亚洲加密基金与其投资项目分析：去年以来参与495项投资，DeFi和NFT增长最快

PanewsPubblicato 2022-08-29Pubblicato ultima volta 2022-08-29

Introduzione

活跃的投资者主要来自中国大陆和香港，其次是新加坡和印度，大部分投资流向了位于美国的公司。

“ 尽管监管方面的担忧日益增加，但依旧不影响亚洲的顶级风险基金投资该地区和世界各地的区块链和加密公司。

从 2021 年 1 月到 2022 年 6 月，亚洲排名前 20 位的 VC（基于他们参与的区块链/加密相关交易的数量）在全球参与了 495 项投资。

活跃的投资者主要来自中国大陆和香港，其次是新加坡和印度，大部分投资流向了位于美国的公司。

亚洲基金为全球加密公司提供资金

根据他们在全球参与的区块链交易数量，相对活跃投资者是 AU21 Capital（59）、分布式资本（45）、GBV （43）、HashKey Capital（41）、NGC Ventures（38）和 Basics Capital（12）。

这些领先的投资者将资金投向了位于美国的区块链公司，包括：

CertiK，一个专注于安全的排名平台，分析和监控区块链协议和 DeFi 项目

MobileCoin，一个支付平台

FalconX，一个加密交易平台

InfStones，一个区块链开发程序

亚洲加密基金与其投资项目分析：去年以来参与495项投资，DeFi和NFT增长最快

亚洲基金支持位于亚洲的加密公司

根据与亚洲区块链公司的交易数量，排名前 5 位的投资者是 AU21（25）、GBV Capital（24）、分布式资本（19）、HashKey Capital（19）和 NGC Ventures（19）。

这些公司大多将资金投向新加坡的区块链公司，包括：

加密交易软件公司Zignaly

Hex Trust，数字资产托管服务商

游戏化平台StarryNift

EthSign，通过以太坊、IPFS 和 Filecoin 技术开发用于签署电子协议的去中心化数字平台

亚洲加密基金与其投资项目分析：去年以来参与495项投资，DeFi和NFT增长最快

最受欢迎的投资：区块链开发平台

在过去的 18 个月里，亚洲 20 家最大的 VC 中有 13 家投资了区块链开发平台或基础设施。

Fenbushi Capital 和 Hashkey Capital 分别投资了 4 家和 3 家公司，包括来自美国的 Blockdaemon 和 InfStones，以及总部位于新加坡的 Stake Technologies。NGC Ventures，Basics Capital 和 Ascensive Assets 等机构投资了更多的应用型项目，特别是在GameFi赛道，他们都有超过10个的投资组合。

这些 VC 还投资于 DeFi 项目和 NFT，这是增长最快的两个加密领域。

亚洲风险投资活动的未来之路

新加坡已成为东南亚区块链的中心。例如，2020 年启动的价值 1200 万美元的新加坡区块链创新计划旨在促进当地区块链生态系统的发展。在 Coincub 2021 年第四季度的世界加密货币排名中，新加坡被评为世界领先的加密货币就绪国家。

另一个可能在未来引起投资者兴趣的国家是印度。目前，印度大约有 230 家初创公司为加密领域提供服务。然而，该国的加密行业正在处理与税收相关的复杂问题，因为政府正在征税以限制交易。尽管如此，这并没有影响对 Web3 企业的投资 — — 这些初创公司的风险投资可能会在 2022 年继续占据主导地位。

亚洲的风险投资公司也将继续为总部设在该地区的公司提供资金。该地区的 Web3 场景非常适合该领域提供面向消费者的服务的初创公司。除了消费者需求外，新加坡等亚洲国家也以对加密货币持开放态度的态度吸引企业家，加密货币在美国受到越来越多的监管审查。

亚洲国家的监管机构正在制定未来几年管理数字资产的框架。

Letture associate

David Villa Officially Appointed as Brand Ambassador for BitradeX

David Villa, the legendary Spanish striker and 2010 World Cup champion, has been officially appointed as the Global Brand Ambassador for BitradeX. This partnership, announced amid the global excitement for the 2026 World Cup, aims to enhance the platform's international brand influence. Villa, a key figure in Spain's golden era of football and the nation's all-time top scorer, embodies a spirit of perseverance, focus, and the relentless pursuit of excellence. BitradeX officials stated that this champion mentality aligns perfectly with their own core values of innovation, long-term development, and global strategic expansion. As a global AI-driven digital asset ecosystem, BitradeX will collaborate with Villa across branding, global market promotion, community engagement, and strategic initiatives. The company believes Villa's widespread influence and trusted international image will serve as a crucial bridge to connect with users worldwide. This collaboration marks a significant step in BitradeX's globalization strategy, with both parties committed to exploring new opportunities in the digital age and writing a new chapter of shared achievement.

