懒人理财攻略|Linea启动10亿代币流动性激励;Jupiter Lend一键循环贷放大收益(9月3日)

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2025-09-03Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-09-03

原创 | Odaily 星球日报(@OdailyChina

作者|Azuma(@azuma_eth

本栏目旨在覆盖当前市场上以稳定币(及其衍生代币)为主体的低风险收益策略(Odaily 注:代码风险永远无法排除),以帮助那些希望通过 U 本位理财来逐渐放大资金量级的用户寻找较为理想的生息机会。

往期记录

懒人理财攻略|Katana、Agora 一鱼双吃;Huma 2.0 再次开门(7 月 16 日)

懒人理财攻略|Ethena 启动 USDe、sUSDe 循环贷激励;Falcon Finance 新增 60 倍积分加速渠道(8 月 4 日)

懒人理财攻略|币安推出核弹级 USDC 补贴计划;Kamino 第四季激励活动启动(8 月 12 日)

懒人理财攻略|币安加码 USDC 补贴;融资 1300 万美元的“AI 稳定币”要开挖了(8 月 18 日)

懒人理财攻略|币安 Plasma USDT 存款活动仍有额度;USD.AI 收益及积分两手抓(8 月 27 日)

新增机会

Linea 启动流动性激励计划

昨日晚间,Linea 官方宣布将启动流动性激励计划 Linea Ignition,计划分发 10 亿 LINEA 代币作为激励,以为 Linea 额外吸引 10 亿美元 TVL。

活动将持续至 2025 年 10 月 26 日,启动阶段符合资格的合作协议包括 Etherex、Aave、Euler(后续预计还将增加 Turtle Club),可参与的流动性池包括:

  • Etherex:USDC/USDT、USDC/ETH、WTBC/ETH、REX/ETH 交易对(含额外 REX 奖励)
  • Aave:WETH、USDC、USDT 借贷池;
  • Euler:由 EulerDAO/Gauntlet、Re7 Labs 和 Zerolend 管理的 WETH、USDC、USDT 池,可直接存款或通过 Euler Earn 参与(即将开放)。

奖励方面,激励代币中的 40% 将在 10 月 27 日解锁,剩余 60% 在 45 天内线性解锁。

截至发文,LINEA 在币安盘前市场暂报 0.033 美元,以该价格静态计算,10 亿枚代币即对应约 3300 万美元的总奖池,考虑到整个活动周期并不长,代币虽有一定的锁仓限制,但解锁周期也很短,所以还是蛮有参与性价比的 —— 建议无脑存 Aave,可以考虑适当上一些循环贷。

Jupiter Lend 正式上线

Jupiter 与 Fluid 合作推出的借贷产品 Jupiter Lend 上周正式上线,且很快就成为了 Solana 生态势头最猛的借贷协议之一。

目前在 Jupiter 直接存入 USDC、USDT、USDS 等稳定币,年化基本都在略低于 10% 的水平,虽然并不算高,但胜在 Jupiter 与 Fluid 的安全背书,且奖励会以相应稳定币的形式发放(收益相对较高的 Kamino,部分收益会以 KMNO 行形式发放)。

此外,Jupiter Lend 自带的一键循环贷功能(Multiply)还比较好用,有过相关操作经验的用户可以适当上一些杠杆来放大收益率 —— 这里最推荐的其实是 SOL 持仓用户,JupSOL/SOL 的循环贷风险更可控,收益在所有 SOL 生息产品中也相对可观。

Cap 进一步集成 Pendle

前一周提到过的生息稳定币 Cap 已完成了与 Pendle 的进一步集成 —— 此前仅支持生息资产 stcUSD,现在新增支持了积分资产 cUSD。

上周推荐时 Cap 尚处于 Epoch1 的阶段,静态持有 cUSD 可获得 20 倍积分加成,但不会有任何年化收益。本周 Epoch2 正式启动,静态持有 cUSD 的积分倍率下调为 10 倍,同时仍不会有任何年化收益,但选择在 Pendle 内投入 cUSD 的 LP,即可继续获取 20 倍的积分增幅,同时也可吃到 8.3% 的 APY,没有不挪的道理。

其他观望协议:USD.AI、Reflect

USD.AI 上周也曾推荐过,但万万没想到这项目进度如此迅猛,先是融资 1300 万美元,之后又拿了币安(YZi Labs)的钱,再然后又是和大热稳定币公链 Plasma 搭上了线,以至于初始存款限额快速被打满。USD.AI 此前已预告后续会对 USDT 开放更多存款限额,建议保持关注,有机会的尽早占坑。

Reflect 今早宣布完成 375 万美元种子轮融资,由 a16z crypto 旗下 CSX 加速器领投,Solana Ventures、Equilibrium、BigBrain Holdings 与 Colosseum 等参投。Reflect 计划构建“软件即稳定币”基础设施,使应用无需锁定资金即可发行可生息的美元稳定币,该项目预计将于 9 月初上线主网,首批支持 Solana 上的 USDC,到时候可以看看收益率情况

Letture associate

Bitroot Public Chain Invited to Attend Tencent Cloud Singapore AI Conference, Discussing the Future Alongside Solana

