apple's Immunity Pass

While Meta and Google face investor scrutiny over ballooning AI capital expenditures, Apple's minimal AI investment has paradoxically become a strength. Its market cap recently reclaimed the global top spot, surpassing $5 trillion. The irony is deep: Apple's own AI efforts have lagged, with "Apple Intelligence" delayed and core talent lost, forcing reliance on partners like Google Gemini and Alibaba's Qianwen. Its Q3 FY2026 (Q2 CY) earnings initially seemed stellar. Revenue hit $109.4B (up 16% YoY), with iPhone and Mac sales, growing 22% and 29% respectively, driving most of the growth. However, the stock fell over 8% post-earnings. The primary concern was a weaker Q4 revenue growth forecast of 9-11%, below expectations, due to looming supply chain constraints. Apple is feeling the indirect cost of the AI boom. Soaring memory and chip prices, fueled by massive data center investments from Microsoft, Amazon, and others, are forcing Apple to raise Mac and iPad prices significantly. The upcoming iPhone launch is also expected to see substantial price hikes. Despite avoiding heavy AI infrastructure spending—its capital expenditures are actually down 28%—Apple cannot escape the industry-wide supply and cost pressures. While Apple's operating cash flow remains robust, its substantial R&D spending (up 32% YoY) has yet to yield major AI breakthroughs. As Tim Cook prepares to step down as CEO, Apple faces a challenging transition: balancing its premium hardware success against the strategic and cost pressures of the AI era it has so far cautiously navigated.

marsbit2 h fa

Low Investment Isn't Apple's Immunity Pass

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare PEOPLE

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente ConstitutionDAOPEOPLE.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Dopo aver acquistato ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Scambia facilmente ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

542 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.12Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di PEOPLE PEOPLE sono presentate come di seguito.