加密市场如何陷入杠杆的循环困境?

比推Pubblicato 2025-10-13Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-10-13

撰文:rosie

编译:AididiaoJP,Foresight News

原标题:在加密领域,你不可能「不玩」杠杆


2025 年 10 月 10 日,24 小时内 190 亿美元被清算,160 万交易者血本无归。

加密领域有史以来最大的清算事件,清算规模是之前最高价值的 9 倍。

而 6 个月后,每个人都会回来做一模一样的事,很可能也包括我。

一夜之间人人都成了专家

崩盘之后,加密推特变成了风险管理研讨会。「你本该保持反脆弱的」「绝不要用杠杆」「这就是我持有现金的原因。」

有趣的是,喊得最大声的总是那些一直持有稳定币的人。10 月 9 号的时候这些高见在哪呢?哦对了,你们当时在发关于错过上涨行情的懊悔帖。

「反脆弱」的真正含义(以及为什么它在这里不适用)

人们一直在不加理解地滥用反脆弱的概念。

反脆弱并不意味着「谨慎行事」。它意味着从波动性中获益,混乱让你变得更强大,而不是更脆弱。

但问题在于:杠杆交易者并不从波动性收益,他们被波动性摧毁。

当你开 10 倍多头而市场下跌 15% 时,你并没有从混乱中变得更强。你被清算了,那不是反脆弱。那是多了几步操作的脆弱。

真正的反脆弱意味着你不依赖于任何单一条件;但加密领域的每个人都依赖于一件事:价格上涨,或者至少不在 20 分钟内暴跌 15%。

稳健 vs 反脆弱

  • 稳健 = 「我不希望波动性影响到我」

  • 反脆弱 = 「我希望波动性让我更强」

持有稳定币?那顶多是稳健。你受到了保护,但你无法从市场变动中获益。你也无法从上涨行情中获益,你只是在场,安全且贫穷。

而这些人正是喊「只管保持反脆弱」最大声的人。他们置身事外,错过了一切,现在因为别人受了伤而觉得自己被证明了是对的。

使用杠杆?那只是脆弱,波动性会摧毁你。

那么加密领域里什么才是真正反脆弱的呢?老实说,没人搞明白。也许是在重大消息发布前做空的人,但那看起来更像是他们只是拥有内幕信息。

我们都深陷其中的游戏

以下是没人愿意承认的事实:在加密领域,你不可能「不玩」杠杆。

完全置身事外?你会看着身边所有人几个月下来都赚了钱。你的购买力在通胀持续中消亡,机会消失。

而且说实话,如果你只有 5000 美金可以玩,你通过现货交易是赚不到改变人生的钱的。所以人们使用杠杆,不是因为这样做聪明,而是因为一年内把 5000 美金变成 6000 美金改变不了什么。

置身事外感觉是负责任的,直到你看着所有其他人赚了 10 倍而你还在「聪明」着。至少被摧毁意味着你尝试过。

为什么每个人都会重蹈覆辙

6 个月后,那些失去一切的人会再次使用杠杆,不是因为他们愚蠢,而是因为替代方案是什么?

永远持有稳定币,而下一个周期在你缺席时发生?看着别人用狗币收益买房,而你却一直在「聪明」着?

每个人都认识那些在比特币 100 美元、以太坊 10 美元、Solana 1 美元时错过的人。他们每次都在「小心谨慎」。现在他们还在朝九晚五地上班,而其他人都退休了。

在加密领域谨慎行事只是一种缓慢的保持贫穷的方式。

我们都知道游戏是被操纵的

你知道游戏是被操纵的,你知道有人拥有更好的信息,你知道基础设施在崩盘时会崩溃,你都知道这一切。

但问题是:其他人都在玩。而当其他人都在玩时,你并不是在做独立的选择,你是在对你周围所有人的行为做出反应。

这实际上只是一个协调博弈。当你整个社交网络都在加密领域,当你的时间线上满是收益截图,当机会流向那些参与其中的人时,置身事外意味着你被抛弃了。

如果你是唯一不在牌桌上的人,你赚不到改变人生的钱。如果你不参与,你就无法保持与生态系统的连接。

为什么那些「专家」是在胡说

在 10 月 10 日之后给出建议的人分为几类:

也被清算了但不承认。置身事外,错过了整个上涨行情,现在看到别人亏损觉得自己被证明了是对的。或者只是运气好对了,却认为是自己的本事。

那些持有稳定币的人是最糟糕的。他们几个月来置身事外,发着懊悔帖,而其他所有人都在赚钱。现在他们因为有人被清算而可以感觉高人一等了。

没人真正搞明白了这件事。我们都只是在一个不确定的游戏中下着不同的赌注。

接下来可能会发生什么

以下是每个人都见过的周期:

  • 第 1-2 个月:每个人都发誓不用杠杆了。「再也不用了。」「加密货币是骗局。」「我退出了。」

  • 第 3-4 个月:新的叙事出现。留下来的人开始晒收益。FOMO 慢慢累积。

  • 第 5-6 个月:杠杆回归。「这次不一样了。」「我从上次吸取了教训。」「只是小仓位。」

然后一切重演。

大多数人都会成为这个周期的一部分。不是因为他们笨,而是因为替代方案是坐在场外看着其他所有人玩。

两种选择都很糟糕

你可以参与,并冒着被清算的风险。或者置身事外,看着其他所有人可能改变他们的人生。

对信息不对称的逻辑反应应该是更小的仓位、更长的时间框架、更多的多样化。但那不是实际发生的情况,因为当你周围的每个人都在使用杠杆并晒出盈利时,保守的策略感觉就像在输。

这不理性,这是反射性的。你不是在真空中做决策,是在看着其他所有人用你避开的策略赚钱的同时做决策。

如果你在 10 月 10 日被摧毁了

如果你失去了一切,休息一段时间。

关上图表,删除应用一会儿,出去走走,去健身房锻炼,和那些不知道永续合约是什么的人聊聊天。

FOMO 情绪一个月后还会在那里,叙事还会继续,加密货币不会消失。

但是在你心态失衡时急于回本,试图把亏掉的全部赚回来?那会让你被摧毁两次。

接受这次亏损,吸取能学到的教训。等你思路清晰时再回来,而不是在你急于挽回损失的时候。

记住:那些喊着要反脆弱的人可能压根就没参与,别让他们让你因为尝试过而感到更糟。


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅: https://t.me/bitpush

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Letture associate

Upbit is Anxious: A Hasty Counterattack Aimed at Regaining Stablecoin Market Share

Title: Upbit's Rushed Counterattack to Reclaim Stablecoin Market Share Facing a dramatic shift in South Korea's stablecoin market, leading exchange Upbit launched a promotional campaign from July 26 to August 9, waiving the 0.05% trading fee for stablecoins paired with the Korean Won (KRW) and rapidly listing new stablecoins like RLUSD and USDG. This move is a direct response to its plummeting market share in this sector. Historically a duopoly with Bithumb, the market has been reshaped since October 2025 when Coinone permanently removed fees for USDC trading. By June 2026, Coinone led with 34.8% of stablecoin volume, followed by Bithumb (31.1%) and Upbit (30.1%). This contrasts sharply with the overall crypto market, where Upbit commands 60%. The data shows stablecoin demand is highly sensitive to fees, as users primarily buy them to transfer capital overseas for derivatives trading or forex arbitrage. South Korean exchanges have seen a net outflow of stablecoins for 18 consecutive months, totaling approximately 14.9 trillion KRW, underscoring their role as a cross-border capital conduit. Upbit's limited-time promotion initially boosted its daily stablecoin volume by 162%, but the surge was almost entirely in USDT (98.1% of volume). The newly listed stablecoins saw negligible, fleeting interest. Furthermore, the promotional effect quickly waned in the second week, with volume dropping 33% on weekdays. A concurrent weakening of the KRW also contributed to the trading spike, independent of the fee waiver. The analysis suggests that once the promotion ends, Upbit is unlikely to retain its temporary gains unless it matches Coinone's permanent zero-fee policy, forcing a choice between market share and fee revenue. Upbit's strategic push may be less about immediate profit and more about preparing for future regulatory shifts. With South Korea's *Digital Asset Basic Act* on the horizon, which will regulate KRW-backed stablecoins, and following Dunamu's (Upbit's parent) integration into Naver Financial to build a payment ecosystem, securing a dominant position in the dollar stablecoin distribution channel holds long-term strategic value. However, potential regulatory conflicts could prevent Upbit from listing a future Naver-issued KRW stablecoin, making the current fight for dollar stablecoin flow even more critical.

marsbit5 h fa

Upbit is Anxious: A Hasty Counterattack Aimed at Regaining Stablecoin Market Share

marsbit5 h fa

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, argues that Bitcoin fundamentally changes how wealth is stored and transferred by transforming digital scarcity into economic value. He describes Bitcoin as the first digital monetary network, combining computers, digital networks, and cryptography. It digitizes monetary assets, allowing their supply to be controlled by public protocols rather than institutions, thus converting economic value into information transmissible over global networks. Comparing Bitcoin to gold, Saylor states that while increasing Bitcoin's supply is harder, its integration with software and transfer is easier. He highlights Bitcoin's proof-of-work mechanism, which ties it to the physical world by consuming real energy to secure the ledger, making past transactions immutable. This creates a shared security system involving miners, energy companies, and investors. Saylor suggests "digital monetary energy" is a more accurate term than "digital gold." He emphasizes that the Bitcoin network is an adaptive ecosystem of miners, nodes, developers, and users. Its core design is intentionally simple, focused on maintaining a secure ledger for scarce digital assets, with complex functionalities built in higher-layer applications. This architecture allows Bitcoin to serve as a foundation for transmitting value and fostering innovation in payments and financial services. Saylor notes Bitcoin's deeper impact lies in creating digital sovereignty, where private keys give individuals permissionless control over their economic power, with ownership verified mathematically, not by institutions. He concludes that while gold's physical scarcity makes it money, Bitcoin's digital scarcity does the same, characterizing Bitcoin as the monetary energy of the digital age.

cryptonews.ru6 h fa

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

cryptonews.ru6 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片