链捕手11 min fa

STRC 跌破面值，比特币财库实验进入下半场

The price of STRC, Strategy's dividend-paying preferred stock, has fallen below its $100 face value, triggering a re-evaluation of the "bitcoin treasury" corporate model. This highlights a critical tension: the company's asset base consists of high-volatility, non-cash-flow-generating Bitcoin, while its capital structure requires continuous cash payouts for dividends and interest. The decline of STRC signals that market pressure is shifting from asset price volatility to the pricing of the company's financing tools. Strategy's core model involves a three-step conversion: turning equity into Bitcoin exposure, converting Bitcoin holdings into capital market credit, and packaging non-yielding BTC into cash-paying securities like STRC. While Strategy holds a massive 847,363 BTC, the focus is now on cash flow mismatches. The company faces annual preferred stock dividend obligations of approximately $1.7 billion, far exceeding the cash flow from its legacy software business. Its ability to meet these obligations relies on continued access to capital markets. The market is now scrutinizing which of three potential costs becomes untenable first: rising dividend costs to attract investors, dilution costs from issuing more common stock, or the reputational cost of selling BTC—a move contrary to its "hodl" narrative. For the broader crypto market, a constrained Strategy means the potential loss of a predictable, narrative-driven marginal buyer for Bitcoin. The STRC discount serves as a reminder that the longevity of such models depends not just on Bitcoin's price, but also on financing windows, cash reserves, and investor willingness to pay a "trust premium" for the structure.

marsbit24 min fa

marsbit24 min fa

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

Standard Chartered Bank has issued an optimistic research report predicting that the AAVE token could surge 50-fold to $3,500 by 2030. This forecast is based on the projection that the total value locked (TVL) in DeFi will grow 37x to approximately $2.7 trillion, driven by stablecoin expansion and the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA). The bank's model links Aave's potential valuation directly to its protocol revenue, which is primarily driven by net interest margins. The report highlights Aave's current dominant position, noting it captures over 80% of the net earnings ("protocol retained earnings") in the lending sector while holding only about half of its TVL. It also points to the recent launch of the Aave V4 architecture and a healthy revenue stream of $142 million in 2025 as positive fundamentals. Grayscale's separate analysis, applying traditional valuation metrics like DCF, concluded AAVE is currently undervalued. However, the article notes significant challenges. Aave's peer-to-pool lending model suffers from inherent capital inefficiency, with an estimated $52 million annual "deadweight loss" due to idle funds needed for liquidity buffers. This structural flaw was exposed during the April KelpDAO exploit, which locked a WETH pool at 100% utilization for days. Emerging protocols like Morpho, with more efficient point-to-point models, are cited as growing competitive threats. In summary, while institutional forecasts paint a macro picture of massive growth fueled by RWA adoption, Aave's path forward hinges on addressing its core structural limitations and competitive pressures within the evolving DeFi lending landscape.

链捕手1 h fa

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

链捕手1 h fa

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

Tidal Investment remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market narrative has changed. While recent large-scale IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and major fundraising plans by tech giants like Alphabet and Meta have caused some nervousness, this isn't a sign of an AI peak. The focus has moved from the initial question of AI's viability to the sustainability of massive investment cycles. The key players—primarily the major cloud providers—are not slowing down; their capital expenditure (Capex) guidance for 2026 has been increased across the board (e.g., Alphabet to $180B, Amazon to $200B). This investment cycle is proving resilient and difficult to stop. Unlike traditional hardware cycles, current AI Capex is distributed across multiple physical layers—computing, memory, networking, and critically, power infrastructure. Bottlenecks are shifting from chips to elements like electricity, transformers, and cooling systems, which have much longer lead times and cannot be easily pre-built like fiber optics during the dot-com bubble. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's 240% YoY data center orders) confirms this broad-based, project-driven expansion. Market concerns are acknowledged but viewed differently. First, while Capex growth currently outpaces revenue growth, raising ROI questions, this mirrors the early scaling phase of cloud computing itself. A change in view would require concrete signals like downward Capex revisions or missed AI product targets, which haven't materialized by mid-2026. Second, comparisons to the 2000 dot-com bust are flawed. That crash was driven by a massive, parallel oversupply of cheap capacity (fiber). The current cycle faces *supply constraints* in critical, capital-intensive physical infrastructure that cannot be overbuilt as easily. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the next, more complex act of the AI story. Physical bottlenecks and sustained high Capex plans suggest this is not the finale but an ongoing, capital-intensive build-out phase. The script has changed, but the play is far from over.

marsbit2 h fa

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

marsbit2 h fa

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

Tidal Investments remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market is concerned about massive concurrent fundraising by tech giants like SpaceX, OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta, fearing an AI peak. However, the authors argue this signals the next act of AI development, not its end. Capital expenditure (Capex) from major cloud providers (Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle) continues to surge aggressively into 2026. This investment cycle is more resilient than past hardware cycles due to its scale and complexity. Bottlenecks have shifted from chips to critical physical infrastructure like power grids, transformers, cooling, and data center construction—areas with long lead times and limited capacity for rapid expansion. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's orders) confirms substantial, tangible progress. Key market concerns are addressed: 1. **ROI vs. Capex Growth**: While Capex growth outpaces revenue, the authors note cloud giants have historically overcome similar phases through scale. The cycle will only be in danger if Capex guidance is cut, orders are canceled, or AI product demand falters—none of which are currently observed. 2. **Comparison to the 2000 Dot-com Bubble**: Unlike the telecom bubble, where cheap, oversupplied fiber crashed prices, AI infrastructure (especially power) is constrained, customized, and subject to lengthy approvals, making a similar supply glut and crash unlikely. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the immense, ongoing capital needs for AI's next phase, constrained by slow-moving physical bottlenecks. The AI cycle is not over; the script has simply changed.

链捕手2 h fa

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

链捕手2 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures