当今最值得购买的4种潜力100倍的加密货币!

币界网Pubblicato 2024-08-21Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-08-21

币界网报道:

894e033a09f1372a68078dfd4948aad7.jpeg

山寨币市场的价格走势可能为预期的山寨币季节铺平道路。今天的文章探讨了现在最值得购买的山寨币,尤其是在加密货币市场接近今年最后一个季度的时候。

现在最值得购买的山寨币

TRX

Tron 最近加入了市值排名前 10 的加密货币之列。这一飞跃发生在 TRX 估值突破十亿美元之后。除了令人振奋的估值外,Tron 的价格走势也引起了投资者的关注。

8ecc7f2d61d909376675302ceb07df2e.png

根据 CoinMarketCap 数据,TRX 在过去 7 天内涨幅超过 20%,过去 52 周涨幅不低于 100%。其表现领先于 ADA 等竞争资产以及同类其他山寨币。

想要进入山寨币市场的发明者应该深入研究 TRX 的潜力。一般来说,该项目旨在颠覆去中心化的互联网。凭借代币最近的进展和明显的表现,很明显该平台有潜力实现其目标。

CKB

互操作性和可扩展性仍然是区块链的核心挑战之一。为解决这些问题而建立的项目众所周知会吸引投资兴趣。Nervos 就是解决互操作性的项目之一。

它使用工作量证明和通用知识库概念。与具有权益证明功能的替代方案相比,它使 Nervos Network 能够实现更高级别的安全性。

bb5ccf0e079695e9891c9fb8405ede2e.png

目前,CKB 代币的价格为 0.007886 美元,市值为 3.5 亿美元,430,195 美元。作为互操作性领域的低市值代币,CKB 拥有积累更多价值所需的空间。此外,该代币今日突破 1100 万美元大关。因此,山寨币投资者应将该代币留在他们的关注名单上,因为它将继续上涨。

NOT

Notcoin 以其白手起家而闻名。该代币在进入加密货币市场后声名鹊起。然而,几周以来,该代币的价格一直在逐步下跌,抹去了其上涨过程中积累的价值的 50% 以上。

93b2c183d8401cfaf384b4baa9250b3f.png

虽然 NOT 整体前景看跌,但对该代币的技术分析显示未来价格可能回升。NOT 的价格目前接近关键支撑位,该支撑位在过去曾为该代币带来价格飙升。回顾过去的价格走势,我们发现,每当 NOT 交易价格接近 0.09 美元至 0.011 美元时,其平均涨幅通常为 10%。

最终,此举将为 Notcoin 生态系统注入新的可见性,吸引人们对该项目的迫切关注。投资者应密切关注该代币在未来几个月的进展,因为其战略的下一阶段可能会释放额外的流动性。

VELO

Velo 是一个基于 DeFi 的项目,正逐渐受到越来越多的欢迎。根据该项目的网站介绍,它是一个利用区块链技术的金融解决方案服务平台。其服务包括流动性提供和结算网络。其核心旨在解决安全性和透明度等金融交易问题。

9d19085c877d89ae6985d4e71d91470c.png

截至发稿时,由于人气日益高涨,Velo 在 CoinmarketCap 的热门榜单上名列前茅。随着越来越多的投资者关注该代币,它很可能在未来几个月的大部分时间内保持乐观的价格走势。VELO 的价格为 0.01186 美元。

今天,Velo 的盘中价格轻微下跌了 5%,使其价格进一步偏离了 0.10 美元。按照目前的速度,Velo 很可能会突破 12 美元的区间,从而轻松迈向 0.14 美元的峰值。

最近,Velo 建立了一些合作伙伴关系,包括与泰国政府的关系。该项目旨在为政府的数字货币计划提供技术支持。此举可能会为该项目提供达到新价格水平所需的数量和知名度。此外,它还与 Lightnet 集团达成了合作协议。

