Floki 已成为诺丁汉森林足球俱乐部的官方加密货币合作伙伴

链捕手Pubblicato 2024-08-16Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-08-16

Floki 已与英超联赛诺丁汉森林足球俱乐部(Nottingham Forest FC)建立了合作伙伴关系。

在周四的官宣公告中,Floki 宣布将成为诺丁汉森林的官方加密货币合作伙伴,并将拥有广泛的市场推广和营销宣传权利。

Floki 的一位媒体代表表示:“我们很自豪能够与足球领域的一支传统俱乐部合作,在英超联赛中获得曝光。正如诺丁汉森林希望打造世界一流足球俱乐部那样,Floki 也希望能呕在自身的行业变成最最成功的品牌之一,不断挑战,并通过 Valhalla 等品牌进行创新。”

在新赛季的所有主场比赛期间,从比赛开始到终场哨响,Floki 的品牌标志将在面向摄像机的 LED 屏幕上出现三分钟。这确保了 Floki 的品牌能够被更多的现场观众和电视观众看到。

此外在主场赛后,Floki 的标志还将出现在英超官方采访背景板的四块位置上,整个赛季的新闻发布会中也将出现四次。

Floki 还将在诺丁汉森林的社交媒体频道中获得大量曝光,在男子和女子成年队的全场比分相关动态,以及所有换人动态中都会提到 Floki 的品牌。

此外,在每场主场比赛发放的赛日节目册中,Floki 将拥有完整页面的展示,且其标志将可以显示在封面上。这有助于将 Floki 与球迷更紧密的联系起来。

球迷们可以期待诸如签名商品之类的周边产品。在赛季结束时,Floki 还将向球迷们提供在体育场内“亲自踢球”的体验机会。

诺丁汉森林首席运营官(COO)Paul Bell 表示:“我们很高兴欢迎 Floki 成为我们的官方合作伙伴,并期待着双方能够在接下来的 2024/25 赛季密切合作。作为该行业内最具创新性的公司之一,我们很兴奋能与 Floki 社区进行合作。”

英超联赛

英格兰超级联赛(EPL)是世界上最受欢迎的体育联赛。它的观众数量超过了欧洲冠军联赛和德国足球甲级联赛(Bundesliga)的总和。在 2022/23 赛季,EPL 的总观众人数达到了 32.3 亿人。这些比赛在 190 个国家的 7.12 亿家庭中进行了转播。

根据 Nielsen 的数据,整个赛季有 20.1 亿观众观看了比赛直播,此外还有 12.2 亿观众收看了精彩集锦和其他相关节目。英超联赛的各大俱乐部在社交媒体上也拥有庞大的粉丝数量,总计超过五亿粉丝,这些粉丝分布在 Facebook、Instagram、TikTok、X 和 YouTube 上。

诺丁汉森林的历史

诺丁汉森林足球俱乐部成立于 1865 年,拥有悠久的历史。它是全球仅有的八家曾连续赢得欧洲冠军的俱乐部之一,其他一些取得类似成就的俱乐部包括利物浦、阿贾克斯、拜仁慕尼黑和皇家马德里等等。诺丁汉森林在社交媒体上也有很强的影响力,拥有超过 450 万粉丝,包括在 Facebook 上的 100 万粉丝、在 X 上的 67 万粉丝、在 Instagram 上的 100 万粉丝、在 TikTok 上的 120 万粉丝以及在 YouTube 上的 18.4 万订阅用户。

关于 Floki

Floki 是面向大众的加密货币,也是 Floki 生态系统的实用代币。Floki 的目标是成为世界上最知名和最广泛使用的加密货币,专注于实用性、慈善、社区以及市场营销。Floki 目前拥有超过 49 万持有者,并因其战略性的市场合作伙伴关系,在全球范围内拥有强大的品牌影响力。

Crypto di tendenza

Letture associate

Trillion-Dollar Pension Fund Entry? Franklin Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETF Comes with a Built-in Selling Pressure Ceiling