On May 19, Bitroot, an emerging Layer 1 blockchain, participated in the Tencent Cloud AI Summit in Singapore alongside key industry players like Solana Foundation. The event explored the intersection of AI infrastructure, enterprise applications, AI Agents, and Web3. Bitroot's invitation, despite being pre-mainnet, highlights industry interest in its focus on high-performance, AI-native architecture tailored for future AI Agent execution and verifiable on-chain automation. Bitroot CEO Juan Jose emphasized that AI competition is shifting from model performance to data, real-world application scenarios, and trust infrastructure. He argued that for AI Agents to evolve from assistants to autonomous executors managing transactions and assets, they require low-latency, low-cost, and high-throughput blockchain environments. Bitroot aims to address this through its EVM-compatible design, optimistic parallel execution, and a consensus mechanism targeting high scalability. Currently in its Testnet 5.0 phase, Bitroot reports metrics like over 50,000 peak TPS and sub-0.3 second average block time. Its narrative positions it within a growing landscape where next-generation Layer 1s like Monad and Aptos also compete on performance, while Bitroot differentiates by integrating AI computational capabilities natively across its stack. The summit underscored that the fusion of AI and Web3 is moving from concept to infrastructure competition, where networks balancing performance, security, and verifiability will be crucial for enabling scalable AI-driven applications.

marsbit4 min fa

Bitroot Public Chain Invited to Attend Tencent Cloud Singapore AI Conference, Discussing the Future Alongside Solana

marsbit4 min fa

Hedge Fund Q1 Interpretation: Everyone Is Selling Software, Buying Chips

Hedge Funds and Mutual Funds Aligned in Q1: Dumping Software, Buying Chips A clear consensus emerged among major U.S. hedge funds and mutual funds in Q1: they were simultaneously selling software stocks and pouring capital into the semiconductor sector. This aggressive rotation pushed semiconductor exposure in hedge fund long portfolios to a record high. Hedge funds delivered a 7% return year-to-date, while only 30% of large-cap active mutual funds outperformed their benchmarks. The average short interest for S&P 500 constituents rose to 3% of market cap, the highest since 2011. Within technology, the structural shift was stark. Hedge funds' semiconductor weighting hit an all-time high, while software fell to its lowest since 2019. Excluding Microsoft, mutual funds' relative overexposure to semis vs. software was the largest since 2012. Microsoft was among the most net-sold stocks by both groups. Hedge funds net purchased semiconductor names like LRCX and AMAT. Strategies diverged on leverage and cash. Hedge funds increased their net exposure to near a one-year high after an initial cut. Mutual funds raised their cash allocation, though it remains historically low at 1.4%. Sector alignment was high in Industrials (both overweight) but divergent in Tech: hedge funds increased their Tech net tilt by a record 853 basis points, while mutual funds reduced theirs. Clear splits also appeared in Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Four stocks appeared on both Goldman's hedge fund VIP and mutual fund overweight lists: BA, MA, MRVL, and V. This "shared favorites" basket has returned 10% YTD, outperforming the equal-weight S&P 500. Notably, all "Magnificent Seven" stocks are on the hedge fund VIP list but are uniformly underweighted by mutual funds.

marsbit14 min fa

Hedge Fund Q1 Interpretation: Everyone Is Selling Software, Buying Chips

marsbit14 min fa

The Evolution Path of Physical Bitcoin

The Evolution of Physical Bitcoin Bitcoin's digital nature is its core strength, enabling self-custody and rapid global transfers. However, its intangibility also hinders mainstream adoption. For over a decade, creators have attempted to materialize Bitcoin while preserving its cash-like properties, yielding notable results. Casascius Coins, launched in 2011, were the first and most iconic physical Bitcoin. Creator Mike Caldwell generated private keys offline, printed them on coins, and sealed them with tamper-evident holograms. This model relied on user trust in the centralized issuer. Production ceased in 2013 due to regulatory pressure from FinCEN. RavenBit Coins emerged in 2014 aiming to decentralize minting by letting users generate and apply their own keys. However, this led to trust issues with numerous untrusted minters and insecure key generation methods. In 2016, Coinkite introduced Opendimes—a breakthrough in bearer asset technology. These USB-shaped devices generate and store keys internally. Funds can be received by checking the public key, but spending requires physically breaking the device to extract the private key. While innovative and open-source, its cost (~$20) and form factor limit its use for small, everyday transactions. Satochip's Satodime, a card-shaped device using similar secure chip technology, followed. It supports NFC interaction and comes in various forms. While potentially cheaper in bulk (~13€), it remains a high-security hardware wallet, not a low-cost cash substitute. A fundamental cost barrier exists. For physical Bitcoin to achieve widespread commercial use, hardware costs must drop below $1 to match the production cost of fiat banknotes. Current secure chips capable of running Bitcoin's cryptographic algorithms (like secp256k1) are too expensive. Chips like NXP's NTAG X DNA (~$3) show cost-reduction potential but lack native Bitcoin curve support. Projects like OfflineCash embed chips in banknote-like paper, but face challenges with durability, the need for custom Bitcoin-enabled chips, and the inherent requirement for users to verify balances online—which conflicts with Bitcoin's trustless ideal. Coinkite's Tapsigner, a ~$20 card with a proprietary Bitcoin NFC chip, is seen as a more practical step forward. It functions as a reloadable hardware wallet for contactless payments, solving the "change" problem and focusing on real-world retail integration, a direction also pursued by companies like Cash App and Square. In summary, the journey to physical Bitcoin has progressed from trusted centralized mints (Casascius) to user-generated keys (RavenBit) and finally to self-contained secure hardware (Opendimes, Satodime, Tapsigner). The core challenge remains developing a sufficiently low-cost, durable, and truly trustless physical bearer asset that can function like cash in daily transactions. Current solutions are either too expensive or introduce new trust assumptions, keeping the ideal of ubiquitous physical Bitcoin just out of reach for now.

marsbit1 h fa

The Evolution Path of Physical Bitcoin

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片