MM yang Menyerang 1: Sistem Penawaran Inventori Market Maker

marsbitPubblicato 2025-12-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-28

Introduzione

**Ringkasan: Sistem Penawaran Inventaris Market Maker (MM)** Pernahkah Anda merasa bahwa setelah membeli altcoin, harganya justru bergerak berlawanan? Ini bukan karena manipulasi "dog zhuang", melainkan hasil dari mekanisme proteksi market maker (MM) berdasarkan model **Avellaneda-Stoikov**. MM bukan investor yang mengambil arah tertentu. Mereka menjaga keseimbangan inventaris (inventory). Ketika investor retail membeli dalam jumlah besar, MM menjual, menyebabkan inventaris mereka menjadi short. Untuk melindungi diri, MM akan: 1. **Quote Skew**: Menurunkan harga untuk menarik penjualan dan mengembalikan inventaris. 2. **Spread Widening**: Melebarkan spread untuk mengurangi risiko transaksi dan melindungi posisi. Harga penawaran (Reservation Price) ditentukan oleh: **Reservation Price = Harga Tengah − γ ⋅ q** di mana q = inventaris saat ini, γ = koefisien penghindaran risiko. Retail sering mengalami hal ini karena: - Order aktif yang besar dan terkonsentrasi - Tidak ada lindung nilai (hedging) - Tidak memecah order atau memilih waktu Di altcoin dengan likuiditas rendah, efek ini lebih terasa karena order retail menjadi lawan utama MM. **Tips**: Daripada membeli sekaligus, pecah order menjadi bagian kecil. Beli sedikit, tunggu harga turun (karena reaksi MM), lalu beli lagi untuk rata-rata harga yang lebih baik. (Bagian selanjutnya akan membahas aliran order beracun (toxic flow) dan penyebab mikro di balik peristiwa 1011).

Penulis: Dave

Pernahkah kalian mengalami situasi di mana setelah membeli altcoin, harganya langsung bergerak berlawanan dalam waktu singkat, seolah-olah ada manipulasi dari "whale"? Mengapa hal ini terjadi, apakah benar ini konspirasi whale?

Postingan ini akan memperkenalkan sistem penawaran market maker, mengungkap misteri di balik "konspirasi whale". Kesimpulannya: harga sering bergerak berlawanan dengan kita bukan karena manipulasi subjektif, melainkan karena Inventory-based pricing quote skew (kemiringan penawaran berdasarkan inventori) dalam model Avellaneda–Stoikov, dan mekanisme perlindungan terhadap toxic flow (aliran order beracun). Bagaimana penjelasannya? once upon a time...

Pertama, mari pahami konsep inventori. Seperti yang kita tahu, market maker bukan investor directional. Dengan lindung nilai yang ketat, perubahan harga spot seharusnya tidak memengaruhi total pnl. Dalam hal ini, memegang inventori adalah tindakan "pasif". Perubahan inventori menyebabkan posisi membesar, dan semakin banyak posisi yang dipegang, semakin besar eksposur risiko terhadap pergerakan harga berlawanan. Saat order beli/jual retail menyebabkan perubahan inventori, market maker akan bereaksi terhadap risiko yang ditimbulkan oleh perubahan inventori ini.

Singkatnya, kamu mengganggu keseimbangan mereka, dan mm harus melindungi diri sendiri, berusaha kembali seimbang. Cara melindungi diri adalah melalui sistem penawaran.

1. Kemiringan Penawaran (Quote Skew)

Ketika MM dibeli dalam jumlah besar olehmu, setara dengan: MM menjual dalam jumlah besar, inventori menjadi short exposure. Saat itu mm berharap: (1) Segera mengisi kembali inventori. (2) Melindungi posisi short yang terekspos.

Jadi reaksi MM adalah: Menurunkan harga, menarik penjualan, mencegah terus dibeli, sekaligus memastikan posisi net short mereka sementara tidak rugi, punya waktu untuk lindung nilai.