Franklin Templeton has filed to launch two ETFs that embed a "default configuration" logic into Bitcoin investment, aiming to tap into massive pension fund flows. These "Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment Index ETFs" will initially hold 95% equities and 5% Bitcoin, automatically reinvesting stock dividends to buy Bitcoin. However, a quarterly rebalancing rule forces selling of Bitcoin if its allocation exceeds 5%, capping its maximum holding at 20%. While the product cleverly circumvents advisor reluctance and compliance hurdles by labeling itself as a U.S. equity product, its actual Bitcoin buying power is minimal. Given low dividend yields (e.g., ~1% for broad market indices), annual Bitcoin purchases from a fund the size of Franklin's existing Bitcoin ETF would be a mere $3.6 million—negligible against Bitcoin's daily trading volume. Crucially, during bull markets, the fund becomes a programmed, passive *seller* of Bitcoin, potentially creating sustained sell pressure if many similar funds emerge. The strategy leverages investor inertia and automatic enrollment, similar to the success of target-date funds in 401(k) plans. It also uses an offshore Cayman subsidiary for holding Bitcoin and raises a tax complication where investors must pay taxes on dividends they never receive as cash. Although recent U.S. regulatory changes allow crypto in retirement plans, widespread adoption as a default option faces legal hurdles. The core premise remains: the system doesn't need to convince anyone to buy Bitcoin actively; it simply relies on people doing nothing.

marsbit3 min fa

Trillion-Dollar Pension Fund Entry? Franklin Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETF Comes with a Built-in Selling Pressure Ceiling

marsbit3 min fa

Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Largest Bull Suffers $15 Billion Paper Loss

Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Major Bull Loses $15 Billion On June 25th, Bitcoin fell below $60,000, hitting a low of $58,030—its lowest level since October 2024. The sell-off triggered over $1 billion in leveraged liquidations in 24 hours, with longs accounting for $788 million. This marks a more than 53% decline from the October 2025 all-time high of $126,198. A critical factor in the downturn is the weakening position of MicroStrategy, the largest corporate Bitcoin holder. With 847,363 BTC at an average cost of $75,651, the company now faces over $14.6 billion in unrealized losses. Its core financing flywheel—raising capital to buy Bitcoin—is stalling. Its variable-rate preferred shares (STRC), a key fundraising tool, have fallen 25% below their $100 target. This raises doubts about its ability to continue providing steady institutional demand for Bitcoin. Simultaneously, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs are experiencing significant outflows, with a single-day net outflow of $469 million on June 24th. This represents the most severe sustained capital flight since their launch. The macroeconomic backdrop remains restrictive, with persistent inflation delaying expected Fed rate cuts. Analysts note a shift in capital allocation, with institutional funds moving away from crypto towards AI infrastructure stocks. Immediate pressure comes from approximately $10 billion worth of Bitcoin options expiring on June 26th, which could increase market volatility. The combined effect of these factors—eroding core demand pillars, macro headwinds, and capital rotation—has decisively broken the $60,000 support level.

Foresight News9 min fa

Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Largest Bull Suffers $15 Billion Paper Loss

Foresight News9 min fa

STRC Falls Below $80, Can Conservative Investors Still Buy the Dip?

The article analyzes whether the STRC (a perpetual preferred stock issued by MicroStrategy) presents a buying opportunity after its price fell below its $100 par value to around $80, offering a seemingly high yield of 13-15%. The core argument is that STRC's discount reflects market skepticism about the sustainability of MicroStrategy's capital structure model, not just temporary panic. This model relies on issuing securities (like STRC) to raise funds to buy more Bitcoin, a "flywheel" that works in a bull market. The recent small sale of BTC to fund dividends, while minor, broke the psychological "never sell" anchor and signaled potential strain. Key risks identified are not a traditional Ponzi collapse but a potential breakdown in the financing narrative: 1) If Bitcoin enters a deep bear market, crushing MicroStrategy's stock premium (mNAV), its ability to raise cheap capital weakens. 2) If STRC remains deeply discounted, it signifies permanently higher funding costs. 3) The high cash dividend yield represents a significant ongoing expense. 4) If selling BTC to pay dividends becomes routine, the bullish narrative reverses. The conclusion is that STRC is not a risk-free high-yield asset. It is a high-coupon bet on whether MicroStrategy's BTC treasury financing model can withstand a bear market. Buying it is a wager that the market will continue to believe in and fund this structure at acceptable costs. The current price asks if this cycle's "casualty" might be a BTC treasury company's融资 model itself.

marsbit25 min fa

STRC Falls Below $80, Can Conservative Investors Still Buy the Dip?

marsbit25 min fa

Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Their Names?

**Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Names?** In the crypto world, changing a project's name is common—over 16% of projects have done so, including major ones like Polygon (formerly Matic Network). This contrasts sharply with traditional businesses, which fiercely protect brand equity. The core reason is that in crypto, brand loyalty is often weak. Users are frequently investors, airdrop hunters, or yield seekers, not traditional consumers. A name associated with price crashes, hacks, or failed narratives becomes a liability, not an asset. Renaming can be a strategic reset to shed this baggage. Name changes serve as a potent marketing tool. They can signal a genuine pivot in strategy or scope (e.g., EthSign dropping "Eth" as it expanded). However, they are often used to "narrative surf," rebranding to align with hot trends like AI, RWA, or the metaverse (e.g., Elrond → MultiversX). Critically, renaming is also a PR tactic to distance a project from past failures like security breaches (e.g., Anyswap → Multichain). The most significant risk emerges when a name change is coupled with a token migration or swap. This process can allow projects to reset exchange price charts, erase visible historical downtrends, and create an illusion of a fresh start. It often facilitates liquidity resets, where low float can be exploited for pumps. More alarmingly, migrations sometimes mask overhauls to tokenomics, introducing substantial new token supply through "ecosystem funds" or "node rewards," effectively diluting existing holders. The fundamental issue isn't renaming itself, which can be valid for strategic evolution. The problem is when it functions as an escape from history—a way to avoid accountability for past mistakes, failed promises, and poor performance. When a project announces a rebrand, the critical questions are: What tangible new capability or strategy does it represent? Has the tokenomics changed? And what part of its past is it most trying to make users forget?

marsbit31 min fa

Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Their Names?

marsbit31 min fa

A Trillion-Dollar Entry Point for Pension Funds? Franklin's Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETFs Come with a Built-In Selling Pressure Ceiling

Franklin Templeton filed for two ETFs on June 18 that embed a "default option" logic into Bitcoin investing. These funds—the Franklin US Equity Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment Index ETF and the Franklin US Innovative Equity Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment Index ETF—aim to automatically allocate a portion of investor dividends to Bitcoin, initially with a 95% stock and 5% Bitcoin allocation. The mechanism is designed for financial advisors, not retail investors. By packaging Bitcoin exposure within a standard equity fund label, advisors can bypass internal compliance restrictions against direct cryptocurrency allocation for their clients. Dividends from the stock holdings are automatically used to buy Bitcoin via spot ETFs, futures, or options. However, the structure imposes strict rebalancing rules: if Bitcoin's allocation exceeds 5%, it is trimmed back to 4.5% quarterly, with a hard cap of 20%. This means the fund becomes a systematic seller during Bitcoin price rallies. Realistically, the potential buying pressure is minimal. Based on dividend yields (approximately 1.05% for broad market, 0.52% for innovative equity), the annual inflow into Bitcoin would be a tiny fraction of the fund's assets. For comparison, Franklin's existing Bitcoin ETF ($359 million AUM) would generate only about $3.6 million in annual Bitcoin purchases—negligible against Bitcoin's daily trading volume. The innovative equity fund, heavily weighted in low-dividend stocks like Nvidia, would have even weaker buying power. The product utilizes an offshore Cayman subsidiary to hold Bitcoin, a common compliance tactic for commodity exposure in mutual funds. A key drawback for investors is the tax liability: they must pay taxes on dividends that are automatically converted into Bitcoin, requiring out-of-pocket cash for a gain they never directly receive. For the strategy to scale significantly, such funds would need to become a default or near-default option in retirement plans like 401(k)s. Recent regulatory moves, including a Trump executive order and a Department of Labor proposal offering fiduciary safe harbors for including crypto assets, could pave the way. However, widespread employer adoption likely awaits further legal clarity. Ultimately, the fund's model leverages investor inertia and automated systems, rather than convincing anyone to actively choose Bitcoin. While it creates a new, albeit small, structural buyer, its rebalancing rules also establish a built-in "selling ceiling" that could dampen price upside if similar products proliferate.

Foresight News33 min fa

A Trillion-Dollar Entry Point for Pension Funds? Franklin's Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETFs Come with a Built-In Selling Pressure Ceiling

Foresight News33 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare FLOKI

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di FLOKI (FLOKI) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente FLOKIFLOKI.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva FLOKI (FLOKI)Dopo aver acquistato FLOKI (FLOKI), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia FLOKI (FLOKI)Scambia facilmente FLOKI (FLOKI) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

232 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.12Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare FLOKI

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di FLOKI FLOKI sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片