Latest Speech by Dan Bin: Do Not Miss Out on a Great Era

链捕手Pubblicato 2026-07-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-02

Introduzione

Dan Bin, Chairman of Dongfang Harbor, delivered a keynote speech titled "Don't Miss a Great Era" at the Glonghui "2026—All in Silicon-Based New纪元" Mid-Year Strategy Summit on June 29th. Addressing concerns about an AI bubble, he argued from an industrial cycle perspective that the risk of missing an entire epoch far outweighs the risk of short-term泡沫. He positioned humanity at the dawn of the AI era, which he views as potentially more disruptive than the electronic, internet, and mobile internet eras. Dan Bin suggested the AI wave is unlikely to end in just three to four years. Drawing a parallel to the internet era's decade-long cycle starting from the 1994 Netscape IPO, he indicated that with ChatGPT's late-2022 launch as a marker, a key risk assessment point might not arrive until around 2033. He emphasized that technological progress is the primary driver of long-term capital market growth, with factors like trade wars and interest rates being secondary. Expanding his perspective to a civilizational scale, Dan Bin presented a thought experiment on silicon-based life potentially replacing carbon-based life as a direction for延续 Earth's civilization, especially given cosmic timescales and interstellar travel challenges. He noted AI's必然 weaponization, citing examples from the Russia-Ukraine war, and stated that neither the U.S. nor China can afford to lose the AI race, with each having distinct competitive advantages. Reflecting on investment lessons, he mentioned Warren B...

Author: Dan Bin

On June 29th, Dan Bin, Chairman of Oriental Harbor, delivered a keynote speech titled Do Not Miss Out on a Great Era at the Gelonghui "2026--All in Silicon-based New Era" Mid-Term Strategy Summit.

Addressing market concerns about AI bubbles from an industry cycle perspective, Dan Bin pointed out:"The risk of missing an entire era may be greater than the risk of worrying about short-term bubbles."

In his view, humanity is standing at the starting point of the artificial intelligence era—this era may be even more disruptive than the electronic era, the internet era, and the mobile internet era.

He judges that the AI wave is unlikely to conclude in just three or four years. At the industry level, it might follow the ten-year rhythm of the internet era. With the release of ChatGPT at the end of 2022 as the starting point, a key reference point for risk assessment could be around 2033.

He pointed out that the "primary driver" of long-term capital market growth is technological progress, while factors like trade wars, interest rate hikes, and wars are secondary. He also discussed the long-term logic of silicon-based life replacing carbon-based life from the perspective of human civilization, emphasizing the importance of focusing on primary drivers, respecting corporate innovation, and market fundamentals in investment.

Finally, he stressed the importance of not failing this great era.

"The tide never turns back, the wheel of the era rolls forward silently. Being born in such times is a great fortune itself; don't let hesitation trap your steps, don't let short-sightedness waste the years—never miss this magnificent, grand era that belongs to us."

The following are excerpts from Dan Bin's speech compiled by Gelonghui, shared with everyone.

01 From an Industry Cycle Perspective, the Risk of Missing the AI Era is Greater Than the Risk of Worrying About Short-Term Bubbles

Recently, people keep asking: Is there a bubble in AI? What's the short-term view?

Dan Bin's response is: From the perspective of long-term industry development, for market participants, the risk of missing an entire era may be greater than the risk you worry about regarding short-term bubbles. Of course, in the face of short-term volatility and uncertainty, investors also need to make independent judgments based on their own investment horizon and risk tolerance.

Looking back at the 55-year history of Nasdaq from its establishment in 1971 to the present, the core driving force that has truly propelled long-term capital market growth is technological progress, not short-term factors like interest rates or macroeconomic policies.

Some worry that a high-interest-rate environment will cause market collapse.

Let's look at history: The US benchmark interest rate once reached as high as 22% in the 1970s, yet the electronic hardware era gained 6.5x over 16 years; the internet era experienced a full interest rate cut-hike cycle and surged for a full 10 years; the same was true for the mobile internet era. Interest rates have never been the primary cause; technological progress is the primary driver.

02 The AI Era is More Disruptive Than the Previous Three Eras; Its Industry Cycle Might Follow the Ten-Year Rhythm of the Internet Era

He further pointed out that at last year's annual meeting, he predicted that 2026 might resemble 1994—forming a cross-star pattern followed by a significant rise. The years '23, '24, and '25 have already seen three years of strong gains, and this year continues to show strong industry momentum.

