Crypto hacks hit record high in H1 2026 – What’s fueling the surge?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-07-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-02

Introduzione

According to TRM Labs, crypto hacks reached a record high in the first half of 2026 with 207 incidents, more than double the 85 reported in H1 2025. While the number of breaches surged, the total value stolen fell to $972 million, less than half the $2.3 billion lost in the same period the previous year. Smart contract exploits were the most common attack type, constituting 125 cases. However, TRM Labs' Ari Redbord noted that three-quarters of the stolen value came from infrastructure failures like compromised keys and custody systems, highlighting a gap between improved code auditing and lagging operational security. Notably, North Korean-linked actors were responsible for 66% of the stolen funds. Major exploits, such as the $293 million attack on KelpDAO, triggered liquidity crises in protocols like Aave and contributed to a broader loss of confidence in DeFi, leading to significant capital outflows and a drop in Total Value Locked to a two-year low of $70 billion.

TRM Labs, a blockchain security firm, reported 207 crypto hacks in the first half of 2026, the most in any six-month period. The bulk of the crypto hack cases happened in Q2 (126 incidents), led by KelpDAO, Humanity, and Rhea Lend exploits.

Source: TRM Labs

In the first half of 2025, 85 crypto hacks were reported. In other words, H1 2026 saw more than double the number of crypto hack cases over the same period. According to the report, most of the attacks were smart contract exploits, which accounted for 125 of the 207 incidents: a 60% dominance share in breaches.

Commenting on the same, Ari Redbord, global head of policy at TRM Labs, told AMBCrypto,

What I find most concerning is how concentrated these losses are in infrastructure failures. Three-quarters of all stolen value came from compromises of keys, custody systems, and signing infrastructure, not from smart contract bugs.

He concluded that,

The industry has improved at auditing code, but our operational security has not kept pace with our on-chain complexity.

Source: TRM Labs

North Korea-linked actors drive 66% of crypto hacks

Despite the record number of breaches, the overall value stolen in 2026 was relatively small compared to 2025.

The report noted that $972 million was lost as of June, which was below half of about $2.3 billion lost over the same period in 2025. Still, 66% of the stolen funds were driven by North Korean-linked entities.

By the end of Q2 2026, North Korea-linked attackers’ share of stolen crypto funds was over 75%. However, intensified activity from other entities during the quarter reduced their dominance to 66% at press time. The impact of the hacks has been more devastating for the DeFi sector. Amid the broader bearish sentiment, the intensified crypto hacks further drove investors from the DeFi sector.

In fact, in the KelpDAO’s $293 million hack, the attacker used fake tokens and deposited them in the Aave lending protocol and borrowed $190M in legitimate assets (wETH). There was a sudden liquidity crunch and subsequent bank run in Aave as investors feared the worthless collateral deposited by the attacker. As a result, Aave pools reached full utilization, preventing some late depositors from withdrawing their funds.

This added to broader DeFi security risk, which has triggered $55 billion in capital outflows in H1 2026. At the time of writing, the total DeFi TVL (total locked value) has hit a two-year low of $70 billion, up from $120B seen earlier in 2026.

Source: DeFiLlama

Final Summary

  • Crypto hack cases hit a record high of 207 in H1 2026, but the stolen value was below $1B
  • North Korea-based threat actors accounted for $643M, or 66% of stolen funds over the same period.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the report, what was the total number of crypto hacks reported in H1 2026 and how does it compare to the same period in 2025?

AThere were 207 crypto hacks reported in the first half of 2026, which is more than double the 85 hacks reported in H1 2025.

QWhat percentage of the crypto hacks in H1 2026 were due to smart contract exploits, and what was identified as the main source of the majority of stolen value?

ASmart contract exploits accounted for 125 out of 207 incidents, or 60% of the hacks. However, the main source of stolen value (75%) was compromises of keys, custody systems, and signing infrastructure, not smart contract bugs.

QWhat percentage of the total stolen funds in H1 2026 were attributed to North Korea-linked entities?

ANorth Korea-linked entities were responsible for 66% of the total stolen funds in H1 2026.

QHow did the overall value stolen from crypto hacks in H1 2026 compare to the value stolen in H1 2025?

AThe total value stolen in H1 2026 was $972 million, which is less than half of the approximately $2.3 billion stolen in H1 2025.

QWhat was one significant consequence of the KelpDAO hack, as described in the article?

AIn the KelpDAO hack, the attacker used fake tokens as collateral on Aave to borrow legitimate assets, causing a liquidity crunch and a bank run on Aave. This led to some Aave pools reaching full utilization, preventing some depositors from withdrawing their funds.

Letture associate

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbit14 h fa

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbit14 h fa

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbit14 h fa

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbit14 h fa

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit15 h fa

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit15 h fa

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit15 h fa

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit15 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片