The Merge’s Long Term Impact on Ethereum

CryptonewsPubblicato 2022-08-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2022-08-10

Introduzione

From the institutional investment perspective, the Merge will create an opportunity to move assets onto Ethereum to take advantage of the new benefits that will come with the upgrade.

Whether you call it the Beacon Chain Merge, ETH2, or something else, this update to the blockchain – the move from the proof-of-work (PoW) to the proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus mechanism – has been a part of the roadmap since the inception of Ethereum (ETH).

The excitement and focus should really be on the long-term impact this will have on projects, developers, and users of Ethereum. As we welcome PoS through the Ropsten testnet, I believe this will be a major leap forward in scaling Ethereum for mainstream adoption.

With non-fungible tokens (NFTs), decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), and staking becoming widely adopted, the Ethereum ecosystem will need to expand in a way that makes sense for the next ten, twenty, and fifty years of development. With the successful deployment of proof-of-stake, developers will continue building out these innovations using more environmentally conscious processes.

My long-term thoughts on the Beacon Chain

As someone who has lived and developed through all of Ethereum’s changes, I believe in the innovation, but do not see the Merge adversely affecting any existing functionality – unless you are a miner because you won't make any ETH as a mining reward. However, I believe we’ll see validators take over the miners' spots with zero issues and will pave the way for a more scalable network.

The idea of merging has always been on the outline of where we planned to go, and although it's taken several years, experts needed the proper research and due diligence to create a fully decentralized PoS system. Moving away from proof-of-work is not a downside to the overall adoption of Ethereum – instead, proof-of-stake is a chance to enhance the overall experience for users.

From the user's perspective, this Merge will not bring noticeable changes to their daily activities. In a way, it will reduce inflation because everyday users will no longer have to pay for both validators and miners, and only pay for validators.

How this impacts institutional interest

There have been worries around sustained institutional interest in Ethereum with the continuous delays of the beacon chain Merge, but now with a proposed date set for September, the institutional investors have something to track towards.

Staking ETH remains appealing to institutions, and with the potential of higher yields, that interest will only grow post-Merge. As more and more investors look to find long-term growth opportunities in crypto, the Merge will help create a more exciting and ripe ecosystem for them to invest in.

From the institutional investment perspective, the Merge will create an opportunity to move assets onto Ethereum to take advantage of the new benefits that will come with the upgrade.

The beacon chain Merge is truly the first step towards a scalable Ethereum, and should be seen as a major milestone in building a more environmentally sound blockchain for the transition to Web3.

Letture associate

Raised $1.3 Billion in Seven Weeks, Yet SpaceX's Weighting Halved: The Dilution Trap of the NASA ETF

A new ETF named NASA, launched just seven weeks ago, has rapidly become the world's largest space-themed fund, amassing $1.3 billion in assets. Its primary draw is its unique position as a "pure" space ETF holding SpaceX stock through a special purpose vehicle (SPV). However, its exposure to SpaceX has been drastically diluted from 10.3% to 4.6% due to a massive, rapid inflow of investor cash. New money is forced into buying other public space stocks like Rocket Lab, meaning investors seeking SpaceX exposure end up with a portfolio of other companies. Further complications arise from the SPV's valuation mechanism, which only updates during specific manager trades, potentially lagging behind SpaceX's market price. This SPV will also face a six-month lock-up post-IPO, preventing investors from selling that portion if SpaceX shares drop after listing. The article highlights a valuation bubble in the broader space sector, with stocks like Planet Labs surging nearly 1000% in a year, driven more by the "SpaceX IPO narrative" than underlying fundamentals. Meanwhile, SpaceX's own financials show significant losses in 2024, and its record-breaking IPO valuation bundles its space business with other Musk assets like xAI, creating a complex investment proposition. The core warning is that the NASA ETF essentially uses SpaceX as bait but delivers a different product. The real beneficiaries may be the ETF issuers collecting high fees, while investors face dilution and hidden risks ahead of SpaceX's historic IPO on June 12th.

marsbit9 min fa

Raised $1.3 Billion in Seven Weeks, Yet SpaceX's Weighting Halved: The Dilution Trap of the NASA ETF

marsbit9 min fa

NEAR Doubles: 3 Major Trends Become the 'Engine' for Token Price Surge

NEAR token price surged from around $1.24 in early May to over $2.5, with its market cap returning above $3 billion. This significant growth, occurring amidst broader market volatility, is attributed to three key factors. First, the AI narrative has been a major driver. NEAR co-founder Illia Polosukhin is a co-author of the seminal Transformer paper, the foundation of modern AI models like ChatGPT. NEAR has integrated AI capabilities into its ecosystem, notably through the Near.com super-app, positioning itself as a key decentralized AI infrastructure project. Endorsements from figures like Arthur Hayes further boosted market sentiment. Second, NEAR is enhancing its utility as a privacy-focused blockchain. With the launch of NEAR Intents for cross-chain transactions, privacy features like Confidential Payments and Confidential Intents have become critical to protect users from MEV attacks. These functionalities allow private transfers of assets like ETH and BTC across more than 35 chains, balancing privacy with usability and appealing to institutional and enterprise users. Third, a new tokenomics mechanism is providing buy-side pressure. Following the full unlocking of its initial supply in late 2025, NEAR now employs a fee-burn model. All protocol fees generated by the NEAR Intents layer are used to buy back and effectively remove NEAR tokens from circulation. With NEAR Intents TVL exceeding $80 million, this creates consistent monthly buybacks estimated around $3 million, reducing sell pressure. Additional technical upgrades planned for mid-2026, including dynamic re-sharding and post-quantum security, aim to further strengthen the network's scalability and robustness.

marsbit12 min fa

NEAR Doubles: 3 Major Trends Become the 'Engine' for Token Price Surge

marsbit12 min fa

After $HYPE Hits a New High, Is It Worth Considering the Stock of "HYPE Version MicroStrategy" $PURR?