2. Pelebaran Spread Penawaran (Spread Widening)

Ketika inventori terus memburuk, MM tidak hanya memiringkan harga, tetapi juga melebarkan spread, mengurangi probabilitas eksekusi.

Tujuan mereka adalah mengurangi risiko eksekusi per unit waktu, sekaligus melalui keuntungan spread, menghasilkan lebih banyak untuk melindungi kerugian harga.

Saat menulis artikel, setiap tambahan rumus matematika akan mengurangi 10% pembaca, tetapi in case ada yang ingin melihat sesuatu yang lebih substantif, saya akan memperkenalkan secara singkat pembentukan penawaran (juga mekanisme matematika di balik perubahan penawaran di atas).

Harga yang kita eksekusi dengan market maker disebut Reservation Price, berasal dari model Inventory-based pricing:

Harga Reservasi = Harga Tengah − γ⋅q

q: Inventori saat ini

gamma γ: Koefisien aversion risiko

Sebenarnya Reservation Price terlihat seperti di bawah ini, tapi saya tidak ingin membuat kalian muak, jadi lihat saja sekilas.

Ketika retail banyak membeli/menjual, q mengalami perubahan besar, sehingga penawaran Reservation Price berubah besar. Dan seberapa banyak perubahan berasal dari model Avellaneda–Stoikov. Bisa ditebak, karena beli/jual menyebabkan perubahan inventori kecil, perubahan kecil, jadi model ini adalah persamaan diferensial parsial. Tebak apa? Saya juga tidak tertarik menurunkan persamaan ini, jadi kita hanya perlu tahu kesimpulan intinya:

Penawaran optimal tersebar simetris di sekitar Reservation Price. Inventori pasti mean-revert ke 0. Spread optimal melebar dengan risiko.

Tidak apa jika tidak memahami bagian di atas, hanya perlu memahami secara umum bahwa setelah retail membeli, harga sering bergerak berlawanan dengan arah bullish, pada dasarnya karena aliran kita mengubah penetapan harga risiko pasar. Alasan retail sering mengalami ini adalah:

• Retail hampir selalu order aktif

• Ukuran terkonsentrasi, ritme tidak tersembunyi

• Tidak ada lindung nilai

• Tidak mempertimbangkan waktu, tidak memecah order

Dan dalam altcoin kecil, situasi ini lebih parah, karena likuiditas altcoin buruk, seringkali order kamu adalah少数 order aktif dalam 5 menit sebelumnya, di instrumen besar mungkin terjadi lindung nilai alami, tapi di koin kecil, kamulah counterparty si whale.

Jadi mm profesional bukan ingin menghancurkanmu, melainkan maxE[Spread Capture]−Inventory Risk−Adverse Selection, sebenarnya fungsi tujuan mereka seperti ini, risiko inventori dihukum secara eksponensial.

Pembaca yang bisa sampai di sini pasti adalah sayuran yang bermimpi menjadi whale, jadi untuk memotivasi yang berani, terakhir bagikan trik kecil menggunakan mekanisme penawaran. Kita bilang retail sering ukuran terkonsentrasi, ritme tidak tersembunyi, jadi balikkan saja. Misalkan Dave ingin long 1000u, maka daripada langsung all-in, gunakan cara whale: beli 100u dulu, sistem penawaran akan menurunkan harga, saat itu saya bisa membangun posisi di harga yang lebih murah, lalu saya beli 100U lagi, harga akan terus turun, sehingga rata-rata biaya posisi saya akan jauh lebih murah daripada all-in sekaligus.

Kisah sial retail hanya setengah diceritakan di sini, selain faktor penawaran manajemen inventori, pemrosesan aliran order oleh mm adalah elemen lain yang menyebabkan divergensi harga, yaitu toxic order flow yang disebut di awal. Bagian selanjutnya saya akan memperkenalkan order book dan order flow market maker, sekaligus saya akan berandai-andai penyebab mikro pasar dari insiden 1011.

Ingin tahu kelanjutannya, simak episode berikutnya.

