单日涨超8倍，PING会再次掀起「铭文热潮」吗？

marsbitPubblicato 2025-10-23Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-10-24

编者注：近两天，最大的金狗或许就是 Base 上的 $PING 了。它通过 x402 协议发行的第一枚代币。x402 是由 Coinbase 开发的一种开放支付协议，它使 AI agents 能够自主完成交易。其铸造流程，让人想起了 2 年前的铭文。关于更多 PING 和 x402 协议的介绍，可参阅：《像铭文的 30 倍大金狗，x402 协议是什么？》。

目前，PING 市值已突破 3000 万美元，24 小时涨超 8 倍，这也引发了人们对于第二次「铭文热潮」的期待。加密研究员 Haotian 也对此次热潮做出了自己的分析，以下为原文内容：

大家都说 $PING 的出现很像 2023 年的 BTC 铭文热潮，为什么像？像在哪里？会向铭文市场一样演化发展吗？先说答案：会。好，以下阐述具体逻辑：

1. 为什么像？核心在于链上合法数据+链下解释权。

铭文的运作逻辑是：用户向 BTC 主网发送交易并占有特定的 UTXO，但 BTC 主网并没有决断哪笔交易有效的能力，而 Ordinals 协议就是那个判断铭文是否有效的 indexer 索引器。它作为第三方裁判，扫描链上所有交易，按照自己定义的规则，比如「First is First」来认定哪些是有效真铭文。

PING 的运作逻辑，也几乎是同样的配方：用户在 Base 链上发送 USDC 到特定地址，地址由 x402scan 动态返回，相当于用户向 x402 协议发出了一笔「支付请求」，但 Base 链和 x402 协议本身并不知道这是在"mint $PING，在它们眼里，这只是一笔普通的 ERC20 转账。

真正赋予这笔交易「mint 意义」的是 x402scan 这个 indexer：它扫描 Base 链上所有发往特定地址的 USDC 转账，按照自己定义的规则（1 USDC = 5000 $PING），认定哪些交易是「有效 mint」，然后在链下数据库记录并通过合约分发代币。

2. 像在哪里

铭文刚出来时候，遭到了 Bitcoin Core 团队的抵制，因为它的存在除了让 BTC 主网上堆满大量粉尘交易，没任何价值。显然，顺着这个思路，$PING 的存在逻辑也类似，但和 BTC 主网一样，x402 协议作为开放标准，即便不讨喜短期看也无能为力。

原理很简单，大家打铭文的资产好歹还是存在了 BTC 主网上，铭文没了炒作意义，释放一下还能返回一部分 BTC，但大家 Mint 的 PING，其实都到了 x402scan 指定的 treasury 钱包内，团队一边众筹，一边发币，真正的 x402 协议前后都只是被「白嫖」了一番。

先别着急怼我，这样的行为我前文说了是一次「冲锋号」行动，对于曝光传播 x402 赛道的价值大有裨益。等于强行为 x402 协议制造使用场景，且效果立竿见影，也算是一次对 x402 协议的压力测试，无疑是一次「x402 叙事的奇点」，会催生一系列改进和生态繁荣可能。

3. 会向铭文市场一样演化吗？

会，前边说了，PING 的存在意义实际上是 x402scan 这个 indexer。但显然它存在很大问题：比如，资产托管在自身中心化实体名下，违背了 x402 协议为 AI Agent 开通的支付通道的初衷，不一定能和其他 x402 协议进行无缝兼容，甚至没有统一的铸造、转账、销毁等操作规范。

所以，顺着 BRC20-ARC20-SRC20-Runes 演进的逻辑，相信还会有很多自称更「正统」的新「铭文」出现。

比如改进托管方式，改变发交易 mint 的形式，获得原生协议支持等等思路等等。夸张点说，中间即便出现 x402scan 协议跑路，Treasury 卷款走等已经阻挡不住这波风刮起来了，潘多拉的魔盒已经开启！

以上。

还是重申一个观点，x402 叙事的爆发是一定的，$PING 只是吹响了冲锋号，后续市场如何演化可能也很多很多，以上分享权当认知逻辑，不做任何投资建议，但大可不必焦虑，接下来该凑的热闹值得凑凑！

