World Liberty Financial создает публичную компанию стоимостью $1,5 млрд для токенов WLFI

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2025-07-08Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-08-09

World Liberty Financial рассматривает создание публичной компании стоимостью $1,5 млрд для хранения токенов WLFI. Криптопроект, связанный с семьей Трампа, изучает возможность запуска торгуемой на бирже компании с криптовалютным резервом по образцу Strategy.

По данным Bloomberg, структура сделки все еще дорабатывается, но крупные инвесторы из технологической и криптовалютной сферы уже получили предложения. Переговоры, как сообщается, идут быстрыми темпами.

Следуя по стопам Strategy

Этот подход копирует стратегию Майкла Сейлора (Michael Saylor) и его Strategy, которая превратилась в компанию, держащую биткоин на балансе.

Strategy накопила актив на сумму более $72 млрд в биткоинах и достигла рыночной капитализации почти в $113 млрд. Успех акций Strategy в качестве прокси для биткоина породил волну подражателей — от японской сети бюджетных отелей до новых компаний, специализирующихся на Ethereum, Litecoin, Sui и других альткоинах.

Трамп заработал $57 млн на токенах WLFI

В июне Трамп раскрыл, что заработал $57,4 млн со своей доли в World Liberty Financial. В публичной финансовой декларации 2025 года, поданной в Управление государственной этики, jy указал владение 15,75 млрд управляющих токенов WLFI. Доходы, согласно документу, поступили от продажи токенов.

World Liberty Financial привлекла около $550 млн через две публичные продажи токенов, позиционируя себя как DeFi и стейблкойн-платформу, которая бросает вызов традиционным финансам. Среди высокопоставленных спонсоров — основатель Tron Джастин Сан (Justin Sun), вложивший $30 млн за 2 млрд токенов, и Web3Port с инвестицией в $10 млн в январе.

Согласно Bloomberg, компании с криптовалютными резервами только в 2025 году привлекли $79 млрд на покупки биткоина. World Liberty присоединяется к растущему тренду фирм, держащих криптовалюты на балансе, которые становятся все более популярными среди инвесторов.

Letture associate

"AI Burning Books" Is Actually a Misunderstanding

"AI Book-Burning" Is Actually a Misunderstanding Recent reports about AI companies purchasing used books, scanning them, and then destroying the physical copies have sparked widespread outrage. Terms like "AI is devouring human knowledge" have become common, fueled by dramatic visuals of books being cut and shredded. However, the actual facts reveal a more nuanced story. While companies like Anthropic have indeed spent millions to buy and "destructively scan" several million books for AI training, this volume is a small fraction of the global second-hand book market. The core act—digitizing content and then discarding the physical object—is the opposite of historical book-burning, which aimed to erase knowledge. A key point of contention is the purchase of rare or out-of-print books. Yet, if these books were legally for sale on the open market, the buyer (whether an AI firm or an individual) has the right to do with them as they wish. The real question is whether society has adequate systems to protect books of genuine cultural heritage *before* they are sold. Expecting profit-driven companies to self-regulate on this is unreliable; the solution lies in establishing public rules, such as protected lists for rare editions or granting libraries priority purchase rights. Much of the intense public reaction stems not from the scale of actual harm, but from the powerful symbolism. The image of books being fed into machines taps into deeper anxieties about AI: fears of job displacement, mistrust of tech giants, and the unsettling feeling that humanity is feeding its own cultural past to the systems that might replace it. The outrage over "AI book-burning" is thus less about the physical books and more a proxy for broader societal tensions surrounding artificial intelligence.

marsbit3 min fa

"AI Burning Books" Is Actually a Misunderstanding

marsbit3 min fa

Robinhood CEO named three benefits of tokenized stocks for American investors

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev advocates for the U.S. to allow trading of tokenized stocks domestically. He argues this model could modernize the financial system through three key benefits: **faster, near real-time settlements** reducing counterparty risk and broker capital requirements; **24/7 trading** enabling reaction to market events anytime; and **greater asset portability**, allowing tokens to be moved between platforms and held in self-custody wallets, increasing competition among services. Tenev emphasized tokenization is about rebuilding asset ownership infrastructure for freer movement, similar to information online. He highlighted potential integration with DeFi, where tokenized stocks could be used for lending or as collateral. Currently, Robinhood's stock tokens are not direct ownership of the underlying securities but are backed by them and provide access to economic value like dividends; their structure may evolve with future regulations. Tenev identified outdated securities laws and market infrastructure, developed over a century, as the main U.S. obstacle, urging regulators to adapt rules for blockchain while preserving investor protections. He warned it would be strange if the rest of the world could build the future of ownership around U.S. assets while Americans are left behind, suggesting tokenization could later expand to private company shares and other illiquid assets.

cryptonews.ru23 min fa

Robinhood CEO named three benefits of tokenized stocks for American investors

cryptonews.ru23 min fa

OpenAI Publishes 4+10 Lifesaving Guidelines Specifically to Prevent AI Automated Attacks

OpenAI President Greg Brockman warns that advanced AI agents can now autonomously discover security vulnerabilities and execute real-world cyberattacks, as demonstrated in a recent Hugging Face security incident. In response, OpenAI is implementing a four-pronged defense strategy: using Codex to secure code entry points, employing AI for initial security alert triage, proactively identifying potential attack paths, and reinforcing foundational security practices. Brockman urges defenders to act swiftly by integrating cutting-edge AI into their security workflows. He outlines a three-step approach: first, equip security teams with AI agent tools tailored to their systems; second, embed AI into the development pipeline for automated code review and patch generation; and third, gradually build a comprehensive autonomous security operations system. The blog emphasizes that no single organization can withstand these evolving AI-powered threats alone. Brockman calls for industry-wide collaboration, advocating for sharing proven vulnerability discoveries, fixes, and operational playbooks to transform isolated defenses into a collective security ecosystem. The goal is to ensure AI becomes a shield for defenders, not just a weapon for attackers, by accelerating defensive capabilities to match the pace of technological advancement.

marsbit28 min fa

OpenAI Publishes 4+10 Lifesaving Guidelines Specifically to Prevent AI Automated Attacks

marsbit28 min fa

Arthur Hayes takes CEO role at Flop Labs ahead of Q4 airdrop

Arthur Hayes, co-founder of BitMEX, has come out of retirement to become the CEO of Flop Labs. The company is developing a network where AI agents will use its native FLOP token to pay for computing and inference services. Hayes announced plans for a "massive airdrop" of the FLOP token in Q4 2026, ahead of the network's genesis block launch in early 2027. He stepped down as BitMEX CEO in 2020, and the exchange recently announced it will shut down in September 2026.

cointelegraph28 min fa

Arthur Hayes takes CEO role at Flop Labs ahead of Q4 airdrop

cointelegraph28 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片