灰度严选35个代币:FDV最低3亿美元,更适合大户投资

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-10-13Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-10-13

Introduzione

涉及DeFi、底层设施、L1、L2、AI+、Meme以及DePIN。

原创 | Odaily星球日报(@OdailyChina

作者 | 夫如何(@vincent 31515173 

灰度严选35个代币:FDV最低3亿美元,更适合大户投资

作为连接 Web3 与主流金融的桥梁之一,灰度在加密行业的举措备受关注。从一开始的比特币、以太坊以及众多知名代币的信托产品,到今年比特币现货 ETF 和以太坊现货 ETF 的上线,灰度对加密行业的贡献有目共睹。

近日,灰度列出正在考虑未来添加到其产品的加密资产,共计 35 个币种。

为此,Odaily星球日报先将 35 个币种按赛道进行分类,同时以各币种的市值进行排序,将近两年的价格走势通过图示向读者分享。

DeFi 赛道共计 7 个币种,分别是:Jupiter (JUP)、Ondo Finance (ONDO)、Ethena (ENA)、Core (CORE)、THORChain (RUNE)、Aerodrome (AERO)、Pendle (PENDLE);

底层设施赛道共计 6 个币种,分别是:Celestia (TIA)、Pyth Network (PYTH)、Cosmos (ATOM)、Akash (AKT)、UMA Project (UMA)、Neon (NEON);

Layer 1 赛道共计 9 个币种,分别是:Toncoin (TON)、TRON (TRX)、Aptos (APT)、Aptos (APT)、Injective Protocol (INJ)、Internet Computer (ICP)、Kaspa (KAS)、VeChain (VET)、Mantra (OM)、Celo (CELO);

Layer 2 赛道共计 8 个币种,分别是:Optimism (OP)、Arbitrum (ARB)、Sei (SEI)、Starknet (STRK)、Polygon (POL,前身为 MATIC)、Mantle (MNT)、Immutable (IMX)、Metis (METIS);

DePIN 赛道共计 2 个币种,分别是:Arweave (AR)、Helium (HNT);

AI +赛道共计 2 个币种,分别是:Fetch.ai(FET)、Worldcoin (WLD);

Meme 赛道共计 1 个币种:Dogecoin (DOGE)。

灰度严选35个代币:FDV最低3亿美元,更适合大户投资

Letture associate

The Truth About Global Payments, Exposed by Airwallex

Airwallex's founder, Jack Zhang, outlines the three primary paths in the global payments industry and explains why the company chooses the most demanding one: building its own global financial infrastructure. The article begins by highlighting a common industry problem: payment platforms appear homogenized on the surface, offering similar features like global acquiring and multi-currency accounts. However, their underlying capabilities differ vastly. Customers truly care about payment stability, compliance robustness, and reliable market entry support. Zhang identifies three strategic paths: 1. **Bypassing Traditional Systems (Web3/Crypto):** This path promises efficiency via stablecoins and blockchain settlement but struggles with mainstream adoption, significant regulatory friction, and a lack of competitive edge against established players, often leaving it with niche or non-compliant markets. 2. **Packaging Existing Infrastructure:** The most common route, where companies layer a modern interface over legacy banking and partner networks. While enabling fast expansion, it fails to solve core issues like dependency on correspondent banks and intermediary risk, merely postponing the need for solid foundations. 3. **Building Own Global Infrastructure:** The path chosen by Airwallex, Ant International, and others. It involves obtaining local licenses, establishing direct regulatory relationships, building local teams, and controlling the full technology stack. This "heavy" approach is slow and capital-intensive but aims to internalize complexity, providing customers with a "lighter" experience. The core argument is that for business clients, the highest cost isn't transaction fees but hidden risks like frozen accounts, payment delays, and regulatory shocks. By investing heavily in its own infrastructure, Airwallex seeks to absorb these complexities, offering customers greater stability, cost savings (beyond fees), and long-term certainty. This foundational investment, though initially slow, enables compound growth, as evidenced by Airwallex's accelerated revenue scaling. In conclusion, while shortcuts enable faster growth, mastering the most difficult aspects—owning the underlying infrastructure—creates durable value for customers and sustainable advantage for the payment provider.

marsbit15 min fa

The Truth About Global Payments, Exposed by Airwallex

marsbit15 min fa

The Truth About Global Payments, Revealed by Airwallex

The article discusses Airwallex's approach to global payments, highlighting the key challenges and different strategic paths in the industry. It begins by addressing common user questions about platform reliability, cryptocurrency payments, and the necessity of Airwallex's "heavy" infrastructure model. The core argument is that while many payment platforms appear similar on the surface—offering features like global acquiring and multi-currency accounts—their underlying capabilities differ drastically. The piece identifies three primary paths for global payment providers: 1. **Bypassing Traditional Infrastructure (Web3/Crypto):** This path promises efficiency through stablecoins and on-chain settlements but faces significant regulatory hurdles and offers little advantage over established players for mainstream use, often serving only niche or non-compliant markets. 2. **Aggregating/Packaging Existing Infrastructure:** The most common route, where companies layer a better user experience over legacy banking and partner networks. While fast to market, this approach does not solve fundamental issues like dependency on intermediaries, correspondent banking risks, and compliance fragility. 3. **Building Proprietary Global Infrastructure:** The path chosen by Airwallex and similar firms. This involves obtaining local licenses, building direct regulatory relationships, establishing local teams, and controlling the compliance and technology stack. This is the most difficult and capital-intensive route but aims to internalize complexity. Airwallex's strategy of "heavy" investment in its own infrastructure is framed not as inefficiency, but as a long-term bet to provide clients with greater stability, cost savings beyond fees, and certainty. The platform's "heaviness" absorbs risk and operational complexity, aiming to deliver a "lighter" experience for business customers. The article concludes that in global payments, while shortcuts enable faster growth, mastering the most difficult aspects—the underlying infrastructure—is what creates durable value for clients and sustainable competitive advantage.

链捕手23 min fa

The Truth About Global Payments, Revealed by Airwallex

链捕手23 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片