Letture associate

Morning Post | Trump Media Group Releases Q1 Financial Report; Top Three DeFi Applications Return Nearly $100 Million in Revenue to Token Holders in 30 Days; Michael Saylor Shares Bitcoin Tracker Info Again

**Title: Daily Briefing | Trump Media Group Releases Q1 Report; Top 3 DeFi Apps Return Nearly $100M to Token Holders; Michael Saylor Signals Potential Bitcoin Buy** **Summary:** Key developments in the past 24 hours include: * **Economic Outlook:** Goldman Sachs has pushed back its forecast for the next two Federal Reserve interest rate cuts to December 2026 and March 2027, citing persistent inflationary pressures from energy costs. This delayed timeline is expected to tighten liquidity flow into risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. * **DeFi & Revenue:** Data from DefiLlama shows that three leading DeFi applications—Hyperliquid, Pump.fun, and EdgeX—collectively distributed $96.3 million in revenue to their token holders over the last 30 days. This trend highlights a shift in the crypto community's focus towards real protocol earnings and sustainable economic models. * **Corporate Bitcoin Moves:** Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy (note: referred to as 'Strategy' in the text, likely a typographical error), has signaled potential upcoming Bitcoin purchases by posting a "Bitcoin Tracker" update, following a pattern that typically precedes the company's official disclosure of new acquisitions. * **Market Integrity:** Prediction market platform Polymarket announced updates to address platform issues, including identifying and banning clusters of accounts involved in "ghost-fill" activities and implementing measures to prevent bulk account creation. * **Regulation:** The Bank of England Governor warned that stablecoin regulation could lead to tensions between US and international regulators. In South Korea, the National Tax Service has launched a pilot program to entrust seized virtual assets to private custody firms for management. * **Meme Token Trends:** GMGN data lists the top trending meme tokens on Ethereum (e.g., HEX, SHIB), Solana (e.g., FWOG, TROLL), and Base (e.g., SKITTEN, PEPE) over the past day. **Financial Note:** Trump Media & Technology Group reported a Q1 loss of approximately $4 billion, primarily attributed to unrealized losses on its Bitcoin and other digital asset holdings.

链捕手4 min fa

Morning Post | Trump Media Group Releases Q1 Financial Report; Top Three DeFi Applications Return Nearly $100 Million in Revenue to Token Holders in 30 Days; Michael Saylor Shares Bitcoin Tracker Info Again

链捕手4 min fa

Telegram Takes Direct Control of TON, Social Traffic Rewrites the Public Chain Narrative

Telegram founder Pavel Durov announced that Telegram will replace the TON Foundation as the core driver and largest validator of The Open Network (TON). Key initiatives include a sixfold reduction in transaction fees, performance upgrades, and improved developer tools within the next few weeks. This marks a strategic shift from Telegram merely providing user access to deeply integrating TON into its platform's core infrastructure. The goal is to transform Telegram's massive social traffic into sustainable on-chain activity. While viral mini-apps like Notcoin have demonstrated Telegram's ability to drive user adoption, TON aims to support frequent, low-value transactions inherent to social platforms—such as tipping, in-app payments, and game rewards. Ultra-low fees and sub-second finality (0.6 seconds) are crucial to making blockchain interactions seamless and nearly invisible within the Telegram user experience. However, Telegram's increased central role raises questions about network decentralization. Durov argues that Telegram's participation will attract more large validators, thereby enhancing decentralization. TON also offers high annual staking rewards (18.8%), aiming to retain capital within its ecosystem. The fundamental challenge for TON is no longer leveraging Telegram's user base, but becoming an indispensable, seamless infrastructure layer for Telegram's everyday applications—moving from an adjacent chain to an embedded utility.

marsbit6 min fa

Telegram Takes Direct Control of TON, Social Traffic Rewrites the Public Chain Narrative

marsbit6 min fa

Telegram Takes Direct Control of TON, Social Traffic Reshapes Public Chain Narrative