**HYPE Hits New Highs: Is $PURR, the "HYPE Version of MicroStrategy," Worth Considering?** The stock of Hyperliquid Strategies (NASDAQ: $PURR), a publicly-traded company that exclusively buys and holds the cryptocurrency HYPE, has gained over 100% year-to-date, mirroring HYPE's own 150% surge to new all-time highs. This has sparked discussions about PURR being a more "capital-efficient" play than MicroStrategy's bitcoin strategy, given its reported ~$1 billion unrealized gain on a ~$220 million investment. The article clarifies that PURR is essentially a pure-play wrapper for HYPE, with no other business. It resulted from a 2025 SPAC merger led by firms like Paradigm and Atlas Merchant Capital, bringing traditional finance veterans to its board. Its value is entirely derived from the price of HYPE. While PURR offers a crucial compliance bridge for US-based institutional and retirement accounts unable to access HYPE directly, the analysis questions the "capital efficiency" narrative. The outsized gains are attributed to HYPE's exceptional performance, not superior corporate strategy. For investors who can buy HYPE directly, holding PURR introduces unnecessary risks: potential shareholder dilution from future stock offerings, incomplete passthrough of staking rewards, market hour mismatches, and counterparty risk via its single custodian. A key metric is its mNAV (modified net asset value). Current calculations show PURR trades at a discount to its HYPE holdings, but this could flip to a premium depending on the execution of registered share issuances. The article concludes that PURR is primarily a "conduit product." The investment thesis hinges entirely on one's bullishness on HYPE itself, not on the PURR wrapper, which adds friction and risk for those with direct crypto access.

marsbit41 min fa

After $HYPE Hits a New High, Is It Worth Considering the Stock of "HYPE Version MicroStrategy" $PURR?

marsbit41 min fa

The Real Progress and Investment Opportunities of Decentralized AI Computing Power Networks in 2026

In 2026, the AI compute market is marked by centralized GPU consolidation and a significant GPU shortage for smaller players. In this context, Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks (DePIN), valued at $9.4B+, have emerged as a viable, revenue-generating alternative. Leading protocols like Aethir ($150M ARR), io.net (130k+ GPUs), Akash, Bittensor, and Render are carving out distinct niches, moving beyond hype to deliver verifiable income primarily from non-crypto-native clients. The key advantage of decentralized GPU networks lies in serving latency-tolerant, cost-sensitive workloads like AI inference, fine-tuning, data preprocessing, and agent operations, offering substantial cost savings (45-80%) compared to major cloud providers. However, reliability variance, lack of robust SLAs, and fragmented tech stacks remain significant adoption hurdles. The sector is maturing with critical 2026 shifts: 1) Evolution of tokenomics towards demand-driven, revenue-linked models (e.g., Render's BME, io.net's IDE), and 2) Clearer enterprise adoption pathways, with traditional firms integrating decentralized compute. For new entrants, opportunities are now concentrated in specialized tooling layers (orchestration, verification, SLA management), vertical applications (e.g., bio-med, content generation), and innovative token designs tied to real usage, rather than generic GPU aggregation. The convergence with the emerging AI Agent economy presents a significant future growth vector.

marsbit42 min fa

The Real Progress and Investment Opportunities of Decentralized AI Computing Power Networks in 2026

marsbit42 min fa

The Iran Deal Is Not a Finale, But a 60-Day Political Respite

The reported "Iran deal" is not a comprehensive peace agreement, but a proposed 60-day memorandum of understanding. During this period, Iran would clear mines from the Strait of Hormuz, the US would lift its naval blockade, and Iran would receive a sanctions waiver to sell oil, with formal nuclear negotiations to follow. However, the core structural conflicts remain unresolved: Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium, ultimate control of the Strait, the sequence of sanctions relief versus nuclear concessions, and the potential for Israeli unilateral action to derail the process. The article highlights deeper geopolitical currents: China is indirectly shaping talks via Pakistan to restore Iranian oil flows and curb US dominance, while trade routes through Oman and the UAE create leaks in the US blockade. Parallel US diplomatic efforts aim to draw India into its security framework, though India remains cautious. Ultimately, the deal offers short-term political breathing room for both Washington and Tehran. The true test will come after the 60-day window, when the irreconcilable demands—US insistence on nuclear rollback versus Iran's determination to retain the Strait as a deterrent—will resurface, determining if this is a path to peace or merely a managed pause in the conflict.

marsbit52 min fa

The Iran Deal Is Not a Finale, But a 60-Day Political Respite

marsbit52 min fa

Trading

Spot

Futures