索尼与Startale合作推出Soneium区块链

币界网Pubblicato 2024-08-23Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-08-23

币界网报道:

索尼集团宣布推出自己的区块链。该区块链被称为“Soneium”,是与总部位于新加坡的Startale Labs合作推出的。

Soneium建立在Optimism的超级链之上,基础设施由Circle、Chainlink、Alchemy、Astar Network和the Graph等行业家庭提供。

Soneium将解决常见的区块链采用障碍

新的以太坊第二层网络旨在解决阻碍区块链采用的常见问题,如可扩展性和效率。Startale Labs的首席执行官Sota Watanabe透露了新区块链的三阶段计划。

主要重点将是吸引web3开发人员和爱好者。随后,将与索尼银行、索尼音乐和索尼影业等各种索尼产品进行整合。渡边表示,长期目标是将企业和去中心化应用(dApps)整合到平台上。

渡边说:“我们将努力创建多样化的业务和新的用例,以吸引尽可能多的用户。”。

索尼与Astar Network合作推出Soneium测试网

正如新闻稿所述,索尼正计划与Astar Network合作建立Soneium测试网。测试网完成后,Astar zkEVM将其资产和基础设施与Soneium整合。

测试网将提供一个多样化的生态系统,包括一个功能齐全的测试网框架。此外,他们还将为开发人员提供内置工具。

渡边强调了索尼集团在多个行业的强大分销渠道。他还表示,使用Soneium,他们将制作出人们想要的东西,并超越web3成为主流。

Chainlink的首席业务官Johan Eid也对区块链的推出发表了评论,他表示Solenium的推出有力地表明了区块链行业的持续发展。

然而,这并不是索尼进入加密货币行业的主要途径。索尼于2023年8月从Amber Group手中收购了一家名为Whalefin的加密货币交易所。该交易所于7月发布通知,已更名为S.BLOX。目前尚不清楚该交易所推出的确切日期。

渡边在X上发布了7月份Soneium区块链发布的消息,称该计划是在近1.5年前制定的,目前正处于执行阶段。

Letture associate

When the Bubble Comes, How to Short "Smartly"?

Title: When the Bubble Comes, How to "Smartly" Short? Author: Campbell (Macro Analyst) Summary: Amid the heated debate over whether the current AI-driven market is in a bubble, analysts are divided. While some, like Dan Niles and Paul Tudor Jones, argue that the AI boom has further to run, Michael Burry warns of similarities to the dot-com bubble. The author explores practical strategies for navigating and potentially shorting a bubble without being crushed by its momentum. Key challenges in shorting a bubble include the exponential risk from parabolic price increases and the high cost of options due to extreme volatility. Instead of directly shorting the bubbly asset, the author proposes three approaches: 1. **Find the "Wedge"**: Identify external factors that could pop the bubble, such as rising interest rates. By betting on trends that could undermine the bubble (e.g., inflation or higher rates), investors can hedge without timing the bubble's collapse. 2. **Short the "Victims"**: Target assets adjacent to the bubble that are highly vulnerable to its burst, such as over-leveraged companies or sectors with "negative convexity." These assets may have cheaper options and suffer disproportionately when the bubble stalls. 3. **Wait for Confirmation**: Exercise discipline and wait for clear signals of a breakdown, including deteriorating fundamentals, exhausted buying sentiment, and decisive breaks in trendlines. Only then should investors take substantial short positions. The author shares their recent actions, including shorting SPX and high-yield bonds while buying short-term put spreads, and emphasizes avoiding direct shorts on vertically rising assets. The core takeaway: Hedge, identify wedges, wait for confirmation, and only then commit heavily.

marsbit6 min fa

When the Bubble Comes, How to Short "Smartly"?

marsbit6 min fa

MuleRun CTO: The Moat of Agents Lies in Data Density and User Memory

In a speech titled "Handing AI's Keys to the On-Chain Controllers," MuleRun CTO Shu Junliang discussed the evolution and security of AI Agents in finance and Web3. He outlined six dimensions for a complete AI assistant: dialogue, data input, agent capability, execution environment, user memory, and continuous learning. MuleRun's product integrates these through features like multi-platform IM bots, real-time multi-asset data, smart model routing, cloud sandboxes, persistent user profiles, and a shared knowledge network. Shu emphasized that while AI Agents are advancing from assisting to autonomously executing decisions—potentially enabling individuals to operate like small funds—safety remains paramount. He detailed MuleRun's security measures, including local key handling, isolated sandboxes, full audit trails, and strict permission controls. However, he acknowledged persistent risks like data exposure, model hallucinations, prompt injection, and the "black box" nature of AI decisions, advising manual confirmation for financial operations. He identified key trends: the shift from human-led to Agent-led on-chain interactions requiring infrastructure redesign; the erosion of information advantages replaced by competition in execution speed and strategy; and the balancing effect of Agents, which democratize access but ultimately advantage those with superior judgment. Shu concluded that an Agent's true moat lies in data density and accumulated user memory, not easily replicable technology, and that while Agents will reshape finance and Web3, human oversight over critical decisions must remain.