Telegram's founder, Pavel Durov, has announced a major shift in the development of The Open Network (TON). Telegram will now become the core driver of TON, replacing the TON Foundation and becoming its largest validator. The focus will be on technical upgrades over the next few weeks, including slashing network fees by six times to near-zero and improving finality time to 0.6 seconds. This move signifies a deeper integration between Telegram and TON, moving beyond just providing a user base. The goal is to transform Telegram's vast social traffic and built-in features—like Mini Apps, payments, and bots—into sustainable, on-chain usage scenarios. The reduced fees and faster speeds are crucial for enabling the small, frequent transactions typical of social interactions. While this promises stronger execution and product alignment, it raises questions about centralization. Durov argues Telegram's involvement will attract more validators, enhancing decentralization, but the outcome remains to be seen. Additionally, TON's high annual staking reward of 18.8% aims to retain capital within the ecosystem. The key challenge for TON is no longer just leveraging Telegram's entry point, but becoming an invisible, seamless infrastructure layer within Telegram's daily use. Its success hinges on converting viral attention into lasting, embedded utility.

Odaily星球日报15 min fa

Telegram Takes Direct Control of TON, Social Traffic Reshapes Public Chain Narrative

Odaily星球日报15 min fa

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

OpenAI engineer Weng Jiayi's "Heuristic Learning" experiments propose a new paradigm for Agentic AI, suggesting that intelligent agents can improve not just by training neural networks, but also by autonomously writing and refining code based on environmental feedback. In the experiment, a coding agent (powered by Codex) was tasked with developing and maintaining a programmatic strategy for the Atari game Breakout. Starting from a basic prompt, the agent iteratively wrote code, ran the game, analyzed logs and video replays to identify failures, and then modified the code. Through this engineering loop of "code-run-debug-update," it evolved a pure Python heuristic strategy that achieved a perfect score of 864 in Breakout and performed competitively with deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in MuJoCo control tasks like Ant and HalfCheetah. This approach, termed Heuristic Learning (HL), contrasts with Deep RL. In HL, experience is captured in readable, modifiable code, tests, logs, and configurations—a software system—rather than being encoded solely into opaque neural network weights. This offers potential advantages in explainability, auditability for safety-critical applications, easier integration of regression tests to combat catastrophic forgetting, and more efficient sample use in early learning stages, as demonstrated in broader tests on 57 Atari games. However, the blog acknowledges clear limitations. Programmatic strategies struggle with tasks requiring long-horizon planning or complex perception (e.g., Montezuma's Revenge), areas where neural networks excel. The future vision is a hybrid architecture: specialized neural networks for fast perception (System 1), HL systems for rules, safety, and local recovery (also System 1), and LLM agents providing high-level feedback and learning from the HL system's data (System 2). The core proposition is that in the era of capable coding agents, a significant portion of an AI's learned experience could be maintained as an auditable, evolving software system.

marsbit1 h fa

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

marsbit1 h fa

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

This article explores the recent phenomenon of AI companies increasingly using anthropomorphic language—like "thinking," "memory," "hallucination," and now "dreaming"—to describe machine learning processes. Focusing on Anthropic's newly announced "Dreaming" feature for its Claude Agent platform, the piece explains that this function is essentially an automated, offline batch processing of an agent's operational logs. It analyzes past task sessions to identify patterns, optimize future actions, and consolidate learnings into a persistent memory system, akin to a form of reinforcement learning and self-correction. The article draws parallels to similar features in other AI agent systems like Hermes Agent and OpenClaw, which also implement mechanisms for reviewing historical data, extracting reusable "skills," and strengthening long-term memory. It notes a key difference from human dreaming: these AI "dreams" still consume computational resources and user tokens. Further context is provided by discussing the technical challenges of managing AI "memory" or context, highlighting the computational expense of large context windows and innovations like Subquadratic's new model claiming drastically longer contexts. The core critique argues that this strategic use of human-centric vocabulary does more than market products; it subtly reshapes user perception. By framing algorithms with terms associated with consciousness, companies blur the line between tool and autonomous entity. This linguistic shift can influence user expectations, tolerance for errors, and even perceptions of responsibility when systems fail, potentially diverting scrutiny from the companies and engineers behind the technology. The article concludes by speculating that terms like "daydreaming" for predictive task simulation might be next, continuing this trend of embedding the idea of an "inner life" into computational processes.

marsbit1 h fa

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures