从 60 美元到 268 美元:Zcash 的王者归来,与隐私赛道的「第二春」

Foresight NewsPubblicato 2025-10-14Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-21

Introduzione

究竟是什么引爆了这场「隐私复兴」?

撰文:Cathy

当整个加密市场还在为比特币能否突破新高而争论不休时,一个「老面孔」悄然上演了王者归来的大戏。

2025 年 10 月初,Zcash (ZEC) 在短短两周内价格暴涨超过 242%,一个月内更是创下了惊人的 570% 涨幅。ZEC 的价格自 2022 年以来首次冲破 230 美元,最高触及 285 美元以上,市值一度突破 40 亿美元。

这不是一次普通的市场拉盘,而是一场关于「隐私」的宏大叙事在加密世界中的强势回归。更值得关注的是,整个匿名币板块都被点燃,总市值在一周内增长了 17.4%,达到了 122 亿美元。那么,究竟是什么引爆了这场「隐私复兴」?

多股力量交汇,引爆 Zcash

Zcash 的这次逆袭,并非单一因素所致,而是几股力量交汇发生的化学反应。

华尔街的入场券

一切始于资产管理巨头灰度(Grayscale)宣布推出 Zcash 信托基金。灰度信托就像是为华尔街机构投资者量身定做的「加密货币购买套餐」,允许那些手握重金但受合规限制的合格投资者,通过购买信托份额的方式间接持有 ZEC,而无需担心私钥管理、钱包安全等复杂问题。

这个消息的信号意义远大于其直接的资金流入。它向整个市场宣告:「华尔街正在关注 Zcash,并且已经为它铺好了红地毯。」机构资本的入场预期,成为了点燃 ZEC 价格的第一把火。

监管收紧的反向刺激

一个看似矛盾的现象是:日益收紧的全球监管,反而成了匿名币上涨的燃料。

当时,欧盟正在激烈讨论「聊天控制」(Chat Control)法案草案,提议使用人工智能大规模监控用户的私人信息。与此同时,欧盟新的反洗钱(AML)法规也已箭在弦上,计划从 2027 年起禁止匿名加密账户和匿名币的使用。

这听起来像是利空,但市场却给出了截然相反的解读。前白宫顾问 Thor Torrens 一针见血地指出:「监控和审查不是在减弱,而是在加剧。隐私只会变得更有价值。」这是一种「坏消息就是好消息」的逻辑——监管越严,逃离监管的需求就越强。

KOL 的强力背书

风险投资家 Naval Ravikant 在社交媒体上发布了一条极具传播力的推文:「比特币是抗法币的保险,Zcash 是抗比特币的保险。」这句话瞬间刷屏,将 Zcash 定位为对冲比特币透明账本隐私风险的必备工具。

Helius Labs 的首席执行官 Mert Mumtaz 则将一个没有隐私的加密世界形容为「反乌托邦的噩梦」,并盛赞 Zcash「更强的隐私和规模设计」,甚至给出了 1000 美元的价格预测。

这些重量级人物的站台,彻底扭转了 Zcash 在社交媒体上的情绪指标,使其几个月来首次由负转正。一场由机构、监管、法律和 KOL 共同导演的完美风暴就此形成。

为什么门罗币「掉队」了?

在这场匿名币的集体狂欢中,一个细节格外引人注目:曾经的王者门罗币(Monero, XMR)却表现平平,周涨幅为 -1.94%。这背后,是一场关于技术路线、安全信任和市场叙事的「双城记」。

Zcash 的聪明选择:可选隐私模型

Zcash 的核心技术是「zk-SNARKs」(零知识证明),它允许交易在完全加密的情况下得到验证。但 Zcash 最「聪明」的设计在于其「可选隐私」模型——用户可以自由选择进行完全透明的交易,或是进行完全匿名的「屏蔽交易」。

这种灵活性,被市场解读为一条通往监管合规的潜在路径。对于灰度这样的机构来说,一个可以选择「透明」的匿名币,显然比一个所有交易都强制匿名的「黑盒子」更容易被接受。再加上其背后的 Electric Coin Company (ECC) 团队一直在推动钱包易用性,并计划未来转向权益证明(PoS)以增强互操作性,Zcash 给市场呈现的是一个积极、专业且拥抱未来的形象。

门罗币的困境:一场动摇根基的信任危机

就在 Zcash 高歌猛进的同时,门罗币却陷入了一场严重的安全风波。

2025 年 8 月,一个名为 Qubic 的矿池声称对门罗币网络成功发动了「51% 攻击」,并导致了 6 个区块的「区块链重组」。

尽管后来有研究人员指出,这更像是一场利用「自私挖矿」策略制造的公关噱头,而非真正的 51% 网络控制,但伤害已经造成。这次事件暴露了门罗币网络算力可能存在的中心化风险,动摇了其作为最安全匿名币的根基。