"Why? Because the AI era is more disruptive than the previous three eras—the electronic era, the internet era, and the mobile internet era."

Dan Bin's basic judgment is: The artificial intelligence era will have a relatively long industry cycle, similar to the internet eraChatGPT was released at the end of 2022. If we reference the historical "ten-year" rhythm of the internet, that point (around 2033) is likely a reference window when risk needs to be examined. Before that, the industry development of AI is unlikely to conclude in just three or four years. However, short-term market fluctuations and local bubbles objectively exist, and investors still need to make rational assessments based on their own situations.

03 The Long-Term Vision of Silicon-Based Life: A Thought Experiment from a Civilizational Perspective

Dan Bin presented two videos, shifting the perspective from capital markets to the dimension of human civilization.

His viewpoint is highly imaginative: Silicon-based life replacing carbon-based life is a highly probable direction. If Earth's civilization is to continue, silicon-based life will likely replace carbon-based life or become the dominant productive force.

He provided a set of vastly different time coordinates:

In 4.1 billion years, the Sun may expand into a red giant and engulf Earth, or it may collapse into a white dwarf.

The Voyager spacecraft has been flying for 77 years and still has about 70,000 light-years to go before leaving the solar system.

In 10 billion years, the Andromeda Galaxy may collide with the Milky Way—by then, humanity must fly out of the Milky Way.

"Carbon-based life cannot fly out of the Milky Way. But silicon-based life—it is a million times smarter than us, thinking and working non-stop 24/7. The revolutionary changes it brings may propel civilization far beyond our understanding."

Dan Bin stated that this is not a short-term investment judgment but provides a framework for thought: The economic growth paradigm brought about by silicon-based intelligence may have infinite possibilities and a longer industry chain. Understanding this helps to transcend immediate distractions and examine long-term trends.

04 Technology Rewrites the Rules of War; Neither China Nor the US Can Afford to Lose the AI Competition

Dan Bin showed a recent example from the Russia-Ukraine battlefield: a Russian soldier was captured by a Ukrainian drone and robot.

"The weaponization of AI is an exponential change, an inevitable process."

He believes that neither China nor the United States can afford to lose this AI race. The US has a first-mover advantage in foundational technology and top talent, while China has formed differentiated competitive strengths in application scenarios, data scale, and industry chain completeness. Both sides are continuously increasing their long-term AI investments.

05 Buffett's "Regret" and Oriental Harbor's Evolution in Cognition

Dan Bin compared the portfolio changes of the "old-timers" in China and the US.

Buffett bought Google in the third quarter of last year and continued to add to the position this year. Google has now entered Berkshire Hathaway's top five holdings.

"Before his passing, Charlie Munger said in an interview that in his era, he should have made $100 billion or even $1 trillion. He had such a close relationship with Bill Gates, yet he only symbolically bought 100 shares of Microsoft. Microsoft rose 7,000 times."

"If he had taken $100 million from Coca-Cola to buy Microsoft, that would have become $700 billion, more than all the money he ever made."

Dan Bin admitted that these historical fragments cannot predict the future, but they remind us that investment requires constantly breaking cognitive boundaries. Oriental Harbor is also iterating and evolving: our company's research team continues to conduct in-depth tracking in AI foundational computing power, storage, and other areas.

06 Settle the Mind, Maintain Perspective, and Rationally Grasp the Chips Endowed by the Era

Dan Bin concluded with a poem he wrote:

"The tide never turns back, the wheel of the era rolls forward silently.

Some are trapped in the immediate noise and details; some stand above the cycles, gazing at the starry river.

Don't dwell on momentary ups and downs, don't blindly follow fleeting trends of heat or cold.

Mountains and rivers are reborn amidst upheavals; opportunities blossom through prolonged perseverance.

Being born in such times is a great fortune itself; don't let hesitation trap your steps, don't let short-sightedness waste the years.

Live well, move forward earnestly, and never miss this magnificent, grand era that belongs to us."

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to Dan Bin's speech, what is the primary driver of long-term capital market growth, and how does it compare to short-term factors like interest rates?

AAccording to Dan Bin, technological progress is the primary driver of long-term capital market growth. He argues that short-term factors like interest rates, trade wars, or macro policies are secondary influences. Historical examples from the Nasdaq show that markets have experienced significant growth during periods of high interest rates when driven by major technological eras like electronics, the internet, and mobile internet.

