XRP Price Chart Shows Wave 4 Corrective Structures That Could Lead To $4 ATH In April

bitcoinistPubblicato 2025-03-25Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-03-25

Introduzione

Crypto analyst Prophecy Trading has alluded to the XRP price chart which he noted is showing a wave 4 corrective...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Crypto analyst Prophecy Trading has alluded to the XRP price chart which he noted is showing a wave 4 corrective structure that could lead to a new all-time high (ATH) in April. XRP is expected to witness one last price correction before it rallies to a new ATH of $4. 

XRP Price Witnessing Corrective Structures Before New ATH

In a TradingView post, Prophecy Trading highlighted the XRP price as one of the crypto assets currently experiencing a corrective structure. He remarked that XRP is showing strength despite this structure, and its current patterns align with historical market cycles

Specifically, the analyst noted that these patterns resemble the price action from September 2017, a final wave 5 rally. The analyst’s accompanying chart showed that the altcoin could rally to a new ATH of $4.5 next month. 

While giving a technical breakdown of the its price action, Prophecy Trading noted that the altcoin has remained resilient, consolidating instead of breaking down, which indicates a strong underlying structure. He then proceeded to provide a macro market alignment, highlighting the parallel with the 2017 bull run. 

XRP
Source: Prophecy on Tradingview

The crypto analyst noted that the XRP price’s correction phase now mirrors its 2017 structure, aligning with the moment before its parabolic move. He also alluded to the stock market correlation, noting that the broader macro trends, including the mega-cap stock movements, also support the prediction of one last rally before the cycle concludes for XRP and other assets.

Prophecy Trading affirmed that if historical patterns hold, a wave 5 blow-off top could occur for the price. If that happens, he remarked that there would be a broad market rally leading to a final euphoric push. 

Momentum Has Shifted For Price 

In an X post, crypto analyst CasiTrades revealed that there is a bullish divergence forming on the RSI for the XRP price, which means momentum may be shifting even though the price has not reacted. She added that sellers are exhausted and that buyers may step in.

CasiTrades noted that the the asset’s price is holding strong, having reached the 0.618 golden retracement at $2.36. She added that this area acts as a pivotal support level and could mark the wave 4 bottom in the subwave Elliot Wave count. If that is the case, the analyst predicts that the next wave up would target higher highs, with the resistance at $2.70. 

She revealed that the key levels to watch are $2.36, which is the current support; $2.70, which is the local resistance to flip; $3.05 and $3.40, which are the macro continuation targets; and $3.80, which is the all-time high test. CasiTrades affirmed that the larger bullish structure remains valid, and a breakout could soon occur. 

At the time of writing, the XRP price is trading at around $2.45, up over 2% in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

XRP
XRP trading at $2.3 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com
Featured image from iStock, chart from Tradingview.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Scott Matherson is a leading crypto writer at Bitcoinist, who possesses a sharp analytical mind and a deep understanding of the digital currency landscape. Scott has earned a reputation for delivering thought-provoking and well-researched articles that resonate with both newcomers and seasoned crypto enthusiasts. Outside of his writing, Scott is passionate about promoting crypto literacy and often works to educate the public on the potential of blockchain.

Letture associate

The Evolution Path of Physical Bitcoin

The Evolution of Physical Bitcoin Bitcoin's digital nature is its core strength, enabling self-custody and rapid global transfers. However, its intangibility also hinders mainstream adoption. For over a decade, creators have attempted to materialize Bitcoin while preserving its cash-like properties, yielding notable results. Casascius Coins, launched in 2011, were the first and most iconic physical Bitcoin. Creator Mike Caldwell generated private keys offline, printed them on coins, and sealed them with tamper-evident holograms. This model relied on user trust in the centralized issuer. Production ceased in 2013 due to regulatory pressure from FinCEN. RavenBit Coins emerged in 2014 aiming to decentralize minting by letting users generate and apply their own keys. However, this led to trust issues with numerous untrusted minters and insecure key generation methods. In 2016, Coinkite introduced Opendimes—a breakthrough in bearer asset technology. These USB-shaped devices generate and store keys internally. Funds can be received by checking the public key, but spending requires physically breaking the device to extract the private key. While innovative and open-source, its cost (~$20) and form factor limit its use for small, everyday transactions. Satochip's Satodime, a card-shaped device using similar secure chip technology, followed. It supports NFC interaction and comes in various forms. While potentially cheaper in bulk (~13€), it remains a high-security hardware wallet, not a low-cost cash substitute. A fundamental cost barrier exists. For physical Bitcoin to achieve widespread commercial use, hardware costs must drop below $1 to match the production cost of fiat banknotes. Current secure chips capable of running Bitcoin's cryptographic algorithms (like secp256k1) are too expensive. Chips like NXP's NTAG X DNA (~$3) show cost-reduction potential but lack native Bitcoin curve support. Projects like OfflineCash embed chips in banknote-like paper, but face challenges with durability, the need for custom Bitcoin-enabled chips, and the inherent requirement for users to verify balances online—which conflicts with Bitcoin's trustless ideal. Coinkite's Tapsigner, a ~$20 card with a proprietary Bitcoin NFC chip, is seen as a more practical step forward. It functions as a reloadable hardware wallet for contactless payments, solving the "change" problem and focusing on real-world retail integration, a direction also pursued by companies like Cash App and Square. In summary, the journey to physical Bitcoin has progressed from trusted centralized mints (Casascius) to user-generated keys (RavenBit) and finally to self-contained secure hardware (Opendimes, Satodime, Tapsigner). The core challenge remains developing a sufficiently low-cost, durable, and truly trustless physical bearer asset that can function like cash in daily transactions. Current solutions are either too expensive or introduce new trust assumptions, keeping the ideal of ubiquitous physical Bitcoin just out of reach for now.

