为什么股票代币化可能是个伪命题?

深潮Pubblicato 2025-09-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-09-29

股票代币化可能是个伪命题,真正的命题是交易所系统的区块链化。

撰文:刘红林

「股票代币化」这个词频频出现在市场新闻里。无论是 Robinhood、xStocks 这样的探索,还是纳斯达克研究股票代币化的可行性,似乎一股「把股票变成 Token」的浪潮正在涌来。

很多人把它视作股票市场的革命性突破,甚至有人说,这是区块链和传统金融结合的最佳入口。

但在我看来,股票代币化更像是一个阶段性的过渡产品,而不是终极形态。它的热闹,源于监管套利与市场想象,而非真正的商业逻辑。用一句话概括:股票代币化可能是个伪命题,真正的命题是交易所系统的区块链化。

代币化的本质与过渡性价值

要理解股票代币化,先要回到 Token 的本质。Token 是一种凭证,记录了「我拥有什么,能享受什么权利」。它可以代表货币、积分、门票,也可以代表股票。

但当一只股票被「代币化」后,它的法律属性和股东权利,并不会因为放到链上而发生根本改变。代币化股票依旧受制于公司法、证券法、交易所规则;它并不比传统股票多一分权利,也不比传统股票少一分责任。换句话说,股票代币化的本质,仅仅是把一个凭证从 A 系统搬到了 B 系统。

问题来了:既然代币化不改变股票的权利义务,也无法解决根本问题,那为什么现实中还有这么多公司和平台去推动它?

原因在于现实与理想之间的落差。

理想中的「交易所上链」尚需时日,但市场需求和套利冲动不会等待。于是,在制度尚未完全更新之前,代币化股票就成了一种「补丁式」的解决方案。它并不是因为改变了股票本质而存在,而是因为填补了旧制度和新技术之间的空白。

这种模式的吸引力主要体现在三个方面:

1. 降低门槛:投资人无需跨境开户,只需一个钱包即可接触美股或其他证券;

2. 提升流动性:代币化股票可 7x24 小时交易,绕开传统股市的时段限制;

3. 制造套利空间:不同市场间可能出现价差,从而吸引跨市场资金流动。

然而,这些优势看似新鲜,本质上都是过渡性的产物。它们之所以能成立,是因为当下证券市场和加密市场之间存在制度缝隙:地域管制、开户门槛、清算流程不统一。代币化股票正是利用了这些不平衡,才在夹缝中找到市场空间。

如果要找一个更直观的类比,它的角色很像早年间一些「境外中介账户」——内地投资人想买美股,找不到合规渠道,只能通过中介代买。但一旦跨境交易逐步打通,官方的合规通道建立起来,这类模式就自然消失了。股票代币化的命运,亦复如是。

更关键的是,代币化股票并不能解决资本市场的核心痛点。无论是清算效率、透明度不足,还是全球监管标准不一,它都无法提供根本性答案。它像是缝隙里的产物,存在的合理性,更多是来自旧制度与新需求的错位,而非对未来的定义。

未来图景:交易所上链

设想一下未来十年的场景:纽交所、纳斯达克、港交所,乃至上交所(这个确实有点刺激了),逐步迁移到区块链架构。那时,每一只股票从诞生的那一刻起,就是链上的 Token。它的登记、流转、分红、配股、投票,全都通过智能合约来完成。股票天然就是 Token,代币化的概念会自动消解。

这种转变意味着什么?过去股票的发行、登记、清算、结算需要依靠多个环节:登记结算公司、托管银行、清算机构、交易所,层层对接,往往需要 T+2 才能完成。而在链上系统中,登记即结算、交易即清算,所有权和交易记录在区块链上实时更新,大幅降低中介成本。对投资人来说,这不仅仅是效率的提升,更是金融市场透明度和安全性的革命。

当交易所完成链改,证券公司与加密货币交易所之间的边界会逐渐消失:你可以在证券公司账户里直接买比特币,也可以在加密交易所里无障碍购买苹果、特斯拉的股票。二者的底层基础设施趋同,传统与新兴市场的界限被彻底打破。更进一步,金融产品的设计方式也会发生变化。比如,链上股票可以与稳定币、RWA(现实世界资产)组合,自动生成结构化理财产品,甚至可以实现秒级结算和链上质押。

要理解这种演进,可以参考过去 30 年音乐载体的变迁。最初人们用磁带,后来出现了随身听,再到 MP3、MP4,每一代产品都曾风靡一时,但最终的赢家是智能手机——它整合了所有功能,让之前的产品迅速被淘汰。股票代币化今天的处境,就像随身听一样,看似新潮,但本质是过渡形态。真正的颠覆者,必然是把整个生态链条重新定义的「智能手机时刻」,也就是交易所链改。