QWhat is Dan Bin's perspective on the AI bubble concern? What does he believe is the greater risk?

ADan Bin believes that the risk of missing out on the AI era is far greater than the risk of short-term market bubbles. From an industrial cycle perspective, he argues that fearing short-term泡沫 and staying on the sidelines could mean missing a transformative technological shift. While acknowledging short-term volatility exists, he emphasizes that the potential cost of missing the era outweighs bubble concerns.

QHow does Dan Bin characterize the AI era in comparison to previous technological eras like the internet?

ADan Bin characterizes the AI era as more disruptive than previous technological eras, including the electronics era, the internet era, and the mobile internet era. He suggests it has the potential to be the most transformative period yet.

QWhat is the long-term, civilization-level vision that Dan Bin discusses regarding the future of intelligence?

ADan Bin discusses a long-term vision where silicon-based life (AI/advanced intelligence) may replace or become the dominant form of productivity compared to carbon-based life (humans). He frames this within a cosmic timescale, suggesting that for Earth's civilization to persist and expand beyond the solar system and galaxy, silicon-based intelligence, with its superior capabilities for continuous work and problem-solving, is a probable and necessary evolutionary direction.

QWhat historical investment example does Dan Bin use to illustrate the importance of adapting to new technological paradigms?

ADan Bin uses the example of Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger missing the massive opportunity in Microsoft. He mentions that Munger, despite being close friends with Bill Gates, only bought 100 shares of Microsoft symbolically. Dan Bin calculates that if Berkshire Hathaway had invested just $100 million from Coca-Cola into Microsoft early on, it could have grown to $700 billion—far surpassing many of their other gains—highlighting the cost of not fully embracing a transformative tech shift.

Letture associate

Anthropic Creates an AI Jailbreak 'Penal Code': Your Requests, Four Ways to Die

Anthropic has publicly detailed its security measures and a new "Cyber Jailbreak Severity" (CJS) framework following the controversial takedown of its Fable 5 model. The incident, triggered by simple user requests like counting letters or stating a profession, highlighted overzealous safety filters. Anthropic classifies cybersecurity-related prompts into four tiers: malicious activities (blocked), high-risk dual-use (like pentesting, with strict limits), low-risk dual-use (often blocked by "safety margin" errors), and harmless tasks (theoretically allowed but still frequently flagged). The company admits its classifiers are tuned for high sensitivity, leading to many false positives. The newly proposed CJS framework aims to objectively score the severity of AI "jailbreaks" (prompts that bypass safety rules) on a 0-10 scale across four dimensions: Capability Gain (does it grant new attack abilities?), Breadth (does it work across multiple attack types?), Weaponization Ease (how hard is it to turn into a real attack?), and Discoverability (how easy is it to find?). The score determines the response, from no action (CJS-0) to a potential model takedown (CJS-4). The score is context-dependent; for example, discovering a major unknown vulnerability today scores high, while asking about a well-known one scores low. The article raises concerns about Anthropic's dual role: it is both creating powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) and defining the rules (CJS) for judging their misuse, potentially giving it disproportionate influence. This is set against the backdrop of U.S. export controls, which for the first time directly restricted API access to a model (Fable 5), creating a "tiered" system where public models are heavily filtered and advanced ones are limited to vetted partners. The CJS framework is portrayed as potentially providing regulators with a metric to justify future API shutdowns. For users, the advice is to carefully phrase prompts, watch for signs of being downgraded to a weaker model, and wait indefinitely for promised filter improvements.

marsbit25 min fa

Anthropic Creates an AI Jailbreak 'Penal Code': Your Requests, Four Ways to Die

marsbit25 min fa

$100M Annual Revenue, Two Berkeley Roommates in Their 20s Build the Most Profitable AI Business