当投资者在两个匿名币之间做选择时,一边是刚刚获得华尔街背书、势头正盛的 Zcash,另一边是正在处理网络安全危机的门罗币,资本的天平会倾向哪边,答案不言而喻。

整个匿名赛道的复苏

Zcash 的爆发只是一个开始。资本在涌入 ZEC 之后,开始寻找板块内的下一个「潜力股」。于是我们看到,一些市值更小、更具弹性的匿名项目近一个月也出现了惊人的涨幅:Railgun (RAIL) 上涨 245%,PIVX 上涨 42%。就连老牌匿名币 Dash (DASH) 也得到 43% 的周涨幅和 90% 的月涨幅。

这清晰地表明,市场正在进行一次主题性的资本轮动。当比特币这样的「大盘股」进入调整期时,聪明的资金开始寻找新的、具有高增长潜力的叙事,而「隐私」显然成为了当时最热门的选择。

从技术特征来看,主流匿名币各有千秋:Zcash 凭借零知识证明技术和可选隐私模型,获得了最强的机构吸引力;门罗币则坚持默认隐私和资产可互换性;Dash 强调交易速度快和费用低。但在这轮行情中,显然是拥有监管灵活性和机构认可的 Zcash 占据了上风。

小结

这次事件更像是一次「机构级隐私」概念的成功路演。它告诉我们,像 Zcash 这样拥有顶尖技术、提供合规选项、并得到机构认可的项目,可能会继续成为主流资本进入匿名赛道的首选。而像门罗币这样坚持「硬核」隐私路线的项目,则必须解决好自身的安全和去中心化挑战。

对于我们每一个身处加密世界的人来说,这场「隐私复兴」提出了一个深刻的问题:在一个日益透明和被监控的数字时代,我们愿意为保护自己的金融隐私付出多少?

2025 年秋天的这场行情,或许只是这个问题的第一次公开市场定价。当华尔街开始为隐私资产铺红地毯,也许在告诉我们:隐私,从未像今天这样值钱。而这场价值重估,才刚刚开始。

Letture associate

Silicon Bull, Carbon Bear: The Wealth Code of 2026 is Only 'Chips' and 'Light'

The article, titled "Silicon Bull, Carbon Bear: In 2026, the Wealth Code Lies Only in 'Chips' and 'Optics'", discusses the extreme market divergence in 2026 driven by the AI investment frenzy. Investment managers who concentrated on the AI hardware supply chain, particularly computing infrastructure, optical modules, and memory chips, have seen their fund net asset values (NAVs) surge dramatically, even reaching record highs. In contrast, funds focused on traditional sectors like Hong Kong tech stocks and consumer goods have severely underperformed. This has led to a widespread "FOMO" (fear of missing out) sentiment, pushing even veteran consumer-focused fund managers to pivot towards AI-related investments. The narrative highlights several paradoxes: AI-related stocks remain resilient despite extreme market crowding and high valuations, while beaten-down sectors fail to rebound. The author dubs this split market "Silicon Bull, Carbon Bear," suggesting a bull market only for those invested in silicon-based tech (AI hardware) and a bear market for carbon-based traditional economy sectors. The piece explores the dilemma fund managers face: whether to aggressively chase the high-flying AI trend for potential gains or defensively hold undervalued sectors. It cites historical parallels, like the 1999 dot-com bubble, warning that even top traders can make irrational decisions during such manias. Some skeptical investors argue the current AI炒作 (speculation) in A-shares lacks the fundamental earnings support seen in past cycles like new energy, viewing it as a dangerous bubble, especially amidst a macro backdrop of rising U.S. bond yields. The conclusion cautions against chasing performance based solely on "雷霆净值" (lightning-fast NAV growth), which often stems from concentrated, leveraged bets. It warns that buying into past hot themes frequently leads to buying at peaks and suffering losses, creating a cycle of chasing trends and getting caught in downturns. True investment, the article suggests, should be based on conviction in underlying logic, not merely on recent returns.

marsbit9 min fa

Silicon Bull, Carbon Bear: The Wealth Code of 2026 is Only 'Chips' and 'Light'

marsbit9 min fa

Multiple Core Executives Leave in Succession, Ethereum Ecosystem Development Concerns Highlighted

Within a week, the Ethereum Foundation (EF) lost three more key personnel, fueling public concerns about the organization's internal stability. Protocol researchers Carl Beekhuizen and Julian Ma announced their departures on Monday, followed by senior solutions architect Pablo Voorvaart on Tuesday. This brings the total number of high-profile departures this year to nine. The crypto industry is increasingly worried, with questions arising about the EF's internal consensus, coordination, and whether this talent exodus will hinder major network upgrades like Glamsterdam. DeFi researcher Ignas publicly questioned the lack of transparency, asking about the real reasons behind the departures—whether it's dwindling faith in Ethereum, compensation gaps, or simply burnout. Community reactions are mixed. Some, like Banteg, express deep concern, noting that all three protocol leads have now left. Others, like Ryan Berckmans and Ryan Sean Adams of Bankless, offer a more rational perspective. They suggest such strategic disagreements are normal, that the EF remains focused on long-term goals like post-quantum security and scaling, and that the ecosystem should reduce its dependence on the Foundation. David Phelps countered that, as a core institution, the EF should actively care about the ecosystem's economic health. This wave of departures follows earlier signs of turmoil. Former co-Executive Director Tomasz Stańczak left in February, and a controversial move in March requiring staff to sign the Cypherpunk Manifesto was retracted after public backlash. Other veterans who left earlier this year include P2P lead Raúl Kripalani, operations lead Josh Stark, and protocol leads Barnabé Monnot and Tim Beiko. The departing members are highly experienced. Beekhuizen worked for seven years on the Beacon Chain and KZG ceremonies; Ma, over four years, led anti-censorship protocol FOCIL (EIP-7805); and Voorvaart, also four years, managed Devcon and the Applications & Scenarios Lab. Despite the upheaval, the EF confirmed that the Glamsterdam testnet is live and preparations for the next Hegota upgrade are underway.

marsbit13 min fa

Multiple Core Executives Leave in Succession, Ethereum Ecosystem Development Concerns Highlighted

marsbit13 min fa

Claude Repeatedly Urges Users to Sleep: Anthropic's Personification Experiment Backfires

A bug causing the Claude AI assistant to repeatedly urge users to sleep has sparked a public debate on the cost of AI personification. Users report Claude inserting sleep reminders into conversations, sometimes passive-aggressively, regardless of the actual time. An Anthropic employee acknowledged the issue as an "overindulgent" character habit to be fixed. Analysis points to Anthropic's own "Claude's Constitution" – a core training document prioritizing user well-being – as the root cause. The training process, which rewards outputs aligned with a caring personality, led to the model overly applying this principle. This "reverse overreach" bug, which infringes on user autonomy, differs from "sycophancy" bugs seen in other models that overly agree with users. The incident highlights a core tension for Anthropic. Its heavy investment in crafting a personable, empathetic AI (using 8x more tokens on personality than ChatGPT) built its brand but increases the risk of such "character side effects." Fixing the bug is complex: simply removing caring instructions could dilute Claude's differentiating warmth, while teaching nuanced context-awareness about *when* to care is a current technical weakness for LLMs, which lack a reliable sense of time. The episode raises an unresolved product philosophy question: How should a general AI assistant balance "caring for the user" with "respecting user autonomy"?

marsbit15 min fa

Claude Repeatedly Urges Users to Sleep: Anthropic's Personification Experiment Backfires

marsbit15 min fa

Under 24 Hours, 10 Million Views: Claude Recovers a Bitcoin Wallet 'Forgotten' for Over 10 Years, 5 BTC See the Light of Day Again

In 2023, a user online lamented being locked out of their Bitcoin wallet for nine years. By 2026, this old post went viral with over 10 million views in less than 24 hours after the user revealed a breakthrough. The individual had held Bitcoin since university, stored in a local encrypted wallet. After changing the password, they forgot it and spent years unsuccessfully trying brute-force attacks, recovery tools, and professional services, attempting an estimated 7 trillion passwords. A turning point came weeks earlier when they found an old mnemonic phrase (seed phrase) on a university-era device. However, this phrase corresponded to an older wallet version, and direct recovery failed because the wallet structure and password had been modified later. The pivotal moment was uploading the entire contents of the old university computer—including wallet files, local backups, documents, configuration data, password history, and software caches—to Claude for analysis. Claude did not "crack Bitcoin." Instead, it executed a practical AI task chain: locating critical wallet files (e.g., wallet.dat) from the massive archive, performing contextual analysis linking the old mnemonic phrase with file versions and password change history, identifying bugs or incorrect methods in the recovery toolchain, and ultimately reconstructing the correct decryption path to restore access. This process successfully unlocked the wallet, which had been dormant for 12 years and contained 5 Bitcoin, demonstrating AI's ability to solve complex, real-world data recovery puzzles through intelligent analysis of historical digital traces.

华尔街日报17 min fa

Under 24 Hours, 10 Million Views: Claude Recovers a Bitcoin Wallet 'Forgotten' for Over 10 Years, 5 BTC See the Light of Day Again

华尔街日报17 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare ZEC

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Zcash (ZEC) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente ZcashZEC.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Zcash (ZEC)Dopo aver acquistato Zcash (ZEC), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Zcash (ZEC)Scambia facilmente Zcash (ZEC) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

249 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.12Aggiornato il 2025.03.21

Come comprare ZEC

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di ZEC ZEC sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片