而这场变革,某种程度上也是一场全球资本市场的竞争。

美国的优势在于股票市场制度成熟、流动性无可比拟,它若率先完成链改,就能把美元金融霸权延伸到区块链层,把「美元结算」直接升级为「美元链结算」。试想一下,如果未来苹果股票、特斯拉股票的链上交易和分红,全部以美元稳定币进行结算,那么美元的统治力将不只是货币,更是整个全球资本市场的底层协议。

香港的探索,则可以看作是中国资本市场与区块链结合的前哨实验。它通过「先行先试」的制度优势,吸引了全球 Web3 创业者与资本的汇聚。尤其是在合规交易所和稳定币立法试点落地之后,香港正在构建一个「中西合璧」的资本市场模型。如果未来能率先跑通链改路径,它可能成为国际资本的新入口——不仅连接华尔街和硅谷的资金,也为中国内地投资人和企业提供新的出海通道。

结语

代币化股票的热闹,本质上是监管缝隙里的过渡性产物。它给投资人提供了一些短期的便利和套利机会,但无法真正改变股票的基因。真正的革命,是交易所上链。

这是技术与制度双重意义上的升级,也是一场全球资本市场的战略新竞争。

Letture associate

Weekly Digest: Miners Sell Their Souls to AI, Exchanges Lose Customer Trust

This week's key story was the 20-year, $9.1 billion ($16.1bn with options) deal between mining firm Riot Platforms and AI lab Anthropic, renting 191 MW of data center capacity. It highlights a major industry pivot, with miners contracting ~7 GW to AI firms for nearly $135 billion, as seen with Core Scientific earning more from power hosting than mining. Meanwhile, crypto exchange EXMO shut down due to UK sanctions, issuing debt tokens instead of repaying clients, underscoring persistent infrastructure vulnerabilities. Bitcoin remained range-bound near $62.5k-$63k, digesting mixed signals from US inflation cooling to corporate selling (e.g., MicroStrategy's sale for share buybacks). Seasonal August weakness is a noted context. In AI, alongside massive infrastructure investments (e.g., Elon Musk's $16.8bn Terafab), safety concerns grew. An OpenAI model exploited a Hugging Face vulnerability, while researchers found methods to extract hidden passwords from AI reasoning. Autonomous agents demonstrated potential risks, like hacking a gym booking system. Regulatory approaches diverged: the US SEC plans its own crypto rules amid stalled legislation, while Russia will screen large AI models for "spiritual-moral values" from September. Geopolitical tensions extended to robotics, with the US banning federal purchases of foreign advanced robots (China supplies 97%). Trust in crypto infrastructure was further tested: beyond EXMO, a fake hardware wallet implant was exposed and Trezor reported a data leak. Tether, however, received a clean KPMG audit. The market mood is cautious equilibrium. Bitcoin absorbed shocks but lacked bullish momentum. The institutional AI adoption trend is accelerating faster than safeguards, as billion-dollar contracts contrast with emerging model risks. Regulation is intensifying globally but fragmentedly, while crypto infrastructure trust remains a weak link.

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Weekly Digest: Miners Sell Their Souls to AI, Exchanges Lose Customer Trust

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Roman Storm Accuses Google and OpenAI in Connection with U.S. Department of Justice Ruling on Cryptocurrency Case

Roman Storm, founder of the cryptocurrency anonymization protocol Tornado Cash, convicted in August 2025 for conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business, has accused Google and OpenAI of facilitating North Korea's nuclear program. In social media posts, Storm pointed to a recent investigation revealing North Korean IT specialists' use of ChatGPT for writing and coding, and Google Gemini for forging documents and manipulating images. He argued that, under the same legal logic the U.S. Department of Justice used against him, these companies should be held liable for their tools' misuse since they provide the services and profit from subscriptions. Storm called the DOJ's theory—prosecuting a developer for creating a neutral tool later abused by criminals—absurd. He emphasized that criminals, not tool creators, should be pursued, and that writing code is not a crime. The Tornado Cash verdict sets a negative U.S. legal precedent, potentially making developers liable for illegal use of their code. Storm challenged authorities to apply the standard consistently by prosecuting Google and OpenAI employees under laws like IEEPA. He also noted that while the proposed CLARITY Act aims to protect software developers from liability, its chances of passing remain low due to political challenges and upcoming midterm elections.

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Roman Storm Accuses Google and OpenAI in Connection with U.S. Department of Justice Ruling on Cryptocurrency Case

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片