Руководитель Bitwise: банкам стоит пересмотреть стратегию в условиях конкуренции со стейблкоинами

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2025-04-09Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-09-10

Американские кредитные организации сталкиваются с растущей конкуренцией со стороны стейблкоинов. И если банки проигнорируют это, то в перспективе могут лишиться львиной доли целевой аудитории. Подобную точку зрения высказал глава Bitwise Мэтт Хоуган. Специалист подчеркнул, что вместо того, чтобы добиваться ужесточения регулирования криптоиндсутрии, банкам лучше сделать услуги более выгодными для потенциальных инвесторов.

На текущий момент разрыв между традиционными и децентрализованными площадками очевиден. Доход по сберегательным вкладам в США в среднем не превышает 1% годовых. При этом стейблкоины предлагают более 5%. Кроме того сфера цифровых монет позволяет проводить быстрые и дешевые транзакции, а также пользователи не платят комиссию за хранение активов. И это делает их привлекательными не только для узконаправленных инвесторов, но и более широкой аудитории.

По словам Хоругана, в банковской среде часто встречается риторика в контексте того, что стейблкоины негативно влияют на рынок кредитования США. Однако это во многом лишь поверхностные оценки. Специалист считает, что сами по себе кредиты не исчезнут, однако изменят формат.

На данный момент сформировалась тенденция, что многие банки опасаются падения прибыли. А потому они активизировали лоббирование своих интересов в Вашингтоне. Многие крупные организации часто настаивают на том, что необходимо внедрять более жесткие нормативные требования для компаний, предлагающих доходные продукты в сфере стабильных монет.

При этом немало специалистов отмечают, что чрезмерное давление на криптоиндустрию негативно отразится на внедрение инноваций в США. При этом страна утратит лидирующие позиции в глобальной финансовой системе. Хоуган подчеркнул, что будущее банков зависит от того, смогут ли они адаптироваться к новым реалиям.

Letture associate

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit2 h fa

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit2 h fa

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手3 h fa

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手3 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片