How stablecoin inflows are shaping the L1 price race

ambcryptoPubblicato 2025-08-24Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-08-24

Key Takeaways

Stablecoin supply has more than doubled in under 24 months. How is this L1 stablecoin supply gap shaping price divergence?


One landmark bill, major market share grabs, and domestic launches pegged to local currencies later, it’s no shock: Stablecoin supply has more than doubled in under two years.

Since January ’24, circulating supply has jumped from $130 billion to $270 billion. In fact, the top four issuers now control 96% of the market.

Tether [USDT] remained the liquidity anchor, while Circle [USDC], Ethena [ENA], and Sky [SKY] captured the rest.

However, now the narrative is shifting: L1s are racing to capture these stablecoin flows. Consequently, could this be the driver behind the recent L1 price divergences?

Stablecoin surge sparks L1 competition

Stablecoin supply has surged across blockchains since 2018, driving a clear divergence in L1 dominance. 

Notably, Ethereum [ETH] and Tron [TRX] lead the pack, together controlling 90% of total supply, while Solana [SOL] has crossed the $10 billion threshold, securing the third spot in stablecoin adoption.

Meanwhile, smaller chains and Layer-2s like BNB Chain, Avalanche, Arbitrum One, Base, and zkSync Era are scaling steadily, gradually capturing incremental stablecoin flows.

StablecoinStablecoin

Source: Token Terminal

All in all, L1s are clearly competing for stablecoin capital. The logic is simple: This widening L1 stablecoin gap is shaping how money flows, and ultimately, influencing price discovery.

Higher market share means more liquidity staying on-network, fueling DeFi activity, staking flows, and transaction demand, which can push prices higher as bid-side pressure accumulates.

According to AMBCrypto, examining cross-chain price divergences would provide a clear validation of this thesis.

Tracking capital flows and price impact

On-chain, stablecoin dominance is clearly aligning with technicals.

Tron [TRX], for example, has absorbed nearly $20 billion in stablecoins this year, pushing total supply to a record $82 billion. The impact? TRX is up almost 80% to $0.36, riding nine consecutive green weeks.

By contrast, Solana [SOL] has added roughly $8 billion in network stablecoins, but is still down 2% from its $213 yearly open.

ETH supplyETH supply

Source: Token Terminal

Ethereum [ETH], meanwhile, is clearly outperforming the rest. 

As the chart shows, the network has onboarded nearly $30 billion in stablecoins. Interestingly, almost 90% of this inflow has occurred since May, coinciding with ETH’s 150%+ rally off its $1,800 Q2 base.

In short, this divergence shows stablecoin inflows translating unevenly into price action. With 90% of supply concentrated in two networks, the L1s dominating liquidity are clearly driving the biggest price moves.

Share

Letture associate

In Such a Crowded Cross-border Payment Track, Where Does the Next Stop Lie in the Future?

The crowded cross-border payments industry faces a paradox: intense competition above water with financing and narratives, while beneath, price wars and shrinking margins in basic PSP services are common. The path forward lies not in simple "cross-border" solutions but in deep **localization**. Success requires mastering the fragmented and tightening regulations of fiat currencies in each market—the "last mile" of compliance, banking, and settlement. Many Chinese PSPs have succeeded by following Chinese merchants overseas but have not deeply penetrated mainstream local merchant ecosystems abroad. Their strong product capabilities need to be applied to new, complex markets. The future belongs to companies that evolve from single-channel providers to **cross-border capital network operators**. This means moving beyond competing on transaction fees to creating internal networks that optimize capital efficiency through multi-directional matching, netting, and position reuse across countries and currencies. For Web3 and stablecoins, the key is integration, not replacement. Stablecoins offer efficiency gains but cannot bypass the foundational trust, compliance, and legal frameworks of traditional finance. The realistic path is the gradual adoption and "taming" of Web3 technologies by established financial institutions. The ultimate solution is a **dual clearing infrastructure** combining deep local fiat capabilities (local accounts, compliance, banking) with lightweight stablecoin-native capabilities (on-chain settlement, wallets). The biggest opportunity lies not in oversaturated mainstream corridors but in complex, underserved regional corridors (e.g., specific CIS, Middle East-Southeast Asia, or Latin American trade pairs). The winners will be those who build hard-to-replicate, deep capabilities in these areas—acting as the essential "clearing shovels" or infrastructure providers. The future keywords are **more local, more networked, and more stablecoin-native**. High-profit opportunities remain in the non-standardized, difficult-to-replicate deep waters of the industry, requiring genuine on-the-ground presence and long-term patience.

链捕手3 h fa

In Such a Crowded Cross-border Payment Track, Where Does the Next Stop Lie in the Future?

链捕手3 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片