Индия ищет баланс между CBDC и частными криптовалютами

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2024-02-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-10-28

Генеральный директор одной из крупнейших криптовалютных бирж Индии Сумит Гупта (Sumit Gupta) выступил с неожиданным заявлением: цифровые валюты центральных банков (CBDC) и частные криптовалюты должны дополнять друг друга, а не конкурировать между собой.

Две стороны цифровой монеты

В своем недавнем посте в соцсети X топ-менеджер CoinDCX подчеркнул принципиальное различие между CBDC и такими криптовалютами, как биткоин.

«CBDC выпускаются централизованно национальным банком, который полностью контролирует их эмиссию, предложение и использование», — поясняет Гупта. По его мнению, именно эта централизация позволяет эффективно проводить монетарную политику и управлять такими показателями, как инфляция, ликвидность и процентные ставки.

Впрочем, не все разделяют его оптимизм. Сооснователь TON Society Джек Бут (Jack Booth) видит в CBDC серьезную угрозу: «Доверие общества к правительствам, особенно в западных странах, находится на рекордно низком уровне. Внедрение CBDC, которое даст никем не избранным чиновникам полный контроль над вашими средствами, только усугубит существующие проблемы».

Индия на распутье инноваций

Хотя индийские власти периодически обсуждают возможность запрета частных криптовалют, Гупта уверен в инновационном потенциале страны. «Согласно различным отчетам о Web3, в Индии работает более 75 000 ключевых специалистов в области Web3 и более 450 стартапов. Запрет может задушить предпринимательский дух и затормозить развитие блокчейн-технологий», — отмечает он.

Позитивные сдвиги уже заметны: в марте 2020 года Верховный суд Индии отменил запрет Резервного банка страны на работу банков с криптокомпаниями. Теперь криптовалютные биржи могут соответствовать требованиям Отдела финансовой разведки (FIU) и налоговым нормам.

Курс на баланс

«К сожалению, некоторые игроки все еще не соблюдают неоторые параметры регулирования», — признает Гупта. Он также отмечает, что высокие налоги вынуждают пользователей уходить на офшорные платформы, и надеется на налоговые послабления после внедрения механизмов контроля и мониторинга в рамках инициатив по предотвращению отмывания денег.

Letture associate

Building USDC by Its Own Hands, Why Does Coinbase Turn to Support Competitor OUSD?

Coinbase, a key distributor of the dominant stablecoin USDC, has joined over 140 major companies—including Visa, Mastercard, and BlackRock—as a founding member of the Open USD (OUSD) alliance, a move that directly challenges the current stablecoin economic model. The new project aims to upend the established profit structure by offering zero minting and redemption fees and allocating the majority of reserve interest earnings to distribution partners, rather than the issuer. This shift highlights a growing power struggle in the $320+ billion stablecoin market, where platforms with massive user bases are demanding a larger share of the revenue generated from the underlying reserves. Circle, the issuer of USDC, saw its stock plummet 16% on the day of the OUSD announcement, reflecting investor concern over the potential strain on its crucial partnership with Coinbase. While Coinbase earned over $900 million from its USDC partnership in 2024, its support for a competing model gives it significant leverage as its revenue-sharing agreement with Circle nears expiration in August 2026. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire defended the USDC model, emphasizing its decade-long development, deep liquidity, and extensive ecosystem integration, which he argues cannot be easily replicated by a large, potentially slow-moving consortium. He also questioned the sustainability of a zero-fee model and warned that diverting all reserve interest would leave issuers without funds for critical compliance and operational infrastructure. Analysts remain skeptical of OUSD's prospects, citing the "cold start" problem of building liquidity, potential governance challenges within a large alliance, and heightened regulatory scrutiny. The emergence of OUSD signals a broader industry bifurcation, where stablecoins are increasingly viewed as backend settlement tools. The core competition is shifting from technology to a direct negotiation over how profits from the network are distributed between issuers and the powerful distribution channels.

Foresight News4 min fa

Building USDC by Its Own Hands, Why Does Coinbase Turn to Support Competitor OUSD?

Foresight News4 min fa

If MicroStrategy Really Sold 491 Bitcoins, How Big Would the Impact on the Market Be?