《MM yang Menyerang 2: Order Book dan Order Flow Market Maker》

《MM yang Menyerang 3: Keunggulan Statistik dan Desain Sinyal》

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QApa yang dimaksud dengan 'Quote Skew' dalam sistem penawaran market maker?

AQuote Skew adalah penyesuaian harga yang dilakukan market maker ketika inventory (persediaan) mereka tidak seimbang. Misalnya, jika banyak yang membeli aset dari MM sehingga inventory MM menjadi short, mereka akan menurunkan harga untuk menarik penjual dan melindungi posisi short mereka sambil berusaha menyeimbangkan kembali inventory.

QMengapa harga sering bergerak berlawanan arah setelah kita membeli aset kripto altcoin?

AHarga sering bergerak berlawanan karena order pembelian kita mengubah inventory market maker, sehingga mereka menyesuaikan harga (quote skew) untuk melindungi diri dari risiko dan berusaha kembali ke posisi inventory yang seimbang. Ini bukan manipulasi, melainkan mekanisme matematis dari model Avellaneda-Stoikov.

QApa yang dilakukan market maker ketika inventory mereka terus memburuk?

AKetika inventory memburuk, market maker tidak hanya melakukan quote skew, tetapi juga melebarkan spread (jarak antara harga bid dan ask) untuk mengurangi probabilitas transaksi dan melindungi diri dari risiko kerugian dengan mendapatkan lebih banyak keuntungan dari spread.

QBagaimana cara menggunakan pengetahuan tentang sistem报价 market maker untuk keuntungan kita?

AKita bisa meniru strategi MM dengan membeli dalam porsi kecil dan bertahap, bukan sekaligus. Misalnya, beli sedikit dulu, tunggu harga turun karena quote skew MM, lalu beli lagi dengan harga lebih murah. Ini akan menurunkan rata-rata harga beli kita.

QApa itu 'toxic flow' yang disebut dalam artikel?

AToxic flow mengacu pada order yang cenderung merugikan market maker karena pembeli atau penjual memiliki informasi lebih atau pola order yang sulit dihadapi. MM memiliki mekan untuk melindungi diri dari toxic flow, yang akan dibahas lebih detail di artikel selanjutnya.

Letture associate

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbit22 h fa

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbit22 h fa

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbit22 h fa

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbit22 h fa

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit22 h fa

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit22 h fa

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit22 h fa

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit22 h fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare O

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di O1 exchange (O) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente O1 exchangeO.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva O1 exchange (O)Dopo aver acquistato O1 exchange (O), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia O1 exchange (O)Scambia facilmente O1 exchange (O) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

151 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2026.06.19Aggiornato il 2026.06.29

Come comprare O

Come comprare PROS

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Pharos (PROS) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente PharosPROS.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Pharos (PROS)Dopo aver acquistato Pharos (PROS), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Pharos (PROS)Scambia facilmente Pharos (PROS) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

145 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2026.06.22Aggiornato il 2026.06.29

Come comprare PROS

Cosa è VERONA

I. Introduzione al Progetto VERONA è una blockchain costruita per tutti, ovunque attraverso l'astrazione della catena. Utilizzando il suo livello di astrazione generalizzato, VERONA si distingue integrando funzionalità blockchain complesse, come conti, firme e interoperabilità, direttamente a livello di protocollo. Questo approccio consente di interagire con le applicazioni blockchain senza la necessità di comprendere le tecnologie sottostanti.1) Informazioni di Base Nome:VERONA(VERONA)III. Link Correlati Link al sito ufficiale:https://xion.burnt.com/ Whitepaper:https://xion.burnt.com/whitepaper.pdf Esploratori:https://explorer.burnt.com/ Social Media: https://x.com/burnt_xion Nota: L'introduzione al progetto proviene dai materiali pubblicati o forniti dal team ufficiale del progetto, che è solo a scopo di riferimento e non costituisce consulenza per investimenti. HTX non si assume responsabilità per eventuali perdite dirette o indirette risultanti.

163 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2026.06.22Aggiornato il 2026.06.22

Cosa è VERONA

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di A A sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片