最重要的是,Velo 正在朝着释放其潜力的方向迈出令人印象深刻的一步,投资者应该密切关注其进展。

Letture associate

"King of Pump Calls" Arthur Hayes Strikes Again, This Time Targeting Deribit

On June 29, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes purchased approximately 6.16 million SYN tokens via OTC platform Flowdesk for around $2.2 million. Hayes subsequently declared on X that SYN represents one of the most asymmetric investments he has seen since HYPE, stating it's time for an options DEX to challenge the dominant platform Deribit, and identifying Hypercall as that challenger. SYN's price surged over 40% following his comments, with a tenfold increase in June 2026 alone, bringing its FDV to roughly $110 million. The article details Synapse Protocol's evolution from a cross-chain messaging and liquidity network into the chain-based options trading protocol Hypercall. Hypercall, built on the Hyperliquid ecosystem's HyperEVM, aims to be a universal options exchange supporting any asset size with capped loss (limited to premium paid) and no forced liquidations. Deribit, established in 2016, remains the centralized leader in crypto options with an estimated 85% market share in BTC and ETH options and $3.588 billion in assets. Its strengths include deep liquidity and professional tools, but it faces criticisms over custody risk, KYC requirements, and regulatory uncertainty. The analysis positions Hypercall not as an immediate replacement for Deribit's entrenched network effects, but as a potential complementary and differentiated competitor, particularly for DeFi-native assets and new asset classes like RWA. The article concludes by noting Hayes's recent mixed "call" record, including fully exiting and later re-buying HYPE, and the controversial price target for CARDS from his family office Maelstrom, which was followed by a significant price drop.

marsbit21 min fa

"King of Pump Calls" Arthur Hayes Strikes Again, This Time Targeting Deribit

marsbit21 min fa

AI is Sweeping the Globe, So Why is Crypto + AI in a Slump?

AI Booms, But Crypto + AI Remains Sluggish: A Demand-Side Analysis Despite the AI industry's explosive growth and massive investment, the convergence of blockchain and AI (Crypto + AI) has seen limited traction. The core issue is a severe supply-demand mismatch, not a flawed premise. Analyzing four key sub-sectors reveals specific gaps: 1. **Decentralized Compute/Storage:** Offer logical benefits like data sovereignty and cost savings but lack a decisive technical advantage over entrenched cloud giants (AWS, GCP). Enterprises prioritize performance and stability and are unwilling to bear the switching risk and uncertainty of decentralized networks. 2. **Model Verification/Privacy (e.g., ZKML):** Address important long-term issues like auditability and data privacy, but these are not urgent operational pain points for most businesses today. Widespread demand will likely follow regulatory mandates (like the EU AI Act), not precede them. 3. **AI Agent Infrastructure:** Projects are building infrastructure for a future of autonomous, interacting agents. However, the current market focus is on internal process automation within corporate firewalls. The technology is ahead of market readiness. 4. **AI Agent Payments:** This is the only sub-sector where blockchain is on a level playing field with traditional finance. Both are trying to solve the unsolved problem of real-time, micro-transactions for machines, making it the most immediately competitive area. The overarching problem is that the AI industry invests heavily in solutions that solve immediate bottlenecks (e.g., faster memory, more power). Most Crypto + AI solutions target secondary, longer-term concerns (decentralization, transparency) and often come with performance trade-offs. The lack of a flagship, large-scale commercial success case further hinders mainstream capital inflow. The path forward requires either aligning more closely with the current industry's performance demands or patiently building the foundational infrastructure for the next phase of AI.

Foresight News31 min fa

AI is Sweeping the Globe, So Why is Crypto + AI in a Slump?

Foresight News31 min fa

Continuous Net Outflows from ETFs, Are Institutions Exiting?

US spot Bitcoin ETFs have experienced approximately $6 billion in net outflows over the past six weeks, marking the longest consecutive weekly withdrawal streak since their launch in 2024. The iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) from BlackRock has been particularly affected, accounting for over 70% of recent outflows. On-chain analysis indicates that long-term Bitcoin holders (holding for over 155 days), who control about 83% of the circulating supply, remain steadfast. The selling pressure is primarily coming from allocators who entered through ETF brokerage accounts. This represents the first major collective capitulation since Bitcoin gained mainstream Wall Street recognition, driven more by risk-off portfolio adjustments than a fundamental rejection of the asset. Factors such as rising inflation, a hawkish shift in Federal Reserve policy, massive capital inflows into AI infrastructure, and attractive IPO opportunities have redirected speculative funds. Bitcoin, treated as a high-beta risk asset, was among the first to be sold. While the pace of outflows has slowed significantly—from $1.72 billion in early June to $226.8 million mid-month—the structural issue remains. IBIT's large size means its outflows alone exert substantial market pressure. With spot market volume thin, new capital inflows absent, and ETF buying muted, the market lacks sufficient buying support to absorb this selling. The coming sessions are critical. If IBIT outflows decelerate and Bitcoin reclaims $60,000, this phase could be seen as a healthy reset. However, if heavy IBIT redemptions resume and the price falls below $58,000, it would signal a more sustained institutional exit, requiring non-ETF buyers to shoulder the entire selling pressure alone. The ETF, while lowering entry barriers, has not removed Bitcoin's inherent volatility.

