$2T lost in 140 days: Why this crypto market crash looks different

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-24Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-24

Introduzione

The crypto market has experienced a severe crash, losing $2 trillion in value over 140 days, with Bitcoin falling nearly 50% and Ethereum down 62% from their peaks. Altcoins like Solana dropped even more sharply, with some smaller tokens losing up to 90% of their value. Unlike previous cycles, this downturn appears more severe and prolonged, driven by a combination of factors including miner capitulation, weak post-halving demand, and significant forced liquidations exceeding $600 million in 24 hours. Additionally, geopolitical tensions and U.S. tariff policies have pushed investors toward safer assets like the U.S. dollar and gold. Key on-chain metrics such as negative MVRV ratios for Bitcoin and Ethereum indicate widespread losses, but historical patterns of oversold rebounds may not hold this time. The market remains under pressure, with no clear signs of immediate recovery.

For years, the crypto industry argued that institutional adoption would drive price momentum and prevent major crashes.

Currently, that narrative appears broken as the market is not just slowing; it is showing signs of deep struggle.

Crypto market tests hard waters

As per an analyst, in the past 140 days, more than $2 trillion in value has been wiped out. The total crypto market cap has shrunk sharply. Bitcoin [BTC] has fallen to around $63,228, nearly 50% below its peak as of writing.

Ethereum [ETH] was trading near $1,825, down about 62% from its high. The biggest damage, however, is in altcoins. Solana [SOL] has dropped around 68%, and many smaller tokens have lost up to 90% of their value.

Instead of fear and greed, the market now feels exhausted and defeated. This feels bigger than a normal correction.

Factors behind this downturn

The key question now is whether this is simply the end of another market cycle or something more long-lasting.

If looked carefully, after the excitement of 2025, investors moved quickly through worry and are now stuck in panic mode.

Fear levels are extremely high, and many retail traders are hesitant to act. At the same time, large and experienced investors are closely watching key indicators like the MVRV ratio.

Bitcoin’s 30-day MVRV is at -10.33%, and Ethereum’s is at -14.04%, showing that most people who bought recently are losing money.

In the past, such levels often suggested that prices were oversold and could bounce back. However, late 2025 showed that low prices can stay low for a long time.

Additionally, the 2024 Bitcoin halving was expected to push prices higher by reducing supply, as it did in past cycles. But instead of strong demand, 2026 has brought weak buying interest.

Even though earlier cycles saw major rallies after halvings, Bitcoin is now showing signs of exhaustion rather than growth.

Additionally, miners are earning more from transaction fees than before, but the shift away from block rewards has not been smooth, putting pressure on Bitcoin’s “digital gold” image.

Political factors also shape the crypto market

The pressure intensified on the 21st of February when U.S. President Donald Trump announced a 15% global tariff.

That decision made investors move money into safer assets like the U.S. dollar and gold. And rising geopolitical tensions are adding even more pressure to an already fragile market.

The stress in the market is most clearly seen among Bitcoin miners. Recently, mining difficulty has fallen, which usually happens when miners turn off machines because they are no longer profitable.

At the same time, miners’ income has dropped due to lower prices and fewer transactions. To survive, many miners are selling their Bitcoin holdings to cover expenses.

This situation, known as miner capitulation, often happens near market bottoms and removes weaker players from the network. However, in the short term, these forced sales add more pressure to prices and make it harder for the market to recover quickly.

Liquidation is another catalyst

While global tariffs and pressure on miners started the decline, more than $600 million in forced liquidations in just 24 hours made the crash much worse.

When prices began to fall, many traders who had borrowed money to bet on higher prices were forced out of their positions, which pushed prices down even faster.

Still, the big question remains unanswered. Is this the final crash before the next recovery driven by the halving cycle, or the beginning of a new, weaker era for crypto?

For now, the data suggests that until liquidations slow down and MVRV levels improve, prices may still have room to fall.


Final Summary

  • Negative MVRV levels reflect widespread losses but do not guarantee an immediate recovery.
  • Weak post-halving demand has challenged Bitcoin’s long-standing growth narrative.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the total value that has been wiped out of the crypto market in the past 140 days according to the article?

AMore than $2 trillion in value has been wiped out.

QWhat key Bitcoin metric is at -10.33%, indicating that recent buyers are losing money?

ABitcoin's 30-day MVRV (Market Value to Realized Value) ratio is at -10.33%.

QWhat major political event on February 21st intensified pressure on the crypto market, according to the article?

AU.S. President Donald Trump announced a 15% global tariff, which caused investors to move money into safer assets.

QWhat is the term used to describe the situation where miners are selling their Bitcoin holdings to cover expenses, often happening near market bottoms?

AThe situation is known as miner capitulation.