marsbit8 min fa

The Evolution Path of Physical Bitcoin

marsbit8 min fa

Samsung Relies on Technology Cycles, SK Hynix on HBM, How Did Micron Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

Micron Technology, the third-largest memory chip maker alongside Samsung and SK Hynix, recently saw its market cap surpass $1 trillion. Founded in 1978 in Boise, Idaho, Micron survived brutal industry cycles while American peers and Japan's memory sector faltered. Its survival is attributed to a dual strategy: leveraging political and legal avenues for critical breathing room, coupled with relentless manufacturing cost control. Historically, Micron sought U.S. government intervention three times. In 1985, it filed an anti-dumping complaint against Japanese firms, leading to the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement. Ironically, this created an opening for Samsung, which later became its toughest competitor. In 2002, Micron turned "whistleblower" in a DRAM price-fixing investigation, escaping penalties while rivals were fined. In 2017, it sued China's Fujian Jinhua, contributing to its placement on a U.S. entity list, stifling a nascent competitor. However, a major strategic misstep occurred in 2013 with the acquisition of bankrupt Japanese firm Elpida. Integrating Elpida's mobile-DRAM-focused technology diverted resources, causing Micron to miss the critical early decade of development for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)—the high-performance memory essential for AI chips like NVIDIA GPUs. By the time AI demand exploded in 2022, SK Hynix, which launched the first HBM in 2013, held about 85% of the HBM3 market, leaving Micron with roughly 3%. Micron now faces a triple squeeze. In the high-end HBM market, it lags significantly behind SK Hynix and Samsung. In the mid-to-low end DRAM market, it faces aggressive price competition from China's CXMT. Furthermore, a 2023 Chinese cybersecurity ban on its products slashed its revenue from China, a once-core market, from over 10% to just 7.1% by FY2025, causing it to exit China's data center server business. Beneath its political maneuvering lies Micron's core strength: exceptional manufacturing efficiency and cost control. Decades of engineering have yielded DRAM chips with a smaller cell area than rivals, meaning more chips per wafer and lower unit costs. This efficiency, not subsidies, has allowed it to withstand price wars. While political leverage bought time, Micron is now paying a "time debt" in the HBM race. It is racing to ramp up HBM3E production and develop HBM4, but catching up to competitors who started a decade earlier is a monumental challenge. Its future hinges on whether its expertise in cost control and political strategy can compensate for the lost time in a technology race where early-mover advantage is decisive.

链捕手41 min fa

Samsung Relies on Technology Cycles, SK Hynix on HBM, How Did Micron Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

链捕手41 min fa

New AMD Paper Overturns Conventional Wisdom: FP4 Training Instability's Cause Is Not Insufficient Randomness

AMD's new research challenges the conventional understanding of FP4 training instability. While reducing precision from FP8 to FP4 promises doubled computational throughput and is supported by new hardware like NVIDIA Blackwell and AMD MI350 series, training large language models natively with FP4 has been notoriously unstable, often attributed to insufficient stochasticity. The paper "Pretraining large language models with MXFP4 on Native FP4 Hardware" demonstrates successful end-to-end FP4 pre-training of Llama 3.1-8B on AMD MI355X GPUs using the MXFP4 format, achieving a 9-10% overall speedup over FP8. Crucially, it identifies the root cause of instability: not randomness, but the accumulation of *structural micro-scaling errors* along the sensitive weight gradient (Wgrad) path. Through controlled experiments, researchers found that quantizing the Wgrad operation to FP4 caused significant convergence degradation. Counterintuitively, common stochasticity-based mitigation techniques like stochastic rounding and randomized Hadamard transforms worsened performance. In contrast, applying a *deterministic* Hadamard transform successfully stabilized training by ensuring consistent error patterns, reducing the extra token cost from 26-27% to just 8-9%. This work has significant implications: 1) It provides a clear diagnostic for low-precision training instability, steering focus towards structural errors. 2) It pushes FP4 from a primarily inference-focused format into the realm of viable training. 3) It leverages the open OCP Microscaling (MX) standard, promoting cross-vendor compatibility. The research marks a critical step towards more economical large model training by further pushing the boundaries of low-precision computation.

marsbit1 h fa

New AMD Paper Overturns Conventional Wisdom: FP4 Training Instability's Cause Is Not Insufficient Randomness

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare ATH

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Aethir (ATH) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente AethirATH.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Aethir (ATH)Dopo aver acquistato Aethir (ATH), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Aethir (ATH)Scambia facilmente Aethir (ATH) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

263 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.11Aggiornato il 2025.03.21

Come comprare ATH

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di ATH ATH sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片