marsbit13 min fa

MuleRun CTO: The Moat of Agents Lies in Data Density and User Memory

marsbit13 min fa

Buying BTC is Not as Good as Buying Nasdaq, and This Statement Has an Expiration Date

The article, titled "Investing in Bitcoin Has an Expiration Date", discusses the recent narrative on social media that investing in U.S. tech stocks (like the Nasdaq 100) has been far superior to investing in Bitcoin. This sentiment is fueled by performance comparisons showing the Nasdaq 100 significantly outperforming Bitcoin over a specific five-year window starting in late 2021. However, the author argues that such comparisons are highly sensitive to the chosen timeframe. By shifting the starting point to other key market moments—like the COVID-19 bottom (March 2020), the FTX collapse bottom (November 2022), or the pre-Bitcoin ETF approval period (January 2024)—Bitcoin's returns often match or dramatically exceed those of the Nasdaq 100. The popular Reddit chart essentially cherry-picks a period that started near a Bitcoin cycle high and just before the massive AI-driven rally in tech stocks. The core difference lies in their asset structures. The Nasdaq 100, backed by corporate earnings, exhibits a steadier long-term upward trend. Bitcoin is a highly cyclical asset with extreme volatility, where returns are drastically different depending on where in its bull/bear cycle an investment is made. The article notes Bitcoin often acts like a leveraged version of the S&P 500, magnifying both gains and losses. Currently, Bitcoin is in a "cyclically undervalued zone," having corrected ~37% from its October 2025 peak while the Nasdaq hits new highs. Historically, peak narratives about stocks beating Bitcoin have often coincided with Bitcoin nearing cyclical lows, as seen before its major rally from late 2022. The conclusion is that declaring one asset permanently superior to another is statistically flawed; performance is entirely dependent on timing. The real challenge for investors is not picking the "better" asset, but mastering entry and exit timing.

marsbit29 min fa

Buying BTC is Not as Good as Buying Nasdaq, and This Statement Has an Expiration Date

marsbit29 min fa

Bezos, Schmidt, Powell Jobs: The Three AI Investment Philosophies of Silicon Valley's Old Money

Jeff Bezos, Eric Schmidt, and Laurene Powell Jobs, three prominent figures from Silicon Valley's "old money," are deploying massive personal fortunes into AI, but with distinctly different investment philosophies reflecting their visions for the future. Eric Schmidt, the former Google CEO, approaches AI as a geopolitical and infrastructural arms race. Through his family office, Hillspire, he invests heavily in defense AI companies, energy infrastructure (like Bolt Data & Energy to power data centers), and space launch capabilities (Relativity Space). For Schmidt, the ultimate AI advantage lies in physical resources—energy, transport, and military application—framing it as a national competition requiring state-level strategy and endurance. Jeff Bezos is building a vertically integrated, full-stack AI empire. His bets span the model layer (via Amazon's massive investment in Anthropic), the application layer (through investments like Perplexity), and now, the physical execution layer. His new venture, Project Prometheus, with $6.2 billion, aims to inject AI into manufacturing, creating a closed loop from AI chips and cloud compute (AWS) to real-world production, potentially for Amazon's own ventures like the Kuiper satellite network. In contrast, Laurene Powell Jobs adopts a more subtle, human-centric approach through her Emerson Collective. Her AI investments focus on specific, positive-impact applications—such as AI for healthcare (Proximie, Atropos Health), education (Curipod), and European AI sovereignty (Mistral AI). A key, high-profile bet was her early backing of Jony Ive's design firm LoveFrom and its spin-off, io, an AI hardware device company later acquired by OpenAI. Her philosophy prioritizes improving human-machine interaction and addressing societal needs over sheer scale or control. These three strategies—Schmidt's focus on state-level infrastructure and security, Bezos's pursuit of end-to-end industrial integration, and Powell Jobs's emphasis on human-centered design and applied solutions—represent fundamentally different wagers on what will define the next decade of AI. While the eventual winner is unknown, the sheer scale of this capital migration from internet-era giants is already reshaping the industry's trajectory.

marsbit52 min fa

Bezos, Schmidt, Powell Jobs: The Three AI Investment Philosophies of Silicon Valley's Old Money

marsbit52 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片