marsbit1 h fa

Continuous Net Outflows from ETFs, Are Institutions Exiting?

marsbit1 h fa

Introduction to the Concept of World Models: A Story from Psychology to the Main Battlefield of AI

**World Models: From Psychology to AI's Core Concept** "World model" is a trending but often confusing term in AI, describing a system that allows machines to internally simulate, predict, and rehearse potential outcomes before taking real-world action—like a mental "sandbox." While definitions vary—Yann LeCun emphasizes physical understanding, OpenAI's Sora is a video-based "world simulator," Google DeepMind's Genie 3 creates interactive 3D environments, and companies like Alibaba and Tesla focus on practical applications—the core goal is consistent: reduce reliance on vast real-world data by creating an internal, predictive model for safer and more efficient AI. The concept has deep roots, tracing back to psychologist Kenneth Craik (1943). In AI, it was revitalized by researchers like David Ha and Jürgen Schmidhuber (2018). Major technical approaches include: 1) generative video models (e.g., Sora) for visual realism; 2) abstract predictive models (e.g., LeCun's JEPA) for efficiency and physical reasoning; and 3) explicit 3D simulators (e.g., NVIDIA Omniverse) for precision. Fei-Fei Li proposes a classification based on the AI action loop: renderers (output observations), simulators (output world states), and planners (output actions). The emerging "World Action Model" (WAM) paradigm aims to unify future prediction and action generation. An industry framework is forming: upstream (data, compute, sensors), midstream (general and vertical platforms), and downstream applications (autonomous driving, robotics, gaming, etc.). Autonomous driving is currently the most mature use case. The current lack of a unified definition reflects the field's early, dynamic stage, similar to past tech revolutions. Different approaches—focusing on pixels, physics, or behavior—represent parallel explorations of how best to compress and understand the world. This diversity, while seemingly chaotic, signals that world models have moved from an academic idea to a critical industrial battleground, ultimately aiming to give machines the ability to understand, imagine, and reason about the world.

marsbit1 h fa

Introduction to the Concept of World Models: A Story from Psychology to the Main Battlefield of AI

marsbit1 h fa

Building the Bright Path While Secretly Crossing Chencang: Is Walsh Paving the Way for a September "Rate Cut"?

The title "Building the Plank Road Openly While Secretly Crossing at Chencang: Is Walsh Paving the Way for a September 'Rate Cut'?" suggests Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Walsh's hawkish stance may be a deliberate smokescreen. Academy Securities analyst Peter Tchir argues in a report that markets, currently pricing a 75% chance of a September hike, are missing a potential path to a September rate cut that Walsh himself might be quietly preparing. Tchir posits that Walsh's hawkish rhetoric aims to suppress long-term yield risks (with the 10-year Treasury yield falling recently) while creating room for a narrative shift based on upcoming data. The potential political endgame, according to this view, could be rate cuts in September and October, ahead of the midterm elections. This hinges on a political logic where the Trump administration's preference for lower rates remains unchanged. A core part of Tchir's argument involves redefining inflation metrics. He contends the Fed under Walsh may deprioritize the PCE index, criticizing its lagging components like Owners' Equivalent Rent (OER). Instead, he points to alternative, more real-time indicators like the New Tenant Repeat Rent Index (NTRR) and the Truflation daily index, which shows core inflation around 1.45%. He suggests the Fed could shift its data narrative to justify policy easing. Furthermore, Tchir downplays AI-driven inflation fears. He argues that consumer price sensitivity, evidenced by negative market reactions to price hikes (e.g., Apple), contradicts persistent inflation narratives. He also separates AI/data center spending—which he sees as relatively rate-insensitive—from broader consumer affordability issues, implying rate hikes are misdirected. Based on this analysis, Tchir sees a re-pricing of rate cut expectations as likely, creating opportunities in short-duration Treasuries. He maintains a neutral-to-slightly-bullish view on the long end of the yield curve. For equities, he recommends a significant overweight in energy (especially global nuclear assets) and, within defense/security themes, an overweight in biotech/pharma versus an underweight in semiconductors, expressing caution on AI/data center valuations.

marsbit2 h fa

Building the Bright Path While Secretly Crossing Chencang: Is Walsh Paving the Way for a September "Rate Cut"?

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片