XRP Price Is Trapped Under A Bearish Structure, What Happens If It Doesn’t Break $2.5

bitcoinistPubblicato 2025-10-20Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-10-20

Introduzione

The XRP price looks to be on the verge of another breakdown that could send it spiraling to new multi-month...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The XRP price looks to be on the verge of another breakdown that could send it spiraling to new multi-month lows. This comes after a failure to hold the support at $2.5 and the subsequent decline that has put it on a rather bearish path. If this bearishness continues, then it is more likely that the XRP price will end up retesting the $2.1 level soon, and a total failure would lead to a crash that could rival that of 2020, triggered by the SEC lawsuit.

Bears Have Trapped The XRP Price

In an analysis, crypto analyst Lingrid revealed that the XRP price is now under a lot of bearish pressure. The first sign of this is that the altcoin’s price has continued to decline within a well-defined downward channel, and this comes after the price was rejected near the resistance trendline below $2.44.

A direct result of this is that the XRP price is still seeing lower highs and lower lows, which is indicative that the sellers are still very much in control of the price. At this juncture, the analyst explains that the XRP price is currently still trapped under bearish pressure due to this.

From here, there are now a lot of things that could happen for the price. The first of these is that it continues to decline, eventually moving as low as $2.1. This would be where the next major support is for the price, and in this case, the price would have to maintain $2.1 and bounce if there is to be a recovery.

On the flip side, if bulls want to invalidate the bearish thesis, then they would have to get the price above $2.5. If the XRP price is able to break through this major resistance with momentum, then there could be a turn in the tide for the digital asset.

XRP Price
Source: TradingView.com

Factors To Watch Out For

Lingrid also highlights a number of factors that could set the XRP price up for another run. The first of these has to do with the Bitcoin price, which categorically controls the broader crypto market. If the Bitcoin price were to move, then it could take the XRP price with it and invalidate the bears.

Next on the list is for the XRP price to break above $2.45. In this case, the breakout would set it on the path toward $2.8, marking an over 10% increase from the breakout point. This also plays into the analysis of bulls maintaining support before a decline to $2.1.

Last but not least is the fact that there would be some unexpected news in the market. This could have to do with regulatory issues or liquidity events that end up throwing the short-term technical flows off balance, while the market figures out the next direction.

XRP price chart from TradingView.com
Price continues to grind upwards | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com
Featured image from Dall.E, chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Scott Matherson is a leading crypto writer at Bitcoinist, who possesses a sharp analytical mind and a deep understanding of the digital currency landscape. Scott has earned a reputation for delivering thought-provoking and well-researched articles that resonate with both newcomers and seasoned crypto enthusiasts. Outside of his writing, Scott is passionate about promoting crypto literacy and often works to educate the public on the potential of blockchain.

Letture associate

Large Language Models Ace All Exams, Yet Move Farther from AGI: What Does This Paper Reveal?

The article discusses the ongoing challenge of defining and achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). It notes that industry leaders have set vague, often profit- or time-based benchmarks for AGI, while the concept itself lacks a consensus definition—a situation the article compares to a "Rorschach test." It highlights a recent 2025 paper by researcher Michael Timothy Bennett, who proposes a new, measurable definition. Bennett frames AGI not as mimicking human performance on tests, which current large language models (LLMs) have already mastered, but as an "artificial scientist." A true AGI, according to this view, should be able to widely and efficiently adapt to new environments and tasks within real-world constraints (like computational and energy limits), focusing on the *discovery of new knowledge* rather than the replication of existing data. The author contrasts this with the current dominant approach of "scale-maxing"—massively scaling up data, parameters, and compute. While powerful, this method leads to models that fail on out-of-distribution problems and lack core intelligent abilities: they are passive learners, cannot reason causally, and cannot actively experiment or balance exploration with exploitation. The article argues that Bennett's framework offers a crucial shift. It makes AGI a quantifiable engineering problem and proposes new evaluation "adaptation benchmarks" that test an AI's ability to actively learn in novel scenarios. The conclusion is that achieving AGI will require a fundamental reset—a fusion of multiple methodologies beyond simple scaling, moving AI from mimicking patterns to embodying the scientific spirit of inquiry and discovery.

marsbit53 min fa

Large Language Models Ace All Exams, Yet Move Farther from AGI: What Does This Paper Reveal?

marsbit53 min fa

Pope Issues First AI Encyclical: 40,000 Words, 10 Key Points, Clarifying AI Anxiety

Pope Leo XIV's historic encyclical "Magnifica Humanitas," released in May 2026, marks the Catholic Church's first major document addressing artificial intelligence. The 40,000-word text moves beyond theological abstraction to confront practical AI anxieties affecting society. It argues that AI is no longer a mere tool but an embedded environment influencing daily decisions in areas like employment, healthcare, justice, and information, often without users' awareness. The encyclical presents ten core concerns. It highlights that the central issue isn't just regulation, but who holds the underlying *power*—control over data, compute, and platforms—often concentrated in private entities. It warns that even developers cannot fully explain AI systems, creating accountability gaps. While AI can simulate human interaction and creativity, it cautions against treating it as a moral agent capable of bearing true responsibility or forming genuine relationships. Key risks identified include AI's role in opaque decision-making for jobs or welfare, the amplification of persuasive disinformation, and the potential for education to focus on tool use over critical thinking. The document stresses that work has value beyond efficiency, and AI should enhance human capabilities, not merely replace roles. It firmly states that irreversible decisions, especially involving life and death, must remain under human judgment. Ultimately, the encyclical frames AI's challenge as anthropological, not just technological. As AI simulates uniquely human capacities like judgment and creation, it forces a re-examination of what makes human action meaningful: our capacity for responsibility, vulnerability, and bearing real consequences. The Pope concludes that technology is never neutral; its development and deployment are shaped by human values and choices, making an inclusive, ethically grounded dialogue essential for its future.

marsbit58 min fa

Pope Issues First AI Encyclical: 40,000 Words, 10 Key Points, Clarifying AI Anxiety

marsbit58 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片