Computing Power Crisis: Google Quietly Imposes Usage Caps on Meta for Gemini

marsbitPubblicato 2026-06-29Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-29

Introduzione

Google has quietly imposed usage caps on Meta's access to its Gemini AI models since around March due to surging demand overwhelming its computational infrastructure, according to a Financial Times report. The limits, which remain in place, have disrupted and delayed several of Meta's internal AI projects, forcing the social media giant to ration AI usage and improve efficiency. This reflects a broader industry-wide shortage of AI inference capacity, as companies deploy more chatbots and AI agents. Google CEO Sundar Pichai acknowledged compute constraints are limiting cloud revenue growth. In response, Google recently signed a $920 million monthly compute leasing deal with SpaceX to expand capacity. The restrictions have accelerated Meta's shift toward its own AI models, such as Muse Spark, to reduce dependence on external providers like Google. While other Google clients also face limits, Meta's vast scale made it particularly affected. The situation highlights how the AI infrastructure bottleneck has shifted from model training to inference, requiring massive new capital investments to resolve.

Written by: Xu Chao

The supply-demand contradiction in artificial intelligence infrastructure is intensifying among the world's leading technology companies. According to informed sources, Google informed Meta around March this year that it could not meet its full Gemini computing power demands and imposed usage caps on the social media giant—even the world's largest AI service provider is struggling to cope with the surging demand for computing power.

According to a report by the Financial Times, the restrictions remain in effect and have already caused disruptions and delays to several internal AI projects at Meta. As a result, Meta has instructed employees to improve the efficiency of their AI computing power usage, promoting a more meticulous accounting of AI tokens internally. Both Google and Meta declined to comment on the matter.

This situation has forced Google to accelerate its expansion efforts. Earlier this month, Google signed a computing power leasing agreement with Elon Musk's SpaceX worth $920 million per month. Google CEO Sundar Pichai admitted during the Q1 earnings call: "We are indeed facing constraints in computing power recently; if we could meet the demand, cloud business revenue would be higher."

Meta is not alone. Multiple sources pointed out that other Google enterprise customers are also subject to varying degrees of restrictions, with Meta being the most affected due to its exceptionally large demand. This incident highlights the explosive growth of AI inference workloads, which has become one of the industry's biggest challenges.

Computing Power Bottleneck Under Persistent Pressure, Major Clients Bear the Brunt

Despite hundreds of billions of dollars invested by major tech companies in chips, data centers, and power supply, AI computing power supply still struggles to keep pace with demand growth.

Google's Q1 cloud business revenue surpassed $20 billion for the first time, and its backlog of signed but undelivered cloud contracts nearly doubled sequentially, exceeding $460 billion. Pichai clearly stated that computing power constraints will persist in the near term.

Against this backdrop, the impact on Meta is particularly pronounced. Sources indicate that it is the high-intensity demand from major enterprise clients like Meta that directly pushed Google to accelerate its search for external computing power sources. As enterprises deploy chatbots, coding assistants, and AI agents on a large scale, inference workloads—the computing power consumed when models perform tasks in real-world applications after training—are becoming a core bottleneck for the industry.

Meta's Internal Projects Hindered, Accelerates Shift to In-House Models

Meta uses Gemini extensively internally, covering platform security review (including identifying fraudulent content and removing harmful information), customer service and advertising-assisted chatbots, as well as some internal workflows and code development, while also using other models like Anthropic's Claude.

According to sources, Meta initially chose Gemini because its performance surpassed that of the company's own open-source Llama model. However, as computing power restrictions tightened, Meta is accelerating its migration to in-house models. Multiple sources stated that Meta has recently begun prioritizing the promotion of its newly launched Muse Spark model, which is believed to be competitive with Gemini in performance, helping to reduce reliance on external models.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has previously continued to increase investment in AI talent and infrastructure, aiming to build what he calls "personal super intelligence." Unlike Google, Meta does not have a cloud business and is accelerating the construction of its own data center system, pledging a cumulative investment of $600 billion in the United States by 2028.

Google Expands Capacity via SpaceX, Industry Seeks Solutions

Faced with computing power pressure, Google signed a $920 million per month computing power leasing agreement with SpaceX this month to bridge the infrastructure gap. AI lab Anthropic also reached a similar agreement with SpaceX last month.

Google's move to impose restrictions on Meta provides a rare window for the outside world to glimpse the real pressure faced by the world's top AI service providers in allocating computing power. Currently, the infrastructure bottleneck across the entire AI industry is spreading from the training side to the inference side. Resolving the supply-demand contradiction still depends on the realization of a new round of large-scale capital investment.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the article, what limitation did Google impose on Meta regarding Gemini usage?

AGoogle reportedly informed Meta around March that it could not meet all of Meta's Gemini computing power demands and imposed usage limits on the AI model for the social media giant.

QWhat consequence did the reported Gemini usage limit have on Meta's internal operations?

AThe limitation has interfered with and delayed several of Meta's internal AI projects, leading the company to instruct employees to be more efficient with AI computing power and to carefully manage their use of AI tokens.

QWhich company did Google recently sign a major compute rental agreement with to address its capacity constraints?

AGoogle recently signed a compute rental agreement with Elon Musk's SpaceX, worth $920 million per month, to help expand its infrastructure capacity.

QHow is Meta responding to the challenges posed by the reliance on external AI models like Gemini?

AMeta is accelerating its shift towards its own self-developed models. It is prioritizing the promotion of its new Muse Spark model, which is considered competitive with Gemini, to reduce dependency on external providers.

QWhat does the article highlight as a major industry-wide bottleneck that is shifting from one area to another?

AThe article states that the infrastructure bottleneck in the AI industry is shifting from the training side to the inference side, as explosive growth in AI inference workloads becomes a core challenge for the sector.

Letture associate

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbitIeri 08:36

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbitIeri 08:36

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbitIeri 08:28

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbitIeri 08:28

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbitIeri 08:06

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbitIeri 08:06

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbitIeri 08:01

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbitIeri 08:01

Trading

Spot
活动图片