A prominent trader, Lightcrypto, claims that MicroStrategy, the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, may have sold 491 BTC. At around $60,000 per BTC, this sale amounts to less than $30 million, a negligible 0.058% of its ~847,000 BTC holdings. The event's significance is not in its size but in its potential context. The company recently authorized a framework to sell up to $1.25 billion in BTC to bolster dollar reserves, pay dividends, service debt, and repurchase shares. This move stems from pressures related to its Series A Preferred Stock (STRC), which is trading below its $100 target and now carries a 12% dividend yield—a significant cost for MicroStrategy. For MSTR stock, the framework was initially seen as positive, providing clarity and extending the company's financial runway. However, it marks a shift from MicroStrategy's long-standing narrative as a perpetual Bitcoin accumulator to a company that may now also be a seller to manage liabilities. For the Bitcoin market, 491 BTC itself has no material impact on supply/demand. The psychological impact is greater, as it challenges the perception of MicroStrategy as an unconditional, final buyer. The key future question is whether market participants will view any future sales as isolated events or as part of a new trend linking Bitcoin "belief" more directly to corporate cash flow needs.

marsbit19 min fa

If MicroStrategy Really Sold 491 Bitcoins, How Big Would the Impact on the Market Be?

marsbit19 min fa

ZCash reclaims $400, but here’s why the recovery could be short-lived

ZCash (ZEC) has seen a 5.28% price increase, reclaiming the $400 level amid a broader, albeit cautious, crypto market recovery at the start of July. However, analysis suggests this rebound may be short-lived. Despite a whale opening an $8.1 million long position, the lack of significant growth in Open Interest indicates weak speculative interest. The price structure remains bearish, with key resistance at the $480-$540 zone. Failure to overcome this supply area, coupled with a potential loss of the local $360-$380 support, could see ZEC retreat toward $300, especially if Bitcoin's own recovery falters.

ambcrypto30 min fa

ZCash reclaims $400, but here’s why the recovery could be short-lived

ambcrypto30 min fa

The Billionaire Who Bought 30,000 Bitcoins at an Average Price of $632, Is He Also Starting to Sell?

A wallet suspected to be linked to billionaire venture capitalist Tim Draper deposited 1,000 BTC (worth approximately $61.82 million) into Coinbase Prime, sparking speculation that he may be selling. In April, another associated wallet sent 150.84 BTC to Coinbase, likely at a loss. Tim Draper is a renowned Silicon Valley investor in companies like Hotmail, Skype, Tesla, and SpaceX. He is also one of the most prominent Bitcoin whales, having famously purchased 29,656 BTC for roughly $632 each in a 2014 U.S. Marshals Service auction, following a total loss of 40,000 BTC in the Mt. Gox collapse earlier that year. His total cost for approximately 31,657 BTC was about $19.7 million, which is now valued at over $1.8 billion. Draper is widely known for his long-term bullish stance on Bitcoin, famously stating, "Why would I sell the future for the past?" and claiming he is a "net buyer" who never sells. He has repeatedly predicted Bitcoin would reach $250,000, though the timeline has shifted over the years. Despite building a public persona of holding through all market cycles, these recent transfers to exchanges challenge that narrative.

Foresight News32 min fa

The Billionaire Who Bought 30,000 Bitcoins at an Average Price of $632, Is He Also Starting to Sell?

Foresight News32 min fa

Zuckerberg Gave the AI Bull Market a Fright

Mark Zuckerberg and Meta inadvertently sent shockwaves through the AI stock market. News that Meta plans to sell its "excess" AI computing power to external clients triggered a trillion-dollar sell-off in AI infrastructure stocks like Nvidia and AMD, while Meta's stock rose. This seemingly simple business move—renting out idle resources—shook a core assumption underpinning the two-year AI bull market: the belief that computing power ("compute") would be perpetually scarce. This scarcity narrative had fueled valuations across the entire supply chain, from GPUs to power suppliers. Meta's motivations are layered: improving hardware utilization during non-peak R&D periods, executing a strategic pivot, and redefining AI infrastructure. Unlike rivals selling APIs, Meta's open-source approach with Llama appears aimed at building an ecosystem where it ultimately profits from the underlying compute, similar to how AWS transformed from Amazon's internal capacity. Meta is essentially offering an integrated "AI factory" service, not just raw GPU rental. The market's fear wasn't Meta selling a few chips, but the signal that GPU supply might become more shareable and efficient, transitioning the industry from a Capex-driven "hoarding" model to an Opex-driven "utilization" model. This could fundamentally reset valuation logic from scarcity to efficiency. While the sell-off reversed somewhat as investors realized this shift is long-term, the direction is set. The move marks a potential inflection point: the era of easy valuation gains from simply buying GPUs may be ending, giving way to an era where operational efficiency and return on AI assets take center stage.

marsbit48 min fa

Zuckerberg Gave the AI Bull Market a Fright

marsbit48 min fa

Trading

Spot