QWhy has the 2024 Bitcoin halving not led to a price increase as it did in past cycles, according to the article?

AInstead of strong demand, 2026 has brought weak buying interest, and Bitcoin is showing signs of exhaustion rather than growth.

Letture associate

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns in an interview that the current AI boom shows classic bubble characteristics, which could lead to significant economic downturns as seen in past cycles like 1929 or 2000. He explains that speculative enthusiasm, fueled by debt and overvaluation, often precedes a crash when rising rates or taxation force asset sales, causing widespread losses and recession. Dalio also outlines his "Big Cycle" theory, describing an approximate 80-year pattern where widening wealth gaps, massive government deficits, and shifting geopolitical power (like China's rise) create internal conflict and global instability. He emphasizes that we are in a late-cycle, transitional phase where traditional powers like the US and UK face decline. For personal wealth protection, Dalio advises diversification beyond cash into assets like stocks, bonds, real estate, and particularly gold, which he prefers over Bitcoin. While he holds about 1% of his portfolio in Bitcoin as a non-printable hard asset, he views gold as more secure from technological or governmental threats. Regarding AI's impact, Dalio believes it will disproportionately benefit capital owners, worsening inequality by replacing both physical and cognitive labor. He suggests that human intuition and emotional intelligence, combined with AI, will be key for future workers. On taxation, Dalio argues that wealth taxes are impractical and risk triggering asset sell-offs, reducing productive investment. He points to the UK as a cautionary example of debt, low productivity, and political strife. Geopolitically, Dalio foresees a more regionalized world, with the US showing weakness in prolonged conflicts like with Iran, akin to past imperial declines. The ideal outcome, he suggests, is coexisting powerful blocs (e.g., Americas, China-Asia Pacific) without major war.

marsbit32 min fa

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

marsbit32 min fa

Daily 7.2 Trillion KRW: Foreign Capital's Record Net Buying on Friday! Wall Street Says Headwinds for Korean Stock Fund Flows Have Subsided

South Korean stock market sees a dramatic shift in fund flows. On July 31, foreign investors made a record net purchase of approximately KRW 7.2 trillion in KOSPI stocks, marking a fundamental reversal from the persistent large-scale net outflows seen in previous months. This contributed to a significant narrowing of foreign net selling in July to KRW 9.8 trillion, down sharply from KRW 48.4 trillion in June and KRW 44.5 trillion in May. Simultaneously, domestic institutional pressure eased. South Korean pension funds and asset managers turned to a net buying position in July, purchasing KRW 1.0 trillion worth of KOSPI shares, contrasting with net sales in May and June. Market volatility is expected to be dampened by new financial regulations. Effective July 31, the Financial Services Commission tightened access for retail investors to single-stock leveraged ETFs by raising the minimum cash deposit requirement. Trading volumes for these products subsequently dropped to about 50% of their monthly average. Citigroup Research maintains its year-end KOSPI target of 10,000 points. The firm cites several supportive factors: the substantial easing of headwinds from capital outflows, a robust fundamental outlook for the semiconductor sector, historically low market valuations, strong economic fundamentals, and the potential for policy support from financial authorities if needed.

marsbit32 min fa

Daily 7.2 Trillion KRW: Foreign Capital's Record Net Buying on Friday! Wall Street Says Headwinds for Korean Stock Fund Flows Have Subsided

marsbit32 min fa

Thanks to Dice Rolls, Bitcoin Keys Are Stored Offline, But Not Everyone Will Do It

The article discusses using dice rolls to generate secure Bitcoin wallet seeds, providing entropy independent of potentially flawed hardware random number generators. It explains that each fair dice roll offers about 2.585 bits of entropy, with around 50 rolls needed for a standard 12-word seed phrase and 99+ recommended for higher security. This method gained attention after a vulnerability was revealed in some Coldcard hardware wallets, where a faulty firmware RNG (dating back to 2021) compromised generated keys. The analysis notes that while a dice-generated main seed was safe from this specific flaw, other Coldcard functions (like creating paper wallets, backup keys, or passwords) could still be vulnerable if they used the defective RNG. The piece argues that while dice-based entropy is technically robust, the manual process is error-prone, tedious, and unrealistic for most new users, who might make mistakes in recording or inputting rolls. It concludes that while manual entropy generation should remain an option for advanced users, the long-term goal is to develop reliable, user-friendly hardware and software that securely generates randomness without requiring specialized knowledge. Coldcard users are advised to check their firmware version and replace any secondary secrets (like paper wallet keys) created with vulnerable devices, while also considering multi-signature setups with devices from different manufacturers for added security.

cryptonews.ru5 h fa

Thanks to Dice Rolls, Bitcoin Keys Are Stored Offline, But Not Everyone Will Do It

cryptonews.ru5 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片