Arena, the AI model ranking platform, has become a $100 million annual revenue business just eight months after launching its commercial service. Originally a UC Berkeley open-source research project called Chatbot Arena, it created a "battle arena" where users blind-test and vote on anonymous AI model responses. This has generated a highly trusted, community-driven leaderboard based on over 10 million user evaluations and 82 million votes. Major AI companies like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic submit their flagship models to be ranked. The core monetization strategy is its AI Evaluations service, where model developers and large enterprises pay for in-depth performance analysis from Arena's massive user community. This provides real-world feedback on model strengths, weaknesses, and hallucinations—a critical service as models become more complex. The company, spun out from Berkeley in early 2025, quickly raised $100 million in seed funding at a $600 million valuation and later secured a $150 million Series A at a $1.7 billion valuation. The founding team includes CEO Anastasios Angelopoulos, a mathematician focused on rigorous model evaluation; CTO Wei-Lin Chiang, creator of the popular Vicuna chatbot; and co-founder Ion Stoica, a renowned Berkeley professor. Arena is now expanding beyond chat benchmarks into "Agent Mode," evaluating AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks like coding and research. The company's success illustrates the growing value and cost of independent, real-world AI model evaluation as the industry intensifies.

marsbit29 min fa

$100M Annual Revenue, Two Berkeley Roommates in Their 20s Build the Most Profitable AI Business

marsbit29 min fa

Racking Up 24,000 Stars: With One Command, AI Can Now Find Its Own Skills

Vercel, known for its developer tools like Next.js, has launched 'skills', a package manager for AI coding agents, garnering 24,000 GitHub stars. It allows developers to add specialized capabilities, such as React best practices, to AI assistants like Claude Code or Cursor with a single command: `npx skills add <package>`. Skills are shareable, reusable modules that define an AI agent's behavior for specific tasks, moving beyond one-off prompt engineering towards standardized 'capability engineering'. A key innovation is the 'find-skills' skill, which acts as an internal search engine, allowing an agent to autonomously find and install the right skill for a user's request. This lowers the barrier for non-developers to leverage advanced AI coding assistance. However, this 'npm moment' for AI brings significant security risks. Security audits of thousands of skills on platforms like skills.sh and ClawHub found over 30% contained security flaws, with about 13% classified as severe. Threats include malicious scripts that can access local files and credentials, and prompt injection hidden within skill documentation. Unlike traditional code packages, skills blend instructions, code, and system access, posing a direct risk to user machines and data. Experts advise treating skills like code—reviewing them carefully before installation, especially their scripts, and being wary of excessive permissions. Ultimately, Vercel's initiative represents a major shift towards modular, reusable AI capabilities, but its rapid adoption requires developers to bring the same caution used in managing traditional software dependencies.

marsbit30 min fa

Racking Up 24,000 Stars: With One Command, AI Can Now Find Its Own Skills

marsbit30 min fa

Claude Engineer Finally Unveils Fable 5's Ultimate Strategy, Teaching You How to Bridge the Information Gap with AI Models

This article, titled "Claude Engineer Finally Releases Fable 5 'Skill-Burning' Guide, Teaching How to Bridge the Information Gap with Models," details a blog post by Claude Code engineer Thariq Shihipar. The core concept is the "information gap" or "unknowns"—the disconnect between a user's instructions (the "map") and the actual task requirements (the "territory"). The article argues that with powerful models like Claude Fable 5, work quality depends on the user's ability to identify and clarify these unknowns. Shihipar categorizes unknowns into four types: Known Knowns (explicit instructions), Known Unknowns (awareness of gaps), Unknown Knowns (implicit, unstated knowledge), and Unknown Unknowns (unforeseen issues). The blog provides a framework for addressing these gaps throughout the workflow: * **Before Implementation:** Techniques include "Blindspot Scanning" to uncover Unknown Unknowns, brainstorming/prototyping for visual or complex tasks, having Claude ask clarifying questions, using reference code/examples, and creating implementation plans. * **During Implementation:** Maintaining an "implementation notes" file for Claude to document deviations and decisions made due to encountered edge cases. * **After Implementation:** Creating summary documents for review and having Claude generate quizzes to ensure the user fully understands the completed changes. The article concludes that as models become more capable, the key to success is systematically discovering and defining these unknowns through low-cost methods like prototyping and planning, allowing for more effective collaboration.

marsbit35 min fa

Claude Engineer Finally Unveils Fable 5's Ultimate Strategy, Teaching You How to Bridge the Information Gap with AI Models

marsbit35 min fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare ERA

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Caldera (ERA) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente CalderaERA.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Caldera (ERA)Dopo aver acquistato Caldera (ERA), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Caldera (ERA)Scambia facilmente Caldera (ERA) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

368 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.07.17Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare ERA

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di ERA ERA sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片